Search

Background: Right ventricular (RV) function plays a critical role in the pathophysiology and acute prognosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). We analyzed the temporal changes of RV function in the cohort of a prospective multicentre study investigating if an early switch to oral anticoagulation in patients with intermediate-risk PE is effective and safe., Methods: Echocardiographic and laboratory examinations were performed at baseline (PE diagnosis), 6 days and 6 months. Echocardiographic parameters were classified into categories representing RV size, RV free wall/tricuspid annulus motion, RV pressure overload and right atrial (RA)/central venous pressure., Results: RV dysfunction based on any abnormal echocardiographic parameter was present in 84% of patients at baseline. RV dilatation was the most frequently abnormal finding (40.6%), followed by increased RA/central venous pressure (34.6%), RV pressure overload (32.1%), and reduced RV free wall/tricuspid annulus motion (20.9%). As early as day 6, RV size remained normal or improved in 260 patients (64.7%), RV free wall/tricuspid annulus motion in 301 (74.9%), RV pressure overload in 297 (73.9%), and RA/central venous pressure in 254 (63.2%). At day 180, the frequencies slightly increased. The median NT-proBNP level decreased from 1448 pg/ml at baseline to 256.5 on day 6 and 127 on day 180., Conclusion: In the majority of patients with acute intermediate-risk PE switched early to a direct oral anticoagulant, echocardiographic parameters of RV function normalised within 6 days and remained normal throughout the first 6 months. Almost one in four patients, however, continued to have evidence of RV dysfunction over the long term., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The current treatment algorithm for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) as depicted in the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) includes a multimodal approach of combinations of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and medical therapies to target major vessel pulmonary vascular lesions, and microvasculopathy. Today, BPA of >1700 patients has been reported in the literature from centers in Asia, the US, and also Europe; many more patients have been treated outside literature reports. As BPA becomes part of routine care of patients with CTEPH, benchmarks for safe and effective care delivery become increasingly important. In light of this development, the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function has decided to publish a document that helps standardize BPA to meet the need of uniformity in patient selection, procedural planning, technical approach, materials and devices, treatment goals, complications including their management, and patient follow-up, thus complementing the guidelines. Delphi methodology was utilized for statements that were not evidence based. First, an anatomical nomenclature and a description of vascular lesions are provided. Second, treatment goals and definitions of complete BPA are outlined. Third, definitions of complications are presented which may be the basis for a standardized reporting in studies involving BPA. The document is intended to serve as a companion to the official ESC/ERS guidelines., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Riociguat and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are treatment options for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, randomised controlled trials comparing these treatments are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BPA versus riociguat in patients with inoperable CTEPH., Methods: In this phase 3, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial done in 23 French centres of expertise for pulmonary hypertension, we enrolled treatment-naive patients aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed, inoperable CTEPH and pulmonary vascular resistance of more than 320 dyn·s/cm 5 . Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to BPA or riociguat via a web-based randomisation system, with block randomisation (block sizes of two or four patients) without stratification. The primary endpoint was change in pulmonary vascular resistance at week 26, expressed as percentage of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of riociguat or had at least one BPA session. Patients who completed the RACE trial continued into an ancillary 26-week follow-up during which symptomatic patients with pulmonary vascular resistance of more than 320 dyn·s/cm 5 benefited from add-on riociguat after BPA or add-on BPA after riociguat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02634203, and is completed., Findings: Between Jan 19, 2016, and Jan 18, 2019, 105 patients were randomly assigned to riociguat (n=53) or BPA (n=52). At week 26, the geometric mean pulmonary vascular resistance decreased to 39·9% (95% CI 36·2-44·0) of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance in the BPA group and 66·7% (60·5-73·5) of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance in the riociguat group (ratio of geometric means 0·60, 95% CI 0·52-0·69; p<0·0001). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 22 (42%) of 52 patients in the BPA group and five (9%) of 53 patients in the riociguat group. The most frequent treatment-related serious adverse events were lung injury (18 [35%] of 52 patients) in the BPA group and severe hypotension with syncope (two [4%] of 53 patients) in the riociguat group. There were no treatment-related deaths. At week 52, a similar reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance was observed in patients treated with first-line riociguat or first-line BPA (ratio of geometric means 0·91, 95% CI 0·79-1·04). The incidence of BPA-related serious adverse events was lower in patients who were pretreated with riociguat (five [14%] of 36 patients vs 22 [42%] of 52 patients)., Interpretation: At week 26, pulmonary vascular resistance reduction was more pronounced with BPA than with riociguat, but treatment-related serious adverse events were more common with BPA. The finding of fewer BPA-related serious adverse events among patients who were pretreated with riociguat in the follow-up study compared with those who received BPA as first-line treatment points to the potential benefits of a multimodality approach to treatment in patients with inoperable CTEPH. Further studies are needed to explore the effects of sequential treatment combining one or two medications and BPA in patients with inoperable CTEPH., Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health and Bayer HealthCare., Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests XJ, PB, HB, MJ, LS, OS, FP, CP, LG, EF, DM, MH, and GS report grants from the French Ministry of Health and Bayer HealthCare, during the conduct of the study. XJ reports grants from Acceleron, Janssen, and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); personal fees from Janssen and MSD; and non-financial support from Janssen, outside of this study. MC reports personal fees from Menarini, and non-financial support from France Oxygène and Actelion, outside of this study. AC reports grants from Actelion and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees from MSD, Chiesi, and GlaxoSmithKline; and non-financial support from Asten Santé, Johnson & Johnson, Chiesi, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside of this study. VC reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX, Promedior, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, and PureTech; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside of this study. PDG reports personal fees from Bayer HealthCare and MSD, outside of this study. LS reports grants from Janssen, MSD, and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees from Janssen and MSD; and non-financial support from Janssen, outside of this study. OS reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Acceleron, Janssen, and MSD; and personal fees from Gossamer Bio, Janssen, AOP Orphan, Ferrer, Acceleron, and MSD, outside of this study. FP reports grants from Acceleron, MSD, and Janssen; personal fees from MSD and Bayer HealthCare; and non-financial support from Bayer HealthCare, outside of this study. CT reports personal fees from Bayer HealthCare, Janssen, and GlaxoSmithKline; and non-financial support from Orkyn and Bayer HealthCare, outside of this study. EF reports personal fees from MSD, outside of this study. DM reports grants from Acceleron, Janssen, and MSD; and personal fees from Acceleron, Bayer HealthCare, Janssen, and MSD, outside of this study. MH reports grants from the French National Research Agency, Acceleron, Janssen, and MSD; and personal fees from Acceleron, Janssen, MSD, and United Therapeutics, outside of this study. GS reports personal fees from Acceleron, Janssen, MSD, and Bayer HealthCare, outside of this study. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Excessive ventilation (V̇E) during exercise, ascribed to heightened neural ventilatory drive and/or to increased "wasted" ventilation, is a feature of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). In selected CTEPH patients, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) allows near-normalization of resting haemodynamic parameters but does not allow excess exercise hyperventilation to normalize. Neural ventilatory drive can be estimated by studying how arterial PCO 2 (PaCO 2 ), end-tidal PCO 2 (PETCO 2 ), V̇E and CO 2 output (V̇CO 2 ) change across the exercise-to-recovery transition during a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Increased "wasted" ventilation can be quantified by the physiological dead space fraction of tidal volume (VD/VT) calculated with the Enghoff simplification of the Bohr equation. These measurements were made before and after BPA in 22 CTEPH patients without significant cardiac and/or pulmonary comorbidities. Our observations suggest that before BPA, excessive hyperventilation was secondary to both heightened neural ventilatory drive and increased "wasted" ventilation; after BPA, measurements made across the exercise-to-recovery transition suggest that heightened neural ventilatory drive was no longer present., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients undergoing balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), single-centre series from expert centres have recognized a learning curve for the magnitude of haemodynamic benefits., Objective: To report our 7-year experience with BPA, focusing on haemodynamic effects, complication rates and radiation exposure over time., Methods: Patients with CTEPH who were treated with BPA between May 2013 and February 2020 were analysed during the 'initial period' versus the 'recent period' (split date: March 2017)., Results: Among 192 patients who underwent at least one BPA procedure, 156 were included in the safety/radiation analysis and 119 were included in the efficacy analysis. During the 'recent period' versus the 'initial period', the median [interquartile range] number of procedures per patient was higher (4.5 [4.0-6.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]; P=0.03), as was the number of dilated vessels per procedure (4.0 [3.5-5.0] vs. 3.5 [3.0-4.0]; P=0.002). Changes in haemodynamic parameters were also greater (mean pulmonary artery pressure: -22% [-31% to -14%] vs. -37% [-44% to -29%]; P=0.001; pulmonary vascular resistance: -38% [-51% to -8%] vs. -53% [-69% to -33%]; P=0.002); complication rates were similar (5.7% vs. 9.3% of procedures; P=0.38); and radiation exposure was lower (effective dose per patient: 43.9 [31.6-66.5] vs. 67.8 [47.9-101.9] mSv; P<0.001)., Conclusion: Our analysis is consistent with a learning curve for the magnitude of haemodynamic improvements. The complication rate was low and did not change over time, but radiation exposure decreased., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The role of diuretics in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial. In this multicentre, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned normotensive patients with intermediate-risk PE to receive either a single 80 mg bolus of furosemide or a placebo., Methods and Results: Eligible patients had at least a simplified PE Severity Index (sPESI) ≥1 with right ventricular dysfunction. The primary efficacy endpoint assessed 24 h after randomization included (i) absence of oligo-anuria and (ii) normalization of all sPESI items. Safety outcomes were worsening renal function and major adverse outcomes at 48 hours defined by death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, or need of catecholamine. A total of 276 patients underwent randomization; 135 were assigned to receive the diuretic, and 141 to receive the placebo. The primary outcome occurred in 68/132 patients (51.5%) in the diuretic and in 49/132 (37.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.61; P = 0.021). Major adverse outcome at 48 h occurred in 1 (0.8%) patients in the diuretic group and 4 patients (2.9%) in the placebo group (P = 0.19). Increase in serum creatinine level was greater in diuretic than placebo group [+4 µM/L (-2; 14) vs. -1 µM/L (-11; 6), P < 0.001]., Conclusion: In normotensive patients with intermediate-risk PE, a single bolus of furosemide improved the primary efficacy outcome at 24 h and maintained stable renal function. In the furosemide group, urine output increased, without a demonstrable improvement in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, or arterial oxygenation.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02268903., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Excessive ventilation (V̇E) and abnormal gas exchange during exercise are features of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). In selected CTEPH patients, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves symptoms and exercise capacity. How BPA affects exercise hyperventilation and gas exchange is poorly understood., Methods: In this longitudinal observational study, symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests and carbon monoxide lung diffusion (DLCO) were performed before and after BPA (interval, mean (SD): 3.1 (2.4) months) in 36 CTEPH patients without significant cardiac and/or pulmonary comorbidities., Results: Peak work rate improved by 20% after BPA whilst V̇E at peak did not change despite improved ventilatory efficiency (lower V̇E with respect to CO 2 output [V̇CO 2 ]). At the highest identical work rate pre- and post-BPA (75 (30) watts), V̇E and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (P(Ai-a)O 2 ) decreased by 17% and 19% after BPA, respectively. The physiological dead space fraction of tidal volume (VD/VT), calculated from measurements of arterial and mixed expired CO 2 , decreased by 20%. In the meantime, DLCO did not change. The best correlates of P(Ai-a)O 2 measured at peak exercise were physiological VD/VT before BPA and DLCO after BPA., Conclusions: Ventilatory efficiency, physiological VD/VT, and pulmonary gas exchange improved after BPA. The fact that DLCO did not change suggests that the pulmonary capillary blood volume and probably the true alveolar dead space were unaffected by BPA. The correlation between DLCO measured before BPA and P(Ai-a)O 2 measured after BPA suggests that DLCO may provide an easily accessible marker to predict the response to BPA in terms of pulmonary gas exchange., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement MBN, NP, AG, SD, MS, FT, CA, HB report no disclosures. CP reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Glaxo Smith Kline, Astra Zeneca and Sanofi outside submitted work. BA reports honoraria and consulting fees grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Glaxo Smith Kline, Menarini, Chiesi, Astra Zeneca and Sanofi unrelated to the submitted work. BD reports grant funding from Novartis and honoraria and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Nuvaira, Menarini, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Astra Zeneca and Sanofi unrelated to the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Since 2014, Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA) has become an emerging and complementary strategy for chronic thromboembolic hypertension (CTEPH) patients who are not suitable for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) or who have recurrent symptoms after the PEA procedure., Objective: To assess the hospital cost of BPA sessions and management in CTEPH patients., Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study of CTEPH-adults hospitalized for a BPA between January 1st, 2014 and June 30th, 2016 was conducted in the 2 centres performing BPA in France (Paris Sud and Grenoble) using the French national hospital discharge database (PMSI-MCO). Patients were followed until 6 months or death, whichever occurred first. Follow-up stays were classified as stays with BPA sessions, for BPA management or for CTEPH management based on a pre-defined algorithm and a medical review using type of diagnosis (ICD-10), delay from last BPA procedure stay and length of stay. Hospital costs (including medical transports) were estimated from National Health Insurance perspective using published official French tariffs from 2014 to 2016 and expressed in 2017 Euros., Results: A total of 191 patients were analysed; mainly male (53%), with a mean age of 64,3 years. The first BPA session was performed 1.1 years in median (IQR 0.3-2.92) after the first PH hospitalisation. A mean of 3 stays with BPA sessions per patient were reported with a mean length of stay of 8 days for the first stay and 6 days for successive stays. The total hospital cost attributable to BPA was € 4,057,825 corresponding to €8,764±3,435 per stay and €21,245±12,843 per patient. Results were sensitive to age classes, density of commune of residence and some comorbidities., Conclusions: The study generated robust real-world data to assess the hospital cost of BPA sessions and management in CTEPH patients within its first years of implementation in France., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Experts: VC, JD, HB and PB are independent experts who received fees for participating in the scientific committee of the study. Outside the submitted work, VC reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bayer / MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche / Promedior, personal fees from Sanofi, 2 personal fees from Celgene / BMS, personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Galecto, personal fees from Shionogi, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Fibrogen, personal fees from RedX, personal fees from PureTech. Outside the submitted work, HB has received personal fees and/or non-financial support from MSD, Actelion, GSK. Outside the submitted work, PB and JD have no competing interest in relation with this topic to declare. MSD employees: LB, AH and LLB are employees of MSD, the company which financed the study. HEVA employees: AV is one of the co-founders of the CRO HEVA; FR and GC are employees of HEVA, a company who received funding from the study sponsor for the conduct of this study and for the analysis of the data. These commercial affiliations does not alter adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Current guidelines recommend a risk-adjusted treatment strategy for the management of acute pulmonary embolism. This is a particular patient category for whom optimal treatment (anticoagulant treatment, reperfusion strategies, and duration of hospitalisation) is currently unknown. We investigated whether treatment of acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism with parenteral anticoagulation for a short period of 72 h, followed by a switch to a direct oral anticoagulant (dabigatran), is effective and safe., Methods: We did a multinational, multicentre, single-arm, phase 4 trial at 42 hospitals in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Slovenia, and Spain. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with symptomatic intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, with or without deep-vein thrombosis, were enrolled. Patients received parenteral low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin for 72 h after diagnosis of pulmonary embolism before switching to oral dabigatran 150 mg twice per day following a standard clinical assessment. The primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism-related death within 6 months. The primary and safety outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study was terminated early, as advised by the data safety and monitoring board, following sample size adaptation after the predefined interim analysis on Dec 18, 2018. This trial is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2015-001830-12) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02596555)., Findings: Between Jan 1, 2016, and July 31, 2019, 1418 patients with pulmonary embolism were screened, of whom 402 were enrolled and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age was 69·5 years [IQR 60·0-78·0); 192 [48%] were women and 210 [52%] were men). Median follow-up was 217 days (IQR 210-224) and 370 (92%) patients adhered to the protocol. The primary outcome occurred in seven (2% [upper bound of right-sided 95% CI 3]; p<0·0001 for rejecting the null hypothesis) patients, with all events occurring in those with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (seven [3%; upper bound of right-sided 95% CI 5] of 283). At 6 months, 11 (3% [95% CI 1-5]) of 402 patients had at least one major bleeding event and 16 (4% [2-6]) had at least one clinically relevant non-major bleeding event; the only fatal haemorrhage occurred in one (<1%) patient before the switch to dabigatran., Interpretation: A strategy of early switch from heparin to dabigatran following standard clinical assessment was effective and safe in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Our results can help to refine guideline recommendations for the initial treatment of acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, optimising the use of resources and avoiding extended hospitalisation., Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, University Medical Center Mainz, and Boehringer Ingelheim., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests FAK reports research grants from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Actelion, the Dutch Heart foundation, and the Dutch Thrombosis Association, all outside the submitted work. SB reports congress and travel payments from Daiichi Sankyo and Bayer; honoraria from BTG Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, Bayer HealthCare, and LeoPharma; and institutional grants from Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. WA reports research support from Bayer, and participating in advisory boards for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, Janssen, Aspen, and Sanofi all outside the submitted work. MB reports consulting and speaker fees from Bayer Healthcare, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi Aventis outside the submitted work. FC reports research grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; fees for board memberships or symposia from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance, and Astra Zeneca; and travel support from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance, Leo Pharma, and Actelion all outside the submitted work. KD reports unrestricted research support and speaker or consultant fees from Janssen outside the submitted work. DD reports speaker's honoraria from Bayer Vital, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; and consulting fees from Bayer Vital and Daiichi Sankyo all outside the submitted work. KE reports lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis; and consulting fees from Bayer Vital, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk all outside the submitted work. GG reports personal fees or research grants, or both, from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Leo, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. MVH reports grants from the ZonMW Dutch Healthcare Fund; and grants and personal fees to the Leiden University Medical Center from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance, Bayer Health Care, Aspen, and Daiichi Sankyo, all outside the submitted work. DJ reports serving as an advisor or consultant for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, ROVI, and Sanofi; serving as a speaker or a member of a speakers' bureau for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Leo Pharma, ROVI, and Sanofi; and receiving grants for clinical research from Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and ROVI all outside the submitted work. MK reports speaker fees from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer outside the submitted work. IML reports receiving consulting fees and research grants from, and being a member of scientific advisory boards for AOPOrphan Pharmaceuticals, Actelion-Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, United Therapeutics, Medtronic, Neutrolis, and Ferrer, in addition to being an investigator in trials involving these companies. ML reports consultant and speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; and project funding from Thermo Fisher Scientific all outside the submitted work. NM reports consulting fees, speaker fees, and project funding from Bayer and Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and consulting fees from Abbott and Terumo all outside the submitted work. AOP reports speaker fees from SC Pfizer Romania, Servier Pharma, Novartis Pharma Services Romania, Bayer, and SC Sanience outside the submitted work. AS reports consulting fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work. SS reports consulting fees and speaker fees from Aspen and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo; and project funding and speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance all outside the submitted work. K-HS reports speaker and consulting fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, and Abbott outside the submitted work. FV reports research grants from Daiichi Sanyo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Radiometer, and Biomerieux, outside the submitted work. SVK reports institutional research grants and personal consultancy or speaker fees from Actelion/Janssen, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Servier; and personal consultancy or speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance and Novartis all outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Acute pulmonary embolism is a frequent cardiovascular emergency with an increasing incidence. The prognosis of patients with high-risk and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism has not improved over the last decade. The current treatment strategies are mainly based on anticoagulation to prevent recurrence and reduce pulmonary vasculature obstruction. However, the slow rate of thrombus lysis under anticoagulation is unable to acutely decrease right ventricle overload and pulmonary vasculature resistance in patients with severe obstruction and right ventricle dysfunction. Therefore, patients with high-risk and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism remain a therapeutic challenge. Reperfusion therapies may be discussed for these patients, and include systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapies and surgical thrombectomy. High-risk patients require systemic thrombolysis, but may have contraindications as a result of the high risk of bleeding. In addition, intermediate-high-risk patients should not receive systemic thrombolysis, despite its high efficacy, because of prohibitive bleeding complications. Recently, percutaneous reperfusion techniques have been developed to acutely decrease pulmonary vascular obstruction with lower-dose or no thrombolytic agents and, thus, potentially higher safety than systemic thrombolysis. Some of these techniques improve key haemodynamic variables. Cardiac surgical techniques and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as temporary circulatory support may be useful in selected cases. The development of pulmonary embolism centres with multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism teams is mandatory to enable adequate use of reperfusion and improve outcomes. We aim to present the state of the art regarding reperfusion therapies in pulmonary embolism, but also to provide guidance on their indications and patient selection., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Introduction: Symptoms and functional limitation are frequently reported by survivors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, current guidelines provide no specific recommendations on which patients should be followed after acute PE, when follow-up should be performed, and which tests it should include. Definition and classification of late PE sequelae are evolving, and their predictors remain to be determined., Methods: In a post hoc analysis of the Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis (PEITHO) trial, we focused on 219 survivors of acute intermediate-risk PE with clinical and echocardiographic follow-up 6 months after randomisation as well as over the long term (median, 3 years after acute PE). The primary outcome was a composite of (1) confirmed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or (2) 'post-PE impairment' (PPEI), defined by echocardiographic findings indicating an intermediate or high probability of pulmonary hypertension along with New York Heart Association functional class II-IV., Results: Confirmed CTEPH or PPEI occurred in 29 (13.2%) patients, (6 with CTEPH and 23 with PPEI). A history of chronic heart failure at baseline and incomplete or absent recovery of echocardiographic parameters at 6 months predicted CTEPH or PPEI at long-term follow-up., Conclusions: CTEPH or PPEI occurs in almost one out of seven patients after acute intermediate-risk PE. Six-month echocardiographic follow-up may be useful for timely detection of late sequelae.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is uncommon. Its diagnosis should not be delayed as its prognosis is poor if not treated. In most cases, an acute pulmonary embolism is found in the medical history of the patient. Once suspected, a specific work-up should be performed in a pulmonary hypertension (PH) center. The ventilation/perfusion scan has a central role in this workup but the emergence of non invasive imaging technologies provides morphological and functional information which take part in the therapeutic decision making, such as operability. Surgical endarterectomy remains the only curative treatment. In some specific patients, percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty (AAP) is performed. This developing technique is a safe and efficient treatment on a clinical and hemodynamic standpoint. The main complication after AAP is lung reperfusion edema., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Background: The long-term effect of thrombolytic treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) is unknown., Objectives: This study investigated the long-term prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk PE and the effect of thrombolytic treatment on the persistence of symptoms or the development of late complications., Methods: The PEITHO (Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis) trial was a randomized (1:1) comparison of thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus placebo in normotensive patients with acute PE, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on imaging, and a positive cardiac troponin test result. Both treatment arms received standard anticoagulation. Long-term follow-up was included in the third protocol amendment; 28 sites randomizing 709 of the 1,006 patients participated., Results: Long-term (median 37.8 months) survival was assessed in 353 of 359 (98.3%) patients in the thrombolysis arm and in 343 of 350 (98.0%) in the placebo arm. Overall mortality rates were 20.3% and 18.0%, respectively (p = 0.43). Between day 30 and long-term follow-up, 65 deaths occurred in the thrombolysis arm and 53 occurred in the placebo arm. At follow-up examination of survivors, persistent dyspnea (mostly mild) or functional limitation was reported by 36.0% versus 30.1% of the patients (p = 0.23). Echocardiography (performed in 144 and 146 patients randomized to thrombolysis and placebo, respectively) did not reveal significant differences in residual pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) was confirmed in 4 (2.1%) versus 6 (3.2%) cases (p = 0.79)., Conclusions: Approximately 33% of patients report some degree of persistent functional limitation after intermediate-risk PE, but CTEPH is infrequent. Thrombolytic treatment did not affect long-term mortality rates, and it did not appear to reduce residual dyspnea or RV dysfunction in these patients. (Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis study [PEITHO]; NCT00639743)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), stenoses or obstructions of the pulmonary arteries due to organized thrombi can cause an elevation in pulmonary artery resistance, which in turn can result in pulmonary hypertension and progressive right heart failure. CTEPH can be cured surgically by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA); however, patients deemed unsuitable for PEA due to distal lesion, advanced age, or comorbidities have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recently, an alternative interventional strategy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) reduces pulmonary artery hypertension in patients with CTEPH. Risk/benefit inbalance appear to be safe in experimented center. BPA can treat the lesions from lobar to subsegmental pulmonary arteries, improving functional and hemodynamic status for inoperable patients. This review highlights this recent progress., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), poor outcome is usually related to right ventricular (RV) failure due to the increase in RV afterload. Treatment of PE with RV failure without shock is controversial and usually relies on fluid expansion to increase RV preload. However, several studies suggest that fluid expansion may worsen acute RV failure by increasing RV dilation and ischaemia, and increase left ventricular compression by RV dilation. By reducing RV enlargement, diuretic treatment may break this vicious circle and provide early improvement in normotensive patients referred for acute PE with RV failure., Methods and Analysis: The Diuretic versus placebo in Pulmonary Embolism with Right ventricular enlargement trial (DiPER) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised (1:1), double-blind, placebo controlled study assessing the superiority of furosemide as compared with placebo in normotensive patients with confirmed acute PE and RV dilation (diagnosed on echocardiography or CT of the chest) and positive brain natriuretic peptide result. The primary end point will be a combined clinical criterion derived from simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score and evaluated at 24 h. It will include: (1) urine output >0.5 mL/kg/min for the past 24 h; (2) heart rate <110 bpm; (3) systolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg and (4) arterial oxyhaemoglobin level >90%. Thirty-day major cardiac events defined as death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, need for catecholamine and thrombolysis, will be evaluated as a secondary end point. Assuming an increase of 30% in the primary end point with furosemide and a β risk of 10%, 270 patients will be required., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval was received from the ethical committee of Ile de France (2014-001090-14). The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, and national and international conference presentations., Trial Registration Number: NCT02268903., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Background: The role of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is controversial., Methods: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared tenecteplase plus heparin with placebo plus heparin in normotensive patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Eligible patients had right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography, as well as myocardial injury as indicated by a positive test for cardiac troponin I or troponin T. The primary outcome was death or hemodynamic decompensation (or collapse) within 7 days after randomization. The main safety outcomes were major extracranial bleeding and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 7 days after randomization., Results: Of 1006 patients who underwent randomization, 1005 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Death or hemodynamic decompensation occurred in 13 of 506 patients (2.6%) in the tenecteplase group as compared with 28 of 499 (5.6%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.87; P=0.02). Between randomization and day 7, a total of 6 patients (1.2%) in the tenecteplase group and 9 (1.8%) in the placebo group died (P=0.42). Extracranial bleeding occurred in 32 patients (6.3%) in the tenecteplase group and 6 patients (1.2%) in the placebo group (P<0.001). Stroke occurred in 12 patients (2.4%) in the tenecteplase group and was hemorrhagic in 10 patients; 1 patient (0.2%) in the placebo group had a stroke, which was hemorrhagic (P=0.003). By day 30, a total of 12 patients (2.4%) in the tenecteplase group and 16 patients (3.2%) in the placebo group had died (P=0.42)., Conclusions: In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, fibrinolytic therapy prevented hemodynamic decompensation but increased the risk of major hemorrhage and stroke. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique in France and others; PEITHO EudraCT number, 2006-005328-18; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00639743.).