Search

Purpose: The capacity for machine learning (ML) to facilitate radiation therapy (RT) planning for primary brain tumors has not been described. We evaluated ML-assisted RT planning with regard to clinical acceptability, dosimetric outcomes, and planning efficiency for adults and children with primary brain tumors., Methods and Materials: In this prospective study, children and adults receiving 54 Gy fractionated RT for a primary brain tumor were enrolled. For each patient, one ML-assisted RT plan was created and compared with 1 or 2 plans created using standard ("manual") planning procedures. Plans were evaluated by the treating oncologist, who was blinded to the method of plan creation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of ML plans that were clinically acceptable for treatment. Secondary endpoints included the frequency with which ML plans were selected as preferable for treatment, and dosimetric differences between ML and manual plans., Results: A total of 116 manual plans and 61 ML plans were evaluated across 61 patients. Ninety-four percent of ML plans and 93% of manual plans were judged to be clinically acceptable (P = 1.0). Overall, the quality of ML plans was similar to manual plans. ML plans comprised 34.5% of all plans evaluated and were selected for treatment in 36.1% of cases (P = .82). Similar tumor target coverage was achieved between both planning methods. Normal brain (brain minus planning target volume) received an average of 1 Gy less mean dose with ML plans (compared with manual plans, P < .001). ML plans required an average of 45.8 minutes less time to create, compared with manual plans (P < .001)., Conclusions: ML-assisted automated planning creates high-quality plans for patients with brain tumors, including children. Plans created with ML assistance delivered slightly less dose to normal brain tissues and can be designed in less time., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective. Machine learning (ML) based radiation treatment planning addresses the iterative and time-consuming nature of conventional inverse planning. Given the rising importance of magnetic resonance (MR) only treatment planning workflows, we sought to determine if an ML based treatment planning model, trained on computed tomography (CT) imaging, could be applied to MR through domain adaptation. Methods. In this study, MR and CT imaging was collected from 55 prostate cancer patients treated on an MR linear accelerator. ML based plans were generated for each patient on both CT and MR imaging using a commercially available model in RayStation 8B. The dose distributions and acceptance rates of MR and CT based plans were compared using institutional dose-volume evaluation criteria. The dosimetric differences between MR and CT plans were further decomposed into setup, cohort, and imaging domain components. Results. MR plans were highly acceptable, meeting 93.1% of all evaluation criteria compared to 96.3% of CT plans, with dose equivalence for all evaluation criteria except for the bladder wall, penile bulb, small and large bowel, and one rectum wall criteria ( p < 0.05). Changing the input imaging modality (domain component) only accounted for about half of the dosimetric differences observed between MR and CT plans. Anatomical differences between the ML training set and the MR linac cohort (cohort component) were also a significant contributor. Significance. We were able to create highly acceptable MR based treatment plans using a CT-trained ML model for treatment planning, although clinically significant dose deviations from the CT based plans were observed. Future work should focus on combining this framework with atlas selection metrics to create an interpretable quality assurance QA framework for ML based treatment planning., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Purpose: High-quality radiotherapy (RT) planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is essential to minimize the risk of late treatment effects. The feasibility of using automated machine-learning (ML) to aid RT planning in this population has not previously been studied., Methods and Materials: We developed a ML model that identifies learned relationships between image features and expected dose in a training set of 95 patients with a primary brain tumour treated with focal radiotherapy to a dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions. This ML method was then used to create predicted dose distributions for 15 previously-treated brain tumour patients across two institutions, as a testing set. Dosimetry to target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared between the clinically-delivered (human-generated) plans versus the ML plans., Results: The ML method was able to create deliverable plans in all 15 patients in the testing set. All ML plans were generated within 30 min of initiating planning. Planning target volume coverage with 95% of the prescription dose was attained in all plans. OAR doses were similar across most structures evaluated; mean doses to brain and left temporal lobe were lower in ML plans than manual plans (mean difference to left temporal, - 2.3 Gy, p = 0.006; mean differences to brain, - 1.3 Gy, p = 0.017), whereas mean doses to right cochlea and lenses were higher in ML plans (+ 1.6-2.2 Gy, p < 0.05 for each)., Conclusions: Use of an automated ML method to aid RT planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is dosimetrically feasible and can be successfully used to create high-quality 54 Gy RT plans. Further evaluation after clinical implementation is planned., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Precision cancer medicine is dependent on accurate prediction of disease and treatment outcome, requiring integration of clinical, imaging and interventional knowledge. User controlled pipelines are capable of feature integration with varied levels of human interaction. In this work we present two pipelines designed to combine clinical, radiomic (quantified imaging), and RTx-omic (quantified radiation therapy (RT) plan) information for prediction of locoregional failure (LRF) in head and neck cancer (H&N)., Methods: Pipelines were designed to extract information and model patient outcomes based on clinical features, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and planned RT dose volumes. We predict H&N LRF using: 1) a highly user-driven pipeline that leverages modular design and machine learning for feature extraction and model development; and 2) a pipeline with minimal user input that utilizes deep learning convolutional neural networks to extract and combine CT imaging, RT dose and clinical features for model development., Results: Clinical features with logistic regression in our highly user-driven pipeline had the highest precision recall area under the curve (PR-AUC) of 0.66 (0.33-0.93), where a PR-AUC = 0.11 is considered random., Conclusions: Our work demonstrates the potential to aggregate features from multiple specialties for conditional-outcome predictions using pipelines with varied levels of human interaction. Most importantly, our results provide insights into the importance of data curation and quality, as well as user, data and methodology bias awareness as it pertains to result interpretation in user controlled pipelines., (Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Refinement of radiomic results and methodologies is required to ensure progression of the field. In this work, we establish a set of safeguards designed to improve and support current radiomic methodologies through detailed analysis of a radiomic signature., Methods: A radiomic model (MW2018) was fitted and externally validated using features extracted from previously reported lung and head and neck (H&N) cancer datasets using gross-tumour-volume contours, as well as from images with randomly permuted voxel index values; i.e. images without meaningful texture. To determine MW2018's added benefit, the prognostic accuracy of tumour volume alone was calculated as a baseline., Results: MW2018 had an external validation concordance index (c-index) of 0.64. However, a similar performance was achieved using features extracted from images with randomized signal intensities (c-index = 0.64 and 0.60 for H&N and lung, respectively). Tumour volume had a c-index = 0.64 and correlated strongly with three of the four model features. It was determined that the signature was a surrogate for tumour volume and that intensity and texture values were not pertinent for prognostication., Conclusion: Our experiments reveal vulnerabilities in radiomic signature development processes and suggest safeguards that can be used to refine methodologies, and ensure productive radiomic development using objective and independent features., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Recent works in automated radiotherapy treatment planning have used machine learning based on historical treatment plans to infer the spatial dose distribution for a novel patient directly from the planning image. We present a probabilistic, atlas-based approach which predicts the dose for novel patients using a set of automatically selected most similar patients (atlases). The output is a spatial dose objective, which specifies the desired dose-per-voxel, and therefore replaces the need to specify and tune dose-volume objectives. Voxel-based dose mimicking optimization then converts the predicted dose distribution to a complete treatment plan with dose calculation using a collapsed cone convolution dose engine. In this study, we investigated automated planning for right-sided oropharaynx head and neck patients treated with IMRT and VMAT. We compare four versions of our dose prediction pipeline using a database of 54 training and 12 independent testing patients by evaluating 14 clinical dose evaluation criteria. Our preliminary results are promising and demonstrate that automated methods can generate comparable dose distributions to clinical. Overall, automated plans achieved an average of 0.6% higher dose for target coverage evaluation criteria, and 2.4% lower dose at the organs at risk criteria levels evaluated compared with clinical. There was no statistically significant difference detected in high-dose conformity between automated and clinical plans as measured by the conformation number. Automated plans achieved nine more unique criteria than clinical across the 12 patients tested and automated plans scored a significantly higher dose at the evaluation limit for two high-risk target coverage criteria and a significantly lower dose in one critical organ maximum dose. The novel dose prediction method with dose mimicking can generate complete treatment plans in 12-13 min without user interaction. It is a promising approach for fully automated treatment planning and can be readily applied to different treatment sites and modalities.

Automating the radiotherapy treatment planning process is a technically challenging problem. The majority of automated approaches have focused on customizing and inferring dose volume objectives to be used in plan optimization. In this work we outline a multi-patient atlas-based dose prediction approach that learns to predict the dose-per-voxel for a novel patient directly from the computed tomography planning scan without the requirement of specifying any objectives. Our method learns to automatically select the most effective atlases for a novel patient, and then map the dose from those atlases onto the novel patient. We extend our previous work to include a conditional random field for the optimization of a joint distribution prior that matches the complementary goals of an accurately spatially distributed dose distribution while still adhering to the desired dose volume histograms. The resulting distribution can then be used for inverse-planning with a new spatial dose objective, or to create typical dose volume objectives for the canonical optimization pipeline. We investigated six treatment sites (633 patients for training and 113 patients for testing) and evaluated the mean absolute difference in all DVHs for the clinical and predicted dose distribution. The results on average are favorable in comparison to our previous approach (1.91 versus 2.57). Comparing our method with and without atlas-selection further validates that atlas-selection improved dose prediction on average in whole breast (0.64 versus 1.59), prostate (2.13 versus 4.07), and rectum (1.46 versus 3.29) while it is less important in breast cavity (0.79 versus 0.92) and lung (1.33 versus 1.27) for which there is high conformity and minimal dose shaping. In CNS brain, atlas-selection has the potential to be impactful (3.65 versus 5.09), but selecting the ideal atlas is the most challenging.

Radiation therapy is an integral part of cancer treatment, but to date it remains highly manual. Plans are created through optimization of dose volume objectives that specify intent to minimize, maximize, or achieve a prescribed dose level to clinical targets and organs. Optimization is NP-hard, requiring highly iterative and manual initialization procedures. We present a proof-of-concept for a method to automatically infer the radiation dose directly from the patient's treatment planning image based on a database of previous patients with corresponding clinical treatment plans. Our method uses regression forests augmented with density estimation over the most informative features to learn an automatic atlas-selection metric that is tailored to dose prediction. We validate our approach on 276 patients from 3 clinical treatment plan sites (whole breast, breast cavity, and prostate), with an overall dose prediction accuracies of 78.68%, 64.76%, 86.83% under the Gamma metric.

Radiation therapy is used to treat cancer patients around the world. High quality treatment plans maximally radiate the targets while minimally radiating healthy organs at risk. In order to judge plan quality and safety, segmentations of the targets and organs at risk are created, and the amount of radiation that will be delivered to each structure is estimated prior to treatment. If the targets or organs at risk are mislabelled, or the segmentations are of poor quality, the safety of the radiation doses will be erroneously reviewed and an unsafe plan could proceed. We propose a technique to automatically label groups of segmentations of different structures from a radiation therapy plan for the joint purposes of providing quality assurance and data mining. Given one or more segmentations and an associated image we seek to assign medically meaningful labels to each segmentation and report the confidence of that label. Our method uses random forests to learn joint distributions over the training features, and then exploits a set of learned potential group configurations to build a conditional random field (CRF) that ensures the assignment of labels is consistent across the group of segmentations. The CRF is then solved via a constrained assignment problem. We validate our method on 1574 plans, consisting of 17[Formula: see text] 579 segmentations, demonstrating an overall classification accuracy of 91.58%. Our results also demonstrate the stability of RF with respect to tree depth and the number of splitting variables in large data sets.