1. Incidence, risk factors and pre-emptive screening for COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis in an era of immunomodulant therapy.
- Author
-
van Grootveld R, van der Beek MT, Janssen NAF, Ergün M, van Dijk K, Bethlehem C, Stads S, van Paassen J, Heunks LMA, Bouman CSC, Reijers MHE, Brüggeman RJ, van de Veerdonk FL, van Bree SHW, van den Berg CHSB, Kuindersma M, Wauters J, Beishuizen A, Verweij PE, and Schouten JA
- Subjects
- Humans, Incidence, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, COVID-19, Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Abstract
Purpose: COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in ICU patients. We investigated the incidence of, risk factors for and potential benefit of a pre-emptive screening strategy for CAPA in ICUs in the Netherlands/Belgium during immunosuppressive COVID-19 treatment., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicentre study was performed from September 2020-April 2021 including patients admitted to the ICU who had undergone diagnostics for CAPA. Patients were classified based on 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria., Results: CAPA was diagnosed in 295/1977 (14.9%) patients. Corticosteroids were administered to 97.1% of patients and interleukin-6 inhibitors (anti-IL-6) to 23.5%. EORTC/MSGERC host factors or treatment with anti-IL-6 with or without corticosteroids were not risk factors for CAPA. Ninety-day mortality was 65.3% (145/222) in patients with CAPA compared to 53.7% (176/328) without CAPA (p = 0.008). Median time from ICU admission to CAPA diagnosis was 12 days. Pre-emptive screening for CAPA was not associated with earlier diagnosis or reduced mortality compared to a reactive diagnostic strategy., Conclusions: CAPA is an indicator of a protracted course of a COVID-19 infection. No benefit of pre-emptive screening was observed, but prospective studies comparing pre-defined strategies would be required to confirm this observation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Paul Verweij: Institution contracted for research grant: F2G and Gilead Sciences; Honoraria for lectures paid to institution: F2G, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board paid to institution: F2G, Mundipharma. Roger Brüggeman: Institution contracted for research grant: Astellas Pharma, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Pfizer; Consulting fees paid to institution: Astellas Pharma, Inc., F2G, Amplyx, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma, Pfizer. Joost Wauters: Investigator-initiated grants: Gilead, MSD, Pfizer; Consulting fees: Investigator-initiated grants from Gilead, Pfizer; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Speakers fees from Gilead, Pfizer; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: travel grants from Gilead and Pfizer. No potential financial or non-financial competing interest was reported by any of the other authors., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF