Search

Objective: We recently found that the risk of diagnosed non-affective psychotic disorder between the ages of 13 and 19 was lower for immigrant adolescents compared to those without a personal or parental migration history in British Columbia (BC), Canada. In the current study, we further examined the risk for migrants compared to non-migrants by region of origin and immigrant generation (first vs. second), adjusting for several demographic factors and migration class., Methods: Administrative data were used to construct a cohort of individuals born 1990-98 and residing in South-Western BC ( N  = 193,400). Cases were identified by either one hospitalization or two outpatient physician visits with a primary diagnosis of a non-affective psychotic disorder. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) of a diagnosed non-affective psychotic disorder by region of origin among first- and second-generation migrants compared to non-migrants, adjusting for sex, birth year, neighbourhood income and low family income., Results: Risk of diagnosed non-affective psychotic disorder was lower among first-generation migrants from East Asia (IRR = 0.34[95% CI: 0.25-0.46]), South-Asia (IRR = 0.47[95% CI: 0.25-0.89]) and South-East Asia (IRR = 0.55[95% CI: 0.32-0.93]) and second-generation migrants from East Asia (IRR = 0.49[95% CI: 0.35-0.69]) and South Asia (IRR = 0.52[95% CI: 0.37-0.73]), compared to non-migrants. Adjusting for migration class attenuated but did not fully explain variation in risk by region among first-generation migrants. No groups exhibited a significantly elevated risk of the diagnosed non-affective psychotic disorder compared to non-migrants., Conclusion: Findings from this study underline the complexity of the association between migration and psychotic disorders. Future research should investigate why certain groups of migrants are less likely to be diagnosed and whether there are specific sub-groups that face an elevated risk.

Objectives: To estimate the diagnosed incidence of non-affective psychotic disorder between the ages of 13 and 19 years in South-Western British Columbia (BC) and to examine variation in risk by sex, family and neighbourhood income, family migration background, parent mental health contact and birth year., Methods: Linked individual-level administrative data were used to construct a cohort of individuals born in 1990-1998 and residing in South-Western BC ( n  = 193,400). Cases were identified by either one hospitalization or two outpatient physician visits within 2 years with a primary diagnosis of a non-affective psychotic disorder (ICD-10: F20-29, ICD-9: 295, 297, 298). We estimated cumulative incidence, annual cumulative incidence and incidence rate between the ages of 13 and 19 years, and conducted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate associations between sociodemographic factors and risk over the study period., Results: We found that 0.64% of females and 0.88% of males were diagnosed with a non-affective psychotic disorder between the ages of 13 and 19 years, with increasing risk observed over the age range, especially amongst males. Incidence rate over the entire study period was 106 per 100,000 person-years for females and 145 per 100,000 person-years for males. Risk of diagnosis was elevated amongst those in low-income families and neighbourhoods, those with a parent who had a health service contact for a mental disorder, and more recent birth cohorts. Risk was reduced amongst children of immigrants compared to children of non-migrants., Conclusions: Findings from this study provide important information for health service planning in South-Western BC. Future work should examine whether variations in diagnosed incidence is driven by differences in health service engagement or reflect genuine differences in risk.

Aim: To characterize the inpatient care received by individuals experiencing early psychotic episodes in an inner city hospital., Method: Medical records of patients admitted between April 01, 2013, and March 31, 2015, to a psychiatric ward at an inner city hospital were retrospectively examined. Included in the study are patients who were 25 years of age or younger and were hospitalized for psychotic symptoms. Demographics and health service use were summarized using descriptive statistics., Results: A total of 73 inpatients (mean age = 22; males =78%; Caucasian = 41%) met the study inclusion criteria with a combined total of 102 care episodes and an average length of stay of 32.6 days. Monitoring of vital signs (VS) and mental status examinations (MSE) were performed in most care episodes although these were not performed regularly (daily VS checks-31%; MSE every nursing shift-18.6%). In 49% of the care episodes, patients were discharged on long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Even when indicated, not all care episodes had follow-up appointments (82.8%) in the community. The use of seclusion was higher in the wards (32%) than in the emergency department (21%), whereas the use of restraints was higher in the emergency department (16%) than in the wards (<1%)., Conclusions: There is wide variation in the rate at which various clinical care processes are performed and in the provision of inpatient care to younger adults experiencing episodes of early psychosis. Consistent standards of care are needed to reduce variations and improve treatment outcomes and experiences., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence on ethnic or racial disparities in the outpatient use versus non-use of antipsychotics and in the outpatient use of newer versus older antipsychotics., Method: Electronic databases were searched for potentially relevant studies. Two independent reviewers conducted the review in three stages: title review, abstract review and full-text review. Included studies were those that: (a) report measures of disparity in the outpatient use of antipsychotic drugs in clearly defined racial or ethnic groups (b) have a primary focus on ethnic or racial disparities, and (c) have adjusted for factors known to influence medicine use. Odds ratios were pooled following the inverse-variance method of weighting effect sizes. I (2) statistics were calculated to quantify the amount of variation that is likely due to heterogeneity between studies. Funnel plots were produced and Egger's statistic was calculated to assess potential publication bias., Results: No significant differences were found in the odds of using any antipsychotics among African Americans (OR = 1.01, CI = 0.99-1.02) compared with non-African Americans and among Latinos (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.86-1.13) compared with non-Latinos. Small to moderate but statistically non-significant disparities were also noted in other ethnic groups: Asians (OR = 1.10, CI = 0.88-1.36), Maoris (OR = 0.78, CI = 0.53-1.13) and Pacific Islanders (OR = 0.97, CI = 0.84-1.11). Among those who received antipsychotic medication, African Americans (OR = 0.62, CI = 0.50-0.78) and Latinos (OR = 0.77, CI = 0.73-0.81) appeared to have lower odds of receiving newer antipsychotics compared with non-African Americans and non-Latinos., Conclusion: No significant ethnic disparities in the use versus non-use of any antipsychotics were observed, but, among those who received antipsychotic treatment, ethnic minorities were consistently less likely than non-ethnic minorities to be treated with newer antipsychotics.

Objective: This study examined ethnic disparities in antipsychotic therapy in a population with significant Asian representation., Methods: Using a cross-sectional retrospective study design, self-reported ethnicity data pooled from three cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey were linked to 2005 administrative data on physician, hospital, and pharmaceutical use in British Columbia, Canada. Logistic regression was used to model the association between ethnicity and the likelihood of filling one or more prescriptions for any antipsychotic, with controls for sex, age, residence, immigrant status, income, health status, and diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and dementia., Results: Of the 27,658 individuals in the sample, 2.2% filled at least one antipsychotic prescription. The proportion varied across ethnic groups: Chinese, 1.0%; other Asians, 1.2%; whites, 2.3%; nonwhite non-Asians, 2.8%; and mixed ethnicity, 4.3%. After adjustment for patient characteristics and diagnoses of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the likelihood of filling a prescription was found to be lower among Chinese (odds ratio [OR] = .47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .24-.90) and higher among persons of mixed ethnicity (OR = 3.19, CI = 1.49-6.83). Further adjustment for depression and dementia diagnoses did not significantly change the ORs for the Chinese (OR = .49, CI = .25-.98) and the mixed ethnic groups (OR = 2.97, CI = 1.30-6.80)., Conclusions: Consistent with the existing literature on ethnic disparities in antipsychotic therapy, the study found evidence of persistent disparities in a population that has a significant number of Asians. Further studies should be done to identify possible causes of these disparities and to identify potential interventions that may reduce or eliminate them.