Search

Background: The search for biomarkers to evaluate ovarian cancer (OC) homologous recombination (HR) function and predict the response to therapy is an urgent clinical need to improve the selection of patients who could benefit from platinum- and olaparib (poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, PARPi)-based therapies. Methods: We used a large collection of OC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) (n = 47) and evaluated their HR status based on BRCA1/2 mutations, BRCA1 promoter methylation and the HRDetect score. RAD51 foci were quantified in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded untreated tumour specimens by immunofluorescence and the messenger RNA expression of 21 DNA repair genes by real-time PCR. Results: Tumour HR deficiency predicted both platinum and olaparib responses. The basal level of RAD51 foci evaluated in geminin-positive/replicating cells strongly inversely correlated with olaparib response (p = 0.011); in particular, the lower the foci score, the greater the sensitivity to olaparib, while low RAD51 foci score seems to associate with platinum activity. Conclusions: The basal RAD51 foci score is a candidate predictive biomarker of olaparib response in OC patients as it can be easily translatable in a clinical setting. Moreover, the findings corroborate the importance of OC-PDXs as a reliable tool to identify and validate biomarkers of response to therapy. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

The tumor suppressor FANCD1/BRCA2 is crucial for DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR). BRCA2 biallelic pathogenic variants result in a severe form of Fanconi anemia (FA) syndrome, whereas monoallelic pathogenic variants cause mainly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition. For decades, the co-occurrence in trans with a clearly pathogenic variant led to assume that the other allele was benign. However, here we show a patient with biallelic BRCA2 (c.1813dup and c.7796 A > G) diagnosed at age 33 with FA after a hypertoxic reaction to chemotherapy during breast cancer treatment. After DNA damage, patient cells displayed intermediate chromosome fragility, reduced survival, cell cycle defects, and significantly decreased RAD51 foci formation. With a newly developed cell-based flow cytometric assay, we measured single BRCA2 allele contributions to HRR, and found that expression of the missense allele in a BRCA2 KO cellular background partially recovered HRR activity. Our data suggest that a hypomorphic BRCA2 allele retaining 37–54% of normal HRR function can prevent FA clinical phenotype, but not the early onset of breast cancer and severe hypersensitivity to chemotherapy.

Pròstata; PARP; Biomarcadors Próstata; PARP; Biomarcadores Prostate; PARP; biomarkers PARP inhibitors are approved for treating advanced prostate cancers (APCs) with various defective DNA repair genes; however, further studies to clinically qualify predictive biomarkers are warranted. Herein we analyzed TOPARP-B Phase II clinical trial samples, evaluating whole exome and low-pass whole genome sequencing and immunohistochemical assays evaluating ATM and RAD51 foci (testing homologous recombination repair function). BRCA1/2 germline and somatic pathogenic mutations associated with similar benefit from olaparib; greater benefit was observed with homozygous BRCA deletion. Biallelic, but not mono-allelic, PALB2 deleterious alterations were associated with clinical benefit. In the ATM cohort, loss of ATM protein by immunohistochemistry associated with better outcome. RAD51 foci loss identified tumors with biallelic BRCA and PALB2 alteration while most ATM- and CDK12-altered APCs had higher RAD51 foci levels. Overall, APCs with homozygous BRCA2 deletion are exceptional responders; PALB2 biallelic loss and loss of ATM immunohistochemical expression associated with clinical benefit. TOPARP is an investigator-initiated trial; we are grateful for the support and funding from AstraZeneca, and for the study grants from Cancer Research UK (CRUK/11/029; C12540/A12829; C12540/A13230; C12540/A20447). ICR-CTSU also receives program grant funding from Cancer Research UK (Grant number: C1491/A15955, C1491/A25351). We acknowledge research funding for this work from Cancer Research UK, Prostate Cancer UK, the Movember Foundation through the London Movember Centre of Excellence (CEO13_2-002), the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the UK Department of Health through an Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC) grant. Professor Johann de Bono is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health; research at the Royal Marsden Hospital is supported by a Biomedical Research Centre grant. Pasquale Rescigno was supported by a PCF Young Investigator Award 19YOUN19. The authors affiliated to VHIO acknowledge funding from “La Caixa” Foundation and European Institute of Innovation and Technology/Horizon 2020 (LCF/TR/CC19/52470003), Fundacion FERO and Fundacion Cellex. J. Mateo, A. Llop-Guevara and V. Serra received grants from Fundacion Cientifica AECC (LABAE16020PORTT) and an ERAPERMED2019-215. J. Mateo gratefully acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant 837900), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Grant PI18/01384), Fundación AECC, CRIS Cancer Foundation and the US Department of Defense CDMRP (Impact Award PC170510P1). S. Arce-Gallego Research. Downloaded from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on July 1, 2021. © 2021 American Association for Cancer Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on May 27, 2021; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0007 3 and V. Serra were supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FI19/00280, CPII19/00033).

Altres ajuts: European Research Area-NET, Transcan-2 (AC15/00063), Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (LABAE16020PORTT) i AIOC15152806CRUZ, Generalitat de Catalunya(PERIS, SLT002/16/00477 En el cas dels drets, per a usos comercials contactar amb: journals.permissions@oup.com BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) -deficient tumors display impaired homologous recombination repair (HRR) and enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents or to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). Their efficacy in germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated metastatic breast cancers has been recently confirmed in clinical trials. Numerous mechanisms of PARPi resistance have been described, whose clinical relevance in gBRCA-mutated breast cancer is unknown. This highlights the need to identify functional biomarkers to better predict PARPi sensitivity. We investigated the in vivo mechanisms of PARPi resistance in gBRCA1 patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) exhibiting differential response to PARPi. Analysis included exome sequencing and immunostaining of DNA damage response proteins to functionally evaluate HRR. Findings were validated in a retrospective sample set from gBRCA1/2-cancer patients treated with PARPi. RAD51 nuclear foci, a surrogate marker of HRR functionality, were the only common feature in PDX and patient samples with primary or acquired PARPi resistance. Consistently, low RAD51 was associated with objective response to PARPi. Evaluation of the RAD51 biomarker in untreated tumors was feasible due to endogenous DNA damage. In PARPi-resistant gBRCA1 PDXs, genetic analysis found no in-frame secondary mutations, but BRCA1 hypomorphic proteins in 60% of the models, TP53BP1 -loss in 20% and RAD51 -amplification in one sample, none mutually exclusive. Conversely, one of three PARPi-resistant gBRCA2 tumors displayed BRCA2 restoration by exome sequencing. In PDXs, PARPi resistance could be reverted upon combination of a PARPi with an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor. Detection of RAD51 foci in gBRCA tumors correlates with PARPi resistance regardless of the underlying mechanism restoring HRR function. This is a promising biomarker to be used in the clinic to better select patients for PARPi therapy. Our study also supports the clinical development of PARPi combinations such as those with ATM inhibitors.

Introduction/Background Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is frequent in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC), justifying clinical trials testing PARP-inhibitors. To facilitate this development a pragmatic test to asses HR competency is required. Accumulation of RAD51 protein at sites of DNA double strand breaks, has been put forward as a reliable functional test for HR competency. Here we aimed to test the performance of this pragmatic assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue. Methodology We used a previously described, prospective collected series of 21 EC that underwent primary resection with known HR status based on genomic analyses (next-generation sequencing for HR-core genes and array comparative genomic hybridization/SNP array) as our training cohort. To assure the presence of endogenous DNA damage, a gamma-H2AX staining was performed. Co-immunofluorescence (IF) was performed for both Geminin (marker staining cells in G2/S phase) and RAD51. RAD51 score was calculated as the fraction of Geminin positive cells that showed RAD51 foci (≥ 2) in the nucleus. Final RAD51 scores were correlated to known HR-status. Results All 21 EC showed positivity for gamma-H2AX staining assuring presence of endogenous DNA damage in routine diagnostic FFPE tumour tissue. Among all cases, the RAD51scores varied form 0–72%. The range of RAD51 scores in the five HRD EC was 0–4%, whereas the 16 HRP EC tested showed RAD51 scores ranging from 16–72% (P Conclusion This RAD51 assay can successfully be performed on diagnostic FFPE material and reliably determined HR competency in 100% of our EC cases using cut-off RAD51 score of 10%. We will present the performance of this cut-off on our test-set of HR-annotated EC. This RAD51 assay is a promising cheap, pragmatic assay that can be used in the clinic to select patients that may benefit from platinum compounds and PARP-inhibitor therapy. Disclosure Nothing to disclose.

5513 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), defined as BRCA1/2 mutation ( BRCAmut)or high genomic instability, is currently used to identify patients (pts) with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitors. While these genomic tests are useful, they are imperfect: some BRCAm EOC demonstrate primary PARPi resistance and some HR-proficient benefit. Another approach to evaluate HRD is to measure the capacity of tumor cells to recruit nuclear RAD51 foci during S/G2 phase in the presence of double strand DNA damage using multiplexed immunofluorescence (IF) for RAD51, geminin (GMN) and yH2AX. We aimed to describe for the 1st time HRD using this RAD51 functional assay in EOC and correlate RAD51 status to platinum response and BRCAmut. Methods: Tumor samples and clinical data were collected prospectively from pts in the randomized CHIVA trial of neoadjuvant platinum chemotherapy +/- nintedanib. IF for RAD51, GMN, and DAPI was performed on a 3uM slide from FFPE blocks, where feasible, yH2AX was positively scored on a consecutive slide. Tumors were considered RAD51-deficient if < 10% of gem+ tumor cells (TC) had > 5 RAD51+ foci. BRCAmut were identified by NGS. Results: 155 baseline chemotherapy naïve EOC samples were available. All were advanced stage (IIIC/IV), 75% were G3, 7% G2, 2% G1, and 16% grade UK. A contributive RAD51 result was obtained for 90% (139/155) of samples. Contributive NGS results were available for 130 samples. Overall, yH2AX scores were high (median % TC+: 86%, IQR: 56%-100%) confirming the presence of significant basal DNA damage in high grade EOC. Only 8 samples were yH2AX-low, including two of the three G1 tumors. In contrast, 55% (76/155) of samples were considered RAD51-deficient (score < 10%). With regard to outcome, pts with RAD51-deficient tumors had significantly higher overall response rates to neoadjuvant platinum (68% vs 37%, p = 0.04) and significantly longer median progression-free survival (HR 0.50, IC95% 0.25-0.98, p = 0.02). Considering BRCA status, 15% of tumors harbored a deleterious BRCAmut and 67% of these were RAD51-deficient. Importantly among BRCAmut EOC, the RAD51-proficient tumors had significantly poorer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR = 17% vs 75%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: We evaluated a novel functional assay of HR functionality in advanced EOC. The assay requires minimal tissue and yields contributive results in 90% of cases. Overall, EOC demonstrate high levels of basal DNA damage, yet 55% fail to recruit RAD51 foci during S/G2 cell cycle phase. These RAD51-deficient EOC have improved outcome after neoadjuvant platinum. Conversely, the RAD51 assay also identified a small subset of RAD51-high BRCAmut tumors with poor platinum response. Whether this RAD51 functional assay may also predict PARP inhibitor benefit is currently being investigated.

Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in cancers with defective homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR), including BRCA1/2‐related cancers. A test to identify additional HRR‐deficient tumors will help to extend their use in new indications. We evaluated the activity of the PARPi olaparib in patient‐derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) from breast cancer (BC) patients and investigated mechanisms of sensitivity through exome sequencing, BRCA1 promoter methylation analysis, and immunostaining of HRR proteins, including RAD51 nuclear foci. In an independent BC PDX panel, the predictive capacity of the RAD51 score and the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score were compared. To examine the clinical feasibility of the RAD51 assay, we scored archival breast tumor samples, including PALB2‐related hereditary cancers. The RAD51 score was highly discriminative of PARPi sensitivity versus PARPi resistance in BC PDXs and outperformed the genomic test. In clinical samples, all PALB2‐related tumors were classified as HRR‐deficient by the RAD51 score. The functional biomarker RAD51 enables the identification of PARPi‐sensitive BC and broadens the population who may benefit from this therapy beyond BRCA1/2‐related cancers.

PARP1/2 inhibitors (PARPi) are the first approved targeted DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors and have been shown to have clinical benefit, particularly in tumors harboring mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 and other genes of homologous recombination repair (HRR). However, resistance to PARPi monotherapy will impact on both the breadth and depth of response. We showed that HRR-mutant TNBC and ovarian cancer patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models frequently exhibit innate or acquired PARP inhibitor resistance and that this resistance is linked to a proficient or reactivated HRR, indicated by the ability to form RAD51 foci. A key component of PARPi mechanism of action results from trapping PARP onto DNA, which has the potential to generate replication stress. Moreover, recent data demonstrate that PARP1, along with components of the HRR, are associated with the re-start and protection of stalled replication forks. Here, we assessed whether combinations of the PARPi olaparib together with inhibitors of the replication stress response (RSR) could reverse PARPi resistance in our PDX cohort and we analyzed the effects on RSR by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Our data demonstrate that 7/27 models exhibit WEE1i (AZD1775) single agent activity measured as tumor regressions (≤ -30% change in tumor volume), all of which were PARPi resistant. Of the PARPi and WEE1i resistant models, 5 responded to combination treatment and demonstrated a significant increase in the RSR markers pRPA32 and pan-γH2AX compared to either single agent treatment alone. For monotherapy ATRi treatment, there were three models showing tumor regression with AZD6738, all harbored ATM mutations, two also responding to WEE1i monotherapy and one responded to olaparib monotherapy. There were an additional two models that responded to the combination of PARPi plus ATRi, and one of these also responded to the WEE1i/PARPi combination. Together, our analysis demonstrates that by targeting the replication stress response we could cause tumor regression in 13/20 PARPi resistant PDX models and in 6 of these cases the response required PARP inhibition, with DDR signalling indicating that the PARPi was impacting on the RSR. Further insights will be presented into which genetic backgrounds and acquired PARPi resistant mechanisms are reversed by targeting either WEE1 or ATR, thus highlighting the potential for how PARPi resistance can be reversed by targeting alternative DDR dependencies. Citation Format: Mark J. O'Connor, Cristina Cruz, Marta Castroviejo-Bermejo, Urszula M. Polanska, Gemma N. Jones, Anderson Wang, Zhongwu Lai, Josep Forment, Krishna Bulusu, Alba Llop-Guevara, Brian Dougherty, Cristina Saura, Rachel Brough, Chris J. Lord, Alejandra Bruna, Carlos Caldas, Stephen Fawell, J Carl Barrett, Susan E. Critchlow, Judith Balmaña, Elaine Cadogan, Violeta Serra. Reversing PARP inhibitor resistance by targeting the replication stress response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 932.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in cancers with defective homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR), including BRCA1/2-related cancers. A test to identify additional HRR-deficient tumors will help to extend their use in new indications. We evaluated the activity of the PARPi olaparib in patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) from breast cancer (BC) patients and investigated mechanisms of sensitivity through exome sequencing, BRCA1 promoter methylation analysis, and immunostaining of HRR proteins, including RAD51 nuclear foci. In an independent BC PDX panel, the predictive capacity of the RAD51 score and the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score were compared. To examine the clinical feasibility of the RAD51 assay, we scored archival breast tumor samples, including PALB2-related hereditary cancers. The RAD51 score was highly discriminative of PARPi sensitivity versus PARPi resistance in BC PDXs and outperformed the genomic test. In clinical samples, all PALB2-related tumors were classified as HRR-deficient by the RAD51 score. The functional biomarker RAD51 enables the identification of PARPi-sensitive BC and broadens the population who may benefit from this therapy beyond BRCA1/2-related cancers.