Search

Background: To evaluate predictive factors for survival outcomes after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. Material and methods: In the years 2003–2008, 324 patients have received postoperative radiotherapy a median time of 14 months after radical prostatectomy. All patients have been treated up to 66.0–66.6 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions. Predictive factors were analyzed at two stages, using a multivariable Cox regression analysis: (1) based on factors known before radiotherapy and (2) based on prostate-specific antigen response after radiotherapy. Results: Median follow-up after radiotherapy was 121 months. Prostate-specific antigen before radiotherapy, pN1 and Gleason score remained predictive factors for disease-free (hazard ratio, HR of 6.0, 2.3 and 2.5) and overall survival (HR of 2.8, 2.0 and 1.6) in multivariable analysis. Prostate-specific antigen levels increased despite radiotherapy in 27% of patients in the first six months. Failed response following salvage radiotherapy and prostate-specific antigen doubling time at the time of biochemical recurrence were predictive factors for disease-free (HR of 2.8 and 7.3; p <.01) and overall survival (HR of 2.2 and 2.6; p <.01). Conclusion: To reach the best survival outcomes following prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy should be initiated early with low prostate-specific antigen levels, especially in patients with higher Gleason scores. Patients not responding to radiotherapy and/or patients with a short prostate-specific antigen doubling time after radiotherapy are candidates for early additional treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To analyze long-term quality-of-life (QoL) changes related to postoperative radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy.Methods and Materials: Patients who received postoperative 3-dimensional conformal RT in the years 2003 to 2008 with 1.8 to 2.0 Gy fractions up to 66.0 to 66.6 Gy (n = 181) were surveyed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire before the beginning of RT (A); on the last day (B); and 2 months (C), 1 to 3 years (D), 6 to 9 years (E), and 10 to 13 years (F) after RT.Results: Mean urinary bother, urinary incontinence bother, and bowel bother score changes (in relation to baseline at time A) of 13, 14, and 7 and 14, 15, and 7 were found at times E and F, respectively (P < .01 for all comparisons). Sexual function scores decreased 6 and 8 points on average (P < .01). Patient age at the time of RT had a considerable impact on urinary bother and urinary incontinence bother, with increasing differences over time when comparing patients aged <68 versus ≥68 years: 0 versus 7 and 0 versus 7 points at time D and 8 versus 23 and 6 versus 35 points at time F, respectively. Patients who did not respond to RT with a decreasing prostate-specific antigen level had greater urinary and urinary incontinence bother and bowel bother score changes >10 years after treatment (25 vs 12; P = .04, 36 vs 10; P = .03, and 20 vs 5; P = .07, respectively). A higher rectal dose was associated with greater acute and long-term bowel bother score decrease. No correlation was found between the dose to the bladder and QoL changes.Conclusions: In contrast to early evaluations in the first years, significantly decreasing QoL in the urinary, bowel, and sexual domains was found >5 years after RT. Aging is likely to be a major factor. Younger patients who responded to the treatment had the most favorable long-term QoL results. As 3-dimensional conformal RT was used in this study, intensity modulated concepts could result in improved outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate quality-of-life changes up to 10 years following three different radiotherapy concepts. Methods and Materials In the years 2000–2003, 295 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 135; 70.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions), low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT with I-125; n = 94; 145 Gy), and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT with Ir-192; n = 66; 18 Gy in two fractions using 4–6 needles) as a boost to EBRT (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions). Quality of life was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at median time of 2, 6, and 10 years after treatment. Results The urinary function score 2 years after EBRT (mean 93 points) was significantly higher in comparison to HDR-BT + EBRT (80 points, higher doses to the urethra relevant) and LDR-BT (88 points). After 10 years, only HDR-BT + EBRT (75 points) remained worse (LDR-BT 92 points; EBRT 91 points). Urinary incontinence score decreased from 83 to 76 points in the HDR-BT + EBRT group. No significant differences or changes resulted in the bowel domain. The mean sexual function score (i.e., sexuality score) was significantly higher after LDR-BT versus HDR-BT + EBRT and EBRT (30 vs. 19 and 24 points after 2 years and 25 vs. 13 and 15 points after 10 years, respectively)—a lower patient age and a lower percentage with hormonal treatment need to be considered. Conclusion Apart from decreasing sexual function for all patients, decreasing urinary scores were found in the HDR-BT + EBRT group predominantly as a result of increasing incontinence. This study demonstrates the need for optimum BT treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate quality of life changes up to 5 years after prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) with a hydrogel spacer.Methods and Materials: In the years 2010 to 2011, 114 patients received external beam radiation therapy to the prostate; 54 patients were selected for a hydrogel injection before the beginning of RT. Treatment was performed applying fractions of 2 Gy up to a total dose of 76 Gy (n=96) or 78 Gy (n=18, all with hydrogel). Patients were surveyed before RT; at the last day of RT; and a median time of 2 months, 17 months, and 63 months after RT using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). A mean score change of >5 points was defined as clinically relevant.Results: For patients treated with a hydrogel spacer, mean bowel function and bother score changes of >5 points in comparison with baseline levels were found only at the end of RT (10-15 points; P<.01). No spacer patient reported moderate or big problems with his bowel habits overall. Mean bother score changes of 21 points at the end of RT, 8 points at 2 months, 7 points at 17 months, and 6 points at 63 months after RT were found for patients treated without a spacer. A bowel bother score change >10 points was found in 6% versus 32% (P<.01) at 17 months and in 5% versus 14% (P=.2) at 63 months with versus without a spacer.Conclusions: The first 5-year quality of life results in a group of prostate cancer patients treated with a hydrogel spacer demonstrate excellent treatment tolerability, in particular regarding bowel problems. Further studies with dose-escalated or re-irradiation concepts can be encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]