Search

Objectives: To review the main findings of the Euralox 1 study - a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study conducted in 1008 healthy postmenopausal women allocated to raloxifene (n = 495) or continuous combined estrogen-progestin therapy (ccEPT; n = 513) for 6 months -- and provide an overview of the risks and benefits of raloxifene and ccEPT., Methods: A review is provided of previously published findings on uterine safety (bleeding rates and changes in endometrial thickness and uterine volume), gynaecological adjudication, cardiovascular risk (lipids, fibrinogen), adverse events, compliance, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. New data on biochemical markers of bone turnover (serum N-telopeptides and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen; NTX and CTX) assessed before and after 6 months' treatment are presented., Results: Raloxifene caused less uterine bleeding than ccEPT and, unlike ccEPT, did not alter endometrial thickness or uterine volume. Serum CTX and NTX levels were reduced in both treatment groups, but the reduction was significantly greater with ccEPT. The two treatments had differential effects on lipids and fibrinogen levels; raloxifene had more favourable effects on serum HDL, the LDL/HDL ratio, and plasma fibrinogen. Raloxifene was associated with fewer adverse events or discontinuations, and this was associated with higher treatment satisfaction and better self-reported compliance., Conclusions: The clinical risk-benefit profile of raloxifene derived from the intermediate endpoints of this study suggests that it may be a better alternative to ccEPT for preventing long-term postmenopausal health risks in healthy postmenopausal women who are not suffering from vasomotor symptoms.

Objective: To compare the incident rate of abnormal endometrial findings in postmenopausal women receiving treatment with either 60 mg of raloxifene or a continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy containing 2 mg of 17 beta-estradiol plus 1 mg of norethisterone acetate for a duration of up to 12 months., Methods: One thousand eight asymptomatic postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or cardiovascular risk factors with an endometrial thickness of less than 5 mm at baseline participated in this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial that lasted 6 months; 347 of these women also participated in a 6-month extension. Women with repeated bleeding or an increase in endometrial thickness to above 5 mm were subjected to saline-infused sonohysterography or hysteroscopy with biopsy. Sonographic, histologic, and clinical findings were adjudicated by a panel of 4 experts blinded with respect to patients' treatments. All adjudicated patients were grouped into 15 diagnostic categories according to predefined criteria., Results: Three hundred thirty-four women needed adjudication during the core phase, 73 (14.7%) of those taking raloxifene and 261 (50.9%) taking continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy (P <.001). Compared with raloxifene, women using continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy had significantly higher rates of benign endometrial proliferation (8.8 versus 1.2%, P <.001), endometrial polyps (4.3 versus 2.0%, P =.048), and cystic atrophy (5.5 versus 1.2%, P <.001)., Conclusion: Women using continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy more often have benign endometrial pathology and, in our study, more often required the protocol-specific gynecological follow-up assessments for safety reasons, as compared with those using raloxifene. These findings are of clinical relevance when choosing the most appropriate therapy for postmenopausal health risks such as osteoporosis.

Raloxifene effectively reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recent data suggest that low-dose monofluorophosphate (MFP) plus calcium reduces the vertebral fracture rate in postmenopausal women with moderate osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination of raloxifene and MFP in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis. A total of 596 postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis (mean femoral neck T-score of -2.87 SD) were randomized to treatment with 60 mg/day raloxifene HCl and 20 mg/day fluoride ions (as MFP) or 20 mg/day fluoride and placebo for 18 months. All patients received calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (500 IU/day) supplements. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), as primary endpoint, and the rate of osteoporotic fractures and biochemical markers, as secondary endpoints, were assessed. As compared with MFP, raloxifene plus MFP was associated with significantly greater mean increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.37% versus 0.33%; P=0.004), total hip (0.89% versus -0.42%; P<0.001) and lumbar spine (8.80% versus 5.47% P<0.001). In the raloxifene plus MFP group, 16 patients sustained 17 osteoporotic fractures, as compared with 22 patients sustaining 34 incident osteoporotic fractures in the MFP group ( P=0.313). One patient in the raloxifene plus MFP group sustained multiple osteoporotic fractures, as compared with eight patients in the MFP group ( P=0.020). MFP alone significantly increased the serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and the urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagene (U-CTX). The addition of raloxifene in the combination arm blunted the rise in bone ALP, which remained nevertheless significant, and abolished the increase in U-CTX. The combination of raloxifene with MFP was generally well tolerated. This study demonstrates that, in postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis, the combination therapy of raloxifene plus MFP favorably influences the BMD and the bone formation and resorption balance, and may reduce the risk of multiple osteoporotic fractures compared to MFP alone.

Objective: To compare the uterine effects of 60 mg of raloxifene with a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy, a preparation of 2 mg 17beta-oestradiol (E(2)) and 1 mg norethisterone acetate for a duration of 12 months., Design: A randomised, double-blind trial., Setting: Multicentre: Europe, Israel, South Africa., Population: Asymptomatic postmenopausal women with risk factors for osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease who had an endometrial thickness of less than 5 mm. One thousand and eight women were randomised for the six month core; of these 420 were invited to continue into a six month extension period., Methods: Randomisation to either raloxifene or continuous combined hormone replacement therapy. Patients, recruiters and assessors were blinded to the treatment used., Main Outcome Measures: The frequency of vaginal spotting/bleeding as recorded in a diary, endometrial thickness and uterine volume as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography at baseline and after 6 and 12 months., Results: After six months of therapy with raloxifene, the rate of women on raloxifene reporting vaginal bleeding and spotting (6.8%) was similar to the rate in the lead-in phase (8.3%) but increased from 7.0% to 55.1% in the continuous combined hormone replacement therapy group. Raloxifene treatment was not associated with a significant change from baseline to endpoint in mean endometrial thickness (P = 0.11), whereas continuous combined hormone replacement therapy treatment was associated with an increase in this value of mean (SD) of 1.2 (2.2) mm (P < 0.001). Compared with raloxifene, mean endometrial thickness for women on continuous combined hormone replacement therapy was significantly increased at endpoint [4.6 (2.1) mm vs 3.5 (1.7) mm; change from baseline P < 0.001]. In the raloxifene group, there was a trend towards a decrease from baseline in uterine volume [from 31.4 (20.3) to 30.3 (16.2) mm; P = 0.37]; in the continuous combined hormone replacement therapy group, there was a significant increase in uterine volume [from 31.3 (16.3) to 54.0 (36.1) mm; P < 0.001], and the difference in the effect of both compounds on change in uterine volume at endpoint reached statistical significance (P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were sustained for all parameters during the extension period. Early discontinuation rates, both overall and due to adverse events, were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the raloxifene group after 6 and 12 months., Conclusion: Compared with continuous combined hormone replacement therapy, 6 and 12 months of raloxifene treatment do not lead to vaginal bleeding/spotting, are not associated with increased endometrial thickness or uterine volume and result in a significantly lower rate of early treatment discontinuations in asymptomatic women receiving treatment to prevent long term postmenopausal health risks.

Objective: To compare continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) and raloxifene with respect to compliance and quality of life, which were predefined secondary endpoints of a large, prospective study designed to investigate the uterine effects of both treatments., Design: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial of six-month duration., Setting: One hundred and twenty-nine gynaecology hospital departments, clinics or practices specialised in women's healthcare, located in Europe, South Africa and Israel., Population: Healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008)., Main Outcome Measures: Changes in quality of life using the Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) and compliance using a compliance questionnaire and pill count. Adverse event and early discontinuation rates and satisfaction with treatment using a visual analogue scale (VAS)., Results: Women taking raloxifene reported greater satisfaction with their treatment as assessed on the VAS (P = 0.004), and a lower proportion, as compared with ccHRT, reported being worried by the treatment (9.6% vs 20.2%, P < 0.01). Women taking ccHRT reported greater deterioration in scores from the WHQ for depressed mood and menstrual symptoms than those taking raloxifene (P < 0.01). For memory, vasomotor symptoms and sexual behaviour, the ccHRT group reported significantly greater mean improvements (P < 0.05). Over half (58.8%) of those taking raloxifene noticed no effect, 37.7% felt better and 3.4% felt worse as measured using the compliance questionnaire. Fifty percent of the women taking ccHRT felt better, 37.8% noticed no effect but over 10% felt worse. More women on raloxifene (94.6%) than on ccHRT (85.9%) reported that they were taking their double-blinded medication regularly (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: A lower rate of adverse event-related discontinuations, the lack of negative effects on quality of life and a smaller proportion of women being worried by the drug treatment were associated with higher treatment satisfaction and better compliance in postmenopausal women taking ccHRT or raloxifene.

Objective: To compare the effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene (Evista) and a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) formulation containing estradiol and norethisterone acetate (Kliogest) on lipid and fibrinogen levels of postmenopausal women., Methods: Euralox 1 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. After a placebo wash-out, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008, average age 56.1 +/- 4.9 years) with a health risk profile that suggested a potential benefit from either treatment were randomly assigned to either 60 mg raloxifene or ccHRT consisting of 2 mg estradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) per day for 6 months., Measurements: Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with its fractions HDL2 and HDL3, the LDL/HDL ratio, triglycerides and fibrinogen were assessed at baseline and after 6 months or on early drop-out., Results: Baseline values were comparable between the two groups. Blood samples of 841 women (83.4%) were available at baseline and endpoint. Total and LDL cholesterol decreased statistically significantly from baseline to endpoint in both treatment arms (by 7.2% and 3.8% with raloxifene and by 13.0% and 8.9% with ccHRT, respectively). Raloxifene produced a statistically significant increase in HDL cholesterol by 4.2%, while ccHRT induced a decline by 9.5%. Triglycerides were moderately suppressed with raloxifene and ccHRT, by 3.6 and 5.4%, respectively. Fibrinogen fell by 7.0% with raloxifene and rose by 3.6% with ccHRT., Conclusions: Continuous combined HRT was associated with decreases in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol about twice as large as with raloxifene, but also with a decrease in HDL cholesterol. The smaller decreases in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol associated with raloxifene were accompanied by an increase in HDL cholesterol and a decrease in fibrinogen. In conclusion, raloxifene affects fibrinogen concentrations and the overall cholesterol profile more favorably than ccHRT; these differences may have important implications for the reduction of cardiovascular disease.