Search

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of depressive symptoms among systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients using the Major Depression Inventory (MDI), identify possible risk factors, and analyze the current standard of care to raise awareness and improve clinical care for SSc patients. Patients and methods: The study included 94 SSc patients (12 males, 82 females; mean age 58.3±13.6 years; range, 28 to 83 years) who completed the MDI, Short Form 36 Health Survey, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, Brief Fatigue Inventory and Physical Activity Questionnaire. Clinical parameters were assessed according to standardized procedures. Discharge letters were analyzed for evaluation of depressive symptoms. Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 22.3%. It correlated with female sex (p=0.047), underweight (p=0.002), fatigue (p<0.001), decreased quality of life (p<0.001) and less physical activity (p=0.048). The latter three were confirmed as independent risk factors in a multivariable regression analysis. The analysis of the current standard of care revealed no assessment of depressive symptoms in the majority of patients (89.4%), including 19 with depressive symptoms according to the MDI score. Conclusion: This study confirms the high prevalence of depressive symptoms in SSc patients. There is an unmet need of regular assessment of mental health during SSc consultations. Fatigue, decreased quality of life and reduced physical activity were ascertained as independent risk factors, while special attention should also be paid to weight loss and underweight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary care physicians (PCP) play a key role in the care of people living with dementia. However, the implementation and practicability of the German S3 Dementia Guideline in primary care remain unclear. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate an intervention for improving guideline‐based dementia care in primary care. Design: A two‐arm, 9‐month follow‐up cluster‐randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Setting: 28 primary care practices in Berlin and the surrounding area in Germany. Participants: A total of N = 28 PCP, N = 91 people living with dementia, and N = 88 informal caregivers participated in the trial. Intervention: A tablet‐based intervention to improve adherence to the German S3 Dementia Guideline in primary care was compared to a control group (care as usual plus a handbook on dementia). MeasurementsAdherence to dementia guideline (primary outcome) was measured on PCP' (23 items) and informal caregivers' level (19 items) with a self‐developed checklist. Secondary outcomes (quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living, general health status, depression, and caregiver burden) were measured with standardized assessments. Also, post‐hoc per‐protocol analyses were conducted. Results: No differences in guideline adherence between the intervention and the control group were observed. Further, no significant impact of the intervention on secondary outcomes was detected. Conclusion: The DemTab Study did not improve self‐reported guideline adherence in PCP. However, important implementation barriers such as lack of interoperability and low applicability of existing German S3 Dementia Guideline in the primary care setting were identified and are being discussed. Trial registration: The DemTab trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15854413. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We aimed to describe the current management and outcomes of patients with secondary immunodeficiencies (SID) on intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) immunoglobulins (IG) as maintenance therapy to prevent infections. Methods Non-interventional, prospective study (average follow-up 20.5 months). Results Of the 307 SID patients (mean age 63.7±14.4 years, 52% males, in 31% IG newly initiated), 95.4% received IV IG (mean dosing interval 4.6 weeks, average dose 199 mg/kg per 4 weeks) and 4.6% were treated with SC IG (2.6 weeks, 343 mg/kg per 4 weeks). Median IG through level at first documentation was 5.8 g/L and did not differ between IV and SC treatment or between underlying malignancies. In 24.1% of patients, treatment was interrupted temporarily, over a mean of 11.6±6.3 months. In patients with newly initiated IG treatment the 82% overall infection rate prior to treatment dropped to 21% at 1 year. Conclusions Under clinical practice conditions, IG replacement therapy in SID patients was feasible, diminished infection rates and improved quality of life. Average IG doses were relatively low. Tolerability of IV IG treatment was excellent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Several immunoglobulin (IG) preparations have been approved for the immunomodulatory treatment of the neurological autoimmune diseases (AID) Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Although efficacy has been proven in randomised clinical trials, long-term outcome data on drug utilization, effectiveness, tolerability, health related quality of life, and economic variables are lacking. Methods: In the prospective, observational internet-based SIGNS registry, patients of all age groups are eligible if they have received or are scheduled for IG therapy for neurological AID or primary or severe secondary immunodeficiency. Results: Of the 306 patients currently included in the database (1 November 2011), 51 have neurological AID (27 males; mean age 56 ± 15 years): 21 CIDP, 7 MMN, 11 multiple sclerosis (MS), 6 myasthenia gravis, 2 myositis, 4 others (no cases of GBS). Mean duration of disease since first symptoms was 7.8 years, and disease duration since diagnosis was 5.9 years. Eight different IG preparations have been reported as current therapy. According to SF-36, patients' quality of life is substantially impaired. Conclusions: Present data indicate some off-label use of IG (e.g. in MS) in patients with neurological AID. Quality of life in these patients is substantially compromised. Increasing patient numbers and extended follow-up periods will provide data on treatment concepts and disease development in AID patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]