Search

Objective: The principal objective of this study was to describe the policies reported by French maternity units for the prevention and early management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). The second objective was to assess their variation according to hospital level and status.Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study of French maternity units, from January 2010 to April 2011. The medical supervisor (obstetrician or midwife) of participating maternity wards completed a questionnaire designed to ascertain the unit's protocol for preventing and managing PPH after both vaginal and caesarean deliveries at a gestational age >22 weeks (or a birth weight >500g). The main outcome measure was the percentage of units reporting protocols adhering to the principal criteria for adequate management defined by the 2004 French guidelines for PPH.Results: 252 maternity units participated in the survey. Almost all units had a written protocol for PPH (97.2%). For vaginal deliveries, 82.5% of units had a definition of PPH (>500ml) and 92.8% had a policy of preventive oxytocin use. For caesareans, only 23.8% defined PPH (as >1000ml), 68.8% used manual delivery of the placenta, and 76.9% recommended oxytocin injection immediately after the birth. The first-line medication for PPH was oxytocin (96.3%) and the second-line treatment a prostaglandin (97.5%). Level III maternity units had a definition of haemorrhage for vaginal deliveries more often than did other levels of care (P=0.04). Manual removal of the placenta after caesareans was significantly more frequent in level I than level III units (P=0.008) and in private than other types of maternity units. Medical management of haemorrhage did not differ according to level of care or maternity status.Conclusions: The responses by maternity unit supervisors showed significant improvement in the management of PPH accordingly to the 2004 French guidelines, especially for the third stage of labour. This improvement did not differ between hospitals by levels of care or legal status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most estimates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) are calculated from studies that use administrative or medical birth databases, and only a few from prospective observational studies. Our principal objective was to estimate the incidence of PPH according to their severity (mild or severe) in vaginal deliveries (>500 mL, ≥1000 mL) and cesareans (>1000 mL and ≥1500 mL). The secondary objectives were to describe the incidence of PPH according to maternity unit characteristics, causes, and types of PPH management.Methods: This prospective observational study took place in French maternity wards. Women who gave birth at a term ≥ 22 weeks were eligible for the study. 182 maternity units participated in a study with prospective data collection from 1 February, 2011, to 31 July, 2011. The main outcome measure was PPH incidence.Results: PPH incidence after vaginal delivery was 3.36 % [95 % CI: 3.25-3.47 %] and after cesareans 2.83 % [95 % CI: 2.63-3.04 %]. The incidence of severe PPH after vaginal delivery was 1.11 % [95 % CI: 1.05-1.18 %] and after cesareans 1.00 % [95 % CI: 0.88-1.13 %]. This incidence rate varied according to maternity unit characteristics. The principal cause of PPH for both modes of delivery was uterine atony (57.7 % for vaginal births and 66.3 % for cesareans). Vascular embolization was more frequent among women with cesareans (10.0 vs. 2.9 %), who also required transfusions more often (44.4 vs 12.7 %).Conclusions: The incidence of PPH was lower than the rate expected from the literature. Effective treatment of uterine atony and optimizing the identification of blood loss remain important priorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]