Search

Abstract The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and Global Methane Pledge formalized agreement for countries to report and reduce methane emissions to mitigate near‐term climate change. Emission inventories generated through surface activity measurements are reported annually or bi‐annually, and evaluated periodically through a “Global Stocktake.” Emissions inverted from atmospheric data support evaluation of reported inventories, but their systematic use is stifled by spatially variable biases from prior errors combined with limited sensitivity of observations to emissions (also called smoothing error), as‐well‐as poorly characterized information content. Here, we demonstrate a Bayesian, optimal estimation (OE) algorithm for evaluating a state‐of‐the‐art inventory (EDGAR v6.0) using satellite‐based emissions from 2009 to 2018. The OE algorithm quantifies the information content (uncertainty reduction, sectoral attribution, spatial resolution) of the satellite‐based emissions and disentangles the effect of smoothing error when comparing to an inventory. We find robust differences between satellite and EDGAR for total livestock, rice, and coal emissions: 14 ± 9, 12 ± 8, −11 ± 6 Tg CH4/yr respectively. EDGAR and satellite agree that livestock emissions are increasing (0.25–1.3 Tg CH4/yr/yr), primarily in the Indo‐Pakistan region, sub‐tropical Africa, and the Southern Brazilian; East Asia rice emissions are also increasing, highlighting the importance of agriculture on the atmospheric methane growth rate. In contrast, low information content for the waste and fossil emission trends confounds comparison between EDGAR and satellite; increased sampling and spatial resolution of satellite observations are therefore needed to evaluate reported changes to emissions in these sectors.

Sector-based methane emissions can be backed out from observed methane fluxes, using a Bayesian optimal estimation method. This could help with monitoring gas leaks from industry.

Abstract Wetland methane (CH4) emissions comprise about one‐third of the global CH4 source. The latitudinal distribution and climate sensitivity of wetland CH4 fluxes are the key determinants of the global CH4‐climate feedback. However, large differences exist between bottom‐up estimates, informed by ground‐based flux measurements, and top‐down estimates derived from spaceborne total column CH4. Despite the extensive coverage of satellite CH4 concentration observations, challenges remain with using top‐down estimates to test bottom‐up models, mainly because of the uncertainties in the satellite retrievals, the model representation errors, the variable prior emissions, and the confounding role of the posterior error covariance structures. Here, we use satellite‐based top‐down CH4 flux estimates (2010–2012) to test and refine 42 bottom‐up estimates of wetland emissions that use a range of hypothesized wetland extents and process controls. Our comparison between bottom‐up models and satellite‐based fluxes innovatively accounts for cross‐correlations and spatial uncertainties typically found in top‐down inverse estimates, such that only the information from satellite observations and the atmospheric transport model is kept as a constraint. We present a satellite‐constrained wetland CH4 ensemble product derived from assembling the highest‐performance bottom‐up models, which estimates global wetland CH4 emissions of 148 (117–189, 5th–95th percentile) Tg CH4 yr−1. We find that tropical wetland emissions contribute 72% (63%–85%) to the global wetland total. We also find that a lower‐than‐expected temperature sensitivity agrees better with atmospheric CH4 measurements. Overall, our approach demonstrates the potential for using satellites to quantitatively refine bottom‐up wetland CH4 emission estimates, their latitudinal distributions, and their sensitivity to climate.