Search

Background: Medicare's voluntary bundled payment programs have demonstrated generally favorable results. However, it remains unknown whether uneven hospital participation in these programs in communities with greater shares of minorities and patients of low socioeconomic status results in disparate access to practice redesign innovations. Objective: Examine whether communities with higher proportions of marginalized individuals were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-Advanced). Design: Cross-sectional study using ordinary least squares regression controlling for patient and community factors. Participants: Medicare fee-for-service patients enrolled from 2015–2017 (pre-BPCI-Advanced) and residing in 2,058 local communities nationwide defined by Hospital Service Areas (HSAs). Each community's share of marginalized patients was calculated separately for each of the share of beneficiaries of Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, or dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid. Main Measures: Dichotomous variable indicating whether a given community had at least one hospital that ever participated in BPCI-Advanced from 2018–2022. Key Results: Communities with higher shares of dual-eligible individuals were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced than communities with the lowest quartile of dual-eligible individuals (Q4: -15.1 percentage points [pp] lower than Q1, 95% CI: -21.0 to -9.1, p < 0.001). There was no consistent significant relationship between community proportion of Black beneficiaries and likelihood of having a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced. Communities with higher shares of Hispanic beneficiaries were more likely to have a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced than those in the lowest quartile (Q4: 19.2 pp higher than Q1, 95% CI: 13.4 to 24.9, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Communities with greater shares of dual-eligible beneficiaries, but not racial or ethnic minorities, were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced Policymakers should consider approaches to incentivize more socioeconomically uniform participation in voluntary bundled payments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Racial and ethnic minorities receive opioid prescriptions at lower rates and dosages than White patients. Though opioid stewardship interventions can improve or exacerbate these disparities, there is little evidence about these effects. We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster‐randomized controlled trial conducted among 438 clinicians from 21 emergency departments and 27 urgent care clinics. Our objective was to determine whether randomly allocated opioid stewardship clinician feedback interventions that were designed to reduce opioid prescriptions had unintended effects on disparities in prescribing by patient race and ethnicity. Methods: The primary outcome was likelihood of receiving a low‐pill prescription (low ≤10 pills, medium 11–19 pills, high ≥20 pills). Generalized mixed‐effects models were used to determine patient characteristics associated with low‐pill prescriptions during the baseline period. These models were then used to determine whether receipt of a low‐pill prescription varied by patient race or ethnicity during the intervention period between usual care and three opioid stewardship interventions: (1) individual audit feedback, (2) peer comparison feedback, and (3) combined (individual audit + peer comparison) feedback. Results: Compared with White patients, Black patients were more likely to receive a low‐pill prescription during the baseline (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.31, p = 0.002) and intervention (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07–1.91, p = 0.015). While combined feedback was associated with an overall increase in low‐pill prescriptions as intended (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.28–2.78, p = 0.001), there were no significant differences in treatment effects of any of the interventions by patient race and ethnicity. Conclusions: Combined individual audit and peer comparison feedback was associated with fewer opioid pills per prescription equally by patient race and ethnicity. However, the intervention did not significantly close the baseline disparity in prescribing by race. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord ependymomas (SCEs) represent the most common intramedullary spinal cord tumors among adults. Research shows that access to neurosurgical care and patient outcomes can be greatly influenced by patient location. This study investigates the association between the outcomes of patients with SCE in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. Cases of SCE between 2004 and 2019 were identified within the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, a combined dataset including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries and National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between urbanicity and SCE treatment, adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity. Survival data was available from 42 National Program of Cancer Registries (excluding Kansas and Minnesota, for which county data are unavailable), and Cox proportional hazard models were used to understand the effect of surgical treatment, county urbanicity, age at diagnosis, and the interaction effect between age at diagnosis and surgery, on the survival time of patients. Overall, 7577 patients were identified, with 6454 (85%) residing in metropolitan and 1223 (15%) in nonmetropolitan counties. Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties had different age, sex, and race/ethnicity compositions; however, demographics were not associated with differences in the type of surgery received when stratified by urbanicity. Irrespective of metropolitan status, individuals who were American Indian/Alaska Native non-Hispanic and Hispanic (all races) were associated with reduced odds of receiving surgery. Individuals who were Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic were associated with increased odds of receiving comprehensive treatment. Diagnosis of SCE at later ages was linked with elevated mortality (hazard ratio = 4.85, P < 0.001). Gross total resection was associated with reduced risk of death (hazard ratio = 0.37, P = 0.004), and age did not interact with gross total resection to influence risk of death. The relationship between patients' residential location and access to neurosurgical care is critical to ensuring equitable distribution of care. This study represents an important step in delineating areas of existing disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]