Search

In the past decade, there has been an increase in research related to the routine collection and active use of standardized patient data in psychotherapy. Research has increasingly focused on personalization of care to patients, clinical skills and interventions that modulate treatment outcomes, and implementation strategies, all of which appear to enhance the beneficial effects of ROM and feedback. In this article, we summarize trends and recent advances in the research on this topic and identify several essential directions for the field in the short to medium term. We anticipate a broadening of research from the focus on average effects to greater specificity around what kinds of feedback, provided at what time, to which individuals, in what settings, are most beneficial. We also propose that the field needs to focus on issues of health equity, ensuring that ROM can be a vehicle for increased wellbeing for those who need it most. The complexity of mental healthcare systems means that there may be multiple viable measurement solutions with varying costs and benefits to diverse stakeholders in different treatment contexts, and research is needed to identify the most influential components in each of these contexts., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Patients seeking psychotherapy often spend time on waitlist (WL), the effect of which is largely unknown. WL patients may forego alternative non-psychotherapeutic assistance and thus do more poorly than had they not been placed on a WL. The course of symptoms might also be influenced by use of antidepressant medication (ADM), an issue that remains unexplored in the literature., Objective: In a naturalistic setting, WL symptom change before inpatient psychotherapy (mean weeks of waiting = 22.6) was assessed in a sample (N = 313) of chronically depressed patients., Methods: Using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, patients' symptoms were tracked at assessment, when admitted to treatment (i.e., after WL), at posttreatment and 1-year follow-up. Multilevel growth curve analysis was used to examine waitlist change for the whole sample as well as for ADM users and nonmedicated patients., Results: Symptoms were reduced significantly from assessment to admittance (Cohen's d = 0.47). Symptoms reduced less for ADM users (d = 0.39) than for nonmedicated patients (d = 0.65)., Conclusion: The findings indicate that chronically depressed patients experience a decrease in symptoms during WL, quite likely due to treatment expectations. We discuss whether less symptom improvement for ADM users could be attributed to iatrogenic comorbidity and a higher degree of demoralization in this group., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Previous research suggests that common relationship factors are composed of two overarching factors, "Confidence in the therapist" and "Confidence in the treatment." The aim of this naturalistic process-outcome study was to investigate the reciprocal relationships between these two constructs and patients' symptom level across treatment. The sample consisted of 587 patients who were admitted to an inpatient program and treated with psychotherapy for a range of mental health disorders, such as chronic depression, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders. Our data consisted of weekly measures of symptomatic distress (Patient Health Questionnaire) and the common relationship factors were measured weekly using a newly developed scale. Latent curve modeling with structured residuals was used to investigate the between- and within effects of week-to-week changes in the two components as predictors of subsequent symptom level. An increase in both relationship factors predicted a decrease in subsequent levels of symptoms at the within-patient level, and the other way around, but the two relationship factors did not systematically relate to one another at the within-patient level over the course of treatment. Our findings indicate that patients' perceptions of the therapist as a person and their appraisal of the treatment, are important, different predictors of therapeutic change. Furthermore, they support prior research demonstrating a reciprocal relationship between common relationship factors and symptomatic distress and add to existing common factor theory by exploring the role of two central relationship dimensions and using a method which examines reciprocal relationships and within-patient effects simultaneously. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: Prior research has established that common therapeutic relationship factors are potent predictors of change in psychotherapy, but such factors are typically studied one at a time and their underlying structure when studied simultaneously is not clear. We assembled empirically validated relationship factors (e.g., therapist empathy; patient expectations; agreement about goals) into a single instrument and subjected it to factor analysis. Method: The instrument was applied to patients ( N  = 332) undergoing intensive psychotherapy of different types for depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, and childhood trauma in an inpatient specialized mental health setting. In order to examine the psychometric properties of the scale, we used half the sample ( N =164) to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and parallel analysis before we tested the solution using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) on the second half of the sample ( N =168). Measurement invariance analysis was conducted to examine the stability of the factor structure. Results: The analysis yielded two factors, which were termed 1. "Confidence in the therapist" and 2. "Confidence in the treatment." Discussion: When assessed simultaneously, patients differentiate between their evaluation of the therapist and of the treatment. The results indicate that there is substantial overlap among previously established relationship factors. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03503981.

Objective : To better understand the complexity of dyadic processes, such as the mechanisms of the working alliance, researchers recommend taking advantage of innovations in data analytic procedures when studying the interactions between therapists and patients that are associated with favorable therapeutic outcomes. Inspired by a recent line of alliance research using dyadic multilevel modeling, the present study investigated the hypothesis that convergence in the patient-therapist working alliance (i.e., increased similarity in ratings of the alliance across treatment) would be associated with better outcomes. Method : Data were retrieved from two samples: 1. A randomized controlled trial for treatment resistant depression ( N  = 96 dyads), and 2. An archival dataset of naturalistic psychotherapies from public health care ( N  = 139 dyads). Multilevel growth curve analysis was employed to investigate the degree of change in session-to-session agreement of global WAI ratings between therapists and patients (i.e., alliance convergence) as a predictor of symptom reduction in the BDI-II and the SCL-90R. Results : Contrary to our expectations, alliance convergence did not predict outcome in either sample, but was negatively associated with symptom severity in Study 2. Implications for understanding the complexity of dyadic processes and alliance work in psychotherapy are discussed.

Objective : There is a need to understand more of the dyadic processes in therapy and how the therapist's ways of being are experienced and reflected upon by both patient and therapist. The aim of this dyadic case study was to investigate how the therapist's personal presence was perceived by the patient and the therapist as contributing to change. Method : From a larger project on collaborative actions between patient and therapist, a dyadic case involving in-depth interviews of the therapist and patient was selected to examine the research question. Interpretative phenomenological analysis of four interviews with the therapist and one interview with the patient was conducted. Results : The analyses indicated that the therapist's way of being, as perceived by both therapist and patient, was expressed at a superordinate level through the concept of embodied listening , which was of particular help for the patient, and influenced by the therapist's theoretical orientation, as well as being rooted in his own personal history. Three sub-themes emerged from the analysis, each illustrating how embodied listening contributed to the therapeutic relationship and process. Our findings flesh out how the underlying phenomena of emotional attunement, presence, and genuineness are observable in therapeutic encounters.

Objective: The aim of this study was to gain knowledge about how the integration of personal and professional experiences affects therapeutic work. Method : Therapists ( N  = 14) who had been recommended by their leaders at their individual workplaces were interviewed twice with semi-structured qualitative interviews, which were then subjected to thematic and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Results: All the therapists in the sample described their personal qualities as an experienced tension between their personal strengths and vulnerabilities in the therapeutic setting. This tension came to expression through four subordinate themes: (a) The tension between perceiving oneself as a helper while dealing with one's own needs for attention and care; (b) The tension between the ability for embodied listening to the patient while tuning into oneself; (c) The tension between staying present while handling aggression and rejection from clients; and (d) The tension in striving for a constructive balance between closeness and distance. Conclusion: The results point to ways in which the personal selves of the therapists may affect their professional role performance. Drawing upon previous research and literature on the topic, the paper discusses how therapists' personal qualities are experienced as affecting their work and suggests several implications for psychotherapy training and practice.

Objective: Differences between therapists in their average outcomes (i.e., therapist effects) have become a topic of increasing interest in psychotherapy research in the past decade. Relatively little work, however, has moved beyond identifying the presence of significant between-therapist variability in patient outcomes. The current study sought to examine the ways in which therapist effects emerge over the course of time in psychotherapy., Method: We used a large psychotherapy data set (n = 5828 patients seen by n = 158 therapists for 50,048 sessions of psychotherapy) and examined whether outcomes diverge for high-performing (HP) and low-performing (LP) therapists as treatment duration increases., Results: Therapists accounted for a small but significant proportion of variance in patient outcomes that was not explained by differences between therapists' caseload characteristics. The discrepancy in outcomes between HP and LP therapists increased as treatment duration increased (interaction coefficient = 0.071, p < .001). In addition, patients' trajectories of change were a function of their therapist's average outcome as well as the patient's duration of treatment (interaction coefficient = 0.060, p = .040)., Conclusions: Indeed, patterns of change previously described ignoring between-therapist differences (e.g., dose-effect, good-enough level model) may vary systematically when disaggregated by therapist effect.

Objective: There are reasons to suggest that the therapist effect lies at the intersection between psychotherapists' professional and personal functioning. The current study investigated if and how the interplay between therapists' (n = 70) professional self-reports (e.g., of their difficulties in practice in the form of 'professional self-doubt' and coping strategies when faced with difficulties) and presumably more global, personal self-concepts, not restricted to the professional treatment setting (i.e., the level of self-affiliation measured by the Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour (SASB) Intrex, Benjamin, ), relate to patient (n = 255) outcome in public outpatient care., Method: Multilevel growth curve analyses were performed on patient interpersonal and symptomatic distress rated at pre-, post- and three times during follow-up to examine whether change in patient outcome was influenced by the interaction between their therapists' level of 'professional self-doubt' and self-affiliation as well as between their therapists' use of coping when faced with difficulties, and the interaction between type of coping strategies and self-affiliation., Results: A significant interaction between therapist 'professional self-doubt' (PSD) and self-affiliation on change in interpersonal distress was observed. Therapists who reported higher PSD seemed to evoke more change if they also had a self-affiliative introject. Therapists' use of coping strategies also affected therapeutic outcome, but therapists' self-affiliation was not a moderator in the interplay between therapist coping and patient outcome., Conclusion: A tentative take-home message from this study could be: 'Love yourself as a person, doubt yourself as a therapist'. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Key Practitioner Messages: The findings of this study suggest that the nature of therapists' self-concepts as a person and as a therapist influences their patients' change in psychotherapy. These self-concept states are presumably communicated through the therapists' in-session behaviour. The study noted that a combination of self-doubt as a therapist with a high degree of self-affiliation as a person is particularly fruitful, while the combination of little professional self-doubt and much positive self-affiliation is not. This finding, reflected in the study title, 'Love yourself as a person, doubt yourself as a therapist', indicates that exaggerated self-confidence does not create a healthy therapeutic attitude. Therapist way of coping with difficulties in practice seems to influence patient outcome. Constructive coping characterized by dealing actively with a clinical problem, in terms of exercising reflexive control, seeking consultation and problem-solving together with the patient seems to help patients while coping by avoiding the problem, withdrawing from therapeutic engagement or acting out one's frustrations in the therapeutic relationship is associated with less patient change., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

As established in several studies, therapists differ in effectiveness. A vital research task now is to understand what characterizes more or less effective therapists, and investigate whether this differential effectiveness systematically depends on client factors, such as the type of mental health problem. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether therapists are universally effective across patient outcome domains reflecting different areas of mental health functioning. Data were obtained from 2 sites: the Research Consortium of Counseling and Psychological Services in Higher Education (N = 5,828) in the United States and from primary and secondary care units (N = 616) in Sweden. Outcome domains were assessed via the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (Lambert et al., 2004) and the CORE-OM (Evans et al., 2002). Multilevel models with observations nested within patients were used to derive a reliable estimate for each patient's change (which we call a multilevel growth d) based on all reported assessment points. Next, 2 multilevel confirmatory factor analytic models were fit in which these effect sizes (multilevel ds) for the 3 subscales of the OQ-45 (Study 1) and 6 subscales of CORE-OM (Study 2) were indicators of 1 common latent factor at the therapist level. In both data sets, such a model, reflecting a global therapist effectiveness factor, yielded large factor loadings and excellent model fit. Results suggest that therapists effective (or ineffective) within one outcome domain are also effective within another outcome domain. Tentatively, therapist effectiveness can thus be conceived of as a global construct. (PsycINFO Database Record, ((c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).)

Unlabelled: Research has shown that the therapist's contribution to the alliance is more important for the outcome than the patient's contribution (e.g., Baldwin, Wampold, & Imel, 2007); however, knowledge is lacking about which therapist characteristics are relevant for alliance building and development. The objective of this study was to explore the development of the working alliance (using the Working Alliance Inventory), rated by both patients and therapists as a function of therapist in-session experiences. The therapist experiences were gathered by means of the Development of Psychotherapists Common Core Questionnaire (Orlinsky & Rønnestad, 2005). Data from the Norwegian Multisite Study of the Process and Outcome of Psychotherapy (Havik et al., 1995) were used. Multilevel growth curve analyses of alliance scores from Sessions 3, 12, 20 and 40 showed that the therapist factors predicted working alliance levels or growths differently, depending on whether the alliance was rated by patients or by therapists. For example, it emerged that therapists' negative reactions to patients and their in-session anxiety affected patient-rated alliance but not therapist-rated alliance, whereas therapist experiences of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990) during sessions impacted only the therapist-rated alliance. The patterns observed in this study imply that therapists should be particularly aware that their negative experiences of therapy are noticed by, and seem to influence, their clients when they evaluate the working alliance through the course of treatment., Key Practitioner Message: The findings of this study suggest that the working alliance is influenced by therapists' self-reported practice experiences, which presumably are communicated through the therapists' in-session behaviours. The study found a notable divergence between practice experiences that influenced the therapists and those that influenced the patients when evaluating the working alliance. Specifically, practitioners' self-reported difficulties in practice, such as their negative reactions to patients and their in-session anxiety, affected patient-rated alliance but not therapist-rated alliance, whereas therapist experiences of 'flow' during sessions impacted only the therapist-rated alliance. Practitioners should note that patient alliance ratings were more likely to be influenced by therapists' negative practice experiences than by positive ones. The divergence in the patient and therapist viewpoints has potential implications for therapist training and supervision and everyday self-reflection., (Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Research suggests that the person of the psychotherapist is important for the process and outcome of psychotherapy, but little is known about the relationship between therapists' personal experiences and the quality of their therapeutic work. This study investigates 2 factors (Personal Satisfactions and Personal Burdens) reflecting therapists' quality of life that emerged from the self-reports of a large international sample of psychotherapists (N = 4,828) (Orlinsky & Rønnestad, 2004, 2005) using the Quality of Personal Life scales of the Development of Psychotherapists Common Core Questionnaire (Orlinsky et al., 1999). These factors were investigated as predictors of alliance levels and growth (using the Working Alliance Inventory) rated by both patients and therapists in a large (227 patients and 70 therapists) naturalistic outpatient psychotherapy study (Havik et al., 1995). The Personal Burdens scale was strongly and inversely related to the growth of the alliance as rated by the patients, but was unrelated to therapist-rated alliance. Conversely, the factor scale of therapists' Personal Satisfactions was clearly and positively associated with therapist-rated alliance growth, but was unrelated to the patients' ratings of the alliance. The findings suggest that the working alliance is influenced by therapists' quality of life, but in divergent ways when rated by patients or by therapists. It seems that patients are particularly sensitive to their therapists' private life experience of distress, which presumably is communicated through the therapists' in-session behaviors, whereas the therapists' judgments of alliance quality were positively biased by their own sense of personal well-being.

The need for psychotherapy research to understand the therapist effect has been emphasized in several studies. In a large naturalistic study (255 patients, 70 therapists), this topic was addressed using therapists' self-assessed difficulties in practice and interpersonal functioning in therapeutic work as predictors of patient outcome in three conventional outcome measures. Three-level growth curve analyses were employed to assess whether the therapist characteristics, measured by the Development of Psychotherapists Common Core Questionnaire (Orlinsky & Rønnestad, 2005), predicted the level of and change in patient symptom distress (SCL-90R), interpersonal problems (IIP-64), and observer-rated global functioning (GAF). Preliminary estimates of therapist effects in patient change indicated that 4% of change in general symptom distress (GSI), almost 21% of change in IIP global scores, and 28% of growth in GAF could be attributed to therapist differences. The results also demonstrated that certain therapist self-perceptions were clearly related to patient outcome. For example, therapists' scores on a type of difficulty in practice called "Professional self-doubt" (PSD) (denoting doubt about one's professional efficacy) were positively associated with change in IIP global scores. It is suggested that therapists' self-reported functioning can be of value in understanding how individual therapists contribute to therapeutic change although their influence is not necessarily exerted in expected directions.

AbstractFeedback-informed treatment (FIT) has been shown to reduce the gap between more and less effective therapists. This study aimed to examine therapists’ professional characteristics as potential moderators of the effect of feedback on treatment outcomes.The IAPT-FIT Trial was a clinical trial where therapists were randomly assigned to a FIT group or a usual care control group. Treatment response was monitored using measures of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and functional impairment (WSAS). In a secondary analysis of this trial (n = 1,835 patients; t = 67 therapists), we used multilevel modelling to examine interactions between therapists’ professional characteristics (e.g., attitude towards and self-efficacy regarding feedback utilization, decision-making style, job satisfaction, burnout, difficulties in practice, coping styles, caseload size) with random allocation (FIT vs. controls) to identify moderators of the effects of feedback.Between 9.6% and 10.8% of variability in treatment outcomes was attributable to therapist effects. Therapist-level caseload sizes and external feedback propensity (EFP) moderated the effect of feedback on depression outcomes. No statistically significant main effects were found for any of the included therapist characteristics.FIT reduced variability in outcomes between therapists and was particularly effective for therapists with high EFP and larger caseloads. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research indicates that combination of psychotherapy and antidepressant medication (ADM) provides cumulative effects and thus outperforms monotherapy in treating chronic depression. In this quasi‐experimental study, we explored symptom change for patients with chronic depression treated with ADM when presenting for a 12‐week psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment programme. We compared outcomes through treatment and follow‐up of patients who continued medication with those who discontinued. We also tested possible moderator effects of initial depression severity on change between the groups. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that combination treatment would yield better results (i.e., more reduction in depression). Patients (N = 112) were referred from general practitioners or local secondary health care. Outcome was measured by Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II), and comparisons were carried out using multilevel modelling. Although 35 patients discontinued ADM during treatment, 77 continued. Both continuers and discontinuers had a significant treatment effect that was maintained at 1‐year follow‐up. There was no difference in outcome between continuers and discontinuers of ADM. Patients with severe depression had significantly more symptom improvement than patients with moderate depression, but depression severity did not affect outcomes across continuers and discontinuers of ADM differently. The results could indicate that patients had developed resistance and/or tolerance to the prophylactic effects of medication and that ADM did not contribute to the reduction of depressive symptoms. The findings may also indicate that psychotherapy alone in some instances can be a viable alternative to continued combined treatment. Clinicians should carefully assess benefits of patients' ongoing use of antidepressant medication when entering psychotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Psychotherapists differ notably in the outcomes their patients achieve, and the characteristics that may explain these differences have attracted increasing interest. We systematically review studies on therapist pre-treatment characteristics predicting patient outcomes. Method: Systematic searches on databases for psychotherapy research, clinical psychology, and medical science for the years 2000–2018 identified published research examining therapist characteristics and psychotherapy outcomes. Of 2041 studies, 31 met inclusion criteria. Results: Findings show a few direct effects of therapist intrapersonal variables (e.g., self-relatedness, attachment) and several interaction effects with other constructs (e.g., patient pathology) on outcome. There is little support for the relevance of self-rated social skills. However, more consistent evidence has recently emerged for performance-based measurements of professional interpersonal skills, especially when elicited in challenging situations. Patient outcomes were also predicted by therapists' self-rated professional characteristics, such as their experienced difficulties in practice, coping mechanisms, and attitudes towards therapeutic work, indicating that therapist self-perception also matters, although not always in the direction expected. Conclusions: More effective therapists seem characterized by professionally cultivated interpersonal capacities, which are likely rooted in their personal lives and attachment history. Research guidelines are proposed for moving this field forward (including larger samples, multilevel modeling, and in-depth qualitative work). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a need for studies that advance our knowledge of therapist effectiveness, expanding the definition of what constitutes therapeutic success. In the present study, four aspects of clinical outcome were analyzed using a sample of highly experienced psychotherapists (mean years of experience as therapy practitioners = 30) who also serve as clinical teachers. The four aspects were: (1) overall change in different outcome domains, including long-term outcome; (2) outcome with clinically distressed clients (i.e. clients above the level of clinical disturbance at pretreatment); (3) level of drop-out; and (4) the degree to which clients re-entered treatment during the follow-up period. Participants were 48 clients treated by 18 therapists. Treatments were open-ended, 'therapy as usual', mostly within the setting of independent private practice. Outcome measurements included the OQ-45.2 and IIP-64, with repeated measurements during therapy and extended long-term follow up (up to 3.5 years). Cohen's d effect sizes and multilevel growth trajectories were estimated for patient change in symptomatic and interpersonal distress. The findings indicate that these therapists obtain very good outcomes overall, particularly with clients above cut-off for clinical disturbance. Moreover, there was a high level of maintenance and increase of treatment gains over time. No clients dropped out. Overall, the findings suggest that a sample of highly experienced therapists obtains particularly good outcomes as defined in more comprehensive terms than what is typical in psychotherapy research. Implications for the understanding of therapeutic success and clinical expertise are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Depression is typically seen as composed of several factors (i.e., cognitive, affective, somatic) which may be targeted by different interventions (i.e., pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or combination treatment). Successfully targeting these factors may contribute to improved treatment response in depression. A previous study identified two subfactors on Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in a sample of chronically depressed patients: (a) self-criticism and (b) somatic symptoms (sleep disturbance, fatigue, changes in appetite). Prior research indicates that these symptoms may respond differently to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. In this study, we examined whether patients who were on antidepressant medication (ADM) had different outcomes on these factors than patients not using medication while undergoing intensive inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Method: After adjusting for baseline difference with propensity score matching, a total of 238 patients with chronic depression were included in the analysis of which 119 patients were using ADM during treatment while 119 were not. We analyzed whether the two groups had different trajectories of change on the factors "self-criticism" and "somatic symptoms" using multilevel growth curve modeling. Results: Patients not using medication during treatment had significantly larger symptom reduction than ADM users on the self-criticism factor, while there was no difference between groups on the somatic factor. Conclusion: There seems to be a difference in outcomes on selfcriticism depending on the use ofADMfor this patient group. This may suggest that the simultaneous use of ADM while in psychotherapy could make patients less accessible to the effects of psychotherapeutic interventions on this factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]