Search

Background: It is recommended that children aged 3 months to five years of age living in areas of seasonal transmission in the sub-Sahel should receive Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) during the malaria transmission season. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of SMC with SPAQ in children when delivered by community health workers in three districts in Senegal where SMC was introduced over three years, in children from 3 months of age to five years of age in the first year, then in children up to 10 years of age., Methods: A surveillance system was established to record all deaths and all malaria cases diagnosed at health facilities and a pharmacovigilance system was established to detect adverse drug reactions. Health posts were randomized to introduce SMC in a stepped wedge design. SMC with SPAQ was administered once per month from September to November, by nine health-posts in 2008, by 27 in 2009 and by 45 in 2010., Results: After three years, 780,000 documented courses of SMC had been administered. High coverage was achieved. No serious adverse events attributable to the intervention were detected, despite a high level of surveillance., Conclusions: SMC is being implemented in countries of the sub-Sahel for children under 5 years of age, but in some areas the age distribution of cases of malaria may justify extending this age limit, as has been done in Senegal. Our results show that SMC is well tolerated in children under five and in older children. However, pharmacovigilance should be maintained where SMC is implemented and provision for strengthening national pharmacovigilance systems should be included in plans for SMC implementation., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00712374., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Individual malaria interventions provide only partial protection in most epidemiological situations. Thus, there is a need to investigate whether combining interventions provides added benefit in reducing mortality and morbidity from malaria. The potential benefits of combining IPT in children (IPTc) with home management of malaria (HMM) was investigated., Methods: During the 2008 malaria transmission season, 1,277 children under five years of age resident in villages within the rural Farafenni demographic surveillance system (DSS) in North Bank Region, The Gambia were randomized to receive monthly IPTc with a single dose of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) plus three doses of amodiaquine (AQ) or SP and AQ placebos given by village health workers (VHWs) on three occasions during the months of September, October and November, in a double-blind trial. Children in all study villages who developed an acute febrile illness suggestive of malaria were treated by VHWs who had been taught how to manage malaria with artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem™). The primary aims of the project were to determine whether IPTc added significant benefit to HMM and whether VHWs could effectively combine the delivery of both interventions., Results: The incidence of clinical attacks of malaria was very low in both study groups. The incidence rate of malaria in children who received IPTc was 0.44 clinical attacks per 1,000 child months at risk while that for control children was 1.32 per 1,000 child months at risk, a protective efficacy of 66% (95% CI -23% to 96%; p = 0.35). The mean (standard deviation) haemoglobin concentration at the end of the malaria transmission season was similar in the two treatment groups: 10.2 (1.6) g/dL in the IPTc group compared to 10.3 (1.5) g/dL in the placebo group. Coverage with IPTc was high, with 94% of children receiving all three treatments during the study period., Conclusion: Due to the very low incidence of malaria, no firm conclusion can be drawn on the added benefit of IPTc in preventing clinical episodes of malaria among children who had access to HMM in The Gambia. However, the study showed that VHWs can successfully combine provision of HMM with provision of IPTc.

Background: Interventions that reduce exposure to malaria infection may lead to delayed malaria morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in children (IPTc) was associated with an increase in the incidence of malaria after cessation of the intervention., Methods: An individually randomised, trial of IPTc, comparing three courses of sulphadoxine pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine (AQ) with placebos was implemented in children aged 3-59 months during the 2008 malaria transmission season in Burkina Faso. All children in the trial were given a long lasting insecticide treated net; 1509 children received SP+AQ and 1505 received placebos. Passive surveillance for malaria was maintained until the end of the subsequent malaria transmission season in 2009, and active surveillance for malaria infection, anaemia and malnutrition was conducted., Results: On thousand, four hundred and sixteen children (93.8%) and 1399 children (93.0%) initially enrolled in the intervention and control arms of the trial respectively were followed during the 2009 malaria transmission season. During the period July 2009 to November 2009, incidence rates of clinical malaria were 3.84 (95%CI; 3.67-4.02) and 3.45 (95%CI; 3.29-3.62) episodes per child during the follow up period in children who had previously received IPT or placebos, indicating a small increase in risk for children in the former intervention arm (IRR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.04-1.20) (P = 0.003). Children who had received SP+AQ had a lower prevalence of malaria infection (adjusted PR: 0.88 95%CI: 0.79-0.98) (P = 0.04) but they had a higher parasite density (P = 0.001) if they were infected. There was no evidence that the risks of moderately severe anaemia (Hb<8 g/dL), wasting, stunting, or of being underweight in children differed between treatment arms., Conclusion: IPT with SP+AQ was associated with a small increase in the incidence of clinical malaria in the subsequent malaria transmission season., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00738946.

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with amodiaquine (SP-AQ) is a highly efficacious regimen for intermittent preventive treatment to prevent malaria in children (IPTc), but the amodiaquine component is not always well tolerated. We determined the association between amodiaquine dosage by body weight and mild adverse events (AEs) and investigated whether alternative age-based regimens could improve dosing accuracy and tolerability, using data from two trials of IPTc in Senegal, one in which AQ dose was determined by age and the other in which it was determined by weight category. Both dosage strategies resulted in some children receiving AQ doses above the recommended therapeutic range. The odds of vomiting increased with increasing amodiaquine dosage. In one study, incidence of fever also increased with increasing dosage. Anthropometric data from 1,956 children were used to predict the dosing accuracy of existing and optimal alternative regimens. Logistic regression models describing the probability of AEs by dosage were used to predict the potential reductions in mild AEs for each regimen. Simple amendments to current AQ dosing schedules based on the child's age could substantially increase dosing accuracy and thus improve the tolerability of IPTc using SP-amodiaquine in situations where weighing the child is impractical.

Background: Malaria in pregnancy is serious, and drug resistance in Africa is spreading. Drugs have greater risks in pregnancy and determining the safety and efficacy of drugs in pregnancy is therefore a priority. This study set out to determine the efficacy and safety of several antimalarial drugs and combinations in pregnant women with uncomplicated malaria., Methods: Pregnant women with non-severe, slide proven, falciparum malaria were randomised to one of 4 regimes: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine [SP]; chlorproguanil-dapsone [CD]; SP+amodiaquine [SP+AQ] or amodiaquine+artesunate [AQ+AS]. Randomisation was on a 1ratio2ratio2ratio2 ratio. Women were admitted for treatment, and followed at days 7, 14, 21, 28 after the start of treatment, at delivery and 6 weeks after delivery to determine adverse events, clinical and parasitological outcomes. Primary outcome was parasitological failure by day 28., Results: 1433 pregnant women were screened, of whom 272 met entry criteria and were randomised; 28 to SP, 81 to CD, 80 to SP+AQ and 83 to AQ+AS. Follow-up to day 28 post treatment was 251/272 (92%), and to 6 weeks following delivery 91%. By day 28 parasitological failure rates were 4/26 (15%, 95%CI 4-35) in the SP, 18/77 (23%, 95%CI 14-34) in the CD, 1/73 (1% 95%CI 7-0.001) in the SP+AQ and 7/75 (9% 95%CI 4-18) in the AQ+AS arms respectively. After correction by molecular markers for reinfection the parasitological failure rates at day 28 were 18% for CD, 1% for SP+AQ and 4.5% for AQ+AS. There were two maternal deaths during the trial. There was no apparent excess of stillbirths or adverse birth outcomes in any arm. Parasitological responses were strikingly better in pregnant women than in children treated with the same drugs at this site., Conclusions: Failure rates with monotherapy were unacceptably high. The two combinations tested were efficacious and appeared safe. It should not be assumed that efficacy in pregnancy is the same as in children., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00146731.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of atovaquone-proguanil (AP) and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in the treatment of malarial anaemia in Zambian children., Methods: An individually randomised, double-blind, controlled trial was undertaken in Zambian children with moderately severe anaemia and Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia. The main trial endpoint was treatment failure defined as a need for blood transfusion or treatment with quinine, persistent anaemia or death within 14 days from the start of treatment. Secondary endpoints were parasitological and haematological findings 14 or 28 days after the start of treatment., Results: A total of 128 children with a packed cell volume of <21% and >9% and P. falciparum parasitaemia received treatment with AP and 127 treatment with SP. Treatment failure occurred in 28 children (22%) who received SP and in 10 (8%) who received AP (OR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.54, 7.21). Ten children required blood transfusion, all of whom were in the SP treatment group. Six children died, five of whom were in the AP group; none of the deaths were considered to be related directly to treatment., Conclusions: Atovaquone-proguanil proved more effective than SP in the treatment of malarial anaemia in an area with a modest level of SP resistance. AP is no longer available through the Malarone Donation Programme and is too expensive for routine use in Africa. However, this study has shown that in an area with a modest level of resistance to SP, use of a more effective antimalaria reduces the need for blood transfusion in children with malarial anaemia.

A double-blind, community-randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a rural area of The Gambia between June and December 1999 to test whether a reduction in the infectious reservoir can reduce malaria transmission. Overall 14,017 (85%) individuals living in the study area were treated with either placebo or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) combined with a single dose of artesunate (AS). Following the mass drug administration (MDA) 1375 children aged 6 months to 10 years were kept under surveillance for clinical malaria in 18 villages throughout the 1999 malaria transmission season. During a 20-week surveillance period 637 episodes of malaria were detected. The mean incidence rate was 2.5/100 child-weeks in the placebo villages, and 2.3/100 child-weeks in villages that received SP + AS. The mean rate ratio, adjusted for individual and village-level covariates, was 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-1.22, P = 0.49). During the first 2 months of surveillance, the malaria incidence was lower in treated villages. After 2 months the incidence was slightly higher in the MDA group but this was not statistically significant. Overall, no benefit of the MDA could be detected. The reason for the absence of an impact on malaria transmission is probably the very high basic reproductive number of malaria, and the persistence of mature gametocytes, which are not affected by AS treatment.

Malaria during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of severe anaemia and low-birthweight babies. Effective intermittent therapy with pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (PSD) decreases parasitaemia and severe anaemia and improves birthweight in areas where Plasmodium falciparum is sensitive to this drug. Increasing resistance to PSD is a concern and alternative antimalarial regimens during pregnancy are needed. Artesunate with PSD is a promising antimalarial combination but few data are available on the safety of artemisinins when taken during pregnancy. Outcome of pregnancy was evaluated for 287 women in The Gambia who were exposed in June 1999 to a single dose of the combination artesunate and PSD during a mass drug administration and 172 women who were not exposed. Women who received placebo (40) and those who did not participate in the mass drug administration (132) comprised the non-exposed group. There was no difference in the proportion of abortions, stillbirths, or infant deaths among those exposed or not exposed to the drugs. The mean weight of 18 infants born to mothers who had received artesunate and PSD during the third trimester was 3.10 kg compared to a mean weight of 2.62 kg of the 10 infants of untreated mothers (adjusted P value = 0.05). We found no evidence of a teratogenic or otherwise harmful effect of gestational exposure to artesunate and PSD. Treatment of a self-selected group of pregnant women with PSD and artesunate during pregnancy was associated with a greater birthweight, which may have resulted from clearance of malaria parasites. However, the influence of confounding factors cannot be excluded.

Chloroquine can no longer be recommended as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in several parts of Africa because of the increasing prevalence of chloroquine resistance. However, chloroquine was a highly effective treatment for malaria not only because of its ability to kill parasites quickly but also because it is an anti-inflammatory drug. Therefore, we have investigated whether Fansidar (pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine) plus chloroquine is a more effective treatment for uncomplicated malaria than Fansidar alone. Four hundred and five Gambian children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were studied in a randomized controlled trial. Significantly more children treated with Fansidar alone, compared to those treated with Fansidar plus chloroquine (19/203 vs. 2/202; P < 0.001), returned to the clinic with persistent symptoms during the first 3 d after treatment. Three children who had received Fansidar alone had fits, but none of the children treated with Fansidar plus chloroquine did so. At the day 7 follow-up, the parasite failure rate in the Fansidar alone group was 3/198 (1.5%), whilst in the Fansidar plus chloroquine group it was 3/201 (1.5%). At the day 28 follow-up, there was still no significant difference between the parasite failure rate in the Fansidar alone group (15/150; 10.0%) and the Fansidar plus chloroquine group (7/141; 5.0%) and the mean packed cell volume (PCV) in the 2 groups was similar. Thus, a combination of Fansidar plus chloroquine was a more effective symptomatic treatment than Fansidar given alone, but neither the parasite cure rate nor the PCV was enhanced by use of the combination.

The occurrence of an unexpected side effect following the use of Maloprim (pyrimethamine/dapsone) for malaria chemosuppression in 3-59 months old children in Sierra Leone is reported. As part of a trial of chemoprophylaxis and insecticide-impregnated bed nets, 2000 children received either Maloprim or placebo; 4% of children who received Maloprim fortnightly for more than 3 months developed hyperpigmented macules, whereas none of the children who received placebo did so. Histopathological examination of full thickness skin biopsies showed macrophages containing melanin in the dermal layer. Clustering of cases was noted among siblings, suggesting the possible involvement of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of these skin reactions. One child was accidentally re-exposed to Maloprim after the drug had been withdrawn and he developed a severe reaction. No other serious side effect was noted. Hyperpigmented lesions similar to those reported in this study have been described previously in patients with leprosy treated with dapsone, and the dapsone component of Maloprim is the likely cause of the skin reactions seen in children given this drug for malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Ninety-two children with complicated, but not cerebral, Plasmodium falciparum malaria, aged 1-9 years, were recruited between August 1992 and December 1994 to an open, randomized trial of parenteral chloroquine (28), pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (P-S) (36) and quinine (28). The median fever clearance time was shorter for chloroquine (27 hours) than for quinine (42 hours) or for P-S (36 hours) (P = 0.02 and P = 0.06, respectively). The parasite clearance times were similar for chloroquine and P-S, but significantly shorter for chloroquine compared with quinine (54 hours vs 66 hours) (P = 0.007) and for P-S compared with quinine (42 hours vs 66 hours) (P < 0.001). However, three children who received chloroquine and three who received P-S required a change to treatment with quinine because of a clinical failure of their initial treatment. Four children died, one in the chloroquine group, one in the quinine group and two in the P-S group. Despite a high level of chloroquine resistance in the community, the majority of Gambian children with complicated malaria responded satisfactorily to parenteral chloroquine given under supervision. The clinical failure rates of chloroquine and P-S were similar. Parenteral chloroquine and P-S remain adequate treatments for complicated, non-cerebral malaria in Gambian children, provided children can be kept under close clinical observation so as to detect early any treatment failures. Parenteral P-S has the advantage that only one dose is required.

Gambian children who had received malaria chemoprophylaxis for a variable period of time during their first 5 years of life were followed to determine whether they experienced a rebound in mortality or in morbidity from malaria during the period after chemoprophylaxis was stopped. The risk of dying between the ages of 5 years, when chemoprophylaxis was stopped, and 10 years was no higher among children who had received chemoprophylaxis with Maloprim (pyrimethamine plus dapsone) for some period during their first 5 years of life than among children who had received placebo (21 vs. 24 deaths) and the beneficial effect of chemoprophylaxis on mortality observed during the first 5 years of life was sustained. The incidence of clinical attacks of malaria during the year after medication was stopped was significantly higher among children who had previously received Maloprim for several years than among children who had previously received placebo. However, at the end of this year, there was no significant difference in spleen rate, parasite rate or packed cell volume between the 2 groups of children. Thus, stopping chemoprophylaxis after a period of several years increased the risk of clinical malaria but did not result in a rebound in mortality in Gambian children. However, the number of deaths recorded was small, so a modest effect on mortality cannot be excluded.

The harmful effects of malaria are most pronounced during first pregnancies and chemoprophylaxis is most effective when given at this time. However, restriction of chemoprophylaxis to first pregnancies might lead to enhanced susceptibility to malaria during second pregnancies. We have investigated this possibility by studying the outcome of second pregnancies in 165 Gambian women who had received either malaria chemoprophylaxis with Maloprim or placebo during their first pregnancy. Many of these primigravidae did not present until the third trimester of pregnancy so that some are likely to have experienced a malaria infection before they started medication. The prevalence of malaria infection of the blood and of the placenta during second pregnancies was similar in women who had received chemoprophylaxis during their first pregnancy and in those who had not, and the mean birth weights of babies born to women in each group were almost identical. Thus, in areas where the epidemiology of malaria is similar to that of The Gambia and where most women present relatively late in pregnancy, it may be possible to restrict malaria chemoprophylaxis to first pregnancies with consequent savings in cost and a reduction in drug pressure on Plasmodium falciparum.

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled community based trial of Maloprim (pyrimethamine 12.5 mg+dapsone 100 mg) administered to primigravid pregnant women by Traditional Birth Attendants was carried out in a rural area of The Gambia, West Africa. Placental histology showed less malaria infection in women who received chemoprophylaxis than in those who received placebo. The birth weight of children born to women who received chemoprophylaxis was increased by an average of 153 g. Within the treatment groups, there were no significant differences in the birthweights of babies born to women who had histological evidence of malaria infection of the placenta compared to those who had no malaria infection. This study confirms the beneficial effect of malaria prophylaxis for primigravid pregnant women but questions the mechanism by which malaria affects foetal development.

The distribution of birth weights among the infants of 172 Gambian primigravidae who had received chemoprophylaxis with Maloprim (pyrimethamine+dapsone) during pregnancy was compared with that of the infants of 149 primigravidae who had received placebo. Administration of chemoprophylaxis led to a reduction in the prevalence of low birth weight babies and to an increase in the median birth weight. However, these changes were not accompanied by a comparable increase in the prevalence of high birth weight babies. The perinatal mortality rate was lower, although not significantly so, among the babies of women who had received chemoprophylaxis. Thus, no evidence was found to support the view that administration of chemoprophylaxis might increase the risks of delivery by causing cephalo/pelvic disproportion.

In The Gambia, insecticide impregnation of bed nets, used alone or combined with Maloprim, reduced morbidity and mortality from malaria amongst children between one and 4 years of age. Taking expenditure of both time and money by public authorities and village volunteers into account, the costs and cost-effectiveness of each intervention were estimated. Bed net impregnation alone and the combined strategy cost US $5.65 and US $7.49 per child-year protected respectively (1990 figures). Insecticide (and drugs) accounted for more than 80% of the costs of each intervention strategy. They were both highly cost-effective. Estimated costs per death and per clinical episode of malaria averted were US $188 and US $28 for bed net impregnation and $257 and $19 for impregnation combined with chemoprophylaxis. Estimated costs per healthy year of life saved, discounted at 3%, were US $7.90 and US $10.84.

Study of the effects of malaria chemoprophylaxis given during pregnancy on birthweight and investigation of the influence of birthweight on child survival suggest that, in a rural area of The Gambia, chemoprophylaxis given during pregnancy might reduce infant mortality by about one-fifth in the children of primigravidae but by less than 5% in the children of multigravidae. In malaria endemic areas, primigravidae should be protected against malaria not only for their own sake but also for that of their infants.

Mortality and morbidity from malaria were measured in children for a one-year period in a rural area of The Gambia 3-4 years after the introduction of a primary health care programme into some villages in the study area. Among children resident in primary health care villages who received treatment for febrile illnesses from a village health worker resident in their village there was no reduction in overall mortality or in morbidity from malaria compared with levels found in villages without a primary health care worker. However, among children aged 3-59 months who received malaria chemoprophylaxis from a village health worker in addition to treatment there was a 49% reduction in mortality and a 73% reduction in attacks of clinical malaria. The level of protection against malaria achieved by chemoprophylaxis given by village health workers 3-4 years after the chemoprophylaxis programme was started was as high as that obtained shortly after the introduction of the primary health care programme.

We have reviewed a malaria chemoprophylaxis programme in which Maloprim (pyrimethamine and dapsone) has been administered fortnightly by village health workers (VHWs) to approximately 1500 children each year aged 6-59 months resident in 15 primary health care villages in a rural area of The Gambia over 5 years. Reasonable levels of compliance with chemoprophylaxis have been maintained by many children over this period. this has occurred despite minimal outside supervision and support of the programme. Factors which may have affected the level of compliance in individual villages are identified. Large villages and those where social or political factionalism were evident tended to have low levels of compliance. The attitudes of VHWs and mothers to the programme were determined. Most VHWs cooperated enthusiastically and kept accurate records of compliance, despite receiving no compensation from the villagers for administering chemoprophylaxis. The administration of a drug to prevent illness in children was complementary to the curative service provided by VHWs. The chemoprophylactic was widely acceptable and nearly all mothers stated that the tablets were good for their children's health. However, knowledge of the specific purpose of chemoprophylaxis in the prevention of malaria was limited. Improvements in the programme which may result in higher levels of compliance are discussed.

A five-year malaria chemoprophylaxis study has begun with Maloprim in children aged three months to five years and pregnant women in a population of 13,000 in the area of Farafenni, The Gambia. Sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to pyrimethamine, Maloprim and chloroquine was assessed in vivo and in vitro in rural Gambian villages before drug intervention. 569 children aged one to seven years inclusive were sampled at the end of the wet season of 1982; 46% had positive blood films. All afebrile children were treated with a single dose of one of the antimalarials under study. Febrile children were treated with chloroquine. 109 infected children were retested 7 to 10 days after treatment and none showed asexual parasitaemia. 83 micro in vitro tests were successfully performed from fingerprick blood samples and the results confirmed the in vivo study. Pyrimethamine in combination with dapsone, in the proportion present in Maloprim, i.e., 1:8, showed a synergistic effect, the mean effective dose of pyrimethamine being reduced 13 times at the 50% inhibitory level.

The efficacy of chloroquine and pyrimethamine as malaria chemoprophylactics was investigated in young Nigerian children. Chloroquine resistance had not been documented in the study area; pyrimethamine resistance was probably present but uncommon. Children who received weekly chemoprophylaxis with pyrimethamine had a lower prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and malaria antibodies than children who received weekly chemoprophylaxis with chloroquine. Pyrimethamine given monthly gave a comparable degree of protection to chloroquine given weekly. Chloroquine frequently induced vomiting in young children and this may have impaired its efficacy as a prophylactic. We conclude that, in an area where neither chloroquine nor pyrimethamine resistance is prevalent, pyrimethamine is a better chemoprophylactic for young children than chloroquine.

A cohort of 48 Gambian children was protected against malaria by fortnightly administration of Maloprim (pyrimethamine and dapsone) for 2 years between their 3 and 5 birthdays. A matched cohort of 47 children received placebo. During the year following the termination of prophylaxis there was no increase in the frequency of clinical attacks of malaria in the protected children compared with the control children. Antibody levels to circumsporozoite protein were measured by a radioimmunoassay and that to blood-stage antigens by a variety of techniques including an ELISA to whole blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum antigen, immunofluorescent assays (IFAT) to acetone fixed, glutaraldehyde fixed and unfixed parasites, a merozoite inhibition test and an opsonizing assay. Antibody levels were, in general, lower in protected than in control children and several differences between the two groups were statistically significant. When antibody levels were measured by ELISA and IFAT at the end of the following rainy season, when malaria transmission was intense, those in protected children had increased to comparable levels to those found in control children. Our findings suggest that chemoprophylaxis given for 2 years lowers malaria antibody levels but that it does not interfere with the development of protective immunity.

Fifty-two Gambian children who had received fortnightly chemoprophylaxis with maloprim, (pyrimethamine and dapsone), and 45 receiving placebo, were studied. Cellular immune responses to malaria antigens, measured by lymphoproliferative responses and interferon production, were higher in children who had received prophylaxis than in controls, although the anti-malarial antibody levels were lower. During a one-year period after termination of prophylaxis, there was no increase in the frequency of clinical episodes of malaria in the children who had received Maloprim. These results suggest that chemoprophylaxis for 3 years may lower malaria antibody levels, but does not interfere with the development of protective immunity, perhaps by enhancing cell-mediated immune responses to malaria in protected children.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent asays (ELISAs) are described for determining levels of dapsone and pyrimethamine in urine. Both assays have a sensitivity of about 20 mug/l and are reproducible, but each produces some false positives. The problem of false positive reactions was partially obviated by requiring positive results in both assays. In a pilot study involving 50 children aged 3 months to 4 years who were given a single dose of Maloprim (pyrimethamine + dapsone), 75% were positive for dapsone 7 days after administration of the drug, while 25% were still positive 15 days after its administration. The corresponding proportions for pyrimethamine were 73% and 30%, respectively. Comparison of the results obtained in a larger chemoprophylaxis trial with those from the pilot study indicated that the assays described could be used to investigate whether antimalarials had been taken.

A comparison has been made of Lapudrine (chlorproguanil) and Maloprim (pyrimethamine +dapsone) as malaria chemoprophylactics when given every two weeks for 3 years to Gambian children under the age of 5 years. Both drugs produced falls in spleen and malaria parasite rates and an increase in packed cell volume. Maloprim, but not chlorproguanil, significantly reduced the incidence of episodes of fever accompanied by malaria parasitaemia. Children who received Maloprim, but not those who received chlorproguanil, grew better than children in the placebo group. This finding suggests that brief clinical episodes of malaria are more important in impairing growth than more prolonged periods of asymptomatic parasitaemia. No serious side-effect attributable to either drug was observed. After chemoprophylaxis had been given for 3 malaria transmission seasons the level of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to pyrimethamine and to chlorproguanil was about 10%.