Search

Predatory publishing tactics are well-documented in the literature; however, the way in which academic librarians handle questions about these deceptive practices is not. A thorough review of the literature revealed a need for true decision-making tools that were easy to use and share. Based on this evidence, the authors developed Scholarly Tools Opposing Predatory Practices (STOPP) to empower librarians to make informed decisions by providing the appropriate context and tools for appraising journals, websites, conferences, and thesis converters. While geared toward academic medical librarians, these tools are built to evolve and adapt across disciplines as predatory practices evolve and adapt.

The article presents the discussion on basic data literacy skills defined as data collection, calculation, analysis and interpretation, and communication correlating with the ability for assessing library performance and the MTAM being a useful assessment tool.

An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses articles in the issue on topics including methodological approach derived from expressions of librarian professional identity; evidence-based practice adopted by the health sciences librarians.