1. Macitentan for the treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (MERIT-1): results from the multicentre, phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
- Author
-
Ghofrani HA, Simonneau G, D'Armini AM, Fedullo P, Howard LS, Jaïs X, Jenkins DP, Jing ZC, Madani MM, Martin N, Mayer E, Papadakis K, Richard D, and Kim NH
- Subjects
- Humans, Treatment Outcome, Sulfonamides therapeutic use, Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, Double-Blind Method, Hypertension, Pulmonary drug therapy, Hypertension, Pulmonary etiology, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension drug therapy, Pyrimidines
- Abstract
Background: Macitentan is beneficial for long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The microvasculopathy of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension are similar., Methods: The phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled MERIT-1 trial assessed macitentan in 80 patients with CTEPH adjudicated as inoperable. Patients identified as WHO functional class II-IV with a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of at least 400 dyn·s/cm
5 and a walk distance of 150-450 m in 6 min were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice/web response system, to receive oral macitentan (10 mg once a day) or placebo. Treatment with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors and oral or inhaled prostanoids was permitted for WHO functional class III/IV patients. The primary endpoint was resting PVR at week 16, expressed as percentage of PVR measured at baseline. Analyses were done in all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment; safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02021292., Findings: Between April 3, 2014, and March 17, 2016, we screened 186 patients for eligibility at 48 hospitals across 20 countries. Of these, 80 patients in 36 hospitals were randomly assigned to treatment (40 patients to macitentan, 40 patients to placebo). At week 16, geometric mean PVR decreased to 71·5% of baseline in the macitentan group and to 87·6% in the placebo group (geometric means ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·70-0·95, p=0·0098). The most common adverse events in the macitentan group were peripheral oedema (9 [23%] of 40 patients) and decreased haemoglobin (6 [15%])., Interpretation: In MERIT-1, macitentan significantly improved PVR in patients with inoperable CTEPH and was well tolerated., Funding: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H-AG has received fees for serving as a board member for AbbVie, Bellerophon Pulse Technologies, Medscape, OMT, UCB Celltech, and Web MD Global; consultancy fees and fees for serving on a steering committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer; lecture fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer; and grant support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Novartis, and Pfizer. GS has received consultancy fees, lecture fees and travel support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer; and grant support and fees for serving on a steering committee from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Bayer. AMD’A has received fees for organising Masters-level courses, lecture fees and writing assistance from Bayer and Merck; and fees for serving on steering committees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals. PF has received fees for serving on an adjudication committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals. LSH has received consultancy fees from Endotronix; fees for serving on steering committees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and BTG plc; lecture fees, fees for serving on advisory boards, and travel support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck; grant support from Bayer; and departmental funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals. XJ has received fees for serving on an adjudication committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals; grant support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline; and personal fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck. DPJ has received fees for serving on a steering committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals and lecture fees from Bayer. Z-CJ has received consultancy fees, lecture fees and fees for serving on a steering committee from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Lee's Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer; fees for serving on an adjudication committee from Actelion Pharmaceuticals; and grant support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, The National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81425002), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2016-I2M-1-002), and The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0901502). MMM has received fees for serving on an adjudication committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals and consultancy fees from Bayer. NM is an employee of Actelion Pharmaceuticals. EM has received consultancy fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline; lecture fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline; and fees for serving on a steering committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals. KP and DR are employees of and hold stock in Actelion Pharmaceuticals. NHK has received consultancy fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Arena, Bayer, Merck, and SteadyMed; lecture fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Bayer; fees for serving on a steering committee for Actelion Pharmaceuticals; and grant support from Bellerophon, Eiger, Gilead, Lung Biotechnology, and Sonivie., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF