1. Comparison of myocardial injury and inflammation between ablation index-guided and conventional contact force-guided ablation in atrial fibrillation patients.
- Author
-
Yano M, Egami Y, Kawanami S, Sugae H, Ukita K, Kawamura A, Nakamura H, Yasumoto K, Tsuda M, Okamoto N, Matsunaga-Lee Y, Nishino M, and Tanouchi J
- Subjects
- Humans, Inflammation, Biomarkers, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Atrial Fibrillation surgery, Catheter Ablation, Pulmonary Veins surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation improves the incidence of arrhythmia recurrence as compared to conventional contact force (CF)-guided ablation. The aim of this study was to elucidate the differences in the biomarkers associated with myocardial injury and inflammation between conventional CF-guided and AI-guided ablation., Methods: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) from the Osaka Rosai Atrial Fibrillation ablation (ORAF) registry were enrolled. We divided the patients into two groups: conventional CF-guided PVI (CF group) and AI-guided PVI (AI group). The differences in biomarkers associated with myocardial injury and inflammation, and long-term durability of PVI between the two groups were evaluated., Results: This study population included a total of 794 patients (CF-guided, 241 patients; AI-guided, 553 patients). Total application time was significantly shorter, and total application number was significantly smaller in AI than CF group. High-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) post-ablation was significantly higher in AI than CF group (p < 0.001), even after taking the total application number and total application time into consideration. No significant differences in inflammatory markers changes from pre- to post-ablation were observed between the two groups. AI-guided ablation was significantly associated with the hs-TnI post-ablation by multiple regression analysis. The PV reconnection ratio was significantly smaller in AI than CF group (p = 0.037)., Conclusions: AI-guided ablation had the ability to create larger lesions than CF-guided ablation despite no increase in inflammation and achieved the better PVI durability than that of CF-guided., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF