Search

Background and Purpose: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with remarkable local control. However, it is not clear if this local control translates to overall survival (OS). The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of SBRT on the OS of early-stage NSCLC patients and examine if the extent of this impact changes with the era of diagnosis, T stage, age, and comorbidity status., Materials and Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we compared the OS of cT1-3 cN0 cM0 NSCLC patients with SBRT or observation. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for age, race, sex, income, education, place of living, hospital type, insurance status, comorbidity score, histology types, and diagnosis year., Results: Among 50,819 patients, 27,027 (53.18%) received SBRT and 23,792 (46.82%) were observed. Multivariable Cox Proportional-Hazards analysis demonstrated SBRT was associated with an improved OS compared to observation (HR:0.56, p < 0.001). Subset multivariable Cox Proportional-Hazards analyses stratified by T stage, year of diagnosis, age, or Charlson Score revealed that HRs of SBRT vs. observation decrease from cT1 to cT3 (0.73-0.68), from 2004 to 2015 (0.65-0.51), from <50 to ≥80 years old (1.04-0.58) and from a Charlson Score 0 to 2 (0.69-0.58)., Conclusion: SBRT was associated with improved OS compared to no treatment in early-stage NSCLC. The magnitude of the impact of SBRT on OS increases in patients with advanced age, higher T stages, higher comorbidity scores and more recent treatment eras., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) occurs during treatment with conventional radiation in multiple organ sites. Development of RIL portends poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) spares RIL in pancreatic cancer, but has not been examined in other sites commonly treated with SBRT. This work examines if SBRT similarly spares RIL in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was done at a single institution on 40 distinct cases of SBRT for early stage NSCLC from 2006-2017. Incidentally collected lymphocyte counts collected within 6 months of SBRT treatment were analyzed to determine if RIL occurred. The presence of RIL was correlated with location of initial failure and survival endpoints. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed with significance defined at the level p < 0.05., Results: RIL was observed in 35% of the analyzed patients. Patterns of failure and survival data were comparable to prior SBRT literature. There was no observed association in two year local, nodal, or distant failure, progression free survival, or overall survival based on the presence of RIL., Discussion: SBRT spares RIL in NSCLC compared to historical rates observed with conventionally fractionated radiation. As understanding of the role of the immune system in cancer control continues to evolve, the importance of RIL sparing techniques take on increasing importance. This study represents further analysis of RIL sparing in SBRT in an early stage NSCLC cohort without the confounding influence of chemotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the standard of care treatment for nonsurgical patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recent report has indicated an improvement in overall survival (OS) with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with tumors ≥ 4 cm treated with SBRT. We present a retrospective study evaluating the impact of histology in patients treated with SBRT and adjuvant chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: Patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with clinical stages I-II NSCLC from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the National Cancer Database (n = 12,055). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) distributions and the log-rank test was used to compare distributions by treatment strategy. Clinical stages I and II were subdivided according to the TNM staging and log-rank tests was used to compare survival distributions by treatment strategy within each subgroup. We performed subgroup analysis for the three main NSCLC histologies (i.e., adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and large cell)., Results: In patients with adenocarcinoma, SCC and, large cell carcinoma; adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse OS in tumors < 4 cm (P<.0001, P<.0099, and P=.0082, respectively). In patients with adenocarcinoma and tumor ≥ 4 cm, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS (P=.262); however, in patients with SCC and large cell, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS (P<.0001, and P=.0129, respectively)., Conclusion: In patients with NSCLC ≥ 4 cm treated with SBRT, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in patients with SCC and large cell histologies., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Conventionally fractionated (CF) radiation therapy (RT) has been associated with lymphopenia, leading to compromised overall survival (OS) in cancer patients. It currently remains unknown if stereotactic body (SB) RT induces lymphopenia to the same degree. The aim of this study is to determine if SBRT with either chemotherapy (CMT) (Fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine) or Nelfinavir (NFV) to pancreatic adenocarcinoma induces lymphopenia to the same degree as CFRT with 5FU or capecitabine and how any associated difference affects patient survival outcomes., Methods: Medical records of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with induction CMT followed by RT with concurrent CMT or NFV were reviewed. Patients with total lymphocyte counts (TLCs) available both prior to and following initiation of RT were included. Three groups were identified: CFRT/CMT, SBRT/CMT, and SBRT/NFV. Median delivered RT doses for CFRT and SBRT were 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions and 35 Gy in 7 Gy fractions, respectively. TLCs from day 0 (the first day of RT) to 40 were recorded and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with p-values adjusted with Bonferroni's method. Linear regressions were utilized to estimate the slope of TLCs as it changes with time and survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier plots., Results: One hundred patients were identified (28 CFRT/CMT, 27 SBRT/CMT, 45 SBRT/NFV). Median pre-RT TLCs were not different among groups. Median lowest TLCs were significantly lower (p <  0.0001) and median TLCs reduction over time were significantly greater (p <  0.0001) in the CFRT group than SBRT groups. There was no difference in lowest TLCs or TLCs reduction over time between SBRT groups. Across all groups, the median time to lowest TLCs was similar. Survival analysis revealed no significant difference in median OS between SBRT and CFRT groups. However, in patients with surgery, Median OS for patients with SBRT/CMT was significantly higher than in those with SBRT/NFV (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Compared to CFRT, SBRT is associated with less lymphopenia. Further study of the effect of radiation technique on immune status is warranted.

Background: Despite the fact that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the only recommended first-line therapy for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), several thermal ablative procedures (TAPs; defined herein as laser/cryoablation and electrocautery) are available. Studies showing outcomes of these procedures and how they compare with SBRT are scarce. We sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy of SBRT versus TAPs using the National Cancer Database (NCDB)., Methods: The NCDB was queried for patients with early-stage NSCLC who did not undergo surgical resection. Treatment-specific inclusion criteria were applied to select for patients receiving either TAPs or SBRT. Univariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Serial propensity matches were performed using a modified greedy 8→n matching 1:1 algorithm., Results: A total of 27,734 patients were analyzed; 26,725 underwent SBRT and 1,009 underwent TAPs. Patients who received SBRT were older and more likely to have clinical stage IB (vs IA) disease. Despite this, SBRT was associated with longer median overall survival (mOS; 37.7 vs 33.5 months; P=.001) and 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates compared with the TAPs cohort (86.7% vs 83.1%, 67.5% vs 62.7%, and 30.6% vs 26.9%, respectively; P=.001). Upon propensity matching, improved OS with SBRT remained, with a mOS of 40.4 versus 33.4 months and 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates of 89.0% versus 82.9%, 69.7% versus 62.7%, and 34.4% versus 26.4%, respectively (P=.003)., Conclusions: Despite being associated with more higher-risk factors, SBRT was associated with higher OS compared with TAPs for treatment of nonoperative patients diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC. However, causation cannot be implied owing to the inherent limitations of large heterogeneous datasets such as the NCDB.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The risk of local and regional recurrence after this treatment remains largely unknown. Because of the lack of elective nodal treatment and high fractional dose, we hypothesized that the incidence of regional out-of-field recurrence would predominate after SBRT., Methods and Materials: Electronic medical records of all patients treated in our department with SBRT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into those who converted or did not convert to surgical resectability. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Recurrence was assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Treatment plans were reviewed to determine the locations of failure with respect to treatment volume. Statistical comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney U testing for continuous variables and χ 2 testing for dichotomous variables., Results: Data on 69 patients was available for analysis. After treatment, 18 patients (26.1%) suffered in-field recurrence and 11 patients (15.9%) recurred regionally out of field. The median time to in-field and out-of-field failures were similar at 120.5 and 108.0 days, respectively (P = .65). Of those who failed out-of-field, 4 of 11 patients (36.4%) were without in-field failure prior to death. In-field failure rates were less in patients who subsequently underwent surgical resection compared with those who did not (2 of 22 patients [9.1%] vs 16 of 47 patients [34.0%]; P = .028), but out-of-field recurrence was unaffected by subsequent surgical resection (3 of 22 patients [13.6%] vs 8 of 47 patients [17.0%]; P = .720). All out-of-field failures occurred in areas that received <2600 cGy., Conclusions: The incidence of out-of-field failure remains acceptable after SBRT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite the high biological equivalent dose allowed by SBRT, in-field control remains problematic and continues to signal relative radiation resistance that is associated with bulky disease., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Contrary to prevailing notions of uniform efficacy regarding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a recent report has indicated increased risk of local failure for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). As those data have not been corroborated by other studies, we performed a multi-institutional analysis to evaluate the influence of histology on post-SBRT outcomes., Materials and Methods: Records from 152 consecutive patients who received SBRT for primary early-stage NSCLC at two academic medical centers were retrospectively assessed. Primary comparison was between SCC and adenocarcinoma. Patient outcomes including actuarial recurrences and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses addressed associated factors., Results: At a median follow-up of 44 months, patients with SCC had an increased risk of local, (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.69 (1.05-2.73), p = 0.032), regional (HR (95% CI): 2.03 (1.24-3.33), p = 0.005), and distant failure (HR (95% CI): 1.71 (1.06-2.77), p = 0.036). Median times to local (32 m vs 50m, p = 0.023), regional (26 m vs 50 m, p = 0.011), and distant (26 m vs 50 m, p = 0.024) failure were all significantly reduced in SCC histology. SCC histology was also independently associated with an increased risk for death (HR: 1.80 (1.10-2.94), p = 0.019) and had a 5-yr overall survival of 26%, versus 41% for adenocarcinoma (p = 0.016)., Conclusions: This multi-institutional analysis corroborates that SCC histology is independently predictive for local, regional, and distant recurrence and worse overall survival. Future data are needed to determine if treatment paradigms should differ by histology for early stage NSCLC., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)