Search

When a pediatric hepatic cystic lesion is identified at imaging, the differential diagnosis may be broad, including developmental, infectious, neoplastic, and posttraumatic or iatrogenic causes. The location of a cystic lesion and its number, size, composition, and relationship to the biliary system are features that help in narrowing the differential diagnosis. An incidentally detected simple hepatic cyst is the most commonly encountered. Ciliated foregut cysts are typically located in hepatic segment IVa. The presence of multiple cysts should raise suspicion for fibropolycystic liver disease, a group of related lesions-including biliary hamartoma and choledochal cyst-caused by abnormal embryologic development of the ductal plate. Communication of the cystic lesion with the biliary tree can confirm the diagnosis of choledochal cyst. In a neonate with jaundice, a cystic lesion at the porta hepatis should raise suspicion for choledochal cyst versus cystic biliary atresia. Hepatic abscess can appear cystlike, though typically with internal contents. In an immunocompromised child, multiple cystlike lesions should raise concern for fungal microabscesses. A complex cystic mass in a young child should raise suspicion for mesenchymal hamartoma, which can evolve into undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma if untreated. Hepatic hematoma and biloma can appear cystlike in children with a history of trauma or recent intervention. In neonates with an umbilical vein catheter (UVC), an intrahepatic cyst along the course of the UVC should raise concern for infusate extravasation. Familiarity with imaging findings and clinical features is essential for achieving accurate diagnosis of pediatric hepatic cystic lesions, which in turn can guide appropriate clinical management.

A differential diagnosis based on a patient's age, clinical presentation, and serum α-fetoprotein level will help guide the initial imaging workup in children with a liver lesion. Children vary significantly in size, the ability to stay still, and the ability to breath hold for imaging examinations. Choosing and tailoring imaging techniques and protocols for each indication and age group is important for optimal care with minimal invasiveness. The need for sedation or anesthesia can be obviated by using techniques like feed and bundle, distraction, contrast-enhanced US, and motion-insensitive sequences for MRI. US is often the first imaging modality used in children with a suspected abdominal mass. Once a hepatic lesion is confirmed, multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI is recommended for most lesions as the next imaging modality allowing full characterization of the lesion and assessment of the liver parenchyma. Contrast-enhanced CT can also be performed for assessment of pediatric focal liver lesions, especially in patients who have a contraindication to MRI. Contrast-enhanced US has shown promise to decrease the need for MRI or CT in some lesions such as hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia. Children with a history of malignancy can develop multiple types of hepatic lesions at various stages, including infections during an immunocompromised state, manifesting as focal liver lesions. Based on available limited data in the literature and the collective experiences of the Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Pediatric Working Group, the authors provide guidelines for the imaging workup of pediatric focal liver lesions with an indication- and age-based approach and discuss the selection and performance of various imaging techniques and modalities.