Search

The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with mammography (MG) and combined CESM + MG in terms of detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast cancers in order to assess the potential to reduce radiation exposure. A total of 118 patients underwent MG and CESM and had final histological results. CESM was performed as a bilateral examination starting 2 min after injection of iodinated contrast medium. Three independent blinded radiologists read the CESM, MG, and CESM + MG images with an interval of at least 4 weeks to avoid case memorization. Sensitivity and size measurement correlation and differences were calculated, average glandular dose (AGD) levels were compared, and breast densities were reported. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon tests were performed. A total of 107 imaging pairs were available for analysis. Densities were ACR1: 2, ACR2: 45, ACR3: 42, and ACR4: 18. Mean AGD was 1.89 mGy for CESM alone, 1.78 mGy for MG, and 3.67 mGy for the combination. In very dense breasts, AGD of CESM was significantly lower than MG. Sensitivity across readers was 77.9 % for MG alone, 94.7 % for CESM, and 95 % for CESM + MG. Average tumor size measurement error compared to postsurgical pathology was -0.6 mm for MG, +0.6 mm for CESM, and +4.5 mm for CESM + MG (p < 0.001 for CESM + MG vs. both modalities). CESM alone has the same sensitivity and better size assessment as CESM + MG and was significantly better than MG with only 6.2 % increase in AGD. The combination of CESM + MG led to systematic size overestimation. When a CESM examination is planned, additional MG can be avoided, with the possibility of saving up to 61 % of radiation dose, especially in patients with dense breasts.

Purpose: To evaluate the additional benefit of true geometric (air-gap) magnification views for the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography., Materials and Methods: After ethical approval, we retrospectively reviewed patient records to identify 100 patients with suspicious microcalcifications (35 malignant, 65 benign) who had a standard digital mammography and an additional digital magnification view in the same projection within three months. All images were obtained using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital system (Senographe 2000 D, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Images were independently analyzed by six board-certified radiologists. The probability of malignancy was estimated using first standard contact mammography alone (MG) and then mammography in combination with the magnification view (MG+MAG) using a modified Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system and a percentage scale. Results were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, readers assessed the subjective visibility of the calcifications., Results: For all six readers combined, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.664 ± 0.052 for MG and 0.813 ± 0.042 for MG + MAG, resulting in a statistically significant improvement of 0.148 ± 0.120. Each reader had a higher AUC for MG + MAG than MG, with the improvement being statistically significant in four of the six readers. In 76.34 % of the cases, MG + MAG resulted in better visibility of calcifications compared with mammography alone. In 33 % slightly more and in 39 % significantly more calcifications were found., Conclusion: Even in digital mammography with the option of using electronic magnification (zoom) at the viewing workstation, true geometric (air-gap) magnification views remain important for the visibility and correct classification of microcalcifications and for the assessment of their extent., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Digital mammography has been well-evaluated for the diagnosis of breast cancer. The scientific data show that mammography alone, especially in dense breast parenchyma, has its weaknesses. These weaknesses are due to the low contrast of tumors in comparison with the surrounding parenchyma and the overlying structures that mask tumors. The initial results from tomosynthesis studies show a tendency for better imaging and higher accuracy and lower recall rates with tomosynthesis. We present in this article a literature review of the development of breast tomosynthesis and follow it with case examples., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The DICOM standard supports both quantitative and qualitative lossy compression of mammograms.The purpose of this study was to investigate qualitative JPEG 2000 lossy compression and how different factors such as object thickness, radiation dose, and lossy compression levels affect image quality., Materials and Methods: The CDMAM phantom Artinis 3.4 was radiographed with 4 different object thicknesses and 5 different doses. The images were compressed at 10 different compression levels. The image quality was assessed by the software interpolated IQFinv value., Results: Lossy 90 resulted in 89 % data reduction, lossy 70 in 95 % data reduction and lossy 60 in 96 % data reduction. At higher compression levels (lossy 30), the resulting image quality ranged from 80 - 36 %, and at low compression levels (lossy 90), it ranged from 89 - 93 %. The object thickness was found to significantly interact with the compression level with regard to the resulting image quality: a higher object thickness resulted in increasingly poor image quality at increasing compression levels (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Higher qualitative JPEG 2000 compression levels contribute only little additional data reduction, while the resulting image quality cannot be reliably predicted. Factors affecting image quality such as radiation dose and object thickness should be taken into account when performing image compression. Large object thicknesses should be compressed with caution because the loss of image quality is greater when intelligent data compression algorithms are used., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Rationale and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare average glandular dose (AGD) in two full-field digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations., Materials and Methods: Mammographies of 50 consecutive patients on a mammography system using a tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh) anode/filter combination were retrospectively compared to prior examinations on a different mammography unit using combinations of Molybdenum (Mo) and Rhodium (Rh). To exclude effects of increasing patient age, two prior examinations within 5 years were used. Both views of one breast were chosen for analysis. AGD was recorded as stated by each mammography unit. Accuracy of stated AGD and contrast-detail resolution were assessed using different breast phantoms., Results: The mean AGDs from the examinations using W/Rh were 0.95 mGy and 1.01 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views compared to 1.51 mGy and 1.54 mGy, respectively, using combinations of Mo and Rh (P < .001). Relative reduction of AGD was independent of breast thickness but decreased with increasing breast density (partial correlation coefficient of 0.46, P < .005 and 0.57, P < .001, for CC and MLO views, respectively). Low-level contrast resolution was equal in both units using standard acquisition parameters., Conclusion: In clinical mammographies, higher energy beam spectra obtained using W/Rh anode/filter combinations may significantly contribute to lowering AGD compared to Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh in breasts that are not extremely dense.

Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading is more complex than screen-film mammography (SFM) with hard-copy reading. The aim of this study was to compare inter- and intraobserver variability in SFM versus FFDM of paired mammograms from a breast cancer screening program. Six radiologists interpreted mammograms of 232 cases obtained with both techniques, including 46 cancers, 88 benign lesions, and 98 normals. Image interpretation included BI-RADS categories. A case consisted of standard two-view mammograms of one breast. Images were scored in two sessions separated by 5 weeks. Observer variability was substantial for SFM as well as for FFDM, but overall there was no significant difference between the observer variability at SFM and FFDM. Mean kappa values were lower, indicating less agreement, for microcalcifications compared with masses. The lower observer agreement for microcalcifications, and especially the low intraobserver concordance between the two imaging techniques for three readers, was noticeable. The level of observer agreement might be an indicator of radiologist performance and could confound studies designed to separate diagnostic differences between the two imaging techniques. The results of our study confirm the need for proper training for radiologists starting FFDM with soft-copy reading in breast cancer screening.

The overriding goal of an organized mammography screening program is to offer high level medical care to everyone at a justifiable cost. The following overview will demonstrate how both aspects of screening, quality and cost efficiency, are supported by a fully digital workflow. Digital mammography systems allow for a constant high image quality and repeat examinations due to overexposure or underexposure can be avoided. Dedicated mammography screening workstations with integration of image viewing and reporting enable efficient softcopy reading. Many aspects of the screening workflow, such as double reading, archiving and retrieval of stored films, as well as information exchange between members of the certified team of the screening unit and other physicians involved in the further treatment, are made significantly easier by the presence of image data in digital form.

Digital mammography is more and more replacing conventional mammography. Initial concerns about an inferior image quality of digital mammography have been largely overcome and recent studies even show digital mammography to be superior in women with dense breasts, while at the same time reducing radiation exposure. Nevertheless, an important limitation of digital mammography remains: namely, the fact that summation may obscure lesions in dense breast tissue. However, digital mammography offers the option of so-called advanced applications, and two of these, contrast-enhanced mammography and tomosynthesis, are promising candidates for improving the detection of breast lesions otherwise obscured by the summation of dense tissue. Two techniques of contrast-enhanced mammography are available: temporal subtraction of images acquired before and after contrast administration and the so-called dual-energy technique, which means that pairs of low/high-energy images acquired after contrast administration are subtracted. Tomosynthesis on the other hand provides three-dimensional information on the breast. The images are acquired with different angulations of the X-ray tube while the object or detector is static. Various reconstruction algorithms can then be applied to the set of typically nine to 28 source images to reconstruct 1-mm slices with a reduced risk of obscuring pathology. Combinations of both advanced applications have only been investigated in individual experimental studies; more advanced software algorithms and CAD systems are still in their infancy and have only undergone preliminary clinical evaluation.

High-quality full-field digital mammography has been available now for several years and is increasingly used for both diagnostic and screening mammography. A number of different detector technologies exist, which all have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography has been shown to be at least equivalent to film-screen mammography in a general screening population. Digital mammography is superior to screen-film mammography in younger women with dense breasts due to its ability to selectively optimize contrast in areas of dense parenchyma. This advantage is especially important in women with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer, where intensified early detection programs may have to start from 25 to 30 years of age. Tailored image processing and computer-aided diagnosis hold the potential to further improve the early detection of breast cancer. However, at present no consensus exists among radiologists on which processing is optimal for digital mammograms. Image processing may also vary significantly among vendors with so far limited interoperability. This review aims to summarize the available information regarding the impact of digital mammography on workflow and breast cancer diagnosis.

Purpose: To determine the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of different elements at different energies using various anode/filter combinations currently employed in digital mammography. The elements investigated included not only elements already used in conventional contrast agents such as gadolinium and iodine but also other elements to investigate their potential as mammographic contrast agents., Materials and Methods: The CNRs of 20 mmol/L bismuth (Bi), gadolinium (Gd), ytterbium (Yb), dysprosium (Dy), and iodine (I) were determined at different slice thicknesses (0.25, 0.5, and 1 cm) of the element solution with an additional 4-cm Plexiglas in relation to water (to simulate dense glandular tissue), oil, and air. The following anode/filter combinations were used: Mo/Mo in the range of 22-34 kVp, Mo/Rh in the range of 36-40 kVp, Rh/Rh in the range of 42-46 kVp, and Mo/Cu in the range of 47-49 kVp. In the range of 22-46 kVp, the mAs were chosen to achieve a fairly uniform dose range (of 4.38-4.71 mGy). Doses were measured using the PTW DIADOS diagnostic dosimeter. The element solutions were examined with a GE Senographe 2000D., Results: Bismuth showed the best CNR for all energies investigated and in relation to both water and oil. In the energy range below 46 kVp, bismuth (CNR at 30 kVp/50 mAs and 1/0.5/0.25 cm slice thickness: 9.9/6.1/3.4) was followed by Yb (5.9/3.5/2.0), Dy (5.3/3.2/1.9), Gd (4.2/2.5/1.6), and iodine (2.4/1.8/1.5). Bismuth had the best CNR relative to both water (values given above) and oil (Bi: 20.7/11.2/5; Yb: 16.9/8.6/3.6; Dy: 16.6/8.4/3.5; Gd: 15.21/7.5/3.2; I: 13.8/6.3/3.2). The CNR of Bi was also superior to that of the other elements investigated at high energy in combination with copper filters (eg, CNR at 49 kVp Mo/Cu at slice thicknesses of 1/0.5/0.25 cm, relative to water: 9.6/6.0/4.0) but now followed by iodine (7.9/5.3/3.5), Yb (5.8/4.0/2.9), Dy (5.4/3.7/2.8), and Gd (4.7/3.2/2.7). Iodine was the only element of those investigated whose contrast-to-noise ratio was improved with the use of a copper filter at high energies based on its K-edge (increase in CNR from 2.9 to 7.9 from 40 to 49 kVp at 1-cm slice thickness). Nevertheless, the improved CNR of iodine was below that of Bi at low energies and for Mo/Mo or Mo/Rh filters. The contrast of water/fat tended to decrease slightly at higher energies (CNR of water/air at 42 kVp: 33.9, at 48 kVp: 25.6; CNR of oil/air at 42 kVp: 23.8, at 48 kVp: 21.9)., Conclusion: Copper filters and higher energies are useful for visualizing iodine-based contrast agents in contrast-enhanced mammography because they markedly improve the CNR relative to water. This technique further benefits from the fact that the CNR of water and fat relative to air markedly decreases at higher energies and with the use of copper filters. Bismuth was found to have a much better CNR than iodine for all energies investigated including the low energy ranges typically used in mammography. These results suggest that bismuth is a potential candidate for a specific mammographic contrast agent.

Purpose: To retrospectively compare screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy interpretation for reader performance in detection and classification of breast lesions in women in a screening program., Materials and Methods: Regional ethics committee approved the study; signed patient consents were obtained. Two-view mammograms were obtained with digital and screen-film systems at previous screening studies. Six readers interpreted images. Interpretation included Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and five-level probability-of-malignancy scores. A case was one breast, with two standard views acquired with both screen-film mammography and digital mammography. The standard for an examination with normal findings was classification of normal (category 1) assigned by two independent readers; for cases with benign findings, the standard was benign results at diagnostic work-up in patients who were recalled. Cases with normal or benign findings that manifested as neither interval cancer nor as cancer at subsequent screening were considered the standard. All cancers were confirmed histologically. Images were interpreted by readers in two sessions 5 weeks apart; the same case was not seen twice in any session. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and, for a given true-positive fraction, 2 x 2 table analysis and the McNemar test were used. For binary outcome, classification of BI-RADS category 3 or higher was defined as positive for cancer., Results: Cases with proved findings (n = 232) were displayed: 46 with cancers, 88 with benign findings, and 98 with normal findings. ROC analysis for all readers and all cases revealed a higher area under ROC curve (A(z)) for digital mammography (0.916) than for screen-film mammography (0.887) (P = .22). Five of six readers had a higher performance rating with digital mammography; one of five demonstrated a significant difference in favor of digital mammography with A(z) values; two showed a significant difference in favor of digital mammography with ROC analysis for a given false-positive fraction (P = .01 and .03, respectively). For cases with cancer, digital mammography resulted in correct classification of an average of three additional cancers per reader. For digital versus screen-film mammography, 2 x 2 table analysis for cancers revealed a higher true-positive rate; for benign masses, a higher true-negative rate. Neither of these differences nor any others from analysis of subgroups between the modalities were significant., Conclusion: Digital mammography allowed correct classification of more breast cancers than did screen-film mammography. A(z) value was higher for digital mammography; this difference was not significant., (RSNA, 2005)

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the potential of dynamic contrast enhancement after the intravenous administration of an iodine-based contrast medium in full-field digital mammography., Material and Methods: A protocol for image acquisition was established for contrast-enhanced mammography and the mammography unit (Senographe 2000D, GE Healthcare, Buc, France) changed as required. The effect of the protocol parameters on imaging was investigated. Subsequently, 21 patients with 25 suspicious lesions of the breast (10 benign, 1 borderline, and 14 malignant) underwent mammography with administration of an iodine-based contrast medium (Ultravist 370, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), after approval of ethical committee as well as permission of German federal office for Radiation protection, and informed consent from each patient was obtained. Three sequential digital mammographic images of the respective breast were acquired after administration of the contrast medium at a dose of 1 mL/kg body weight and a flow of 4 mL/s. The postcontrast images were acquired 60, 120, and 180 seconds after administration. Subsequently, the precontrast image was logarithmically subtracted from the postcontrast images. Enhancement of the lesions was measured in absolute terms as well as relative to the enhancement of the glandular tissue. The subtracted images were evaluated for lesion depiction and dynamic contrast enhancement. Lesion-enhancement kinetics were compared with the histologic findings., Results: All malignant lesions were identified on the contrast-enhanced images of digital mammography. Three of the tumors (2 malignant, 1 benign) were detected only by contrast-enhanced mammography and not by standard mammography. Dynamic enhancement curves of benign and malignant tumors in contrast-enhanced mammography look similar to the curves known from gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Nevertheless differentiation between malignant and benign tumors based on the enhancement patterns cannot be directly taken over from magnetic resonance imaging, as suggested by our initial results. The results are somewhat better when tumor enhancement relative to surrounding glandular tissue is used instead of absolute enhancement., Conclusion: The results of this preliminary study suggest that contrast-enhanced digital mammography is a potentially useful tool for the detection and the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Rationale and Background: The emission spectrum of an x-ray tube is determined by the anode and filter materials as well as by the high voltage being used. For mammography, typical anode materials are molybdenum (Mo), rhodium (Rh), and tungsten (W); molybdenum, rhodium, and aluminum are favored for filters. Mammography is a soft tissue imaging modality demanding a high spatial resolution as well as a high detector sensitivity. Low-energy photons are only absorbed in tissue and have no contribution to the image; nevertheless, they increase the dose. High-energy photons mostly penetrate soft tissue and generate a background noise as a result of strong scattering that deteriorates the image quality. For mammography, the optimal energy window is in a range from 17 and 25 keV. From a theoretical perspective, one would favor monoenergetic x-rays (eg, the Mo-emission line at 17.5 keV). This article presents the realization of imaging with monochromatic x-rays using a diagnostic mammography unit., Methods: Basically, a monochromatic module was added to a conventional mammographic system. The monochromatic module can be mounted at the end of the x-ray tube and it consists of a curved HOPG (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) crystal and a slit collimator. For image generation, the object is moved through the fan-shaped monochromatic radiation field. In addition to the conventional polychromatic 2-dimensional case, the polychromatic irradiation was also able to be performed under similar conditions. For image acquisition, image plates or a linear array detector were used. Exposure doses were measured for both poly- and monochromatic radiation. The initial evaluation of the system performance was carried out by imaging a contrast-detail phantom and biologic specimens., Results: The monochromatic x-ray beam has a size of approximately 35 mm x 200 mm in the object plane. The photon flux of the monochromatic x-rays is considerably lower than the photon flux of the polychromatic x-rays but adequate for initial studies of phantoms, biologic tissue, or small animals. The comparison of the results obtained with the monochromatic and polychromatic imaging modalities reveal a conspicuous increase of image contrast in the monochromatic case., Conclusion: The results suggest that the experimental setup for monochromatic excitation shows clear potentials for improvements of the image in comparison to the conventional polychromatic case.

X-ray spectra are composed of a broad bremsspectrum and anode-characteristic emission lines. In mammography typically molybdenum (Mo), rhodium (Rh) or tungsten (W) anodes are used in combination with Mo, Rh or aluminium filters. Only the photons with energies between 17 and 22 keV of the resulting spectrum are suitable for the soft tissue imaging needed for mammography. The aim of this article is to present first results obtained with a monochromator module mounted at the exit of the X-ray tube of a conventional clinical mammography unit. The experimental setup consists of a Siemens Mammomat 300, an X-ray monochromator module and a linear array detector for image acquisition. The technique is similar to the slot-scan technique known from digital mammography. The experimental machine allows to obtain images both with polychromatic and monochromatic X-rays. Initial evaluation of the system was performed by examination of a contrast-detail phantom (CD-MAM-phantom, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Images done with the new monochromatic technique were compared to images of the phantom done with polychromatic spectra, with film-screen mammography as well as with digital mammography. The new technique with monochromatic slot-scan mammography resulted in correct identification of 93% of the phantom. Digital slot-scan mammography with polychromatic beam resulted in correct identification of 87%, digital full-field mammography in 83% and conventional film-screen mammography in 70% of the phantom. The results suggest that monochromatization has a potential for improving image quality or decreasing dose in X-ray mammography.

Purpose: To evaluate a new wavelet-based computer-assisted detection (CAD) system for detecting and enhancing microcalcifications., Material and Methods: A total of 280 mammograms acquired by full-field digital mammography (Senographe 2000D; G.E. Medical Systems Milwaukee, Wisc., USA) were analyzed with and without a new wavelet-based CAD system for detecting and enhancing microcalcifications. The mammograms comprised roughly equal numbers of cases from each of the BIRADS (Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System, according to the American College of Roentgenology) categories 1-5. Histologic confirmation was available for all of the 180 cases assigned BIRADS categories 3-5. Four readers interpreted all 280 images for suspicious microcalcifications using a scale of 1-5. The readers alternately assessed 5 images with and 5 without CAD. In a second reading immediately following the first, the readers had to reassess the 280 mammograms. The images that had already been interpreted without CAD were now presented with CAD and vice versa. The images were interpreted as soft copies on a diagnostic mammography workstation (Image Diagnost GmbH, Neufahrn/Munich, Germany). All images interpreted with CAD were presented with enhancement of microcalcifications by wavelet algorithms and prompting of microcalcifications. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analyses were performed, and image interpretation time with and without CAD was measured., Results: The overall time for interpretation required by all 4 readers together was 483 min with CAD compared to 580 min without CAD. ROC analysis revealed no significant advantage of CAD for the individual readers. Readers 3 (0.811/0.817) and 4 (0.799/0.843) had a slightly improved AUC (area under the curve) with CAD. Readers 1 and 2 had a slightly lower AUC with CAD (0.832 versus 0.861 and 0.818 versus 0.849)., Conclusion: The CAD system significantly (P<0.05, t test) speeded up image interpretation with respect to the identification of microcalcifications, while the diagnostic quality remained almost identical under the study conditions.

Rationale and Objectives: In contrast-enhanced dual-energy subtraction imaging 2 images acquired postcontrast media administration at different energies are subtracted to highlight structures hidden in the absence of contrast media. X-ray spectra of the newly developed digital full-field mammography units (GE Senographe 2000 D) are dominated by the emission lines of the Mo or Rh anodes. The K-edge of Zirconium (Zr) is flanked by these 2 emission lines. Thus, the attenuation of Zr should experience a pronounced change of attenuation in parallel with a change of anodes. Under clinically relevant conditions, the contrasting behavior of Zr should be compared with that of other elements having K-edge energies outside the window spanned by the 2 anode emission lines., Methods: Solutions containing the contrasting elements Br, Y, Zr, I, and Gd were investigated for dual-energy subtraction in digital mammography with the 2 anode/filter settings (Mo/Mo and Rh/Rh). These solutions were investigated in phantom studies in the energy range conventionally used in mammography. Additionally, the contrasting behavior of Zr and I was compared in an in vivo study in rats., Results: The sweeping over the K-edge by alternating between the Mo and Rh anodes increases the detection of Zr in energy subtraction imaging at constant high voltage. This procedure does not lead to sufficient contrast enhancement for iodine-based contrast media which become detectable by increasing the high voltage to 40-49 kV., Conclusion: The instrumental and physical data outlined predestine Zr as contrasting element with a high potential for energy subtraction imaging in digital mammography in the energy range conventionally applied.

Purpose: To determine the role of the scatter grid in digital full-field mammography with respect to image quality and dose and to compare the experimental results with initial clinical experience., Materials and Methods: A phantom consisting of 205 fields that enclose gold dots of different thickness and size (CD-Mam phantom, Medical Department, Nijmegen, Netherlands) was used for digital full-field mammography with the conventional grid module and a special gridless module. Four different breast thicknesses were simulated using Plexiglas as scatter material. First, the phantom was exposed at the parameter and dose settings automatically selected in each experimental setup (with and without grid). Subsequently, the phantom was exposed at the different simulated breast thicknesses using the gridless module in combination with the parameters automatically selected for the grid module. This was followed by a series of phantom mammograms obtained with the experimental setup reversed. The 16 mammograms were evaluated by 3 readers and the results compared considering breast thickness, radiation dose, and quality. The gridless module was used for preoperative labeling in 16 patients for comparison of mammograms obtained with and without a grid., Results: For the same entrance dose used in routine mammography, digital mammography without grid is superior to digital mammography with grid when performed on simulated thin breasts (Plexiglas less than 3 cm), with no difference found when performed on simulated large breasts. The advantages of gridless mammography are more pronounced at a markedly reduced entrance dose (identical parenchymal dose without and with grid using the dose automatically selected for the gridless module). This tendency is confirmed by the initial clinical comparison., Conclusion: Gridless digital full-field mammography has the potential to reduce the dose further, in addition to already known mechanisms of dose reduction. However, the gridless system must be adjusted (markedly higher "switch-off dose" at the detector) to achieve an overall dose reduction since gridless mammography is inferior to grid mammography for identical doses at the detector plane.

Purpose: To evaluate the visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography (FSM)., Material and Methods: Forty-seven digital and film-screen mammographies depicting histologically proven lesions (27 benign, 20 malignant) were assessed by 4 readers. The images obtained with the different systems were comparable in terms of positioning. Maximum time interval between film-screen mammography and digital mammography was three months. Using a questionnaire, the readers evaluated the number of microcalcifications and their subjective conspicuity for FFDM (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, USA) and FSM. A 7-point scale based on the BIRADS classification was used to characterize the calcifications by means of ROC analysis., Results: No statistically significant differences were seen between the two types of mammography among the readers in assessing the number of microcalcifications. The subjective conspicuity of microcalcifications was found to be significantly better for digital mammographies. The diagnosis assigned by the readers did not show significant differences between the two systems., Conclusion: Although the subjective conspicuity of microcalcifications was found to be significantly better on digital mammography compared to film-screen mammography, there was no significant advantage of digital mammography resulting from the higher contrast resolution nor a disadvantage in terms of characterization of microcalcifications resulting from the lower spacial resolution. The advantages of digital mammography (e. g. CAD-systems, archiving, dose reduction) can be used without a loss of diagnostic quality.

Aim: To investigate the use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography., Methods: After performing initial phantom studies, seven patients underwent digital mammography (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, USA) using a specially filtered beam before as well as 60, 120, and 180 seconds after injection of 80 ml of iodine contrast medium (Ultravist 370, Schering AG, Germany). The precontrast mammograms were then subtracted from the postcontrast mammograms and the resulting images compared with a contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI study, performed on all women., Results: Contrast medium accumulation within the tumors was visualized with a good quality in all cases. The conditions under which successful contrast-enhanced digital mammography can be performed were determined in phantom studies., Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography has a potential for improving the visualization of breast tumors in mammography using special beam filtering, adjusted x-ray parameters, proper timing, and suitable subtraction software.

Purpose: The use of digital full field mammography for imaging augmented breasts., Methods: Images of a sponge, as a tissue equivalent, partly covered with one of three different implants (silicone, silicone/saline, saline) were obtained using digital and film-screen technique. The visualisation of the sponge structure covered by the implant and next to the implant was evaluated by two radiologists. Results were compared to clinical results from 35 patients with implants., Results: Two images with different parameter settings have to be obtained to visualize the covered sponge structure and the structure around the implant with film-screen technique. Digital mammography allows assessment of both areas using one image at different window settings. The assessability of covered structures depends on the type of implant. These results are in keeping with our clinical experiences., Conclusion: Digital mammography allows equal or better assessment of covered and non-covered tissue in augmented breasts without the need for additional exposures.

Purpose: To evaluate the conspicuity of microcalcifications in magnified mammographic views of preparations obtained with full field digital mammography (FFDM), film-screen mammography (FSM), and the DIMA technique., Material and Methods: Twelve preparations were examined by FFDM and FSM using 1.8 x magnification and DIMA using 7 x magnification. Parameter settings were identical for all three techniques. The number of visible microcalcifications was then determined for each modality by three radiologists. As far as possible, all preparations were X-rayed at 22 kV and 10 mAS., Results: Altogether 9705 calcifications were counted (DIMA: 1609/1542/1534; FFDM: 1020/753/881; FSM: 901/643/822). The total number of microcalcifications identified with the DIMA technique was 4685 as compared to 2654 with FFDM and 2366 with FSM. The calcifications counted with FFDM and FSM thus corresponded to 56.6 % and 50.5 %, respectively, of those identified with DIMA. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (F-Test, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Significantly more calcifications are identified when magnified mammographic views of preparations containing microcalcifications are obtained with the DIMA technique compared to FFDM or FSM. FFDM depicts markedly more calcifications than FSM. This means one should increase spatial resolution. Digital mammography offers the potential for improved visualization of microcalcifications with advanced applications.