Search

Reports on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of carbon‐ion radiotherapy (C‐ion RT) for oligometastatic liver disease are limited, with insufficient evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of C‐ion RT for oligometastatic liver disease at all Japanese facilities using the nationwide cohort data. We reviewed the medical records to obtain the nationwide cohort registry data on C‐ion RT between May 2016 and June 2020. Patients (1) with oligometastatic liver disease as confirmed by histological or diagnostic imaging, (2) with ≤3 synchronous liver metastases at the time of treatment, (3) without active extrahepatic disease, and (4) who received C‐ion RT for all metastatic regions with curative intent were included in this study. C‐ion RT was performed with 58.0–76.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 1–20 fractions. In total, 102 patients (121 tumors) were enrolled in this study. The median follow‐up duration for all patients was 19.0 months. The median tumor size was 27 mm. The 1‐year/2‐year overall survival, local control, and progression‐free survival rates were 85.1%/72.8%, 90.5%/78.0%, and 48.3%/27.1%, respectively. No patient developed grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicity. C‐ion RT is a safe and effective treatment for oligometastatic liver disease and may be beneficial as a local treatment option in multidisciplinary treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Carbon‐ion radiation therapy has shown encouraging results in hepatocellular carcinoma patients in single‐centre studies. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of short‐course carbon‐ion radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in a multicentre study conducted by the Japan Carbon Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group. Methods: Consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients who were treated with carbon‐ion radiation therapy in four or fewer fractions at four Japanese institutions between April 2005 and November 2014 were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were local control rate, treatment‐related toxicity and radiation‐induced liver disease. Results: A total of 174 patients were included in this study. Prescribed carbon‐ion radiation therapy doses were (relative biological effectiveness): 48.0 Gy in two fractions (n = 46), and 52.8 Gy (n = 108) and 60.0 Gy (n = 20) in four fractions. The median follow‐up period was 20.3 (range, 2.9‐103.5) months. The overall survival and local control rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 95.4%, 82.5% and 73.3%; and 94.6%, 87.7% and 81.0% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1‐2, Child‐Pugh class B, maximum tumour diameter ≥3 cm, multiple tumours and serum alpha foetoprotein level >50 ng/mL were significant prognostic factors of overall survival. No treatment‐related death occurred during the follow‐up period. Grades 3 or 4 treatment‐related toxicities were observed in 10 patients (5.7%); radiation‐induced liver disease was observed in three patients (1.7%). Conclusions: Short‐course carbon‐ion radiation therapy is a safe, effective and potentially curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. See Editorial on Page 2132 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in external beam radiotherapy have allowed us to deliver higher doses to the tumors while decreasing doses to the surrounding tissues. Dose escalation using high-precision radiotherapy has improved the treatment outcomes of prostate cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been widely used throughout the world as the most advanced form of photon radiotherapy. In contrast, particle radiotherapy has also been under development, and has been used as an effective and non-invasive radiation modality for prostate and other cancers. Among the particles used in such treatments, protons and carbon ions have the physical advantage that the dose can be focused on the tumor with only minimal exposure of the surrounding normal tissues. Furthermore, carbon ions also have radiobiological advantages that include higher killing effects on intrinsic radio-resistant tumors, hypoxic tumor cells and tumor cells in the G0 or S phase. However, the degree of clinical benefit derived from these theoretical advantages in the treatment of prostate cancer has not been adequately determined. The present article reviews the available literature on the use of particle radiotherapy for prostate cancer as well as the literature on the physical and radiobiological properties of this treatment, and discusses the role and the relative merits of particle radiotherapy compared with current photon-based radiotherapy, with a focus on proton beam therapy and carbon ion radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The prognosis of high-risk prostate cancer is poor with a high mortality rate. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has performed dose-escalation studies of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and has developed high-precision radiation therapy (RT) methods such as intensity-modulated RT, carbon ion therapy, and proton beam therapy. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is also studied as an option for high-risk prostate cancer treatment. Past clinical trials have suggested that the local control rate of high-risk prostate cancer improves with total EBRT dose, even for doses >70Gy. Several randomized controlled trials, including RTOG 94-06, have shown significantly better prognoses with higher doses (>75Gy) than with lower doses (<70Gy). A proton beam therapy trial (PROG 95–09) also showed similar results. A phase II clinical trial (National Institute for Radiological Sciences, Japan; trial 9904) showed that carbon ion therapy resulted in very good biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among high-risk prostate cancer patients, demonstrating particle therapy to be a valid treatment option. RTOG 86-10 showed that short-term neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) was inadequate for high-risk prostate cancer but effective for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, whereas RTOG 92-02 and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22863 showed significant improvements in the prognosis of high-risk groups receiving long-term (>2years) HT combined with definitive RT. Further studies are warranted to elucidate optimal irradiation doses, HT treatment durations, and combination therapy schedules. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose To evaluate the applicability of carbon ion beams for the treatment of carcinoma of the lacrimal gland with regard to normal tissue morbidity and local tumor control. Methods and materials Between April 2002 and January 2011, 21 patients with locally advanced primary epithelial carcinoma of the lacrimal gland were enrolled in a Phase I/II clinical trial of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences. Acute radiation toxicity was the primary endpoint of this dose-escalation study and the late toxicity, local control, and overall survival were additionally evaluated as secondary endpoints. Of the 21 subjects enrolled, all patients were followed for more than 6 months and analyzed. Results The radiation dose was increased from the initial dose of 48.0 Gy equivalents (GyE)/12 fractions at 10% increments up to 52.8 GyE. Of the 21 patients, five received a total dose of 48.0 GyE, and 16 received a total dose of 52.8 GyE. No patient developed grade 3 or higher skin toxicity. As late ocular/visual toxicity, three patients had grade 3 retinopathy and seven patients lost their vision. Among the 10 patients treated until May 2005, five patients had local recurrence, three of whom had marginal recurrence. Therefore, the margin for the CTV (clinical target volume) was set to a range according to the orbital exenteration since June 2005. After the application of the extended margin, no local recurrence has been observed. The three-year overall survival and local control rates were 82.2% and 79.0%, respectively. Conclusion CIRT can be applied for primary epithelial carcinoma of the lacrimal gland, with a borderline acceptable morbidity and sufficient antitumor effect when an extended margin is adopted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose A multi-institutional observational study (J-CROS1501PR) has been carried out to analyze outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for patients with prostate cancer. Patients and methods Data of the patients enrolled in prospective studies of following 3 CIRT institutions were analyzed: National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS; Chiba, Japan), Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center (GHMC; Gunma, Japan), and Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation (HIMAT; Saga, Japan). Endpoints of the clinical trial are biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), local control rate (LCR), and acute/late adverse effects. Results A total of 2157 patients’ data were collected from NIRS ( n = 1432), GHMC ( n = 515), and HIMAT ( n = 210). The number of patients in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups was 263 (12%), 679 (31%), and 1215 (56%), respectively. The five-year bRFS in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients was 92%, 89%, and 92%, respectively. The five-year CSS in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients was 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. The incidence of grade 2 late GU/GI toxicities was 4.6% and 0.4%, respectively, and the incidence of ⩾G3 toxicities were 0%. Conclusions Favorable overall outcomes of CIRT for prostate cancer were suggested by the analysis of the first multi-institutional data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]