Search

Dose optimization of sirolimus may further improve outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients receiving post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) to prevent graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Sirolimus exposure–response association studies in HCT patients (i.e., the association of trough concentration with clinical outcomes) have been conflicting. Sirolimus has important effects on T‐cells, including conventional (Tcons) and regulatory T‐cells (Tregs), both of which have been implicated in the mechanisms by which PTCy prevents GVHD, but there is an absence of validated biomarkers of sirolimus effects on these cell subsets. Considering the paucity of existing biomarkers and the complexities of the immune system, we conducted a literature review to inform a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model of GVHD. The published literature presented multiple challenges. The sirolimus pharmacokinetic models insufficiently describe sirolimus distribution to relevant physiological compartments. Despite multiple publications describing sirolimus effects on Tcons and Tregs in preclinical and human ex vivo models, consistent parameters relating sirolimus concentrations to circulating Tcons and Tregs could not be found. Each aspect presents a challenge in building a QSP model of sirolimus and its temporal effects on T‐cell subsets and GVHD prevention. To optimize GVHD prevention regimens, phase I studies and systematic studies of immunosuppressant concentration–effect association are needed for QSP modeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective To determine an appropriate empiric oral sirolimus dose adjustment when given concurrently with posaconazole oral suspension in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant ( HSCT). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Comprehensive cancer center in the United States. Subjects Seventy five allogeneic HSCT patients who received posaconazole oral suspension and oral sirolimus concurrently between 2009 and 2011. Measurements and Main Results Sirolimus concentrations were recorded at baseline and for up to 28 days after posaconazole initiation. The sirolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was determined for each sirolimus concentration obtained. Following analysis of patient data and based on the initial empiric sirolimus dose reduction, patients were stratified into two groups: ≥50% sirolimus dose reduction (Group 1) and <50% sirolimus dose reduction (Group 2). The mean sirolimus C/D ratio was 2.29 ng/mL/mg prior to posaconzole initiation. Coadministration of posaconazole and sirolimus resulted in an increase in the steady state sirolimus C/D ratio to 6.24 ng/mL/mg, which occurred approximately 17-20 days after initiation of posaconazole. The mean maximum sirolimus concentration was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (12.64 ng/ mL vs. 9.24 ng/ mL, p=0.001). Significantly more patients in Group 2 than Group 1 experienced at least one sirolimus concentration >15 ng/ mL (27% vs. 2.6%, p=0.003). Conclusion Coadministration of posaconazole oral suspension with oral sirolimus increases the sirolimus C/D ratio by approximately 2.7-fold in HSCT patients. An initial empiric oral sirolimus dose reduction between 50% and 65% may be recommended for most clinically stable patients with close sirolimus concentration monitoring for at least 3 weeks following posaconazole initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We report a consecutive series of 59 patients with MDS who underwent reduced-intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RI-HSCT) with fludarabine/melphalan conditioning and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. Two-year OS, EFS, and relapse incidences were 75.1%, 65.2%, and 20.9%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality at 100 days, 1 year, and 2 years was 3.4%, 8.5%, and 10.5%, respectively. The incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD was 35.4%; grade III–IV was 18.6%. Forty of 55 evaluable patients developed chronic GVHD; of these 35 were extensive grade. This RI-HSCT protocol produces encouraging outcomes in MDS patients, and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis may contribute to that promising result. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introduction: Isavuconazole, a triazole antifungal, is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, which also metabolizes tacrolimus and sirolimus. In previous studies, isavuconazole administration increased tacrolimus and sirolimus area under the curve values by 2.3‐fold and 1.8‐fold, respectively, in healthy adults and tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio by 1.3‐fold in solid organ transplant patients. We aimed to determine the magnitude of effect of isavuconazole administration on tacrolimus and sirolimus C/D ratios in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) patients. Methods: A retrospective, single‐center, single‐arm study in adult alloHSCT patients who received at least 10 days of combination therapy with isavuconazole and tacrolimus and/or sirolimus as inpatients or outpatients was conducted. Tacrolimus and sirolimus trough serum concentrations were measured up to twice weekly for up to 4 weeks. Results: Twenty‐two patients receiving tacrolimus and twenty patients receiving sirolimus met the inclusion criteria. The mean C/D ratio increased from baseline by 1.42‐fold for tacrolimus during week 1 (P = 0.002) and up to 1.56‐fold for sirolimus during week 2 (P = 0.02). For the remaining timepoints, tacrolimus and sirolimus C/D ratios were not statistically significantly different from baseline. Conclusion: In alloHSCT patients, modest increases in tacrolimus and sirolimus C/D ratios from baseline were observed within the first 2 weeks after initiation of isavuconazole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 35% of matched, related donor (MRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. We sought to determine if the combination of tacrolimus and s irolimus (Tac/Sir) was more effective than tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/Mtx) in preventing acute GVHD and early mortality after allogeneic MRD HCT in a phase 3, multicenter trial. The primary end point of the trial was to compare 114-day grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival using an intention-to-treat analysis of 304 randomized subjects. There w as no difference in the probability of day 114 grades 2 -4 acute GVHD-free survival (67% vs 62%, P = .38). Grades 2-4 GVHD was similar in the Tac/Sir and Tac/Mtx arms (26% vs 34%, P = .48). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were more rapid in the Tac/Sir arm (14 vs 16 days, P < .0 0 1 ; 16 vs 19 days, P = .03). Oropharyngeal mucositis was less severe in the Tac/Sir arm (peak Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale score 0.70 vs 0.96, P < .001), but otherwise toxicity was similar. Chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years were no different between study arms (53% vs 45%, P = .06; 53% vs 54%, P = .77; and 59% vs 63%, P = .36). Based on similar long-term outcomes, more rapid engraftment, and less oropharyngeal mucositis, the combination of Tac/Sir is an acceptable alternative to Tac/Mtx after MRD HCT. This study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Cancer Institute; and the trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00406393. (Blood. 2014;124(8):1372-1377) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• HCT outcomes in ALL patients after Flu/Mel conditioning & Tac/Siro GVHD prophylaxis. • OS and PFS at 4 years were 58% and 44%, respectively. • Cumulative incidences of relapse and NRM at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. • Patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) status had lower relapse. • This regimen had favorable outcomes in adult ALL patients with Ph+ status. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been an increasingly used strategy in this population. At City of Hope we conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel) as the conditioning regimen between 2005 and 2018, from either a matched sibling or fully matched unrelated donor while in complete remission. Tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 4 years post-HCT were 58% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) ALL had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (20% versus 48% for patients with Ph-negative status, P =.007). In conclusion, RIC HCT with FluMel conditioning and T/S GVHD prophylaxis was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with Ph+ ALL and should be considered as a viable consolidative therapy for adult patients with ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT The current standard of care for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is high-dose conditioning followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). For some patients (ie, those with highest-risk disease, insufficient stem cell numbers after mobilization, or bone marrow involvement) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers the potential for cure. However, the majority of patients undergoing alloHCT receive reduced-intensity conditioning as a preparative regimen, and studies assessing outcomes of patients after alloHCT with myeloablative conditioning are limited. In this retrospective study, we reviewed outcomes of 22 patients with recurrent and refractory NHL who underwent alloHCT with myeloablative BEAM conditioning and received tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at City of Hope between 2005 and 2018. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 1.0 to 11.2 years), the probabilities of 2-year overall survival and event-free survival were 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.0% to 75.8%) and 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4% to 64.3%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 45.5% (95% CI, 23.8% to 64.9%), with only 1 patient developing grade IV acute GVHD. However, chronic GVHD was seen in 55% of the patients (n = 12). Of the 22 eligible patients, 2 had undergone previous ASCT and 2 had undergone previous alloHCT. Both patients with previous ASCT developed severe regimen-related toxicity. Patients who underwent alloHCT with chemorefractory disease had lower survival rates, with 1-year OS and EFS of 44.4% and 33.0%, respectively. In conclusion, alloHCT with a BEAM preparative regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD should be considered as an alternative option for patients with highest-risk lymphoma whose outcomes are expectedly poor after ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allelic variants of genes implicated in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) determine the pharmacokinetic variability of many medications and are increasingly recognized as important factors determining the success or failure of medical treatments. Both tacrolimus and sirolimus have narrow therapeutic ranges maintained by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Using an ADME panel that covers >99% of the PharmaADME working group core list (188 single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] and 12 copy number variant [CNV] assays in 36 pharmacogenetically relevant genes), we studied 177 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using tacrolimus/sirolimus–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We tested for possible associations between ADME variants and tacrolimus/sirolimus drug levels, concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, and clinical endpoints, including acute GVHD. A total of 62 SNP and 6 CNV assays were evaluable after removing the variants, which were homozygous in (nearly) all samples. For sirolimus, rs2032582 (ABCB1) T-carriers versus non–T-carriers were associated with higher blood levels ( P = .01), with similar results for C/D ratio. Generalized estimating equation analysis supported these findings. For tacrolimus, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were associated with higher blood levels than CYP3A5*1/*1 ( P = .002). By multivariable analysis, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were independently associated with decreased acute GVHD compared with CYP3A5*1/*1 , after adjustment for conditioning, donor type, race/ethnicity, and age. We demonstrated association of specific ADME genetic polymorphisms with blood levels of tacrolimus/sirolimus, and incidence of acute GVHD after HCT, in spite of TDM and dose adjustment. A larger ongoing study will determine whether these associations have clinical utility beyond TDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Posttransplantation thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a multifactorial complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) whose incidence is increased with the use of a sirolimus plus tacrolimus (SIR/TAC) regimen for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis. We evaluated the incidence and possible risk factors for TMA in a case series of 177 patients who received allo-HCT using SIR/TAC-based GVHD prophylaxis. The patients received either a sibling donor graft (n = 82) or a matched unrelated donor graft (n = 95). Within the first 100 days post-HCT, 30 patients (17%) were diagnosed with TMA, and an additional 9 patients (5%) were classified as probable TMA cases. The median time to onset of TMA was 4.6 weeks (range, 1.6-10.6 weeks). Thirty-four patients developed both TMA and aGVHD, with the majority (81%) developing aGVHD first. Multivariate analysis identified the following factors as associated with increased risk of TMA: day 14 serum sirolimus level ≥9.9 ng/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.27; P = .02), presence of previous aGVHD grade II-IV (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.38-6.71; P < .01), and fully myeloablative conditioning (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.60-7.53; P < .01). These risk factors for TMA suggest that when using a SIR/TAC regimen for GVHD prophylaxis, careful monitoring and adjustment of the sirolimus dosage is critical, particularly in patients with active aGVHD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens is a potentially curative treatment for patients (patients) with myelofibrosis (MF), as we and others have reported. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and other complications has limited the success of this approach. As part of an ongoing prospective research study at City of Hope, a combination of tacrolimus/sirolimus ± methotrexate (MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis has become the standard treatment for our allogeneic HCT patients. In this report, we present results for 23 consecutive patients, including extended follow up for 9 patients previously reported who received cyclosporine (CsA)/mycophenolate moffetil (MMF)±MTX, and the current series of 14 patients who received tacrolimus/sirolimus±MTX, and evaluate the impact of the GVHD prophylaxis regimen on the outcomes. Median follow-up for alive patients was 29.0 months (9.5-97.0). The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) for the CsA/MMF cohort was 55.6% (confidence interval 36.0, 71.3), and for the tacrolimus/sirolimus cohort it was 92.9% (63.3, 98.8) (P =.047). The probability of grade III or IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 60% for the CsA/MMF patients, and 10% for the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (P =.0102). No significant differences were seen for grade II to IV aGVHD in the 2 groups. We conclude that the combination of tacrolimus/sirolimus±MTX for GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of RIC HCT for MF appears to reduce the incidence of severe aGVHD and NRM, and leads to improved OS compared to CSA/MMF±MTX. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]