Search

Background: Adherence to evidence-based hospital stroke care is variable and may change over time. It is important to determine which process measures are associated with variation in outcome. In a large dataset, we analyzed the association between process and outcome and the fluctuations of indicators over time, and identified quality indicators (QIs) that should be prioritized for improving the quality of stroke care. Methods: We analyzed data from 123,259 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who were treated at 109 large tertiary hospitals in China between January 2011 and May 2017. In total, 12 stroke treatment indicators were selected to calculate the hospital process composite performance (HPCP). Hospitals were divided into subgroups according to the time trend of HPCP estimated by the Group-Based Model. We analyzed the influence of hospital subgroups on the patient outcomes using a multi-level model and explored the QIs that led to variation. Results: The HPCP trends for stroke indicators of 109 hospitals over 7 years were divided into two groups (Group 1, low-HPCP; Group 2, high-HPCP). After adjusting for patient age, medical insurance, comorbidities, patterns of admission, and NIHSS-scores, patients in the high-HPCP group presented higher rate of independence and longer length of stay compared to the low-HPCP group. The multi-level model showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the utilization rate between the two groups, with most marked differences seen in emergency assessment and function evaluation indicators. Conclusion: Variation in the quality of stroke care exists across hospitals, and better adherence to guideline-based care is associated with improved outcomes. We found that QIs related to emergency examination and functional assessment were the main factors differing between good and poor adherers to stroke indicators, suggesting that quality improvement in stroke care could prioritize these QIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim: Benchmarking is a management approach for implementing best medical practices at the lowest cost. The objectives of this study were to set achievable performance benchmarks for individual quality indicators to determine the predicted quality achievement related to better adherence, and to select optimal quality indicators for improving the quality of acute ischemic stroke care. Methods: We analyzed data on 500,331 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke who were treated at 518 hospitals in China from January 2011 to May 2017. The primary outcome was independence (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) at discharge. Data-driven achievable benchmarking used the "pared-mean" approach to set objective performance targets. Hierarchical logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the process–outcome association, as well as the predicted quality improvement if all hospitals were to operate at the benchmark level. Results: Of the overall population, 64.01% were independent patients at discharge. The performance benchmarks were >90% for most of the quality indicators. After adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics and unifying hospital performance to the benchmark level, the quality indicators with high increase in both overall adherence rate and independence rate were thrombolytic therapy, anticoagulant therapy, venous thrombosis prophylaxis. Conclusions: Performance targets for three acute treatments, including thrombolytic therapy, anticoagulant therapy, venous thrombosis prophylaxis, could best motivate improvements in both overall adherence rate and independence rate at discharge. The finding suggests that the above three types of acute treatment should be given priority to improve the quality of acute ischemic stroke care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]