1. Stereotactic radiotherapy for wet age-related macular degeneration (INTREPID): influence of baseline characteristics on clinical response.
- Author
-
Jackson TL, Shusterman EM, Arnoldussen M, Chell E, Wang K, and Moshfeghi DM
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiogenesis Inhibitors therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Intravitreal Injections, Male, Middle Aged, Ranibizumab, Treatment Failure, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A antagonists & inhibitors, Visual Acuity physiology, Wet Macular Degeneration drug therapy, Wet Macular Degeneration pathology, Radiosurgery methods, Wet Macular Degeneration surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: To determine which patients respond best to stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration., Methods: Participants (n = 230) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration enrolled in a randomized, double-masked sham-controlled trial comparing 16 Gray, 24 Gray, or Sham SRT. In a post hoc analysis, participants were grouped according to their baseline characteristics, to determine if these influenced SRT efficacy., Results: At 52 weeks, SRT was most effective for lesions ≤4 mm in greatest linear dimension and with a macular volume greater than the median value of 7.4 mm. For 26% of the participants with both these characteristics, SRT resulted in 55% fewer ranibizumab injections (2.08 vs. 4.60; P = 0.0002), a mean visual acuity change that was 5.33 letters superior to sham (+2.18 vs. -3.15 letters; P = 0.0284), and a 71.1-μm greater reduction in mean central subfield thickness (-122.6 vs. -51.5 μm; P = 0.027). Other features associated with a positive response to SRT included pigment epithelial detachment and the absence of fibrosis., Conclusion: Stereotactic radiotherapy is most effective for neovascular age-related macular degeneration lesions that are actively leaking at the time of treatment, and no larger than the 4-mm treatment zone.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF