Search

Purpose: ARTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03449719) is a multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)., Materials and Methods: All patients were affected by oligometastatic CRPC as defined as three or less nonvisceral metastatic lesions. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either AAP alone (control arm) or AAP with concomitant SBRT to all the sites of disease (experimental arm). Primary end point was the rate of biochemical response (BR), defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50% from baseline measured at 6 months from treatment start. Complete BR (CBR), defined as PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 months from treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points., Results: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2022. BR was detected in 79.6% of patients (92% v 68.3% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.34 (95% CI, 2.05 to 13.88; P = .001) in favor of the experimental arm. CBR was detected in 38.8% of patients (56% v 23.2% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an OR of 4.22 (95% CI, 2.12 to 8.38; P < .001). SBRT yielded a significant PFS improvement, with a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.57; P < .001) in the experimental versus control arm., Conclusion: The trial reached its primary end point of biochemical control and PFS, suggesting a clinical advantage for SBRT in addition to first-line AAP treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Background: M1a disease represents an intermediate status between loco-regional relapse and bone metastatic disease. Metastasis directed therapy (MDT), through stereotactic body RT (SBRT) may be offered to patients, aiming to exclusively treat sites of macroscopic relapse and avoiding wide prophylactic treatment volumes. This appears as a viable treatment, especially after the rise of PSMA tailored treatment approaches., Materials and Methods: Data about patients treated in two different institutions were retrieved from a prospectively collected dataset. All included patients were affected by oligo-recurrent M1a disease after definitive RT or radical prostatectomy, defined as ≤ 3 nodal lesions situated above aortic bifurcation and below renal arteries. Both castration resistant PCa (CRPC) and castration sensitive (CSPC) PCa patients were included. All imaging methods were allowed to detect recurrence (CT scan, Choline or PSMA PET/CT).All sites of recurrences were treated with SBRT., Results: Median PFS was 10 months (95% CI 8-17). Twelve patients died, with a median OS of 114 months (95% CI 85-114). Out of the 83 recurrences, 2 (2.4%), 11 (13.25%), 36 (43.37%) and 15 (18%) patients had respectively prostate bed only, pelvic nodal, para-aortic or distant relapse. Furthermore, 19 (22.9%) patients experienced a biochemical only relapse with negative imaging at re-staging., Discussion: MDT conferred a remarkable PFS outcome in a mixed cohort of CSPC and CRPC patients with m1a disease, with an optimal safety profile. Prospective trials are needed in order to compare MDT and ENRT for these patients, allowing to select the best treatment option., (© 2023. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.)

Background: Improvements in radiation delivery and systemic therapies have resulted in few remaining indications for palliative whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Most centers preferentially use stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and reserve WBRT for those with >15 lesions, leptomeningeal presentation, rapidly progressive disease, or limited estimated survival. Despite regional differences among preferred dose, fractionation, and treatment technique, we predict survival post-WBRT will remain poor-indicating appropriate application of WBRT in this era of SRT and improved systemic therapies., Methods: A multi-center, international retrospective analysis of patients receiving WBRT in 2022 was performed. Primary end point was survival after WBRT. De-identified data were analyzed centrally. Patients receiving WBRT as part of a curative regimen, prophylactically, or as bridging therapy were excluded. The collected data consisted of patient parameters including prescription dose and fractionation, use of neurocognitive sparing techniques and survival after WBRT. Survival was calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Of 29,943 international RT prescriptions written at ten participating centers in 2022, 462 (1.5%) were for palliative WBRT. Participating centers were in the United States (n=138), the United Kingdom (n=111), Hong Kong (n=72), Italy (n=49), Belgium (n=45), Germany (n=27), Ghana (n=15), and Cyprus (n=5). Twenty-six different dose regimens were used. The most common prescriptions were for 3,000 cGy over 10 fractions (45.0%) and 2,000 cGy over 5 fractions (43.5%) with significant regional preferences (P<0.001). Prior SRT was delivered in 32 patients (6.7%), hippocampal avoidance (HA) was used in 44 patients (9.5%), and memantine was prescribed in 93 patients (20.1%). Survival ranged from 0 days to still surviving at 402 days post-treatment. The global median overall survival (OS) was 84 days after WBRT [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.0-104.0]. Actuarial survival at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were 95%, 78%, 48%, and 32%, respectively. Twenty-seven patients (5.8%) were unable to complete their prescribed WBRT., Conclusions: This moment-in-time analysis confirms that patients with poor expected survival are being appropriately selected for WBRT-illustrating the dwindling indications for WBRT-and demonstrates the variance in global practice. Since poor survival precludes patients from deriving benefit, memantine and HA are best suited in carefully selected cases.

Purpose: To explore the benefit yielded by radiotherapy (RT), we report a series of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with concomitant RT plus Nivolumab., Methods/patients: Patients undergoing Nivolumab treatment plus concomitant RT (ablative or palliative) were included. RT was defined Ablative if >5 Gy/fraction were delivered., Results: Ablative RT intent was the only independent predictor of both progression free and overall survival (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.6-7.5, p = 0.0012 and HR 2.8, 95% CI 0.99-8.07, p = 0.05, respectively)., Conclusion: Ablative RT may improve oncologic outcomes in selected patients with metastatic RCC treated with Nivolumab as compared to palliative RT., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Since the first definition by Hellman and Weichselbaum in 1995, the concept of OligoMetastatic Disease (OMD) is a growing oncology field. It was hypothesized that OMD is a clinical temporal window between localized primary tumor and widespread metastases deserving of potentially curative treatment. In real-world clinical practice, OMD is a "spectrum of disease" that includes a highly heterogeneous population of patients with different prognosis. Metastasis directed therapy with local ablative treatment have proved to be a valid alternative to surgical approach. Stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrated high local control rate and increased survival outcomes in this setting with a low rate of toxicity. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding many clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic aspects of this disease entity. In this review, we try to summarize the major critical features that could drive radiation oncologists toward a better selection of patients, treatments, and study endpoints. With the help of a set of practical questions, we aim to integrate the literature discussion., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: ARTO trial was designed to evaluate the difference in terms of outcomes between patients affected by oligo metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with Abiraterone acetate and randomized to receive or not SBRT on all sites of disease. Here, we present a preliminary analysis conducted on patients enrolled at promoting institution., Objective: To present a preliminary overview about population features, clinical outcomes, adverse events, quality of life and explorative translational research., Design, Setting, and Participants: ARTO (NCT03449719) is a phase II trial including patients affected by oligo mCRPC, randomized to receive standard of care (GnRH agonist or antagonist plus abiraterone acetate 1000 mg and oral prednisone 10 mg daily) with or without SBRT on all metastatic sites of disease. All subjects have < 3 bone or nodal metastases. All patients are treated in I line mCRPC setting, no previous lines of treatment for mCRPC are allowed., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Data about a mono-centric cohort of 42 patients enrolled are presented in the current analysis, with focus on baseline population features, PSA drop at 3 months, biochemical response, and quality of life outcomes. Descriptive statistics regarding translational research are also presented., Results and Limitation: Significant difference in terms of PSA drop at three months was not detected (p = 0.68). Biochemical response (PSA reduction > 50%) was reported in 73.7 versus 76.5% of patients in control vs SBRT arm, respectively (p = 0.84). All patients are alive. Progression occurred in 1 versus 0 patients in the control versus SBRT arm, respectively. After 3 months, an average decrease of 13 points in terms of Global Health Score was reported for the overall population. However, complete recovery was noticed at 6 months. Circulating tumor cells detection rate was 40%., Conclusions: SBRT + Abiraterone treatment was safe and well tolerated, non-significant trend in terms of PSA drop and biochemical response at 3 months was detected in SBRT arm. Interestingly, CTCs detection in this selected cohort of oligo-mCRPC was lower if compared to historical data of unselected mCRPC patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Aims: Currently, when nodal pelvic oligorecurrent disease is detected, no standard treatment option is recommended. One possible salvage option is nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here we analysed recurrence patterns after nodal SBRT in patients affected by pelvic oligometastatic relapse after radical prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival in this population., Materials and Methods: Data on 93 patients consecutively treated in five different institutions for pelvic oligorecurrent disease were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and imaging showing three or fewer metachronous lymphoadenopathies under aortic bifurcation. Patients underwent SBRT on all sites of disease. Concomitant ADT was allowed., Results: After a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range 11-41), 57 patients had post-SBRT radiological evidence of relapse, for a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months (95% confidence interval 9-24). Concomitant ADT was administered in 20 patients (21.5%). Overall, eight (8.6%), 21 (22.6%) and 28 (30.1%) patients had prostate bed only, pelvic nodal or distant relapse, respectively. The median ADT-free survival was not reached. Concomitant ADT, International Society for Urologic Pathology pattern at diagnosis < or ≥3, time to relapse ≤ or >12 months, prostate-specific antigen at recurrence < or ≥1.10 ng/ml and prostate-specific membrane antigen staging were not significantly associated with DFS. After relapse, 42 patients (45.2%) received a second SBRT course., Conclusion: Nodal SBRT yielded encouraging DFS and ADT-free survival in this population. Only a minority of patients developed prostate bed recurrence, suggesting that local treatment may be safely avoided. A consistent percentage of patients could be managed with a second SBRT course., (Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: In 2018, we published early results from a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after previous radiotherapy with definitive or postoperative intent. We sought to provide extended follow-up of this cohort to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach in a real-world scenario., Materials and Methods: Fifty patients affected by local relapse after previous definitive or postoperative radiotherapy were treated with SBRT. Treatment provided a total dose of 30 Gy in five fractions. Data about biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS), together with adverse events, were analysed. Toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) score v.4.03., Results: After a median follow-up of 48.2 months, the median BRFS was 43 months. A Gleason score >7 and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy were shown to be predictors of the worst BRFS (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.41, P = 0.02; hazard ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.17-6.8, P = 0.02, respectively). The median MFS was not reached; concomitant androgen deprivation therapy was confirmed to be predictive of the worst MFS (hazard ratio 4.75, 95% confidence interval 1.52-14.8, P = 0.007). Late grade 1 and 2 rectal and bladder toxicity occurred in three (6%) and 13 (26%) patients, respectively. One patient experienced both grade 3 acute and chronic bladder toxicity., Conclusion: Salvage SBRT re-irradiation after previous postoperative or definitive radiotherapy for local prostate cancer recurrence confirmed promising results in terms of oncological outcomes and the safety of this approach., (Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients may benefit from local ablative treatments due to modest efficacy of systemic chemotherapy. However, use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial because of presumed radioresistance of STS., Methods: Patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive metastatic STS were retrospectively reviewed to assess results in terms of local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Incidence and grade of adverse events were reported. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables correlated with outcome and toxicity., Results: Forty patients were treated with SBRT to a median biologic effective dose (BED) of 105 (66-305) Gy5 to 77 metastases. Two-year LC, DFS, and OS were 67%, 23%, and 40%. Improved LC was shown in patients receiving a BED >150 Gy5 (hazard ratio [HR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-9.7; P = 0.028). A delay >24 months between primary tumor diagnosis and onset of metastases was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96; P = 0.01) and OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.99; P = 0.03). No toxicity grade ≥3 was observed., Conclusions: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is effective in metastatic STS with a benign toxicity profile. A BED >150 Gy5 is required to maximize tumor control rates. Metastatic relapse >24 months after diagnosis is correlated to improved survival., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To define efficacy and toxicity of Immunotherapy (IT) with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) including radiosurgery (RS) or hypofractionated SRT (HFSRT) for brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a multicentric retrospective study from AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology)., Methods: NSCLC patients with BM receiving SRT + IT and treated in 19 Italian centers were analyzed and compared with a control group of patients treated with exclusive SRT., Results: One hundred patients treated with SRT + IT and 50 patients treated with SRT-alone were included. Patients receiving SRT + IT had a longer intracranial Local Progression-Free Survival (iLPFS) (propensity score-adjusted P = .007). Among patients who, at the diagnosis of BM, received IT and had also extracranial progression (n = 24), IT administration after SRT was shown to be related to a better overall survival (OS) (P = .037). A multivariate analysis, non-adenocarcinoma histology, KPS = 70 and use of HFSRT were associated with a significantly worse survival (P = .019, P = .017 and P = .007 respectively). Time interval between SRT and IT ≤7 days (n = 90) was shown to be related to a longer OS if compared to SRT-IT interval >7 days (n = 10) (propensity score-adjusted P = .008). The combined treatment was well tolerated. No significant difference in terms of radionecrosis between SRT + IT patients and SRT-alone patients was observed. The time interval between SRT and IT had no impact on the toxicity rate., Conclusions: Combined SRT + IT was a safe approach, associated with a better iLPFS if compared to exclusive SRT., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Recent findings from literature evidenced that metastatic prostate cancer often shows heterogeneous response to therapy, with persistent sensibility to systemic treatments after biochemical, clinical, or radiographic progression. This highlights the advantage of integrated approaches in which local ablative treatments (e.g., stereotactic body radiation therapy) could prolong clinical benefit of systemic therapies beyond oligo-progression. Of course, development of predictive biomarker could be helpful in order to select patients who could much benefit from this treatment strategy. Circulating tumor cell detection and analysis could also have a crucial role in this field. A joint effort of two prospective ongoing trials (ARTO, clinical.gov identifier NCT03449719 and PRIMERA, clinical.gov identifier NCT04188275) might help to improve criteria to select patients in whom a local ablative approach might confer significant benefit. In this commentary, we summarized recent data from literature to support this thesis.

Aim: Aim of this analysis is to review the role of RT in the management of several rare tumors for adult patients., Methods: Collection data regarding RT and rare tumors was made by Pubmed., Results: For mucosal melanomas, RT is prescribed, being associated with lower local recurrence rate. For trachea tumors, RT was used as adjuvant or salvage treatment for unresectable disease. For pNET, RT can be a suitable option for post-surgical or unresectable/borderline. For bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors the role of adjuvant treatments is uncertain. For hepatobiliary and ovarian malignancy, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a promising approach. For soft tissue sarcoma, perioperative treatments are indicated, and a growing role of SBRT in oligometastatic disease is recognized. For endocrine tumors, adjuvant RT has demonstrated benefits through reducing recurrence risk., Conclusion: The radiotherapy is a frequent indication in adult rare cancers; thus the role of Radiation Oncologist must not be neglected., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We retrospectively analyzed data from records of 48 patients (48 eyes) treated with gamma-knife (n = 18) or Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy (n = 30) for uveal melanoma, in our Ocular Oncology Unit between December 2013 and September 2019, with the aim to evaluate treatment outcomes, and incidence and risk factors for secondary glaucoma. Patients demographics and tumor characteristics at diagnosis were recorded. Follow-up data were collected regarding local tumor control, treatment complications, enucleation need, metastases occurrence and survival status. The median follow-up period was 33.7 months in the gamma-knife group and 26.2 months in the brachytherapy group. The mean tumor thickness, the largest basal diameter and the tumor volume were significantly higher in the gamma-knife group than in the brachytherapy group. The local tumor control rate was 100% in the brachytherapy group and 77.8% in the gamma-knife group. In the gamma-knife group, six patients were enucleated, no patient treated with brachytherapy underwent enucleation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% in the brachytherapy group and 94.44% in the gamma-knife group. Secondary glaucoma occurred in 10 patients after gamma-knife and in one patient after brachytherapy: it should be emphasized that larger lesions were treated with gamma-knife, whereas smaller tumors were selected for brachytherapy. We found a significative correlation of tumor thickness (P value = 0.043) and volume (P value = 0.040) with secondary glaucoma occurrence after gamma-knife treatment. Moreover, secondary glaucoma significantly correlated with radiation retinopathy in the gamma-knife group (P value = 0.009). This study shows preliminary clinical results that could be useful for further studies with more patients and longer follow-up., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Older patients with brain metastases (BM) are often excluded from clinical trials. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcomes following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in young old (65-74 years) and very old (≥75 years) patients with BM., Methods: Between October 2012 and October 2018, we treated 89 patients aged ≥65 years with GKRS. Patients were divided in two group: young old (YO) and very old (VO) patients. At baseline G8, Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) and Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBM) were assessed for all patients. Survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Cox regression model was used to investigate the influence of significant factors on KM., Results: Median age at the time of GKRS was 72.2 years (range 65-87). A mean of 2.52 lesions were treated per patient (range 1-14). Median overall survival (OS) for YO and VO patients was 14.2 and 15.7 months, respectively. At univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in OS between the two age groups. A high BSBM (p ≤ .0001) and a high DS-GPA score (p = .0069) were associated with longer survival. A low DS-GPA score was the most powerful independent factor for predicting short survival (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.25-2.46, p = .001) at multivariate analysis., Conclusion: GKRS is a safe approach to treat BM in elderly patients. DS-GPA score represents an important prognostic factor for survival in elderly patients undergoing GKRS., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Local failure (LF) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) may be treated with a second course of SRS (SRS2), though this procedure may increase the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis (RN)., Methods: A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA to identify studies reporting LF, overall survival (OS) and RN rates following SRS2. Meta-analysis was performed to identify predictors of RN., Results: Analysis included 11 studies (335 patients,389 metastases). Pooled 1-year LF was 24 %(CI95 % 19-30 %): heterogeneity was acceptable (I2 = 21.4 %). Median pooled OS was 14 months (Confidence Interval 95 %, CI95 % 8.8-22.0 months). Cumulative crude RN rate was 13 % (95 %CI 8 %-19 %), with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 = 40.3 %). Subgroup analysis showed higher RN incidence in studies with median patient age ≥59 years (13 % [95 %CI 8 %-19 %] vs 7 %[95 %CI 3 %-12 %], p = 0.004) and lower incidence following prior Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT, 19 %[95 %CI 13 %-25 %] vs 7%[95 %CI 3 %-13 %], p = 0.004)., Conclusions: SRS2 is an effective strategy for in-site recurrence of BM previously treated with SRS., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Non-surgical locally ablative treatments for primary liver cancer and liver metastases represent an effective therapeutic choice when surgery cannot be performed or is not indicated. Thermal ablative employing electric currents or electromagnetic fields have historically played an important role in this setting. Radiotherapy, in the last decades, due to a series of important technological development, has become an attractive option for the treatment of liver tumours, especially with the introduction of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Published literature so far evidenced both for radiotherapy and thermal ablative techniques a benefit in terms of local control and other oncological outcomes; however, no direct prospective comparison between the two techniques have been published so far. The aim of this review is to summarize the technical and clinical implications of these treatment modalities and to identify criteria to allocate patients to one or another option in consideration of the expected efficacy. The main features and critical aspects of both thermoablative techniques and external beam radiation will also be covered in the present paper.

Purpose: To report on the safety and clinical benefit of robotic stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: Robotic SBRT was applied to oligometastatic CRC patients, defined as having 1-4 liver metastases and absent or controlled extrahepatic disease. The intended prescription dose was 37.5 Gy in three fractions. Treatment efficacy was estimated by clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was graded according to CTC-AE scale, v. 4.03. Regression analysis was performed to search for the presence of any predictive factors., Results: Between 2012 and 2017, 38 patients (66 lesions) were irradiated. The median delivered biological effective maximum dose (maxBED 10 ) was 142 Gy. At a median follow-up of 11.8 months (range 3.2-58.8), the 1- and 2-year OS were 67.3% and 44.1%, respectively. Actuarial LC rates for all patients at 6 and 12 months were 64.2% and 60.4%, respectively. Local or distant progression occurred in 28 (77.8%) patients, with a 1- and 2-year PFS of 19.3% and 12.2%, respectively. The CBR was 71.4%, with no significant association with maxBED 10 . At multivariate analysis, the presence of extrahepatic disease had a detrimental impact on PFS (HR 3.98, 95% CI 1.77-8.93; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.06-12.07; p < 0.04). No acute grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed., Conclusions: Our analysis underlines the importance of patients' selection to identify the oligometastatic scenario most likely to benefit from SBRT. Prospective studies are needed to further assess its role among locoregional treatment options for liver metastases from CRC.

Introduction: Orbital lesions are rare, but are likely to become symptomatic and can impact on patients' quality of life. Local control is often difficult to obtain, because of proximity to critical structures. CyberKnife stereotactic robotic radiotherapy could represent a viable treatment option., Materials and Methods: Data on patients treated for intraorbital lesions from solid malignancies were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent treatment with CyberKnife system. We analyzed local control, response rate, symptoms control, progression-free survival and overall survival, acute and late toxicity., Results: From January 2012 to May 2017, 20 treatments on 19 patients were performed, with dose ranging from 24 to 35 Gy in 1 to 5 fractions, prescribed at an average isodose line of 79.5% (range: 78-81). After a mean follow-up of 14.26 months (range: 0-58), overall response rate was 75%, with 2 and 4 patients presenting a partial and complete response, respectively. Mean time to best measured response was 15.16 months (range: 2-58). Thirteen patients were alive, with a local control rate of 79%. Mean time to local progression was 5 months (range: 3-7). Three patients reported improvement in symptoms after treatment. Mean planning target volume dose coverage was 97.2% (range: 93.5-99.7). Mean maximum dose (D max) to eye globe, optic nerve, optic chiasm, and lens was 2380.8 cGy (range: 290-3921), 1982.82 cGy (range: 777.3-2897.8), 713.14 cGy (range: 219.5-2273), and 867.9 cGy (range: 38-3118.5). Four patients presented acute toxicity., Conclusion: This current retrospective series demonstrated that CyberKnife robotic stereotactic radiotherapy is a feasible and tolerable approach for intraorbital lesions.

Urothelial cancer is one of the most common malignancies; after relapse or disease progression available therapeutic options are limited. We analyze efficacy and toxicity of local treatment on metastases using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligometastatic disease from urothelial cancer. A significant percentage of treated lesions achieved local control, with a promising overall response rate., Objectives: to analyze efficacy and toxicity of local treatment on metastases using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligometastatic disease from urothelial cancer., Materials and Methods: Data from clinical records of 19 patients treated in our institution since May 2011 to October 2017 with SBRT for oligometastatic/oligoprogressive urothelial carcinoma were retrospectively collected. Clinical outcomes in terms of local control (LC), response rate, symptoms control, progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS), and adverse events were analyzed and reported., Results: Nineteen patients were treated on 25 metastatic lesions; 5 of them received treatment on multiple sites. After an average follow up of 11.5 months, LC was achieved in 17 lesions (68%) and there was no local recurrence in lesions with complete or partial response. OS was 13.8 months. Adverse events were reported only in 3 patients (5 overall events). No late toxicity was reported., Conclusions: An approach consisting in SBRT for local treatment of oligometastatic or persistent disease can be effective and safe in selected patients. Prospective studies are needed, to find correct selection criteria and optimal dose and fractionation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by the delivery of high doses of ionizing radiation in few fractions. It is highly effective in achieving local control, and, due to the high biological effective dose administered, it seems to overcome the radioresistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thus, SBRT could constitute a treatment option for the management of localized RCC in patients who are not surgical candidates. In this paper, we report an overview about data from the current evidence about SBRT in patients affected by localized RCC., Materials and Methods: A non-systematic review was performed, including data from both retrospective and prospective studies focusing on the use of SBRT for localized RCC and its biological rationale. Furthermore, ongoing trials on this issue are reported., Conclusion: Currently, SBRT might be considered a treatment alternative in inoperable patients affected by primary RCC. Currently, dose-escalation to 48 Gy in 3-4 fractions are effective and well tolerated. Emerging role of immune therapies in RCC patients warrant further studies to explore interactions between SBRT and immune response., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (rSBRT) to local recurrences emerged as a valuable option for exclusive local failure after prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localised prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of rSBRT in patients experiencing locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior definitive or postoperative radiotherapy using the Cyberknife., Materials and Methods: Data from 50 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Local recurrence was assessed by 18F-choline positron emission tomography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging; a dose of 30 Gy was delivered in five fractions. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was assessed at 2 months, 6 months and every 4 months thereafter. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v.4.03., Results: All patients received prior EBRT. The median EQD2 total dose was 74 Gy (60-80 Gy). Eleven patients were receiving androgen deprivation after prior biochemical failure. At 6 months, 41 patients showed a median PSA decline of -77.1% (14.3-99.3%), whereas nine patients experienced a median PSA elevation of +58.7% (0-2300.0%). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was 80.0%. Impaired BRFS was correlated with the high-risk category at diagnosis (P = 0.014, hazard ratio 5.61) and ongoing androgen deprivation (P = 0.025, hazard ratio 2.98). Neither clinical variables nor dosimetric parameters were found to be predictive for toxicity., Conclusion: Focal rSBRT can achieve durable remission in locally relapsing patients and systemic treatment can be postponed with acceptable toxicity. Accurate patient selection is mandatory to maximise disease control., (Copyright © 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) emerged as a treatment option in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients experiencing lymph node relapse from treated prostate cancer. No recommendations are available concerning dose schedule, and available studies report the use of multiple-fraction regimens due to theoretical lower toxicity and higher cumulative dose delivered to the target. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a dose-intensive, single-fraction SBRT regimen., Patients and Methods: Retrospective data on outcome and toxicity from 27 treatments on 23 consecutive patients were collected. Statistical analysis was performed., Results: Median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-63, interquartile range 15-28). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 65%, 40%, and 26%, respectively. In 2 cases acute toxicity of grade 1 were observed., Conclusion: Single-fraction SBRT for lymph node relapse of oligometastatic prostate cancer resulted in promising biochemical control with minimal toxicity., (© 2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

Purpose: Radiosurgery (RS) is a well-established treatment in selected patients with brain metastasis. The aim of this study is to compare the differences between CyberKnife (CK) and TomoTherapy (HT) treatment plans of RS of single brain metastasis (BM) to define when HT should be used in cases beyond Cyberknife-when both systems are readily available for the radiation oncologist., Methods and Materials: Nineteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CK were re-planned for radiosurgery using TomoTherapy Hi-ART system. Two planning approaches have been used for TomoTherapy plans: the classical one (HT) and the improved conformity (icHT) that produces dose distributions more similar to those of RS plans. PTV coverage, Conformity Index (CI), Paddick Conformity Index (nCI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Gradient Index (GI), and beam on time of CK, HT, and icHT plans were evaluated and compared., Results: A good coverage was found for CK, HT, and icHT plans. A difference between mean HI of CK and icHT plans was observed (p = 0.007). Better dose gradients compared to both icHT and HT modalities were observed in CK plans. icHT modality showed improved mean CI respect to HT modality, similar to that obtained in CK plans., Conclusions: CK plans show higher conformity and lower GI than icHT and HT plans. TomoTherapy demonstrates the advantage of being a device capable to reach different clinical objectives depending on the different planning modality employed. CyberKnife and TomoTherapy are both optimal RS devices, the choice to use one over another has to be clinically guided.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) in the treatment of single and multiple brain metastases., Patients and Methods: From October 2012 to June 2014 106 patients were treated with Radiosurgery (RS) for brain metastases at University of Florence. 77 out of 106 patients had a radiological follow up and their data were analyzed. The target was defined as the enhancing lesion. The prescription dose was defined depending on tumor volume and tumor location. Each patient performed an MRI one month after GKRS for the first three months and every 3 months thereafter. Overall survival was calculated from the day of RS until death. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as radiologic growth of the irradiated lesion, while distant brain recurrence (DBR) was the evidence of brain lesion outside the previous irradiated field. Both the LR and DBR were calculated from the RS till the day of radiological evidence of relapse. The correlations within patient and disease characteristics and the outcomes of survival and disease control were analyzed., Results: Mean follow up was 7.2 ± 4.8 months (range: 2.4-22.8 months). At the time of analysis 21 patients (27.3%) were dead. The overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 74%. On univariate Cox Regression analysis female gender (p=0.043, HR: 0.391, 95% CI: 0.157-0.972) and age >65 years (p=0.003 HR: 4.623, 95% CI: 1.687-12.663) were predictive for survival. On multivariate analysis, age older than 65 years (p=0.005HR: 4.254, 95% CI: 1.544-11.721) was confirmed as associated with worsened overall survival. 19 patients (24.7%) had recurrence in the radiosurgery field. The median time to local failure was 4.8 ± 2.0 months (range: 1.8-9.4 months) from GKRS. On Cox Regression univariate analysis, the only factor associated with higher risk of local failure was a number of treated lesions more than 4 (p=0.015, HR: 3.813, 95% CI: 1.298-11.202), no significant parameters were found at the multivariate analysis. The median time to develop distant brain failure was 6 ± 4.32 months (range: 1.08-21.6 months). Median distant brain control was 74% at 1 year. None of the factors analyzed was statistically significant for the distant brain relapse. The radiosurgery treatment was well tolerated. One patient treated for seven metastases developed seizures 8h after GKRS, he was treated with steroids and anticonvulsants. One patient had radiologic evidence of radionecrosis without any neurological symptoms., Conclusions: In well-performing patients with stable systemic disease radiosurgery can be performed as an exclusive treatment for brain metastases. Younger patients could have a greater benefit from the RS, on the other hand our finding confirm no correlation between the survival outcome and the number of lesions treated., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims and Background: Radiobiological and technical considerations have traditionally limited the role of radiation therapy in the context of primary and secondary cardiac malignancies. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising modality for the delivery of focused high-dose radiation with ablative potential to complex targets such as small, deep-seated, moving lesions, allowing also for re-irradiation., Methods: Between January 2013 and October 2013, 3 patients underwent SBRT for cardiac lesions: 2 patients had recurrent, previously irradiated cardiac angiosarcomas (PCA) and 1 patient had a cardiac metastasis from melanoma. They were treated with fiducial-guided robotic radiotherapy with CyberKnife. As for dose prescription, 24 Gy in 3 fractions (80% isodose) and 30 Gy in 5 fractions (80% isodose) were administered to the recurrent PCAs and cardiac metastasis, respectively., Results: At 2 months after SBRT, cardiac MRI showed a partial response in the patients treated for recurrent PCA while the cardiac metastasis remained stable. In all cases, absence of local progression was subsequently confirmed by contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI after 6 months, without any evidence of treatment-related side effects., Conclusions: Fiducial-guided SBRT proved to be feasible and effective in preventing local disease progression in selected patients with cardiac malignancies.

External beam radiation therapy with conventional fractionation to a total dose of 76-80 Gy represents the most adopted treatment modality for prostate cancer. Dose escalation in this setting has been demonstrated to improve biochemical control with acceptable toxicity using contemporary radiotherapy techniques. Hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy have gained an increasing interest in recent years and they have the potential to become the standard of care even if long-term data about their efficacy and safety are not well established. Strong radiobiological basis supports the use of high dose for fraction in prostate cancer, due to the demonstrated exceptionally low values of α / β . Clinical experiences with hypofractionated and stereotactic radiotherapy (with an adequate biologically equivalent dose) demonstrated good tolerance, a PSA control comparable to conventional fractionation, and the advantage of shorter time period of treatment. This paper reviews the radiobiological findings that have led to the increasing use of hypofractionation in the management of prostate cancer and briefly analyzes the clinical experience in this setting.

Mauro Loi,1 Joost J Nuyttens,2 Isacco Desideri,1 Daniela Greto,1 Lorenzo Livi1 1Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 2Radiotherapy Department, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsCorrespondence: Mauro LoiRadiotherapy Department, University of Florence, L.go Brambilla 3, Florence 50100, ItalyEmail mauro.loi@unifi.itAbstract: Bone metastases are a frequent and important source of morbidity in cancer patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an established treatment option for local control and pain relief of bone metastases, and it is increasingly used as upfront treatment, postoperative consolidation or salvage treatment after prior RT. However, heterogeneity of dose schedules described in literature represents a severe limitation in the definition of the role of SBRT as a standard of care. No consensus is available on the use of single versus multiple fraction SBRT for bone metastases. Advantages of single-fraction SBRT include shorter overall duration of treatment, absence of inter-fraction uncertainty, improved compliance, theoretical increased efficacy, and lower costs. However, caution has been advised due to reports of severe late toxicities, in particular, vertebral collapse fracture (VCF). The aim of this paper is to review dose fractionation and indications for the management of bone metastases using SBRT.Keywords: SBRT, stereotactic radiotherapy, radiosurgery, bone metastases, spine, non-spine