Search

Background: The purpose of the study was to determine whether the extent of prostate radiotherapy (ie, whole-pelvic radiotherapy [WPRT] vs. prostate and seminal vesicle radiotherapy [PSVRT]) is associated with all-cause mortality (ACM) in men treated with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)., Patients and Methods: A multiple-institution cohort of 3709 prostate cancer patients was prospectively assembled from 1991 to 2006. The median age was 72 years and all patients had T1c-T3N0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients were treated with WPRT or PSVRT followed by a brachytherapy boost, with or without neoadjuvant ADT (median duration, 4.2 months). Seventy percent of patients had unfavorable-risk disease (Gleason score ≥ 7; prostate-specific antigen ≥ 10 ng/mL; or stage ≥ T2b). Cox regression was applied to determine whether the radiation treatment volume affected the risk of ACM. The interaction between radiation volume and ADT use was assessed., Results: After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 561 deaths were observed. A decreased risk of ACM was noted with the use of WPRT versus PSVRT (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.89; P = .01), or with ADT use (AHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.90; P = .004). However, a combination of WPRT and ADT did not further improve ACM compared with either WPRT alone or PSVRT with ADT. Moreover, there was a significant interaction between the radiotherapeutic treatment volume and ADT (AHR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.004-2.58; P = .048)., Conclusion: Treatment with WPRT or short-course ADT is associated with a decreased risk of ACM, although a combination of the two does not yield greater benefit. This observation suggests a shared mechanism for this risk reduction, which we hypothesize to be via the treatment of micrometastatic disease within the pelvic lymph nodes., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Type - Therapy (retrospective cohort analysis) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Prostate cancer is generally considered to be high risk when the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is >20 ng/mL, the Gleason score is ≥8 or the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) tumour (T) category is ≥2c. There is no consensus on the best treatment for men with prostate cancer that includes these high-risk features. Options include external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen suppression therapy (AST), treatment with a combination of brachytherapy, EBRT and AST termed combined-modality therapy (CMT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by adjuvant RT in cases where there are unfavourable pathological features, e.g. positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion. While outcomes for both approaches have been published independently these treatments have not been compared in the setting of a prospective RCT where confounding factors related to patient selection for RP or CMT would be minimised. These factors include age, known prostate cancer prognostic factors and comorbidity. RCTs that compare RP to radiation-based regimens have been attempted but failed to accrue. OBJECTIVE To assess the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality after therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) or combined-modality therapy (CMT) with brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen-suppression therapy (AST) in men with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer., PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with localised high-risk prostate cancer based on a Gleason score of 8-10 were selected for study from Duke University (285 men), treated between January 1988 and October 2008 with RP or from the Chicago Prostate Cancer Center or within the 21st Century Oncology establishment (372) treated between August 1991 and November 2005 with CMT., Fine and Gray multivariable regression was used to assess whether the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality differed after RP as compared with CMT adjusting for age, cardiac comorbidity and year of treatment, and known prostate cancer prognostic factors., RESULTS As of January 2009, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.62 (2.4-8.2) years, there were 21 prostate cancer-specific deaths., Treatment with RP was not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality compared with CMT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-5.6, P= 0.3)., Factors associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality were a PSA concentration of <4 ng/mL (adjusted HR 6.1, 95% CI 2.3-16, P < 0.001) as compared with ≥4 ng/mL, and clinical category T2b, c (adjusted HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.2; P= 0.03) as compared with T1c, 2a., CONCLUSION Initial treatment with RP as compared with CMT was not associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Black men present more frequently with high grade prostate cancer and are more likely to have diabetes mellitus. We evaluated whether there is an independent association between diabetes mellitus and the risk of high grade prostate cancer in men diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was associated with the odds of Gleason score 7 or 8–10 prostate cancer in a cohort of 16,286 men, adjusting for black race, advancing age, prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination findings. Results: Black men (adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.08–3.13, p = 0.024) and nonblack men (adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.33–1.89, p <0.001) with diabetes were more likely to have Gleason score 8–10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer than nondiabetic men. However, this was not true for Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer. Black race was significantly associated with Gleason score 7 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17–1.63, p <0.001 and 1.61, 95% CI 1.17–2.21, p = 0.003, respectively). Black race was also associated with Gleason score 8–10 vs 6 or less prostate cancer in men without and with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01–1.83, p = 0.04 and 1.58, 95% CI 0.98–2.53, p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusions: In a cohort of men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer independent of black race. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the comparison of the use of brachytherapy alone with combined brachytherapy, external-beam radiation to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and androgen-suppression therapy (CMT) to determine the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in healthy elderly men. The composition of the study cohort is presented. A lower risk of PCSM was found in elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer without cardiovascular disease when they received CM, than with brachytherapy alone.

Purpose: To assess characteristics and outcome of patients treated with radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer at 44 community-based radiotherapy centers and compare these to those on clinical trials.Materials and Methods: We reviewed 155 patients who had been treated from 2010 to 2014. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results were compared to a pooled analysis of 6 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols.Results: What stood out was that our patients' characteristics were significantly inferior than those on RTOG studies: lower rate of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor: 36.8% vs. 70% (P<0.0001), higher median age: 79 years vs. 66 (P<0.0001), more medically inoperable: (51.0%) vs. 0% in RTOG (P<0.001), and 46.9% had refused surgery. Fewer patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy: 56.1% vs. 100% (P<0.0001). It was also striking that at median follow-up 12.6 months (range: 3.1-49.2), the 36-month overall survival was 51.3% for those who refused surgery vs. 24.5% for medically inoperable (P = 0.009); 58.1% with complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor vs. 29.8% if incomplete (P = 0.07); 54.3% with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. 17.2% without (P = 0.03); 66.3% for those who refused surgery and had CRT vs. 38.9% for medically inoperable who had CRT (P = 0.04).Conclusions: The cohort at community-based centers was older, more medically inoperable, and less likely to receive CRT than clinical trial patients. This suggests that we may not be able to apply trial-derived regimens for many patients in this setting. There is a pressing need to find treatment options for such patients, especially given the aging population. Survival of medically operable CRT patients was comparable to results of RTOG protocols notwithstanding this study's smaller sample size, retrospective nature and suboptimal documentation of patient characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]