1. Clinical Implementation of a Model-Based In Vivo Dose Verification System for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy-Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatments Using the Electronic Portal Imaging Device.
- Author
-
McCowan PM, Asuni G, Van Uytven E, VanBeek T, McCurdy BM, Loewen SK, Ahmed N, Bashir B, Butler JB, Chowdhury A, Dubey A, Leylek A, and Nashed M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Computer Simulation, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Neoplasms diagnosis, Neoplasms physiopathology, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted instrumentation, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiometry instrumentation, Radiosurgery instrumentation, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated instrumentation, X-Ray Intensifying Screens
- Abstract
Purpose: To report findings from an in vivo dosimetry program implemented for all stereotactic body radiation therapy patients over a 31-month period and discuss the value and challenges of utilizing in vivo electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry clinically., Methods and Materials: From December 2013 to July 2016, 117 stereotactic body radiation therapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy patients (100 lung, 15 spine, and 2 liver) underwent 602 EPID-based in vivo dose verification events. A developed model-based dose reconstruction algorithm calculates the 3-dimensional dose distribution to the patient by back-projecting the primary fluence measured by the EPID during treatment. The EPID frame-averaging was optimized in June 2015. For each treatment, a 3%/3-mm γ comparison between our EPID-derived dose and the Eclipse AcurosXB-predicted dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and the ≥20% isodose volume were performed. Alert levels were defined as γ pass rates <85% (lung and liver) and <80% (spine). Investigations were carried out for all fractions exceeding the alert level and were classified as follows: EPID-related, algorithmic, patient setup, anatomic change, or unknown/unidentified errors., Results: The percentages of fractions exceeding the alert levels were 22.6% for lung before frame-average optimization and 8.0% for lung, 20.0% for spine, and 10.0% for liver after frame-average optimization. Overall, mean (± standard deviation) planning target volume γ pass rates were 90.7% ± 9.2%, 87.0% ± 9.3%, and 91.2% ± 3.4% for the lung, spine, and liver patients, respectively., Conclusions: Results from the clinical implementation of our model-based in vivo dose verification method using on-treatment EPID images is reported. The method is demonstrated to be valuable for routine clinical use for verifying delivered dose as well as for detecting errors., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF