Search

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is the standard therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinomas with common EGFR mutations. Preclinical studies have suggested that uncommon G719X, L861Q, and S768I mutations are also sensitive to EGFR-TKIs. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with these uncommon mutations remains unclear., Methods: A nationwide survey was performed to collect data from gefitinib and erlotinib treatment outcomes of patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma bearing EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I mutations. The results were compared with those regarding patients with exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations., Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients with uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled from 18 institutes throughout Taiwan. Mutations of G719X, L861Q, S768I, G719X + L861Q, and G719X + S768I were observed in 78, 57, 7, 9, and 10 patients, respectively. After receiving EGFR-TKI treatment, patients with uncommon mutations exhibited a significantly inferior tumor response rate (41.6% vs. 66.5%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (median, 7.7 vs. 11.4 months; p < 0.001) than patients with common mutations. Among the patients who used EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment, there was a significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (median, 24.0 vs. 29.7 months; p = 0.005)., Conclusion: Gefitinib and erlotinib are active in patients with G719X/L861Q/S768I mutations; however, less effective than in those with common mutations.

Purpose: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and RET signaling. This placebo-controlled trial assessed whether vandetanib conferred an overall survival benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and one or two chemotherapy regimens., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive vandetanib 300 mg/d or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to compare the outcomes between the two arms with respect to overall survival., Results: Overall, 924 patients received vandetanib (n = 617) or placebo (n = 307). No significant increase in overall survival was detected in the vandetanib cohort compared with placebo (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95.2% CI, 0.81 to 1.11; P = .527); median overall survival was 8.5 months versus 7.8 months for vandetanib and placebo patients, respectively. Statistically significant advantages favoring vandetanib were observed for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.63; P < .001) and objective response rate (2.6% v 0.7%; P = .028). Postprogression therapy was balanced across the cohorts in both number and type. Adverse events were generally consistent with previous NSCLC studies of vandetanib 300 mg; common events occurring with a greater frequency in the vandetanib arm versus placebo included diarrhea (46% v 11%), rash (42% v 11%), and hypertension (26% v 3%)., Conclusion: The study did not demonstrate an overall survival benefit for vandetanib versus placebo. There was a higher incidence of some adverse events with vandetanib.

Introduction: Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that significantly increases survival for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been reported to be particularly effective in Asian patients and may have a distinct safety profile in this population compared with non-Asian patients. We report safety and efficacy data from a subpopulation of East/South-East (E/SE) Asian patients enrolled in a global, open-label, phase IV trial of erlotinib (Tarceva Lung Cancer Survival Treatment study)., Methods: Patients who had previously failed on chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or were unsuitable for these treatments, were treated with oral erlotinib (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity., Results: Best response data were available for 1118 E/SE Asian and 4276 non-E/SE Asian patients. The overall response rates were 27% versus 10%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The disease control rates were 78% versus 66%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Survival data were available for 1242 E/SE Asian and 5338 non-E/SE Asian patients. The median progression-free survival times were 5.78 months versus 2.92 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.66, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival times were 14.7 months versus 6.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.57, p < 0.0001). One-year survival rates were 58.3% and 32.7%, respectively. Safety data were available for 1242 E/SE Asian patients. Seventeen percent of these patients experienced one or more erlotinib-related adverse event (AE) (other than the most frequently occurring AEs prespecified in the protocol) and 2% experienced an erlotinib-related serious AE. Dose reductions were reported for 171 (14%) patients., Conclusion: Erlotinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: It was found that second-line or thereafter therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed previous chemotherapy yielded a modest survival benefit. However, whether elderly patients (> or =70 years) benefit and are as suitable for salvage therapy as nonelderly patients (<70 years) are unknown. Whether epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is more favorable than chemotherapeutic agents as a salvage therapy agent in elderly patients with NSCLC is also undetermined., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and updated the data of our patients with NSCLC who received second-line salvage therapies, classified them into elderly and nonelderly groups, and compared the efficacy, toxicities, and survival of the patients., Results: Four hundred sixty-one cases were reviewed. The nonelderly group had a similar response rate, control rate, and median survival time than the elderly group (p = 0.2, p = 0.9, and p = 0.5, respectively). The median progression-free time was numerically longer in the elderly than the nonelderly patients (p = 0.08). The nonelderly group had statistically insignificantly less hematologic toxicities than the elderly group, but more nausea and vomiting. In addition, the use of EGFR-TKI salvage therapy, compared with salvage chemotherapies in the elderly group, resulted in a similar disease control rate and median survival time and more favorable toxicity profiles., Conclusions: There were no differences in the efficacy of salvage chemotherapies and EGFR-TKI therapy, in terms of response rate, control rate, and overall survival, in elderly and nonelderly patients, and the therapies had acceptable toxicities. Age itself should not preclude patients with NSCLC from second-line salvage therapy.

Purpose: Erlotinib is the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) which has demonstrated a survival benefit in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. An open label phase II study was conducted in Taiwanese patients with NSCLC to evaluate its efficacy., Methods: Patients with proven stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received at least one line of standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled into this study. All patients were given oral erlotinib, 150mg/day till disease progression., Results: From May 2005 to July 2006, 300 patients were entered from 14 hospitals in Taiwan. This analysis was based on 299 patients who received at least one dose of erlotinib. The best response rates were a 29% partial response and 44% stable disease in 273 patients who had response data available. Non-smoking (p=0.033), adenocarcinoma/BAC (p=0.0027), female (p=0.0013), aged less than 65 years (p=0.0115), stage IV (p=0.0492), patients with skin rash (p=0.0216), and a higher grade of skin rash (p=0.003) were significantly correlated with response to treatment. Skin rash was a common adverse event (any grade: 84%, Gr 3-4: 16%). The median time to disease progression was 5.6 months. Cox regression model for progression free survival showed patients most at risk of early progression were males of low performance status having squamous cell carcinoma., Conclusions: This was the largest multicenter prospective clinical study of NSCLC in Taiwan. The results demonstrated the excellent response rates, time-to-progression and overall survival of erlotinib in a large population of Taiwanese NSCLC patients who had been previously treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Background: Though the imaging-based response (IBR) is the most frequently used index of the therapeutic effect in cancer patients, an index based on serum tumor markers might prove to be useful, especially in patients without measurable tumors., Methods: Paired pre- and post-treatment serum tumor markers (CEA, CA-125, and CA-199) were measured in 89 of 100 registered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received gefitinib. Correlation and agreement analyses between the IBR at the 8th week and the tumor marker response (TMR) at the 4th or the 8th week were performed in patients with measurable lesions (n=68). Analysis of survival in relation to TMR was performed in all patients and in patients with no measurable lesions (n=21)., Results: IBR was closely correlated with individual tumor marker responses and the response of all 3 markers combined at 4 weeks (P values ranged from <0.001 to 0.002). The agreements were also significant (P values ranged from 0.001 to 0.004). In the whole group, 4-week TMR was predictive for progression-free survival (P values ranged from <0.0001 to 0.0086). In patients without measurable lesions, differences in progression-free survival and overall survival were closely correlated with the 4-week CA-125 response, CA-199 response, and TMR(overall) (P values ranged from 0.0002 to 0.0399). However, the correlation between the 8-week TMR and either IBR or survival was not significant., Conclusions: In gefitinib-treated NSCLC patients, correlation was good between 4-week TMR and IBR. Four-week TMR was predictive for survival. TMR may serve as a tool for assessing the gefitinib response in patients without measurable lesions.

Purpose: This phase II single arm, open label study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oral gefitinib (250mg) daily in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with adequate organ functions, and were chemonaïve. All eligible patients were treated with oral administration of 250mg of gefitinib until intolerable toxicity, disease progression or death occurred. Responses were assessed after every 8 weeks of therapy., Results: For a total of 53 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 32.1% and overall disease control rate (DCR) was 52.8%. Median overall and progression-free survivals (PFS) were 9.4 (95% CI, 8.8-13.3) and 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.1-5.2) months, and 1-year survival rate was 41.5%. Patients with adenocarcinoma (n=35) had a higher response rate. Adenocarcinoma, female gender (n=24), and response to gefitinib were predictive factors for better survival. The most commonly seen adverse events (AEs) were skin toxicity (54.7%), diarrhea (43.4%) and nail change (16.9%). Most AEs were mild to moderate and considered manageable. Drug-related interstitial pneumonia was clinically diagnosed in four cases (7.5%)., Conclusions: Oral gefitinib, as compared to conventional chemotherapy, has comparable effect but less toxicity as a first-line treatment in Chinese patients who have advanced NSCLC, especially in those with adenocarcinoma histology. A further phase III prospective study comparing gefitinib to standard chemotherapy to define the efficacy of gefitinib is appropriate in advanced NSCLC patients.

Introduction: The IRESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) phase III study compared the efficacy of gefitinib (IRESSA) versus placebo in patients with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although a statistically significant difference in survival was not seen between gefitinib and placebo in the overall ISEL population, preplanned subset analyses demonstrated a significant survival benefit in patients who had never smoked and in patients of Asian origin., Methods: In ISEL, 1692 patients who were refractory to or intolerant of their latest chemotherapy were randomized to receive either gefitinib (250 mg/day) or placebo, plus best supportive care. Preplanned subgroup analyses included an assessment of patients who were of Asian origin (n = 342)., Results: Two hundred thirty-five patients of Asian origin received gefitinib, and 107 received placebo. In these patients, treatment with gefitinib significantly improved survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48, 0.91; p = 0.010; median survival, 9.5 versus 5.5 months). Patients of Asian origin also experienced statistically significant improvements in time to treatment failure with gefitinib compared with placebo (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.91; p = 0.0084; 4.4 versus 2.2 months), and objective response rates were higher with gefitinib than with placebo (12 versus 2%). Gefitinib was generally well tolerated in patients of Asian origin, with rash and diarrhea being the most common adverse events. No unexpected adverse events were observed., Conclusions: Treatment with gefitinib was associated with a significant improvement in survival in a subgroup of patients of Asian origin with previously treated refractory advanced NSCLC.

Background: Gender, smoking history, adenocarcinoma histology, performance status, and East Asian ethnicity were predictive factors of gefitinib response in previous analysis. However, these factors tend to be correlated with each other; it is not clear whether gender, smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology were all independent predictors for response in East Asian populations., Methods: Tumor response, survival and predictive factors of gefitinib response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated between May of 2002 and November of 2004 were collected retrospectively from three medical centers in Taiwan. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to test potential predictive factors associated with response to gefitinib. Overall survivals between groups with different predictive factors were compared by log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that independently predict for survival., Results: A total of 428 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up duration for living patients was 19.5 months (range, 10.2-39.9). Objective tumor response was observed in 114 patients (26.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4%-30.8%) and disease stabilization in 129 patients (30.2%). Response rate was statistically significant higher in adenocarcinoma, good performance status, and chemonaive patients in multivariate analysis. The median survival was 7.4 months (95% CI: 5.8-9.0) and 1-year survival was 34.3% (95% CI: 29.0%-38.0%). Significant independent predictive factors associated with longer survival in multivariate analysis were good performance status (p < 0.001) and responsiveness to gefitinib (p < 0.001). In 286 chemotherapy-treated patients, the response rate was 22.7%. Median and 1-year survival was 7.9 months and 36.7%, respectively. Good performance status was predictive of tumor response (p < 0.001) and better survival (p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. Response to gefitinib was predictive of better survival (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Gender and smoking status were not, but good performance status (PS), no previous chemotherapy, and adenocarcinoma histology were independent predictive factors in multivariate analysis for gefitinib response in Taiwanese advanced non-small cell lung cancer population. In patients previously treated with chemotherapy, only good PS was an independent predictor for tumor response in multivariate analysis.

Gefitinib has shown activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed previous platinum-based combination chemotherapy and/or taxane treatment. Recently, gefitinib was documented to be more effective in an East Asian population, as well. Thus, we performed a gefitinib trial in Taiwanese patients to assess the efficacy of this regimen. Treatment consisted of gefitinib 250 mg one tablet daily until disease progression. Thirty-six patients were enrolled from January 2003 to September 2004. Gefitinib was second-line treatment in 10, third-line in 15, fourth-line in 9, and fifth-line in 2. All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. After 8 weeks of treatment, three patients had a complete response (CR) and nine had a partial response (PR), with an overall response rate of 33.3% (95% confidence interval 17.9%-48.7%). All treatment-related toxicities were few and mild in severity, except that one patient suffered from reversible grade 3 interstitial pneumonitis. The median time to disease progression was 4.7 months, and the median survival was 9.5 months. The one-year survival rate was 45.1%. Survival was significantly better in those who responded to treatment (CR and PR) than in those who did not (median 20.1 vs. 4.7 months, p=0.0002). Survival was also better in those who demonstrated disease control using gefitinib (CR, PR, and stable disease) than in those who did not (14.1 vs. 1.4 months, p<0.0001). The authors conclude that daily gefitinib treatment has high activity, is well tolerated, and provides very good survival in Taiwanese NSCLC patients who have failed previous chemotherapy, especially in those who responded to gefitinib treatment or those whose disease was controlled by gefitinib treatment.

Gefitinib, an orally active, selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinase, is an effective treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most drug-related adverse events are mild to moderate; however, some patients may develop acute interstitial pneumonia that is sometimes fatal. In a prospective study of gefitinib in 76 patients with advanced NSCLC, 69 patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 4 cases (5.8%) of gefitinib-related interstitial pneumonia were diagnosed: 1 occurred in the second week; 2 in the second month; and 1 during the fourth month of treatment. When interstitial pneumonia occurred, the patients had stable disease (n = 2), a partial response (n = 1), or progressive disease (n = 1). All 4 patients recovered when gefitinib treatment was stopped and glucocorticosteroid therapy was started; no deaths related to gefitinib therapy were noted in this series. While treating NSCLC patients with gefitinib, it is important to carefully evaluate any new-onset respiratory symptoms and promptly arrange radiographic examinations, and to stop gefitinib treatment and begin glucocorticosteroid therapy whenever pulmonary toxicity is highly suspected.

Gefitinib is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its role in patients with brain metastases has not been clearly defined. We had conducted a prospective study to give gefitinib to NSCLC patients irrespective of their performance status (PS), number of prior treatment regimens and the presence of brain metastases. A total of 76 patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven patients had measurable lesions and the objective response rate was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 20.7-46.0%). For all enrolled patients, the disease control rate was 63.2% (95% CI, 52.1-74.3%) with a median progression-free survival of 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.6-6.5 months) and median overall survival 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.9-14.8 months). Twenty-one patients had simultaneously assessable intracranial lesions (ICLs) and extracranial lesions (ECLs), 17 of them (81.0%) showed comparable tumor response. There was no survival difference between the patients with and without metastatic brain disease. Most drug-related adverse events were mild. Intolerable toxicities happened in five patients, four of them were interstitial pneumonia (5.8%). Severity of skin toxicity was tightly associated with tumor response and patient survival (P = 0.007 and <0.001) and the association was consistent in the analysis using early toxicity profile (P = 0.033 and 0.001). In conclusion, gefitinib is active in patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC and tumor response is related to skin toxicity. It is feasible to conduct randomized trials to identify the role of gefitinib alone or in combination with other modality for treatment of NSCLC patients who have metastatic brain lesion(s).