1. A community-randomized evaluation of the effect of intermittent preventive treatment in infants on antimalarial drug resistance in southern Tanzania.
- Author
-
Pearce RJ, Ord R, Kaur H, Lupala C, Schellenberg J, Shirima K, Manzi F, Alonso P, Tanner M, Mshinda H, Roper C, and Schellenberg D
- Subjects
- Antimalarials blood, Antimalarials pharmacology, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mutation, Peptide Synthases genetics, Pyrimethamine blood, Pyrimethamine pharmacology, Selection, Genetic, Sulfadoxine blood, Sulfadoxine pharmacology, Tanzania, Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase genetics, Antimalarials administration & dosage, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Resistance, Malaria parasitology, Malaria prevention & control, Plasmodium drug effects, Pyrimethamine administration & dosage, Sulfadoxine administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) is the administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) at 2, 3, and 9 months of age to prevent malaria. We investigated the influence of IPTi on drug resistance., Methods: Twenty-four areas were randomly assigned to receive or not receive IPTi. Blood collected during representative household surveys at baseline and 15 and 27 months after implementation was tested for SP and resistance markers., Results: The frequency of SP in blood was similar in the IPTi and comparison areas at baseline and at 15 months. dhfr and dhps mutations were also similar at baseline and then increased similarly in both arms after 15 months of SP-IPTi. First-line treatment was switched from SP to artemether-lumefantrine before the final survey, when SP positivity fell among infants in comparison areas but increased in IPTi areas. This was accompanied by an increase in dhfr but not dhps mutations in IPTi areas (P = .004 and P = .18, respectively)., Conclusions: IPTi did not increase drug pressure or the selection on dhfr and dhps mutants, when SP was the first-line malaria treatment. Introduction of artemether-lumefantrine was followed by an increase in dhfr mutations, consistent with weak selection attributable to SP-IPTi, but not by an increase in dhps mutations, suggesting a fitness cost of this mutation.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF