Search

Background: Depression is a pervasive symptom in patients with gynecological cancer undergoing chemotherapy., Objectives: Purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct depression profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, severity of common symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes among these subgroups., Methods: Patients with gynecological cancer (n = 231) completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was done to identify the distinct depression profiles. Differences were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests., Results: Three distinct profiles were identified: low (60.1%), high (35.1%), and very high (4.8%). Compared with low class, the other 2 classes had lower functional status and were more likely to self-report a diagnosis of depression. Patients in the 2 worse profiles reported a higher comorbidity burden, higher levels of trait and state anxiety, sleep disturbance, and fatigue, as well as lower levels of cognitive function and poorer QOL. State and trait anxiety, evening fatigue, and sleep disturbance scores exhibit a "dose-response effect" (ie, as the depression profile worsened, the severity of these symptoms increased)., Conclusions: Almost 40% of our sample experienced high or very high levels of depression across 2 cycles of chemotherapy., Implications for Practice: Clinicians can use the identified risk factors to identify high patients risk and provide tailored psychological interventions aimed to decrease symptom burden and prevent decrements in QOL., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Frailty in older adult cancer survivors after cancer treatments is associated with various health outcomes. However, there is less agreement on how frailty affects symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current literature on frailty, symptoms, and HRQOL, as well as the associations of frailty with these factors in older adult cancer survivors with chemotherapy., Methods: A review was conducted on peer-reviewed publications from 2008 to 2023, using seven electronic databases. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models to determine pooled effect estimates for frailty prevalence, symptom severity, and HRQOL scores., Results: A total of 26 studies involving older cancer survivors were included in the analysis. Most of these studies were conducted in Western countries and focused on White survivors, particularly those with breast cancer. The mean pooled prevalence of frailty was 43.5%. Among frail survivors, the most common symptoms reported after cancer treatments were pain (36.4%), neuropathy (34.1%), and fatigue (21.3%). Frailty was associated with higher pooled mean symptom severity (B = 1.23, p = 0.046) and lower functional HRQOL (B = - 0.31, p = 0.051, with marginal significance) after cancer treatments., Conclusion: Frail older cancer survivors are at high risk of adverse symptoms and poor HRQOL after cancer treatment. Further research on screening for frailty is needed to prevent older adults from developing worse symptoms burden and maintain HRQOL. It is also essential to understand the mechanisms of the associations between frailty, symptoms and HRQOL in this population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: To assess the role of self-efficacy as a mediator of the association between patient-centred communication (PCC) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a sample of participants with ovarian cancer., Methods: English-speaking adults with ovarian cancer completed a cross-sectional survey. We assessed self-efficacy with the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale, PCC with the Patient-Centred Communication in Cancer Care-36, and HRQoL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. We used the PROCESS macro to calculate regression coefficients for the total effect of PCC on HRQoL and direct effect of PCC on HRQoL. We calculated a 95% CI for the indirect effect of PCC on HRQoL using 10 000 bootstrapped samples., Results: The total effect of PCC on HRQoL (9.47, 95% CI 6.21 to 12.74) was greater than the direct effect of PCC on HRQoL (3.47, 95% CI 0.73 to 6.21). The indirect effect of PCC on HRQoL was 6.00 (95% CI 3.56 to 8.95). Self-efficacy explained approximately 63.4% of the association between PCC and HRQoL., Conclusions: Self-efficacy partially mediated the association between PCC and HRQoL. Self-efficacy is a potential target for communication interventions that aim to improve HRQoL. Research to validate this finding in the setting of a randomised trial is warranted., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Physical and cognitive function are two of the most important patient-reported outcomes. In oncology patients receiving chemotherapy (N = 1331), purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint physical and cognitive function profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, severity of common symptoms, and quality of life outcomes., Data Sources: Measures of physical and cognitive functions were obtained six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were done prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was done to identify the distinct joint physical and cognitive function profiles. Differences among the profiles were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests., Conclusion: Five distinct profiles were identified (ie, Very Low Physical and Low Cognitive Function [18.4%; Both Low], Low Physical and High Cognitive Function [19.8%], Moderate Physical and Low Cognitive Function [26.7%], Changing Physical and Cognitive Function [5.4%], and Normal Physical and Cognitive Function [29.7%]). Patients in the Both Low class had the highest symptom burden and the poorest quality of life. Over 70% of the sample had moderate to severe decrements in one or both of these extremely important patient outcomes., Implications for Nursing Practice: Clinicians need to assess for both physical and cognitive function using simple subjective and objective measures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression are four of the most common symptoms in patients with gynecologic cancer. The purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct co-occurring pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression profiles (i.e., pre-specified symptom cluster) in a sample of patients with gynecologic cancer receiving chemotherapy and assess for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the severity of other common symptoms and QOL outcomes among these subgroups., Methods: Patients completed symptom questionnaires prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients using the pre-specified symptom cluster. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate for differences between the subgroups., Results: In the sample of 233 patients, two distinct latent classes were identified (i.e., low (64.8%) and high (35.2%)) indicating lower and higher levels of symptom burden. Patients in high class were younger, had child care responsibilities, were unemployed, and had a lower annual income. In addition, these women had a higher body mass index, a higher comorbidity burden, and a lower functional status. Patients in the high class reported higher levels of anxiety, as well as lower levels of energy and cognitive function and poorer quality of life scores., Conclusions: This study identified a number of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with membership in the high class. Clinicians can use this information to refer patients to dieticians and physical therapists for tailored interventions., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Morning and evening fatigue are distinct and distressing symptoms experienced during chemotherapy that demonstrate a large amount of interindividual variability., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning and evening fatigue co-occurrence profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics and quality of life., Methods: Oncology patients ( n = 1,334) completed the Lee Fatigue Scale to self-report morning and evening fatigue, six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning and evening physical fatigue profiles., Results: Four distinct morning and evening fatigue profiles were identified (i.e., Both Low, Low Morning + Moderate Evening, Both Moderate, and Both High). Compared to the Both Low profile, the Both High profile was significantly younger, less likely to be married or partnered, more likely to live alone, had a higher comorbidity burden, and lower functional status. The Both High profile had higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, and pain and lower levels of quality of life., Discussion: The variability in the morning and evening severity scores among the four profiles supports the hypothesis that morning and evening fatigue are distinct but related symptoms. Clinically meaningful levels of both morning and evening fatigue were reported by 50.4% of our sample, which suggests that the co-occurrence of these two symptoms is relatively common. Patients in Both Moderate and Both High profiles experienced an extremely high symptom burden that warrants ongoing assessments and aggressive symptom management interventions., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Greater perceived patient-centered communication (PCC) is associated with better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer. Quantitative measures of PCC and HRQoL do little to explain this association. We interviewed patients with high and low ratings of PCC to understand how it is associated with HRQoL., Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Participants were English-speaking U.S. adults with ovarian cancer. We assessed PCC with the Patient-Centered Communication - Cancer (PCC-Ca)-36 (possible score range 1-5; higher scores represent greater patient-centeredness), and purposively sampled 14 participants with total scores in the top and bottom quartiles. Participants completed individual, semi-structured interviews about their communication experiences. Guided by the National Cancer Institute Framework for PCC in Cancer Care, we analyzed interview transcripts using directed content analysis. We integrated survey and interview findings in a joint display., Results: Among 176 survey respondents, PCC-Ca-36 total scores ranged from 1.7 to 5.0. Participants with scores in the top quartile (4.8-5.0) perceived clinicians as proactive and attentive to psychosocial concerns. Those with scores in the bottom quartile (1.7-3.5) described not feeling known as an individual and receiving limited support for self-management., Conclusions: The association between PCC and QoL may be partially explained by differences in perceived support for psychosocial concerns and self-management. PCC may facilitate receipt of proactive, personalized care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors RAP, NX, FH, AAW, BAG, MLU, JAT, MJH, and DLB have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe perceptions of patient-centered communication (PCC); assess whether physician specialty, patient characteristics, or health system characteristics are associated with PCC; and identify associations between PCC, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and symptom burden among individuals with ovarian cancer., Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive survey of English-speaking adults with ovarian cancer. PCC, HRQoL, and ovarian cancer symptom burden were assessed with the PCC-Ca-36, the FACT-G, and the FOSI-18, respectively. PCC-Ca-36 scores were summarized using descriptive statistics. Predictors of PCC-Ca-36, FACT-G, and FOSI-18 scores were identified using multiple linear regression., Results: Participants (n = 176) had a mean age of 59.4 years (SD = 12.1). The majority (65.9%) had advanced-stage disease, while 42.0% were receiving treatment. The mean PCC-Ca-36 total score was 4.09 (SD = 0.78) out of a possible 5, indicating participants often perceived that clinicians engaged in PCC. Among the PCC functions, participants reported that clinicians least often enabled patient self-management (M = 3.65, SD = 0.99), responded to emotions (M = 3.84, SD = 1.04), and managed uncertainty (M = 3.91, SD = 0.93). In multivariable analyses, neither physician specialty nor patient and health system characteristics were significantly associated with overall PCC. Greater overall PCC predicted better overall HRQoL; better social/family, emotional, and functional well-being; and lower overall and physical symptom burden (all p ≤ 0.05)., Conclusion: Greater PCC is significantly associated with better HRQoL and lower symptom burden among individuals with ovarian cancer., Practice Implications: Promotion of PCC is a promising strategy to improve patient-reported outcomes in the ovarian cancer care setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors RAP, NX, FH, AAW, BAG, MLU, JAT, MJH, and DLB have nothing to declare. The authors confirm that all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Identify subgroups of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients with distinct multiple co-occurring symptom profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics and quality of life (QOL) outcomes., Methods: Patients with GI cancers (n = 399) completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) that was used to assess for multiple co-occurring symptoms. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct symptom profiles using symptom occurrence ratings. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and QOL outcomes among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests., Results: All Low (36.6%), Moderate (49.4%), and All High (14.0%) classes were identified. Compared to the All Low class, patients in the other two classes were significantly younger and were more likely to report depression and back pain. Compared to the other two classes, patients in the All High class had fewer years of education and a higher number of comorbidities. Significant differences were found among the three classes for comorbidity burden and total number of MSAS symptoms (i.e., All Low < Moderate < All High), as well as for performance status (i.e., All Low > Moderate > All High). A higher symptom burden was associated with poorer QOL outcomes., Conclusions: The first study to identify subgroups of patients with GI cancers based on distinct symptom profiles. LCA allowed for the identification of risk factors associated with a higher symptom burden. Clinicians can use this information to identify high-risk patients and develop personalized symptom management interventions.

Purpose: Older adults receiving cancer chemotherapy are at increased risk for decrements in physical (PF) and cognitive (CF) function., Objectives: Study identified subgroups of patients with distinct PF and CF profiles; risk factors associated with subgroup membership; and impact of subgroup membership on quality of life (QOL)., Methods: In 366 older oncology patients, PF and CF were assessed using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-12 and Attentional Function Index, respectively. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of older patients with distinct PF/CF profiles., Results: Three distinct PF/CF profiles were identified (i.e., Very Low PF + Moderate CF (15.6%); Low PF + Low CF (39.3%), Normal PF + Normal CF (45.1%)). Compared to the both Normal class, patients in the other two classes had a lower functional status, a worse comorbidity profile, and were less likely to exercise on a regular basis. Compared to the Both Normal class, patients in the Both Low class were less likely to be married/partnered, more likely to live alone, less likely to be employed, and more likely to report depression and back pain. Compared to the other two classes, patients in the Both Low class had a lower annual household income and were receiving chemotherapy with a worse toxicity profile., Conclusion: First study to use a person-centered analytic approach to identify subgroups of older adults with distinct PF/CF profiles. Fifty-five percent of the older adults had statistically significant and clinically meaningful decrements in both PF AND CF that had negative effects on all aspects of QOL., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Few studies have examined interindividual variability in the symptom experience of lung cancer patients. We aimed to identify the most prevalent, severe, and distressing symptoms, and risk factors associated with increased symptom burden., Methods: Lung cancer patients (n = 145) reported occurrence, severity, and distress for 38 symptoms on the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 1 week after chemotherapy. Using multidimensional subscales, risk factors for higher global distress, physical, and psychological symptoms were evaluated using simultaneous linear regression., Results: Mean age was 64.0 years and 56.6% were female. Mean Karnofsky Performance Status score was 79.1 (SD 14.6) and mean Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire score was 7.3 (SD 3.9). The most distressing and prevalent symptom was fatigue. Problems with sexual interest/activity had the highest mean severity rating. Patients with lower functional status (p = 0.001) and higher comorbidity (p = 0.02) reported higher global distress. Similarly, lower functional status (p = 0.003) and higher comorbidity (p = 0.04) were associated with a higher physical symptom burden along with lower body mass index (p = 0.02). Higher psychology symptom burden was associated with lower functional status (p = 0.01), younger age (p = 0.02), non-metastatic disease (p = 0.03), higher number of prior treatments (p = 0.04), and income (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Fatigue was the most distressing and prevalent symptom among lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Lower functional status was associated with a higher burden of global distress, physical, and psychological symptoms. Younger age and non-metastatic disease were additional risk factors for increased psychological symptoms. Together, these risk factors can help clinicians identify lung cancer patients at increased need for aggressive symptom management.

BackgroundWhile pain is a significant problem for oncology patients, little is known about interindividual variability in pain characteristics.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct worst pain severity profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics and stress and symptom scores.MethodsPatients (n = 934) completed questionnaires 6 times over 2 chemotherapy cycles. Worst pain intensity was assessed using a 0- to 10-point numeric rating scale. Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess various pain characteristics. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct pain profiles.ResultsThree worst pain profiles were identified (low [17.5%], moderate [39.9%], severe [42.6%]). Compared with the other 2 classes, severe class was more likely to be single and unemployed and had a lower annual household income, a higher body mass index, a higher level of comorbidity, and a poorer functional status. Severe class was more likely to have both cancer and noncancer pain, a higher number of pain locations, higher frequency and duration of pain, worse pain quality scores, and higher pain interference scores. Compared with the other 2 classes, severe class reported lower satisfaction with pain management and higher global, disease-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as higher anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction scores.ConclusionsUnrelieved pain is a significant problem for more than 80% of outpatients.Implications for practiceClinicians need to perform comprehensive pain assessments; prescribe pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions; and initiate referrals for pain management and psychological services.

ContextA common complaint among oncology patients receiving chemotherapy is altered taste perception.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate for differences in common symptoms and stress levels in patients who reported taste changes.MethodsPatients were receiving chemotherapy for breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer. Change in the way food tastes (CFT) was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale before the patients' second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Valid and reliable instruments were used to assess for depressive symptoms, state and trait of anxiety, cognitive impairment, diurnal variations in fatigue and energy, sleep disturbance, and pain. Stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate for risk factors associated with CFT.ResultsOf the 1329 patients, 49.4% reported CFT. Patients in the CFT group reported higher levels of depression, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbance as well as higher levels of general and disease specific stress. Factors associated with CFT group included being non-White; receiving an antiemetic regimen that contained a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist with two other antiemetics; having a lower functional status; higher levels of morning fatigue; and reporting higher scores on the hyperarousal subscale of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence on associations between taste changes and common co-occurring symptoms and stress in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. Clinicians need to evaluate for taste changes in these patients because this symptom can effect patients' nutritional intake and quality of life.

BackgroundPurposes were to identify subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers with distinct morning and evening fatigue severity profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics, co-occurring symptoms and quality of life (QOL) outcomes.MethodsPatients with gastrointestinal cancers (n=405) completed questionnaires six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct morning and evening fatigue profiles. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, co-occurring symptoms and QOL outcomes among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.ResultsTwo distinct mornings (ie, low and very high) and three distinct evenings (ie, low, moderate and very high) fatigue classes were identified. Common risk factors for both morning and evening fatigue included younger age, lower performance status, higher comorbidity burden and self-reported depression. Higher levels of morning fatigue were associated with being unmarried, living alone, being unemployed, having a lower income, lack of regular exercise and a self-reported diagnosis of anaemia. Higher levels of evening fatigue were associated with being women, white and having childcare responsibilities. Patients in the very high morning and evening fatigue classes reported higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance and pain and lower levels of attentional function and poorer QOL.ConclusionFindings provide new insights into risk factors for and deleterious effects of morning and evening fatigue in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Clinicians can use this information to identify high-risk patients and develop individualised interventions for morning and evening fatigue and other co-occurring symptoms.

PurposeOlder adults receiving cancer chemotherapy are at increased risk for decrements in physical (PF) and cognitive (CF) function.ObjectivesStudy identified subgroups of patients with distinct PF and CF profiles; risk factors associated with subgroup membership; and impact of subgroup membership on quality of life (QOL).MethodsIn 366 older oncology patients, PF and CF were assessed using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-12 and Attentional Function Index, respectively. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of older patients with distinct PF/CF profiles.ResultsThree distinct PF/CF profiles were identified (i.e., Very Low PF + Moderate CF (15.6%); Low PF + Low CF (39.3%), Normal PF + Normal CF (45.1%)). Compared to the both Normal class, patients in the other two classes had a lower functional status, a worse comorbidity profile, and were less likely to exercise on a regular basis. Compared to the Both Normal class, patients in the Both Low class were less likely to be married/partnered, more likely to live alone, less likely to be employed, and more likely to report depression and back pain. Compared to the other two classes, patients in the Both Low class had a lower annual household income and were receiving chemotherapy with a worse toxicity profile.ConclusionFirst study to use a person-centered analytic approach to identify subgroups of older adults with distinct PF/CF profiles. Fifty-five percent of the older adults had statistically significant and clinically meaningful decrements in both PF AND CF that had negative effects on all aspects of QOL.

ContextDespite current advances in antiemetic treatments, between 19% and 58% of oncology patients experience chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN).ObjectivesAims of this post hoc exploratory analysis were to determine occurrence, severity, and distress of CIN and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, symptom severity, stress; and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between oncology patients who did and did not report CIN in the week before chemotherapy (CTX). Demographic, clinical, symptom, and stress characteristics associated with CIN occurrence were determined.MethodsPatients (n = 1296) completed questionnaires that provided information on demographic and clinical characteristics, symptom severity, stress, and QOL. Univariate analyses evaluated for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, symptom severity, stress, and QOL scores between the two patient groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate for factors associated with nausea group membership.ResultsOf the 1296 patients, 47.5% reported CIN. In the CIN group, 15% rated CIN as severe and 23% reported high distress. Factors associated with CIN included less education; having childcare responsibilities; poorer functional status; higher levels of depression, sleep disturbance, evening fatigue, and intrusive thoughts; as well as receipt of CTX on a 14-day CTX cycle and receipt of an antiemetic regimen that contained serotonin receptor antagonist and steroid. Patients in the CIN group experienced clinically meaningful decrements in QOL.ConclusionThis study identified new factors (e.g., poorer functional status, stress) associated with CIN occurrence. CIN negatively impacted patients' QOL. Pre-emptive and ongoing interventions may alleviate CIN occurrence in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: To identify subgroups of patients with distinct cough occurrence profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups. SAMPLE & SETTING: Outpatients receiving chemotherapy (N = 1,338) completed questionnaires six times over two chemotherapy cycles. METHODS & VARIABLES: Occurrence of cough was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups with distinct cough occurrence profiles. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate for differences. RESULTS: Four distinct cough profiles were identified (None, Decreasing, Increasing, and High). Risk factors associated with membership in the High class included lower annual household income; history of smoking; self-reported diagnoses of lung disease, heart disease, and back pain; and having lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians need to assess all patients with cancer for cough and provide targeted interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression often co-occur in oncology patients and negatively impact quality of life (QOL).Objectives: Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct symptom profiles based on their experiences with a pre-specified symptom cluster (i.e., pain, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance) and to identify demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics and QOL outcomes associated with each distinct profile.Methods: Patients with breast, lung, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic cancers (n = 1340) were recruited from outpatient clinics during their first or second cycle of chemotherapy. They completed valid and reliable measures of pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance. depression, and QOL prior to their next dose of chemotherapy. Latent class profile analysis was used to identify the patient subgroups. Differences among the profiles were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests.Results: Three distinct profiles were identified (i.e., Low (44.0%), Moderate (45.1%), High (10.8%). Compared to Low class, Moderate and High classes were younger and more likely to be female. Compared to the other two classes, High class was less likely to be married/partnered and employed, more likely to have a lower income and childcare responsibilities, had lower functional status, a higher body mass index, and exercised less. For both QOL scales, differences in subscale and total scores followed the same pattern (Low>Moderate>High).Conclusions: Over 55% of patients undergoing chemotherapy had a moderate to high symptom burden associated with these four common co-occurring symptoms. Multimodal interventions are needed to decrease symptom burden and improve QOL outcomes in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences among stress, resilience, and coping strategies related to morning and evening fatigue profiles (both low, low morning and moderate evening, both moderate, and both high). SAMPLE & SETTING: Data were collected from 1,334 adult patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. METHODS & VARIABLES: Morning and evening fatigue severity were rated over two cycles of chemotherapy using the Lee Fatigue Scale. Latent profile analysis was used to identify patient subgroups with distinct joint morning and evening profiles. Data were collected on global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress; resilience; and coping strategies. Differences among the latent classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Compared to the other three classes, the both high class reported the highest stress scores, highest occurrence of and effects from a variety of stressful life events, lowest resilience scores, and higher use of disengagement coping strategies. The both high class met the criteria for subsyndromal post-traumatic stress disorder. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: When patients report high levels of fatigue, detailed assessments of stress are warranted to provide tailored interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary goal of the thousands of registered trials in cancer research is to extend survival. With evaluation of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, healthcare providers must ensure that the principles described in the Belmont Report are upheld and that patients are truly informed when signing a consent form. In this article, two cases are highlighted, and reasons for participating in clinical trials are discussed. Challenges, such as healthcare literacy, patients' dedication to their healthcare providers, and choosing between multiple trials, are also explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations among social determinants of health (SDOH), stress, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and quality of life among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic cancer survivors. SAMPLE & SETTING: Individuals who had completed cancer treatment and did not identify as White (N = 46) were recruited through community partnerships in western Massachusetts and a state cancer registry. METHODS & VARIABLES: This descriptive crosssectional study used questionnaires and morning salivary samples to collect data between June 2022 and September 2023. RESULTS: Most participants were breast cancer survivors, were female, identified as African American or Black, and reported moderate levels of stress and low physical activity. Cortisol levels were higher among African American or Black participants, those with lower body mass index, and those with less consumption of fruit and vegetables. Higher symptom experience was associated with higher IL-6 levels. No associations were identified between IL-6 and cortisol or perceived stress and cortisol levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Incorporating SDOH in self-reported outcomes, including health behaviors and associated biologic indicators, can facilitate early identification and interventions to improve symptom experience and health outcomes of cancer survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An emerging area of research is the relationship between sleep disturbance and decrements in energy. Given the paucity of research on the co-occurrence of these two symptoms, study purposes were to identify subgroups of oncology patients with distinct joint sleep disturbance AND morning energy profiles and evaluate for differences among the subgroups in demographic, clinical, and sleep disturbance characteristics, as well as the severity of other common symptoms and QOL outcomes. Patients (n = 1336) completed measures of sleep disturbance and energy 6 times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed at enrollment. Latent profile analysis was used to identify the distinct joint sleep disturbance and morning energy profiles. Three distinct profiles were identified (i.e., Low Sleep Disturbance and High Morning Energy (Normal, 20.6%), Moderate Sleep Disturbance and Low Morning Energy (Moderately Severe, 52.1%), Very High Sleep Disturbance and Very Low Morning Energy (Very Severe, 27.3%). Compared to Normal class, other two classes were more likely to be female, less likely to be employed, and had higher comorbidity burden and poorer functional status. Symptom scores and QOL outcomes exhibited a dose response effect (i.e., as the profile worsened, symptom scores increased and QOL scores decreased). Given the associations between sleep disturbance and decrements in energy and a higher symptom burden, poorer QOL outcomes, and increased mortality, assessment of these two symptoms needs to be a high priority for clinicians and appropriate interventions initiated. • 80% of patients had high levels of sleep disturbance and decrements in morning energy. • Worst profiles had a higher symptom burden. • Worst profiles had poorer quality of life outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: /Background - Depression and sleep disturbance are significant problems during chemotherapy. Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct joint depression AND sleep disturbance profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, severity of symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes among these subgroups.Patients/methods: Oncology outpatients (n = 1331) completed measures of depression and sleep disturbance six times over two chemotherapy cycles. Latent profile analysis, that modeled the two symptoms together, was done to identify the distinct joint depression and sleep disturbance profiles.Results: Five distinct profiles were identified (i.e., no depression or sleep disturbance (None, 21.4%); no depression and moderate sleep disturbance (32.3%); subsyndromal depression and very high sleep disturbance (20.4%); moderate depression and moderate sleep disturbance (17.7%); and high depression and very high sleep disturbance (8.2%)). Compared to the None class, the other four classes were more likely to be female; less likely to be employed; had a higher comorbidity burden; and had a lower functional status. Patients in the two very high sleep disturbance classes had problems with both sleep initiation and maintenance. These patients reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, trait and state anxiety, and fatigue as well as lower levels of energy, cognitive function, and poorer QOL.Conclusions: Over 45% of the patients had subsyndromal to high levels of depression AND moderate or very high levels of sleep disturbance. Characteristics associated with the higher risk profiles can be used to screen patients at increased risk for both symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]