1. The subperitoneal space of the abdomen and pelvis: planes of continuity
- Author
-
Alfred S. Berne, Michael Oliphant, and Morton A. Meyers
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Radiography, Abdominal ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pelvis ,Peritoneal recesses ,Medical imaging ,Medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Mesenteries ,Child ,Peritoneal Cavity ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Space-occupying lesion ,Middle Aged ,Clinical Practice ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Child, Preschool ,Abdomen ,Female ,Radiology ,business ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed - Abstract
T he purpose of this article is to define the anatomic relationships of the continuum of the intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal tissues of the abdomen and pelvis called the subperitoneal space and to establish the clinical usefulness in identifying the direct spread of disease by modem imaging techniques. In clinical practice and in diagnostic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis, it has been useful to distinguish between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal organs, structures. and compartments. Concepts introduced and established over the past two decades regarding the spread and localization of the full range of disease processes in the abdomen and pelvis have been universally adopted [1-5]. Whether of inflammatory, malignant, or traumatic origin, spread and localization are determined by dynamic and anatomic features related to the peritoneal mesenteries and ligaments. the peritoneal recesses. and the three extraperitoneal spaces and their continuity with pelvic compartments. On the basis of pathogenesis and recognized anatomic avenues of dissemination, characteristic imaging features often lead to uncovering an occult primary site and to anticipating sites of extension, thereby permitting accurate prognosis and appropriate management. Nonetheless, instances are encountered in which the sites of the presence or extension of disease states in the abdomen and pelvis appear paradoxical. Our recent experience leads to the unifying conclusion that, indeed, intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal structures constitute an anatomic continuum (the embryologic development ordains that the mesenchyme beneath the peritoneum is a substrate in continuity throughout the body) and that these anatomic planes of continuity serve as pathways for the spread of disease. The holistic paradigm conceptualizes the abdomen and pelvis as a single space interconnected by planes. In acknowledging this continuum deep in relation to the peritoneum with its subserous connective tissue, we have designated this the subperitoneal space (Fig. I ). Thus, it is essential to recognize that this space and its discrete planes of continuity provide the avenues for bidirectional spread of disease between intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal sites and structures [6-14].
- Published
- 1996