Search

In arXiv:1911.06042v1 M. Casiulis et al. study a Hamiltonian model in which rigid rotations of moving clusters give rise to scale-free correlations of velocity and speed. M. Casiulis et al. compare correlations in their model to those observed in real flocks of birds and claim that rigid-body rotations provide an explanation that stands in contrast with, and it is simpler than, previously proposed explanations of correlations in bird flocks, namely Goldstone modes in the velocity orientations and marginal (or near-critical) modes in the speed. Here, we show that the rigid rotation scenario is completely inconsistent with a large body of well-established experimental evidence on real flocks of birds, and it therefore does not provide an appropriate explanation for the observed phenomenology.

Many systems in nature, from ferromagnets to flocks of birds, exhibit ordering phenomena on the large scale. In physical systems order is statistically robust for large enough dimensions, with relative fluctuations due to noise vanishing with system size. Several biological systems, however, are less stable than their physical analogues and spontaneously change their global state on relatively short timescales. In this paper we show that there are two crucial ingredients in these systems that enhance the effect of noise, leading to collective changes of state: the non-symmetric nature of interactions between individuals, and the presence of local heterogeneities in the topology of the network. The consequences of these features can be larger the larger the system size leading to a localization of the fluctuation modes and a relaxation time that remains finite in the thermodynamic limit. The system keeps changing its global state in time, being constantly driven out of equilibrium by spontaneous fluctuations. Our results explain what is observed in several living and social systems and are consistent with recent experimental data on bird flocks and other animal groups.

The correlated motion of flocks is an instance of global order emerging from local interactions. An essential difference with analogous ferromagnetic systems is that flocks are active: animals move relative to each other, dynamically rearranging their interaction network. The effect of this off-equilibrium element is well studied theoretically, but its impact on actual biological groups deserves more experimental attention. Here, we introduce a novel dynamical inference technique, based on the principle of maximum entropy, which accodomates network rearrangements and overcomes the problem of slow experimental sampling rates. We use this method to infer the strength and range of alignment forces from data of starling flocks. We find that local bird alignment happens on a much faster timescale than neighbour rearrangement. Accordingly, equilibrium inference, which assumes a fixed interaction network, gives results consistent with dynamical inference. We conclude that bird orientations are in a state of local quasi-equilibrium over the interaction length scale, providing firm ground for the applicability of statistical physics in certain active systems.

When birds come together to form a flock, the distribution of their individual velocities narrows around the mean velocity of the flock. We argue that, in a broad class of models for the joint distribution of positions and velocities, this narrowing generates an entropic force that opposes the cohesion of the flock. The strength of this force depends strongly on the nature of the interactions among birds: if birds are coupled to a fixed number of neighbors, the entropic forces are weak, while if they couple to all other birds within a fixed distance, the entropic forces are sufficient to tear a flock apart. Similar entropic forces should occur in other non-equilibrium systems. For the joint distribution of protein structures and amino-acid sequences, these forces favor the occurrence of "highly designable" structures.

One of the most impressive features of moving animal groups is their ability to perform sudden coherent changes in travel direction. While this collective decision can be a response to an external perturbation, such as the presence of a predator, recent studies show that such directional switching can also emerge from the intrinsic fluctuations in the individual behaviour. However, the cause and the mechanism by which such collective changes of direction occur are not fully understood yet. Here, we present an experimental study of spontaneous collective turns in natural flocks of starlings. We employ a recently developed tracking algorithm to reconstruct three-dimensional trajectories of each individual bird in the flock for the whole duration of a turning event. Our approach enables us to analyze changes in the individual behavior of every group member and reveal the emergent dynamics of turning. We show that spontaneous turns start from individuals located at the elongated edges of the flocks, and then propagate through the group. We find that birds on the edges deviate from the mean direction of motion much more frequently than other individuals, indicating that persistent localized fluctuations are the crucial ingredient for triggering a collective directional change. Finally, we quantitatively show that birds follow equal radius paths during turning allowing the flock to change orientation and redistribute risky locations among group members. The whole process of turning is a remarkable example of how a self-organized system can sustain collective changes and reorganize, while retaining coherence., Comment: 18 pages, 2 Videos added

Bird flocks are a paradigmatic example of collective motion. One of the prominent experimental traits discovered about flocks is the presence of long range velocity correlations between individuals, which allow them to influence each other over the large scales, keeping a high level of group coordination. A crucial question is to understand what is the mutual interaction between birds generating such nontrivial correlations. Here we use the Maximum Entropy (ME) approach to infer from experimental data of natural flocks the effective interactions between birds. Compared to previous studies, we make a significant step forward as we retrieve the full functional dependence of the interaction on distance and find that it decays exponentially over a range of a few individuals. The fact that ME gives a short-range interaction even though its experimental input is the long-range correlation function, shows that the method is able to discriminate the relevant information encoded in such correlations and single out a minimal number of effective parameters. Finally, we show how the method can be used to capture the degree of anisotropy of mutual interactions., Comment: 21 pages, 7 figures, 1 table

Birds in a flock move in a correlated way, resulting in large polarization of velocities. A good understanding of this collective behavior exists for linear motion of the flock. Yet observing actual birds, the center of mass of the group often turns giving rise to more complicated dynamics, still keeping strong polarization of the flock. Here we propose novel dynamical equations for the collective motion of polarized animal groups that account for correlated turning including solely social forces. We exploit rotational symmetries and conservation laws of the problem to formulate a theory in terms of generalized coordinates of motion for the velocity directions akin to a Hamiltonian formulation for rotations. We explicitly derive the correspondence between this formulation and the dynamics of the individual velocities, thus obtaining a new model of collective motion. In the appropriate overdamped limit we recover the well-known Vicsek model, which dissipates rotational information and does not allow for polarized turns. Although the new model has its most vivid success in describing turning groups, its dynamics is intrinsically different from previous ones in a wide dynamical regime, while reducing to the hydrodynamic description of Toner and Tu at very large length-scales. The derived framework is therefore general and it may describe the collective motion of any strongly polarized active matter system., Comment: Accepted for the Special Issue of the Journal of Statistical Physics: Collective Behavior in Biological Systems, 17 pages, 4 figures, 3 videos

Flocks of birds exhibit a remarkable degree of coordination and collective response. It is not just that thousands of individuals fly, on average, in the same direction and at the same speed, but that even the fluctuations around the mean velocity are correlated over long distances. Quantitative measurements on flocks of starlings, in particular, show that these fluctuations are scale-free, with effective correlation lengths proportional to the linear size of the flock. Here we construct models for the joint distribution of velocities in the flock that reproduce the observed local correlations between individuals and their neighbors, as well as the variance of flight speeds across individuals, but otherwise have as little structure as possible. These minimally structured, or maximum entropy models provide quantitative, parameter-free predictions for the spread of correlations throughout the flock, and these are in excellent agreement with the data. These models are mathematically equivalent to statistical physics models for ordering in magnets, and the correct prediction of scale-free correlations arises because the parameters - completely determined by the data - are in the critical regime. In biological terms, criticality allows the flock to achieve maximal correlation across long distances with limited speed fluctuations.

Collective decision-making in biological systems requires all individuals in the group to go through a behavioural change of state. During this transition, the efficiency of information transport is a key factor to prevent cohesion loss and preserve robustness. The precise mechanism by which natural groups achieve such efficiency, though, is currently not fully understood. Here, we present an experimental study of starling flocks performing collective turns in the field. We find that the information to change direction propagates across the flock linearly in time with negligible attenuation, hence keeping group decoherence to a minimum. This result contrasts with current theories of collective motion, which predict a slower and dissipative transport of directional information. We propose a novel theory whose cornerstone is the existence of a conserved spin current generated by the gauge symmetry of the system. The theory turns out to be mathematically identical to that of superfluid transport in liquid helium and it explains the dissipationless propagating mode observed in turning flocks. Superfluidity also provides a quantitative expression for the speed of propagation of the information, according to which transport must be swifter the stronger the group's orientational order. This prediction is verified by the data. We argue that the link between strong order and efficient decision-making required by superfluidity may be the adaptive drive for the high degree of behavioural polarization observed in many living groups. The mathematical equivalence between superfluid liquids and turning flocks is a compelling demonstration of the far-reaching consequences of symmetry and conservation laws across different natural systems.

Flocks of starlings exhibit a remarkable ability to maintain cohesion as a group in highly uncertain environments and with limited, noisy information. Recent work demonstrated that individual starlings within large flocks respond to a fixed number of nearest neighbors, but until now it was not understood why this number is seven. We analyze robustness to uncertainty of consensus in empirical data from multiple starling flocks and show that the flock interaction networks with six or seven neighbors optimize the trade-off between group cohesion and individual effort. We can distinguish these numbers of neighbors from fewer or greater numbers using our systems-theoretic approach to measuring robustness of interaction networks as a function of the network structure, i.e., who is sensing whom. The metric quantifies the disagreement within the network due to disturbances and noise during consensus behavior and can be evaluated over a parameterized family of hypothesized sensing strategies (here the parameter is number of neighbors). We use this approach to further show that for the range of flocks studied the optimal number of neighbors does not depend on the number of birds within a flock; rather, it depends on the shape, notably the thickness, of the flock. The results suggest that robustness to uncertainty may have been a factor in the evolution of flocking for starlings. More generally, our results elucidate the role of the interaction network on uncertainty management in collective behavior, and motivate the application of our approach to other biological networks., Comment: 19 pages, 3 figures, 9 supporting figures

Flocking is a paradigmatic example of collective animal behaviour, where decentralized interaction rules give rise to a globally ordered state. In the emergence of order out of self-organization we find similarities between biological systems, as bird flocks, and some physical systems, as ferromagnets. In both cases, the tendency of individuals to align to their neighbours gives rise to a polarized state. There is, however, one crucial difference: the interaction network within an animal group is not necessarily fixed in time, as each individual moves and may change its neighbours. Therefore, the dynamical interaction mechanism in biological and physical system can be quite different, not only due to the gross disparity in the complexity of the individual entities, but also because of the potential role of inter-individual motion. To assess the relevance of this mechanism it is necessary to gain quantitative experimental information about how much individuals move with respect to each other within the group. Here, by using data from field observations on starlings, we study the diffusion properties of individual birds within a flock and investigate the effect of diffusion on the dynamics of the interaction network. We find that birds diffuse faster than Brownian particles (superdiffusion) and in a strongly anisotropic way. We also find that neighbours change in time exclusively as a consequence of diffusion, so that no specific mechanism to keep one's neighbours seems to be enforced. Finally, we study the diffusion properties of birds at the border of the flock. We find that these individuals remain on the border significantly longer than what would be expected on the basis of a purely diffusional model, suggesting that there is a sort barrier a bird must cross to make the transition from border to interior of the flock., Comment: 22 pages, 10 figures

Interactions among neighboring birds in a flock cause an alignment of their flight directions. We show that the minimally structured (maximum entropy) model consistent with these local correlations correctly predicts the propagation of order throughout entire flocks of starlings, with no free parameters. These models are mathematically equivalent to the Heisenberg model of magnetism, and define an "energy" for each configuration of flight directions in the flock. Comparing flocks of different densities, the range of interactions that contribute to the energy involves a fixed number of (topological) neighbors, rather than a fixed (metric) spatial range. Comparing flocks of different sizes, the model correctly accounts for the observed scale invariance of long ranged correlations among the fluctuations in flight direction.

From bird flocks to fish schools, animal groups often seem to react to environmental perturbations as if of one mind. Most studies in collective animal behaviour have aimed to understand how a globally ordered state may emerge from simple behavioural rules. Less effort has been devoted to understanding the origin of collective response, namely the way the group as a whole reacts to its environment. Yet collective response is the adaptive key to survivor, especially when strong predatory pressure is present. Here we argue that collective response in animal groups is achieved through scale-free behavioural correlations. By reconstructing the three-dimensional position and velocity of individual birds in large flocks of starlings, we measured to what extent the velocity fluctuations of different birds are correlated to each other. We found that the range of such spatial correlation does not have a constant value, but it scales with the linear size of the flock. This result indicates that behavioural correlations are scale-free: the change in the behavioural state of one animal affects and is affected by that of all other animals in the group, no matter how large the group is. Scale-free correlations extend maximally the effective perception range of the individuals, thus compensating for the short-range nature of the direct inter-individual interaction and enhancing global response to perturbations. Our results suggest that flocks behave as critical systems, poised to respond maximally to environmental perturbations., Comment: Submitted to PNAS

Bird flocking is a striking example of collective animal behaviour. A vivid illustration of this phenomenon is provided by the aerial display of vast flocks of starlings gathering at dusk over the roost and swirling with extraordinary spatial coherence. Both the evolutionary justification and the mechanistic laws of flocking are poorly understood, arguably because of a lack of data on large flocks. Here, we report a quantitative study of aerial display. We measured the individual three-dimensional positions in compact flocks of up to 2700 birds. We investigated the main features of the flock as a whole - shape, movement, density and structure - and discuss these as emergent attributes of the grouping phenomenon. We find that flocks are relatively thin, with variable sizes, but constant proportions. They tend to slide parallel to the ground and, during turns, their orientation changes with respect to the direction of motion. Individual birds keep a minimum distance from each other that is comparable to their wingspan. The density within the aggregations is non-homogeneous, as birds are packed more tightly at the border compared to the centre of the flock. These results constitute the first set of large-scale data on three-dimensional animal aggregations. Current models and theories of collective animal behaviour can now be tested against these results., Comment: To be published in Animal Behaviour

The study of collective animal behaviour must progress through a comparison between the theoretical predictions of numerical models and data coming from empirical observations. To this aim it is important to develop methods of three-dimensional (3D) analysis that are at the same time informative about the structure of the group and suitable to empirical data. In fact, empirical data are considerably noisier than numerical data, and they are subject to several constraints. We review here the tools of analysis used by the STARFLAG project to characterise the 3D structure of large flocks of starlings in the field. We show how to avoid the most common pitfalls i the quantitative analysis of 3D animal groups, with particular attention to the problem of the bias introduced by the border of the group. By means of practical examples, we demonstrate that neglecting border effects gives rise to artefacts when studying the 3D structure of a group. Moreover, we show that mathematical rigour is essential to distinguish important biological properties from trivial geometric features of animal groups., Comment: To be published in Animal Behaviour

The most startling examples of collective animal behaviour are provided by very large and cohesive groups moving in three dimensions. Paradigmatic examples are bird flocks, fish schools and insect swarms. However, because of the sheer technical difficulty of obtaining 3D data, empirical studies conducted to date have only considered loose groups of a few tens of animals. Moreover, these studies were very seldom conducted in the field. Recently the STARFLAG project achieved the 3D reconstruction of thousands of birds under field conditions, thus opening the way to a new generation of quantitative studies of collective animal behaviour. Here, we review the main technical problems in 3D data collection of large animal groups and we outline some of the methodological solutions adopted by the STARFLAG project. In particular, we explain how to solve the stereoscopic correspondence - or matching - problem, which was the major bottleneck of all 3D studies in the past., Comment: To be published in Animal Behaviour