Search

The aim of the study was to report the clinical results in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the prostate area. A total of 110 patients entered our study, 37 patients presented with localized prostate cancer and radiological evidence of node metastases or ≥15% estimated risk of lymph node (LN) involvement, while 73 patients underwent postoperative adjuvant or salvage irradiation for biochemical or residual/recurrent disease, LN metastases, or high risk of harboring nodal metastases. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2 years. The median follow-up was 56.5 months. For the whole patient group, the 3- and 5-year freedom from biochemical failure were 82.6% and 74.6%, respectively, with a better outcome in patients treated with radical approach. The 3- and 5-year freedom from local failure were 94.4% and 90.2%, respectively, while the 3- and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival were 87.8% and 81.7%, respectively. For all study patients, the rate of freedom from G2 acute rectal, intestinal, and urinary toxicities was 60%, 77%, and 61%, respectively. There was no G3 acute toxicity, ≥G2 late intestinal toxicity, or G3 late urinary or rectal toxicity. The 3- and 5-year ≥G2 freedom from late rectal toxicity rate were 98% and 95%, respectively, while the 3- and 5-year ≥G2 freedom from late urinary toxicity rate were 95% and 88%, respectively. The study concludes that pelvic IMRT and SIB to the prostatic area in association with 2-year ADT was a well-tolerated technique, providing high disease control in patients with prostate cancer requiring LN treatment., (© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To quantify the changes in dose as well as in the prediction of parotid gland toxicity due to anatomical changes during therapy of head and neck cancer patients., Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with advanced locoregional head and neck cancer, with no evidence of distant metastasis, were enrolled in a prospective study. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Multiple computed tomography scans were repeated at the end of each treatment week. The original treatment plans were copied to the per-treatment scans to create hybrid plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated assuming the end point to be grade ≥3 xerostomia according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity scale., Results: The gross tumour volume dose coverage was slightly affected by the anatomical changes, whereas the mean dose (D(mean)) to the parotids changed from 26.1 ± 6.0 to 27.4 ± 7.4 Gy, with a mean increase of 0.22 Gy/treatment week. Consequently, the mean NTCP increased from 0.15 ± 0.06 to 0.18 ± 0.10, primarily due to a few patients exhibiting a marked increase. The absolute gross tumour volume shrinkage and the percentage parotids shrinkage were the best independent predictors for the NTCP variations., Conclusions: On average, the increase in the parotids D(mean) as well as in NTCP during treatment is limited, and the observed variations were strongly patient-dependent., (Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare 5-field and 7-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques in terms of xerostomia and related quality of life in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer., Methods: Eight and 23 patients were treated with 5-field (group I) and 7-field (group II) techniques, respectively. The xerostomia was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale, stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow (SSF/USF), and xerostomia-related questionnaires (XQs). The assessments were done before and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after radiotherapy., Results: The mean parotid dose was 45.7 Gy and 29.9 Gy and the ≥G3 toxicity at 24 months was 25% and 19% in group I and II, respectively. Sixty-three percent and 93% of patients recovered at least 25% of SSF pretherapy values. The XQ scores of both groups improved over time but more so in group II., Conclusion: The 7-field technique decreases the mean parotid dose, reducing xerostomia assessed by the RTOG/XQ score., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: To investigate dose-volume effects of salivary flow and the functional recovery over time, using salivary function data and different models of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)., Methods and Materials: A total of 59 patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were analyzed in the present study. The toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale and salivary flows, both unstimulated (USF) and stimulated (SSF). The assessments were done before radiotherapy (RT) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT. Grade 3 toxicity was the primary endpoint. Analyses of toxicity incidence at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT were performed by both the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) and relative seriality (S) models., Results: A significant correlation was found between the incidence of Grade 3 toxicity and the incidence of patients with a reduction in SSF to <25% of the pre-RT value. Better correlations resulted between the RTOG toxicity score and the dosimetric parameters, compared with USF/SSF. The TD(50), assessed by the LKB model, was 21.4, 27.8, and 41.6 Gy at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT, respectively. The TD(50), assessed by the S model, was 20.0, 26.3, and 40.0 Gy at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT, respectively., Conclusion: Recovery of salivary gland function vs. time after RT took place mostly within 1 year after RT. The RTOG Grade 3 was a reliable score to perform the NTCP modeling. The choice of NTCP model had no influence on the accuracy of predictions.

Purpose: The aim of this work is to report a retrospective study of radiobiological indicators based on Dose-Volume Histograms analysis obtained by stereotactic radiotherapy treatments., Methods and Materials: Fifty-five patients for a total of sixty-seven brain metastases with a mean target volume of 8.49 cc were treated by Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy (DCAT) and Intensity-Modulated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (IMRST). The Delivered prescription dose was chosen on the basis of tumor size and location so as to ensure a 100% isodose coverage to the target volume., Results: The treatment plans reported a mean value of 10% and 2.19% for the inhomogeneity and conformal index, respectively. The F factor showed we overdosed sixty-three patients delivering an additional 7% dose more than calculated values. The radiobiological parameters: TCP and NTCP showed a complete tumor control limiting the organs at risk damage., Conclusion: One goal of stereotactic radiotherapy is to design a treatment plan in which the steep dose gradient achievable minimizes the amount of radiation delivered outside the tumor region. This technique allows to deliver a much larger dose to the target without exceeding the radiation-related tolerance of normal tissues and improving patients' quality of life.

Background and Purpose: To report the treatment-related morbidity in patients with prostate cancer treated with an optimized pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate/prostate bed., Materials and Methods: Between November 2003 and May 2006, 55 patients with localized prostate cancer and >15% risk of lymph node involvement were treated with pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area. Twenty-four patients received a radical radiation therapy program, and the remaining thirty-one patients received a postoperative irradiation as adjuvant treatment or after biochemical or macroscopic local/regional relapse. After a customized immobilization all patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT. On the CT slices CTV1 and CTV2 were delineated. CTV(1) included the prostate and seminal vesicles or prostate bed. CTV(2) consisted of CTV(1) plus pelvic nodes. CTV(1) and CTV(2) were then expanded by 0.5 and 1cm, respectively, to generate the planning target volumes. IMRT treatment plans were generated using commercial inverse planning software. Total doses of 66-80 Gy and 50-59 Gy in 33-40 fractions were prescribed to the prostate area and pelvis, respectively. The worst acute and late rectal, intestinal and GU toxicities during and after treatment were scored according to the EORTC/RTOG scales., Results: The IMRT dose distribution provided excellent PTV coverage and satisfying sparing of all the organs at risk, with no patient experiencing >grade 2 acute or late toxicities. Patients without acute grade 2 intestinal, rectal, and GU toxicity were 91%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range of 9 to 28 months), late grade 2 toxicity was detected only for rectum, with an actuarial 2-year rate of freedom from G2 rectal bleeding of 92%. (CI 95% 0.83-0.99.), Conclusions: Pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area is a well-tolerated technique in patients with prostate cancer requiring treatment of pelvic lymph nodes, and seems to be associated with a lower frequency and severity of side effects when compared with conventional techniques reported in other series.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (1) is an advanced form of 3-D conformal radiotherapy. It uses non uniform spatial modifications in the intensity of the beams across the irradiated field. Consequently, it is necessary to develop sophisticated tools to compare measured and calculated dose distributions in order to verify the accuracy of the results of the planned dose distribution. Different methods have been developed to evaluate the accordance between measured and calculated doses, such as the point-to-point dose difference or the evaluation of the distance between two closed points having the same dose value (2-4). The verification method proposed by Low (5-7) seems to be more complete since it takes into account both the dose difference (DD) and the distance to agreement (DTA), allowing to define a "score", the gamma value, at each point of interest. A software tool (DDE: Dose Distribution Evaluator), based on Low's method, to evaluate the agreement between dose distribution matrices has been implemented. In particular, the proposed gamma curve, as a function of the isodose levels, gives real-time information useful for decision making about the treatment plan. The paper describes the software, and reports the obtained results in a simple geometry and in several clinical cases (head-neck and prostate). Comparison between measured data (film and MapCheck) and calculated data (CadPlan) using DDE has shown very good agreements. Thanks to its higher resolution, film dosimetry showed better accuracy than the MapCheck technique. Similar results can be obtained also with the MapCheck technique when proper measurement methods are used.

Purpose: To assess the influence of setup errors and organ motion in terms of the probability of tumor control and normal-tissue complications by tumor control probability and normal-tissue complication probability., Methods and Materials: Twelve patients were treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Two orthogonal portal images were taken daily. All patients underwent three computed tomography scans during the 8-week treatment time (i.e., baseline, intermediate, and final). The original treatment plans were re-evaluated, taking into account setup errors and organ motion., Results: The mean shifts +/- standard deviation of the whole patient population in the lateral, anterior-posterior, and craniocaudal direction were 1.0 +/- 1.5 mm, 0.9 +/- 2.1 mm, and 1.9 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively. In most of the recalculated dose-volume histograms, the coverage of clinical target volume was granted despite organ motion, whereas the rectal wall histograms were often very different from the planned ones., Conclusion: We have studied the impact of prostate and rectum motion, as well as setup errors, on dose-volume histograms. The estimate of these effects may have implications for predictive indications when planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments on prostate.