Search

Purpose: The objective of this study was to survey the use of reirradiation (Re-RT) for in-field failures after previous radical radiation treatment (RT) among Canadian radiation oncologists (ROs)., Methods and Materials: An electronic survey was sent to 271 ROs in Canada. The completed surveys were received electronically via e-mail and the data were analyzed using SAS 9.1.3 software., Results: A total of 183 ROs (67.5%) completed and returned the survey. The majority of the respondents were involved in the practice of either breast (48%) or genitourinary (43%) tumor sites. A total of 49% of the participants were interested in using Re-RT for the management of in-field recurrences. The goals of the therapy would be improvement of quality of life (99%), locoregional control (80%), or cure (32%). Most of the physicians believed that patients should have a minimum Karnofsky performance status of 50 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3, a minimum life expectancy of 3 months, and a minimum interval from initial treatment of 3 months if Re-RT were to be given with curative intent., Conclusions: This survey showed that a wide variation existed among ROs in their approach to Re-RT. Newer technologies in RT planning and delivery would be employed to facilitate normal tissue avoidance. The results of this study suggested that a consensus meeting was needed to establish guidelines for the practice and prospective evaluation of Re-RT.

Radiotherapy (RT) is often utilized for symptom control at the end of life. Palliative RT (pRT) may not be taken to completion by patients, thus decreasing clinical benefits and adversely impacting resource allocation. We determined rates of incomplete pRT and examined predictors of non-completion using an electronic questionnaire. Methods: A questionnaire was embedded within the RT electronic prescribing system for all five cancer centers of Alberta, Canada, between 2017 and 2020. Prescribing radiation oncologists (ROs) were tasked with completing the questionnaire. Treatment variables were collected for 2040 patients prescribed pRT. Details on pRT courses delivered and completed were used to determine rates of incomplete RT. Electronic medical records of a subset of 367 patients randomly selected from the 2040 patients were then analyzed to examine for association of non-completion of RT with patient, disease, and therapy-related factors. Results: Overall, 10% of patients did not complete pRT. The rate of single fractions prescribed as a proportion of all RT fractions increased from 18% (pre-2017: pre-study era) to 29% (2017–2020: study era) (p < 0.0001). After conducting multivariate analysis on the overall group, multiple lifetime malignancies (OR:0.64) or increasing the number of pRT fractions (OR:0.08–0.17) were associated with non-completion. Being selected for stereotactic RT (OR:3.75) or survival > 30 days post-RT prescription (OR:2.20–5.02) were associated with greater rates of RT completion. The ROs' estimates of life expectancy at the time of RT prescription were not predictive of RT completion. In the multivariate analysis of the 367-patient subset, the presence of hepatic metastases (OR 2.59), survival 30–59 days (OR 6.61) and survival 90+ days (OR 8.18) post-RT prescription were associated with pRT completion. Only increasing pRT fractionation (OR:0.05–0.2) was associated with non-completion. Conclusion: One in ten patients prescribed pRT did not complete their treatment course. Decreasing pRT fractionation and improving prognostication in patients near the end of life may decrease rates of incomplete RT courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study retrospectively reviewed data from men with localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We identified 359 men with localized prostate cancer treated with curative EBRT at the Cross Cancer Institute between 2010–2011. The volume of seminal vesicles (SVs) treated as well as dose values were extracted. These volumes were compared to gold standard contours drawn by a trained expert based on consensus European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) contouring guidelines. Patient and tumor characteristics were extracted for these patients. Memorial Sloan Kettering prostate cancer nomogram was used to assign a predicted risk of SV involvement for each patient based on baseline tumor characteristics. In patients with a predicted risk of SV involvement greater than 15% (n = 184), 86.5% (SD = 18.6) of the base of the SVs were treated with EBRT, compared to 66.7% (SD = 32.6) for patients with a predicted risk of SV involvement less than 15% (n = 175, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean percentage of proximal and total SV volumes treated with EBRT was 75.6% (SD = 24.4) and 68.7% (SD = 26.0) for patients with a predicted risk of SV involvement of greater than 15%, compared to 50.3% (SD = 31.0, p < 0.0001) and 41.0% (SD = 27.8, p < 0.0001) for patients with a risk of less than 15%. The results indicate that all parts of the SVs are more likely to be contoured in men with >15% risk of SV involvement than those with <15% risk. However, radiation oncologists still contour a high percentage of SVs in men with <15% risk of SV involvement, suggesting that there may be over-treatment of SVs that increases the risk of rectal or bladder toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment with radical radiation therapy (RT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) experience a constellation of deleterious metabolic and anthropometric changes related to hypogonadism that are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effect of metformin versus placebo to blunt the adverse effects of ADT on body weight, waist circumference, and other metabolic parameters. This phase 2, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomized normoglycemic men with locally advanced prostate cancer receiving radical RT and ADT (18-36 months) in a 1:1 ratio to receive metformin 500 mg by mouth 3 times a day (for 30-36 months) versus identical placebo. From December 2015 to October 2019, 83 men were randomized with median follow-up of 23 months. Baseline mean body mass Index (BMI) of the cohort was 30.2 (range 22.2-52.5). Change in mean weight relative to baseline was lower among men who received metformin compared with placebo at 5 months (−1.80 kg, P =.038), but was not significant with longer follow-up (1 year: +0.16 kg, P =.874). Although participants on ADT had increases in waist circumference in both study arms, metformin did not significantly reduce these changes (1 year: +2.79 cm (placebo) versus +1.46 cm (metformin), P =.336). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was lower in the metformin arm (−0.32 mmol/L) compared with the placebo arm (−0.03 mmol/L) at 5 months (P =.022), but these differences were not significant with longer follow-up (1 year: −0.17 mmol/L vs −0.19 mmol/L, P =.896). There were no differences in HbA1C, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol by study arm. Men receiving radical RT and ADT gained weight and had increases in waist circumference over time that metformin did not significantly mitigate. Although this study did not observe any preventive effect of metformin on the anthropometric and metabolic complications of ADT, metformin continues to be studied in phase 3 RCTs in this patient population to assess its potential antineoplastic effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: We report the outcomes of using a combination of cetuximab with radiation therapy (Cetux-RT) to treat a selected group of patients with locally advanced (unresectable) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (LA-cSCC). This study presents two-year efficacy and safety data for 8 patients with LA-cSCC treated within a single institution.Methods: Between 2014 and 2017 a total of eight patients (seven males, one female) with LA-cSCC received curative intent treatment with Cetux-RT. All patients received an initial loading dose of cetuximab at 400 mg/m2 seven days prior to radiotherapy, followed by weekly treatment with 250 mg/m2 , continuing through the end of radiotherapy. Radiation doses were 6600 cGy/30 fr (n = 2), 6300 cGy/30fr (n = 2) and 5500 cGy/22 fr (n = 4).Results: The median age was 81 years (range, 55-87). The ECOG performance status of all patients was between 0 and 2. With a median duration of follow-up of 25 months (range 10-48 months), five patients remain in a complete response. After a partial response, another patient has relapsed and is receiving palliative chemotherapy, while two patients have died during the period of follow up (one of whom died following progression of disease, the other of an unrelated cause). Treatment in this group of patients was well tolerated, with most toxicities ≤ grade 2, and no toxicities of grade 4/5 reported.Conclusions: Cetux-RT was well tolerated and provided durable disease control within this patient sample. Our data support the use of the Cetux-RT regimen for selected patients with inoperable LA-cSCC and adequate performance status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Xerostomia is a debilitating side effect of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Combining surgical submandibular‐gland transfer (SMGT) with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may provide greater protection of salivary function. Methods: This was a single‐institution, prospective phase II feasibility trial. Patients with head and neck cancer or unknown primary with neck node metastases received primary surgery with SMGT and postoperative radiotherapy with tomotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). Toxicity and quality of life (QOL) were assessed before surgery, before RT, and after RT. Results: Forty patients received SMGT and IMRT. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 salivary gland toxicity. At 12 months post‐RT, the rate of absent or only mild xerostomia was 89%, and salivary flow rates were approximately 75% of pre‐RT levels. Conclusions: The combination of IMRT with SMGT is feasible and with improved dose constraints may maximally spare the parotid and submandibular glands, leading to decreased xerostomia and improved patient QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brachytherapy (BT) target dose and coverage are critical to the cure of locally advanced cervical cancer (CC). Advances in imaging, volumetric definitions, and BT planning aims/constraints have collectively been associated with improved tumor control outcomes over traditional practices. But some historic conventions remain in BT, such as applying uniform radiobiological parameters (RbP). Having previously generated a/b and T 1/2 from CC cell lines, we explored the potential impact of differing RbP against population-based outcomes in an era of MR-BT boost. All CC patients seen 1/2013 - 12/2015 in the Canadian province of Alberta (AB), and treated with radical (chemo)radiotherapy (external beam (EBRT) + BT), were identified. From health records, demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment and outcomes data were abstracted. Descriptive and Kaplan-Meier methods were supplemented by Cox-regression multivariable analysis (MVA), factoring in experimentally derived (exp) RbP for BT tumor doses (in addition to treated doses using conventional a/b and T 1/2 (10 Gy, 1.5 h)). 127 women (median age 50.5 y [23-82]) received curative (chemo)EBRT+BT in AB's 2 tertiary cancer centers (2:1), after exclusions (such as n=12 oligometastatic). Over half (73/125) were smokers. Squamous (SCC) predominated (76.4%) over adenocarcinoma-containing (ADC, 16.5%) or higher-risk (3.1%) histologies, with 3.9% incompletely characterized carcinoma. Primaries were mainly FIGO(2009) clinical stage IIB (37.8%, with the remainder IB 29.9%, IIA 10.2%, IIIA 2.4%, IIIB 15.0%, and IVA 3.9%); 61.4% were node(LN)-positive (pelvic and/or para-aortic (PA)) on imaging. Most (n=102) had weekly cisplatin (median 5 cycles [1-6]) with usual pelvic±PA EBRT (45-50.8 Gy EQD2 in 25-28 fx) and image-based intracavitary BT (67.7% PDR 1-2 fx, vs HDR 1-3 fx; 96.9% MRI; 15% hybrid interstitial). N=12 had initial hemostatic 1-2 fx (5-7.2 Gy); EBRT boost was sequential (3.6-21 Gy in 1.8-4 Gy/fx, to LN/parametria/pelvis) in n=26, simultaneous integrated in n=2. Median overall treatment time (OTT) was 48 days [38-112]. 9 of 127 had no chemotherapy. At BT, median HR-CTV volume was 29.8 cm3 [9.6-212.1], with median treated D90, 88.3 Gy EQD2 [53.4-122.1] (Point A 79.6 [56.3-146.2]). Applying a/b 5.6 Gy and T 1/2 3.4 h for SCC (4.3 Gy and 1.0 h for ADC), exp HR-CTV D90 and Point A medians were 102.0 [54.6-177.9] and 86.9 [57.7-225.8] Gy EQD2. Median follow-up was 83 months [4-115], with 5y-OS of 69.3% and pelvic LC, 79.9%. Clinical stage group (p=0.001) and OTT (p=0.008) were associated with OS (LN or chemotherapy status did not reach statistical significance). Exp target dose (Point A, p=0.029; D90, p=0.028) but not treated HR-CTV D90 or volume (trend only) also showed association. For ADC (not SCC), 5y-OS varied by exp, not treated, dose (Point A 79.5% vs 61.2%, p=0.013; D90 54.7% vs 80.3%, p=0.006). On MVA, OTT and exp Point A dose were significant predictors of OS after adjusting for age, chemo, stage, HR-CTV volume and smoking status. Pelvic LC differed, on univariate analysis, by stage (p=0.025), LN status (p=0.021), and exp D90 (p=0.022), with trends observed for OTT and HR-CTV volume but not histology, chemotherapy, BT imaging or center. 5y-LC of ADC also differed by exp Point A (93.2% vs 72.4%, p=0.062) and exp D90 (68.5% vs. 92.3%, p=0.019) doses, but not on MVA. Real-world late outcomes for a province-wide CC cohort are reflective of treatment factors, more so than disease burden. Further understanding of RbP is needed for optimum application in CC and outcomes-informed EBRT+BT dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Skin bolus may routinely be used in the perineum to build up the surface dose in the treatment of anal cancer (ACC); this may contribute to significant acute skin toxicity. Skin bolus may not be needed with the introduction of modern radiotherapy techniques if these planning techniques would achieve adequate surface dose. Our study is to ascertain if appropriate skin dose can be achieved without the use of bolus when VMAT is used in the treatment of ACC.Methods: The study includes 10 ACC patients treated with VMAT radiotherapy. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) are used to evaluate whether the calculated dose for the VMAT planning technique (VMAT-PT) accurately predicted the dose delivered to peri-anal target region without bolus. The OSLD recorded the dose at the anal verge or at the lower most extent of the tumour for each patient over two fractions. The OSLD was read after each of the two fractions, and the average value was reported. The mean dose over a volume centred on the anal marker was calculated in the treatment planning system (TPS).Results: The mean TPS-calculated dose was 186.1 cGy. The mean of the OSLD-measured doses was 205.7 cGy for a single fraction. The mean of the measured doses was 10.6% higher than the mean of the calculated doses.Conclusions: The calculated dose for the VMAT-PT consistently under-predicted the dose delivered to the peri-anal target region without bolus. Routine use of skin bolus could be avoided with VMAT-PT when the patient is treated in a supine position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) was recently shown in a randomized phase III trial to be non-inferior to 40 Gy in 15 fractions in elderly and/or frail patients with glioblastoma multiforme. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of the two regimens. Material and methods The direct unit costs of imaging, radiotherapy (RT), and dexamethasone were collected from the five primary contributing countries to the trial, constituting the data of 88% of all patients. Effectiveness was measured by the restricted mean overall survival (RMOS) and progression free survival (RMPFS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Indirect costs were also estimated for comparison. Results The median OSs for the short-course and commonly used RTs were 8.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1–10.3) and 7.7 (95% CI 5.5–9.9) months, respectively (log rank p  = 0.340). Median PFSs were also not different ( p  = 0.686). The differences in the RMOS and the ICER, however, were +0.11 life-years and -$3062 United States dollars (USD) per life-year gained, respectively. The differences in the RMPFS and the ICER were +0.02 PFS and -$17,693 USD, respectively. Conclusion The ICER of -$3062 per life-year gained and -$17,693 per PFS gained indicates that the short-course RT is less costly compared to the longer RT regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has confirmed its superiority in improving acute treatment-related toxicities in anal cancer, without compromising tumor control. However, the effect of IMRT on long-term quality of life (QOL) is poorly documented. The study prospectively evaluated the long-term patient-reported QOL after IMRT-based chemoradiation in anal cancer. Fifty-eight patients treated with IMRT and concurrent 5 fluorouracil/mitomycin-C were enrolled in the study. A prespecified secondary endpoint was prospective evaluation of long-term QOL. Fifty-four patients underwent QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment, and during follow-up until 60 months, with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales and the Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) scales. The QOL scores at baseline and posttreatment periods were compared. For QLQ-C30, at 60 months, the mean scores of global health status, all functional scales, and all symptoms except diarrhea had improved, indicating normalization of QOL. Clinically and statistically significant improvements in the global health status (15.4; P =.003), role functioning (19.3; P =.0017), emotional functioning (18.9; P =.008), and social functioning (29.8; P ≤.001) were observed. Diarrhea persisted as a concern over the years (P =.172). For European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CR29, rectal pain (-38.6; P =.001), mucous or blood discharge per rectum (-22.8; P =.005), and perianal soreness (-37.3; P ≤.001) were improved both clinically and statistically. Clinically significant fecal leakage was reported by 16% of patients (5.6; P =.421). Volumes receiving 45 and 54 Gy were independent predictors for fecal incontinence. Clinically and statistically significant urinary incontinence occurred in 21% of patients (17.5; P =.014). Deterioration of dyspareunia was clinically significant (26.7; P =.099) at 60 months. Compared with historical data, IMRT is associated with reduced long-term effects on QOL. The majority of patients treated with IMRT experienced clinically significant recovery of function and improvement in QOL over 5 years after completion of treatment. Specific toxicities such as chronic diarrhea, fecal incontinence, and urinary and sexual dysfunction were primarily responsible for deterioration of the long-term QOL. Future research aimed at reducing such toxicities is needed to further improve long-term QOL in anal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background. Xerostomia is a serious morbidity of radiation treatment in head and neck cancer. Methods. We conducted a prospective phase III multicenter randomized study comparing submandibular salivary gland transfer (SGT) procedure with pilocarpine during and for 3 months after XRT. Salivary flow (baseline, stimulated) and University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (U of W QOL) scores were measured. Results. An interim intent to treat analysis (120 patients) at 6 months shows superior results in SGT arm: median baseline salivary flow for SGT (0.04 mL/minute) versus pilocarpine (0.01 mL/minute), p = .001; median stimulated salivary flow (0.18 mL/minute) for SGT versus (0.05 mL/minute) for pilocarpine, p = .003. Scores (U of W QOL) for amount (p = .017) and consistency of saliva (p = .005) in favor of SGT leading to premature closure of study. Conclusions. Submandibular SGT procedure is superior to pilocarpine in management of radiation-induced xerostomia. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The quality of radiotherapy services in post-Soviet countries has not yet been studied following a formal methodology. The IAEA conducted a survey using two sets of validated radiation oncology quality indicators (ROIs). Methods Eleven post-Soviet countries were assessed. A coordinator was designated for each country and acted as the liaison between the country and the IAEA. The methodology was a one-time cross-sectional survey using a 58-question tool in Russian. The questionnaire was based on two validated sets of ROIs: for radiotherapy centres, the indicators proposed by Cionini et al., and for data at the country level, the Australasian ROIs. Results The overall response ratio was 66.3%, but for the Russian Federation, it was 24%. Data were updated on radiotherapy infrastructure and equipment. 256 radiotherapy centres are operating 275 linear accelerators and 337 Cobalt-60 units. 61% of teletherapy machines are older than ten years. Analysis of ROIs revealed significant differences between these countries and radiotherapy practices in the West. Naming, task profile and education programmes of radiotherapy professionals are different than in the West. Conclusions Most countries need modernization of their radiotherapy infrastructure coupled with adequate staffing numbers and updated education programmes focusing on evidence-based medicine, quality, and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Critical structure constraints used in our randomized controlled trial of short-course versus conventional radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma were appropriate for limiting grade 2 or higher toxicities. • Higher left-hippocampal mean doses were the most predictive for neuro-cognitive decline post-radiotherapy. • Routine contouring and use of dose constraints for the hippocampus is recommended. • Our left hippocampus sparing treatment model may help minimize neuro-cognitive decline in patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy. There is no consensus on appropriate organ at risk (OAR) constraints for short-course radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma. Using dosimetry and prospectively-collected toxicity data from a trial of short-course radiotherapy for glioblastoma, this study aims to empirically examine the OAR constraints, with particular attention to left hippocampus dosimetry and impact on neuro-cognitive decline. Data was taken from a randomized control trial of 133 adults (age 18–70 years; ECOG performance score 0–2) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with 60 Gy in 30 (conventional arm) versus 20 (short-course arm) fractions of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02206230). The delivered plan's dosimetry to the OARs was correlated to prospective-collected toxicity and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) data. Toxicity events were not significantly increased in the short-course arm versus the conventional arm. Across all OARs, delivered radiation doses within protocol-allowable maximum doses correlated with lack of grade ≥ 2 toxicities in both arms (p < 0.001), while patients with OAR doses at or above protocol limits correlated with increased grade ≥ 2 toxicities across all examined OARs in both arms (p-values 0.063–0.250). Mean left hippocampus dose was significantly associated with post-radiotherapy decline in MMSE scores (p = 0.005), while the right hippocampus mean dose did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.277). Compared to the original clinical plan, RapidPlan left hippocampus sparing model decreased left hippocampus mean dose by 43 % (p < 0.001), without compromising planning target volume coverage. In this trial, protocol OAR constraints were appropriate for limiting grade ≥ 2 toxicities in conventional and short-course adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma. Higher left hippocampal mean doses were predictive for neuro-cognitive decline post-radiotherapy. Routine contouring and use of dose constraints to limit hippocampal dose is recommended to minimize neuro-cognitive decline in patients with glioblastoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Myocardial perfusion defects after breast radiation therapy (RT) correlate with volume of irradiated left ventricle (LV). We aimed to determine the relationship between myocardial perfusion, LV dosimetry, and grade ≥2 late cardiac events in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant RT.Methods and Materials: A randomized study evaluated the benefit of inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy over forward-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy for radiation toxicity in breast cancer. A secondary endpoint was evaluating cardiac perfusion by single-photon emission computed tomography done at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years post-RT. We used receiver operating curve and regression analysis to identify association between perfusion, radiation dose-volumes, and the risk of late cardiac events.Results: Of 181 patients who received adjuvant RT, 102 were patients with cancer in the left breast (called in this study the left-sided group) and 79 were patients with cancer in the right breast (called in this study the right-sided group). Median follow-up was 127 months (range, 19-160 months). A significant worsening of perfusion defects occurred after RT in the left-sided group, which improved by 1 year. Late cardiac events were found among 16 patients (17.2%) in the left-sided group and 4 patients (5.5%) in the right-sided group. Perfusion changes did not correlate with late cardiac events, but LV dose-volumes correlated with late cardiac events. Maintaining the LV volume receiving 5 Gy and 10 Gy to <42 cc and <38cc, respectively, can reduce the risk of radiation-related late cardiac events at 10 years to <5% over baseline.Conclusions: RT was associated with short-term perfusion defects that improved within 1 year and was not correlated with late cardiac events. The ventricular volumes receiving 5 Gy and 10 Gy were correlated with late cardiac events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the equivalence of multifraction and single-fraction (SF) radiotherapy for the palliation of painful bone metastases (BM). However, according to previous surveys, SF schedules remain underused. The objectives of this study were to determine the current patterns of practice internationally and to investigate the factors influencing this practice. Methods and Materials: The members of three global radiation oncology professional organizations (American Society for Radiology Oncology [ASTRO], Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology [CARO], Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists) completed an Internet-based survey. The respondents described what radiotherapy dose fractionation they would recommend for 5 hypothetical cases describing patients with single or multiple painful BMs from breast, lung, or prostate cancer. Radiation oncologists rated the importance of patient, tumor, institution, and treatment factors, and descriptive statistics were compiled. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables and the Student t test for continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of the use of SF radiotherapy. Results: A total of 962 respondents, three-quarters ASTRO members, described 101 different dose schedules in common use (range, 3 Gy/1 fraction to 60 Gy/20 fractions). The median dose overall was 30 Gy/10 fractions. SF schedules were used the least often by ASTRO members practicing in the United States and most often by CARO members. Case, membership affiliation, country of training, location of practice, and practice type were independently predictive of the use of SF. The principal factors considered when prescribing were prognosis, risk of spinal cord compression, and performance status. Conclusion: Despite abundant evidence, most radiation oncologists continue to prescribe multifraction schedules for patients who fit the eligibility criteria of previous randomized controlled trials. Our results have confirmed a delay in the incorporation of evidence into practice for palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To review our institution''s results with primary low dose rate (LDR) intracavitary brachytherapy using Heyman''s capsules for medically inoperable cancer of the endometrium. Methods: The study was a retrospective review of inoperable early-stage endometrial cancer patients at the Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton, Canada, treated with primary radiotherapy from January 10, 1986 to July 17, 2006. Forty-four patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical Stage I disease were included in the study. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to obtain estimates of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival (DSS). Tumor grade was assessed as a potential predictor of OS by comparing survival curves using a log-rank test. Results: The median OS time was 75.5 months (95% confidence interval 55.6–95.3 months). For the entire group, the 5- and 10-year OS was 60.5% and 24.0%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year DSS was 87.7% and 79.7%, respectively. For a subset treated as planned, the 5- and 10-year OS was 54.5% and 34.5%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year DSS was 83.0% and 76.4%, respectively. When stratified by grade, trends in survival analysis are inversely related to grade. Both the trend analysis and the log-rank test were statistically significant at a p <0.05 level. Conclusions: Our experience with LDR brachytherapy for the treatment of Stage I endometrial cancer is comparable to surgical treatment and to results reported in the literature for high dose rate brachytherapy. Further study that would help define the indications for a primary radiotherapeutic approach in early-stage endometrial cancer may lower current thresholds for recommending primary radiotherapy versus surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To perform a subset analysis of survival outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma from a randomized phase 3 trial comparing 2 short-course radiation therapy (RT) regimens in elderly and/or frail patients.Methods and Materials: The original trial population included elderly and/or frail patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma. Patients joined the phase 3, randomized, multicenter, prospective, noninferiority trial; were assigned to 1 of 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio, either short-course RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions, arm 1) or commonly used RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions, arm 2); and were stratified by age (<65 years and ≥65 years), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and extent of surgery. For the subset analysis in this study, only patients aged ≥65 years were evaluated (elderly and frail patients were defined as patients aged ≥65 years with KPS of 50%-70%; elderly and non-frail patients were defined as patients aged ≥65 years with KPS of 80%-100%); 61 of the 98 initial patients comprised the patient population, with 26 patients randomized to arm 1 and 35 to arm 2.Results: In this unplanned analysis, the short-course RT results were not statistically significantly different from the results of commonly used RT in elderly patients. The median overall survival time was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-9.1 months) in arm 1 and 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.7 months) in arm 2 (P=.936). The median progression-free survival time was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.9 months) in arm 1 and 3.2 months (95% CI, 0.1-6.3 months) in arm 2 (P=.706).Conclusions: A short-course RT regimen of 25 Gy in 5 fractions is an acceptable treatment option for patients aged ≥65 years, mainly those with a poor performance status or contraindication to chemotherapy, which would be indicated in cases of methylated O6 methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with bone metastases may experience pain, fatigue, and decreased mobility. Multiple medications for analgesia are often required, each with attendant side effects. Although palliative-intent radiotherapy (RT) is effective in decreasing pain, additional supportive care interventions may be overlooked. Our objective was to describe the feasibility of multidisciplinary assessment of patients with symptomatic bone metastases attending a dedicated outpatient palliative RT clinic. Methods and Materials: Consecutive patients referred for RT for painful bone metastases were screened for symptoms and needs relevant to their medications, nutritional intake, activities of daily living, and psychosocial and spiritual concerns from January 1 to December 31, 2007. Consultations by appropriate team members and resulting recommendations were collected prospectively. Patients who received RT were contacted by telephone 4 weeks later to assess symptom outcomes. Results: A total of 106 clinic visits by 82 individual patients occurred. As determined by screening form responses, the clinical Pharmacist, Occupational Therapist, Registered Dietician and Social Worker were consulted to provide assessments and recommendations within the time constraints presented by 1-day palliative RT delivery. In addition to pain relief, significant improvements in tiredness, depression, anxiety, drowsiness and overall well-being were reported at 4 weeks. Conclusions: Systematic screening of this population revealed previously unmet needs, addressed in the form of custom verbal and written recommendations. Multidisciplinary assessment is associated with a high number of recommendations and decreased symptom distress. Our findings lend strong support to the routine assessment by multiple supportive care professionals for patients with advanced cancer being considered for palliative RT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate clinical outcome, prognostic factors and chronic morbidity with radiotherapy for vaginal cancer treatment. Materials and methods: 68 patients with vaginal cancer treated by radical or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) were selected. Five with rare subtypes of histopathology and 8 with adenocarcinoma were excluded from this study. 76.4% of the remainder had early-stage diseases (stage I: 14, II: 28, III: 9, and IV: 4). The patients in the years from which they were treated were almost evenly distributed (1st 5 years: 13, 2nd: 14, 3rd: 16, and 4th: 12). There were four treatment groups: external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone (n =18), brachytherapy (BT) alone (n =4), EBRT and BT (n =30), and surgery plus RT (n =3). Results: Median follow-up was 50.3 months ranging from 3 to 213 months. 5-year overall survival (OS) was 55.6%, disease-specific survival (DSS) was 77.3%, disease-free survival was 74.2%, and local control was 87.7%. Independent prognostic factors for DSS and OS were tumor stage, site and size (p <0.05). Late radiation toxicity was minimal in the bladder (4.6%) and bowel (4.6%). Vaginal morbidity was observed in 35 patients (63.6%). It was lowest in the BT alone (0%), and highest in the EBRT and BT group (82.1%), especially for those received more than 70 Gy (p =0.05, Odds ratio=4.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–21.65). Conclusion: This retrospective review suggested that tumor stage, site, and size were important prognostic factors in patients with vaginal cancer. Higher radiation dose was associated with more frequent vaginal toxicity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing various radiotherapy (RT) schedules for locally advanced lung cancer published since 1991 found no difference in palliation of intrathoracic symptoms. The most commonly prescribed schedule by Canadian Radiation Oncologists (RO) (20 Gy in five fractions [20 Gy/5]), when first evaluated versus 10 Gy/1 in a 2002 RCT, showed a significant survival benefit. A subsequent RCT assessing 20 Gy/5 found worse survival versus 16 Gy/2. This study examines whether the RT prescription for lung cancer palliation in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) has changed over time. Methods and Materials: Chart review was conducted for patients treated with palliative thoracic RT across three periods (1999–2006). Patient demographics, tumor, treatment, and organizational factors were analyzed descriptively. Chi-square test was used to detect differences in proportions between unordered categorical variables. Continuous variables were tested using analysis of variance. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of RT schedule prescribed. Results: A total of 117 patients received 121 courses of palliative thoracic RT. The most common dose (20 Gy/5) comprised 65% of courses in 1999, 68% in 2003, and 60% in 2005–2006 (p = 0.76). The next most common dose was 30 Gy/10 (13%). Overall, the median survival was 14.9 months, independent of RT schedule (p = 0.68). Multivariate analysis indicated palliative chemotherapy and certification year of RO were significant predictors of prescription of 20 Gy/5. Conclusion: RT schedule for palliation of intrathoracic symptoms did not mirror the results of sequential, conflicting RCTs, suggesting that factors other than the literature influenced practice patterns in palliative thoracic RT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]