Search

Introduction: Prescription drug abuse and dependence is a widespread phenomenon in many countries. The use of disproportionality measures in drug abuse surveillance is rarely performed., Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence of signals of abuse and dependence for different psychoactive drugs in real-life settings., Methods: Disproportionality analysis was realised from a database specifically constructed for the monitoring of drug abuse and dependence. This database provides information on approximately 5000 patients and 8000 consumption modalities for more than 100 distinct psychoactive medications for 2010 and 2011. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was computed in two population groups: subjects under an opiate maintenance treatment (OMT) versus those not under OMT, and focused on four types of behaviours: abuse and dependence, illegal acquisition, diverted route of administration and concomitant alcohol use., Results: Among the 100 psychoactive drugs for which a signal could be detected, those presenting the highest signals were the following: flunitrazepam, clonazepam, methylphenidate, ketamine, morphine sulfate, codeine and buprenorphine., Conclusions: The present study shows an innovative application of disproportionality measures for drug abuse monitoring based on two cross-national, annual studies. The disproportionality analysis provided the opportunity to reveal and compare the magnitude of signals between 100 psychoactive drugs. This approach helps to compare the magnitude of abuse and dependence behaviours for a large number of drugs, and allows prioritizing actions in a context where such events are usually underreported.

The objective of the study was to determine which psychoactive prescription drugs are illegally obtained and through which ways of acquisition. OPPIDUM is an annual national study. It is based on specialized care centers that included subjects presenting a drug dependency or under opiate maintenance treatment. All their psychoactive substances consumed are reported. This work focuses on the different ways of acquisition specially the illegal ways of acquisition (bought on the street, forged prescription, stolen, given, internet). For each medication illegally obtained, a ratio has been calculated (number of illegal acquisitions divided by the number of described acquisitions). In 2008, 5542 subjects have been included and have described the consumption of 11 027 substances including 63.8% of prescription drugs. Among them, 11% were illegally obtained. The different illegal acquisition ways were 'street market' (77.6%), 'gift' (16.6%), 'theft' (2.3%), 'forged prescription' (2.3%), and 'internet' (0.7%). The third first drugs illegally obtained were high dosage buprenorphine, methadone, and clonazepam. Some prescription drugs, less consumed, have an important ratio of illegal acquisition like ketamine, flunitrazepam, morphine, trihexyphenidyl, or methylphenidate. This study confirms that theft, forged prescription and internet are few used and permits to highlight diversion of prescription drugs. It is important to inform healthcare professionals on the different prescription drugs that are illegally obtained., (© 2011 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Recent observations suggest the existence of clonazepam abuse. To determine its importance in France, a quantitative and systematic synthesis of all clonazepam data of several epidemiological tools of the Centers for Evaluation and Information on Pharmacodependence (CEIP) network has been performed in comparison with data on others benzodiazepines (BZD). Data on clonazepam and other BZD have been analysed from different epidemiological tools: OSIAP survey that identifies drugs obtained by means of falsified prescriptions, Observation of Illegal Drugs and Misuse of Psychotropic Medications (OPPIDUM) survey that describes modalities of use and data from regional French health reimbursement system. In OSIAP survey, the proportion of clonazepam falsified prescriptions among all BZD falsified prescriptions increased. During the 2006 OPPIDUM survey, the analysis of the BZD modalities of use highlights clonazepam abuse liability (for example 23% of illegal acquisition), in second rank after flunitrazepam. Studies based on data from the French health reimbursed system show that 1.5% of subjects with clonazepam dispensing had a deviant behaviour. Among BZD, clonazepam has the second most important doctor-shopping indicator (3%) after flunitrazepam. All these data provide some arguments in favour of clonazepam abuse liability in real life and the necessity to reinforce its monitoring., (© 2010 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2010 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Drugs affecting the central nervous system form a unique group of products for surveillance because they could be misused, abused or diverted. Considering the characteristics of this behaviour that is often concealed, specific post-marketing surveillance systems have been developed to monitor abuse of prescription drugs in some countries. The purpose of this review is to list and to describe post-marketing surveillance systems, according their methodology, in France and in foreign countries. These programs are based on adverse effect notifications, medical or legal consequences of abuse, general or specific population-based survey, professional networks or medication databases. Some programs use simultaneously several information sources. In conclusion, the multifaceted nature, the diversity and the inventiveness of post-marketing surveillance systems reflects the complexity of the abuse issue., (© 2011 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacoeducation module both on hospital stay and on clinical and functional state in a French patient population with schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders., Methods: After inclusion, 82 patients were randomly distributed in 2 groups, one group receiving the pharmacoeducation module and the other to be a control group. Data on the number of hospital stays and emergency visits, and the type of medication received, were compiled. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale, Barnes Akathisia Scale, Simpson-Angus Scale, Quality of Life Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning; data were gathered at baseline, then each year for 2 years., Results: Among the 72 analyzed patients, those receiving pharmacoeducation had significantly lower total hospital stays, forced hospital stays, and emergency visits, compared with the control group patients. They also had more improvement in their symptomatology, autonomy, and quality of life. They presented less akathisia and less medication intake., Conclusions: Pharmacoeducation can reduce the hospital stays of patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders, as well as improve their clinical and functional state, likely through better compliance.

Introduction: The data on consumption of psychoactive substances among new prisoners are documented but not detailed with precision. Nevertheless, analyzing the consumption's characteristics of psychoactive products would led to a better caring of subjects at the entry in the prison. The consumption of psychoactive drugs the week before the imprisonments of subjects seen in prison were studied from the Observation of Illegal Drugs and Misuse of Psychotropic Medications (OPPIDUM) program's between 2003 and 2006. These were compared to those of others subjects with an history of abuse/dependence or under an opiate maintenance therapy presented in other structures of care., Methods: OPPIDUM is an annual cross-sectional national study, repeated each year in October since several years. It is based on the Network of the Centres for Evaluation and Information on Pharmacodependence (CEIP) which recruits, via the medical system (drug users outpatient care centers, psychiatric units, drug-addict units...), subjects presenting a drug dependency or benefiting of an opiate maintenance treatment., Results: During the four years between (2003 to 2006), 13,008 subjects were included. Seven percent (n=893) of them were in prison. They are younger and present worse social-economical indicators compared to the others subjects seen in other structures of care. In comparison to other subjects, the prisoners consume more products, more illicit ones and more benzodiazepines like flunitrazepam and clonazepam before their imprisonment. The medicines are consumed with higher doses and are more often obtained illegally (35% vs 14%). These subjects are less often under an opiate maintenance therapy (51% vs 74%). Between 2003 and 2006 the consumption of cocaine, increased from 18% to 28% for the patients before their confinement and from 11% to 21% for the heroine. Nevertheless, the consumption of benzodiazepines have decreased passing from 41% to 25%; and the consumption and of opiate maintenance treatment taken out of a protocol have decreased from 11% to 4%., Discussion: This study underlines the specificity of the characteristics of consumption of psychotropic drugs before the imprisonment of the subjects with history of abuse/dependence or under an opiate maintenance therapy by report to consumers presented in other structures of care. It outlines the need to optimize the care by a better knowledge of the consumption of psychoactive products., (2009 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)