Search

Aim: To establish significant risk factors for the development of adverse drug effects (ADEs) in children and adolescents with an acute psychotic episode taking antipsychotics. Materials and Methods: The research team randomly selected 15 patient records each month for 3 years (2016-2018). Overall, 450 patient records were included (223 boys and 227 girls, mean age was 14.52 ± 2.21 years). Adverse effects were identified using the standard algorithm of the Global Trigger Tool method. A "trigger" is an indication that an adverse reaction is likely to occur, e.g., an antihistamine prescription on a prescribing list. When a trigger was detected, the case history was studied in further detail to confirm the occurrence of ADEs. We divided patients into two groups: the "children" group (under 12 years old) and the "adolescents" group (13 years and older). Data were analyzed using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. Results: Of the 450 patient records, 402 (89.3%) had at least one trigger detected. In total, 126 case histories contained evidence of ADE (28%). The total number of ADEs per 1000 patient days was 5.39 and the number of ADEs per 100 admissions was 32.0. Among adolescents, two or more triggers per patient were significantly more frequently identified (61.3% vs. 44.6%; p = 0.001). ADEs were rare in "Children" compared with "Adolescents" (13.8% vs. 30.4%; p = 0.006). The logistic regression analysis confirmed high predictive role of "Adolescence" (odds ratio [OR] = 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-5.4; p = 0.013), "Polypharmacy" (OR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.23-3.1; p = 0.004), and "First-life hospitalization" (OR = 2.17; 95% CI 1.34-3.48; p = 0.001) for ADE fact in patient records. Conclusion: We found that significant risk factors for ADEs to antipsychotics in patients with acute psychotic episode were adolescence (13 years and older), polypharmacy, and first-life hospitalization. The fact that children (i.e., younger than 13 years of age) are less likely to experience ADEs was not associated with high-risk drugs or higher doses in our study.

Objectives: To identify possible associations of CYP2D6, CYP3A4/5 , and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms with the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in adolescents with acute psychotic episodes., Methods: We examined the associations of pharmacogenetic factors with the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in 101 adolescents with acute psychotic episodes. The diagnosis on admission was "Brief psychotic disorder" (F23.0-23.9 by ICD-10). All patients were administered antipsychotics for 14 days. Treatment efficacy and safety were assessed using the PANSS, CGAS, CGI-S(I), UKU SERS, BARS, and SAS scales. Pharmacokinetic genotyping was performed for the CYP2D6 * 4, * 10 , ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T, and 3435C>T genes., Results: CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers had "Micturition disturbances" more often than extensive metabolisers (24.2 vs. 7.4%; p=0.026). "Wild" homozygote ABCB1 3435C>T CC was associated with more prominent akathisia. Haplotype analysis of three ABCB1 polymorphisms revealed that the "wild" alleles "C-G-C" (ABCB1 1236-2677-3435) were associated with higher risk of "Reduced salivation" (OR=2.95; 95% CI=1.35-6.45; p=0.0078)., Conclusions: CYP2D6 intermediate metabolism was associated with the risk of urinary difficulties under treatment with antipsychotics. We found that "wild" homozygotes ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T, and 3435C>T were predictors of adverse drug effects caused by treatment with antipsychotics., (© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Children and adolescents are a special group in the context of psychopharmacotherapy. Given the limited choice of registered antipsychotics permitted in childhood, caution should be exercised in the choice of medication. This literature review reviews the current evidence base for pharmacotherapy of acute psychotic episode and schizophrenia in children and adolescents. The results of major systematic reviews and meta-analyses are compared. Meta-analyses of pharmacotherapy studies of the first psychotic episode are considered separately. Antipsychotics of the first and second generation are comparable in effectiveness for children and adolescents with acute psychotic episode. Olanzapine demonstrates higher efficacy in reducing negative symptoms. Ziprasidone and asenapine are less effective in treating schizophrenia in children and adolescents than other antipsychotics. Compared to adults, children and adolescents are at higher risk of metabolic impairments when taking antipsychotics.