Search

Introduction: A continuing shift of healthcare delivery from hospital to the community has increased the acuity and complexity of care provided in the home. Global financial crises and nursing shortages have prompted policies supporting two tiers of nursing and expansion of the licensed practical nurse, second level or enrolled nurse role and evoked debate surrounding roles traditionally undertaken by registered nurses. Community nursing offers unique challenges for enrolled nurses wanting to enact their full scope of practice. Aim: To compare and describe registered and enrolled nurse opinions of their current and potential enrolled nurse scope of practice in the community health setting. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey of 136 nurses (115 registered and 21 enrolled nurses) was undertaken within a large community nursing team in Australia. Participants reported their opinions of enrolled nurse scope of practice based on 27 core community nursing skills. Results: Although substantial agreement was evident, there were statistically significant differences between registered nurse and enrolled nurse opinions in core skill areas; ‘Patient Education’ and ‘Clinical Observation’. Registered nurses identified some specialized skills—catheter and gastrostomy care—that could be undertaken by enrolled nurses with further education. Conclusion: We confirm that registered nurses do agree with extending the skills of enrolled nurses. Education approaches that build shared confidence in enrolled nurse advanced skills are recommended. Implications for nursing and health policy: The future supply of nurses is at risk. There are limited resources and increasing demand for quality health care where people live and work. While there may be opportunities internationally to improve productivity through advanced nursing roles, these policies should prioritize efficiency by firstly promoting the full enactment of nursing skills in these settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background While developmental surveillance programs promote early identification of child developmental problems, evidence has indicated suboptimal uptake. This study aimed to identify predictors of developmental surveillance completion at 6 months postpartum. Methods Questionnaires were administered to the parents of 510 infants who were born in south western Sydney, Australia over a 22-month period. Attendance for developmental screening and completion of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) at 6 months postpartum were modelled separately using multivariable logistic regression. Results Developmental surveillance attendance was predicted by higher levels of maternal education, annual income and being informed about checks. PEDS completion at 6 months of age was predicted by higher income and being informed, as well as being married, employed, speaking English at home, full-term birth and the professional status of the practitioner completing the check. Conclusions Barriers to developmental surveillance included low socioeconomic status, linguistic diversity and possible gaps in parental knowledge and professional education. Developmental surveillance rates may be increased by the addition of targeted parental and professional support within current universal frameworks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To determine if the EuroQol Health Related Quality of Life survey produces equivalent results when administered by phone interview or patient-completed forms.Methods: People awaiting hip or knee arthroplasty at a major metropolitan hospital participated. They were randomly assigned to receive the EuroQol Health Related Quality of Life survey via telephone, followed by a patient completed form 1 week later, or vice versa. Equivalence was determined using two one-sided tests (TOST) based on minimal clinically-important differences for the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the summary Utility Index. Cohen's Kappa scores were computed to determine agreement for the individual EuroQoL Likert scale items.Results: Seventy-six from 90 (84%) participants completed the survey twice. Based on limits set at ±7 and ±0.11 for the VAS and Utility Index, respectively, equivalence was established between the two methods of administration for both the VAS (mean difference 0.05 [90% CI -3.76-3.67]) and the Utility Index (mean difference 0.06 [90% CI 0.02-0.11]). Varying levels of agreement, ranging from slight to substantial (κ = 0.17-0.67), were demonstrated for the individual health domains. The order of telephone and patient-completed survey administration had no significant effect on results.Conclusions: Equivalent results are obtained between telephone and patient-completed administration for the VAS and Utility Index of the EuroQol Survey in people with advanced hip or knee osteoarthritis. The limits of agreement for the individual health domains vary which prevents the accurate interpretation of real change in these items across modes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]