Search

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine whether a 'housing first' permanent supported accommodation was effective in improving housing stability, continuity of care and reducing mental health admissions for persons experiencing chronic homelessness with psychosis.Methods: A quasi prospective cohort study of 42 chronic homeless persons with psychosis accommodated in a new purpose built facility in central Melbourne. Accommodation stability, mental health service contacts and psychiatric admissions were compared across the 2 years prior, the first 2 years of placement and the 2 years after leaving.Results: The mean number of mental health admissions in the first 2 years of accommodation was less (0.56, SD = 1.0) when compared with in the 2 years prior to accommodation (1.0, SD = 1.4, p = 0.05). There was an increase in the mean total number of days admitted in the 2 years after having left the supported accommodation, (33.3 days, SD = 86.7, p = 0.043) Conclusions: The accommodation of chronic homeless persons with psychosis in a 'housing first' permanent supported accommodation lead to increased housing stability and optimism, improved continuity of care and reduced psychiatric admissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A proportion of persistently homeless men with psychosis are unable to function in the community, despite intensive outreach. The present study aimed to (i) develop a method to measure the number of homeless clients with a psychosis who are unable to maintain basic levels of function, despite the application of intensive community treatment; and (ii) determine if the proportion of these men had increased in an Australian inner urban setting over a 5-year period. Criteria were developed and validated to define this group. A review of records of clients engaged in homeless settings was conducted in order to compare the proportion of men with these features in 2000 and 2005. In 2005, 23% met the criterion of long-term homelessness with poor function, despite intensive outreach, as compared with 17% in 2000 (P = 0.62). The 2005 cohort was more likely to have attempted intensive community psychiatric treatment (P = 0.04). We conclude that a proportion of homeless men with a psychosis in Australia do not achieve basic function, despite access to intensive outreach. The proportion of these men did not change between 2000 and 2005. These men require additional specialized services, including access to long-term supported housing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if homeless men with psychosis using emergency accommodation services are spending more time homeless. Method: A 12-month accommodation history was collected from all men with psychosis referred to mental health services using two emergency accommodation services in inner Melbourne over a 5-year period. Results: Of the 241 men referred with psychosis, 200 (81%) were able to provide a full accommodation history. In 2001 the mean total days spent in crisis accommodation was 27.0 days and in 2005 the mean number of days was 60.9. Over the 5 years, increasing time was spent homeless in the 12 months prior to assessment, most commonly in emergency accommodations. Conclusions: Australian men with psychosis using emergency accommodation are spending an increasing amount of time homeless. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The movement from institutional to community care has been a key component of national mental health reform in Australia. In Victoria, where a model of community care has been fully implemented, a specialized forensic hospital is the sole remaining stand-alone psychiatric inpatient facility and access to long-term inpatient beds is severely limited. Clinical experience suggests that some high-needs patients are not well serviced by this structure. These patients are placing an increasing burden on a wide range of community services outside mental health. This paper aims to define more clearly this patient group, explore the limitations of their management and outline potential pathways for service development. Conclusions: A population of complex patients with chronic mental illness are not effectively contained within a ‘good enough’ community-based mental health system. Active debate is required regarding the community’s willingness to tolerate the risks and challenges that arise from the current approach. A collaborative care model involving case-based and incentive funding in combination with community-integrated complex care units may improve the care of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between accommodation history and management outcome in patients with psychosis.Demographic information, diagnosis and an accommodation history were taken from patients with psychosis accepted for case management by the Inner West Area Mental Health Service over a 12-month period. The patients were followed up 2 years later to determine their continuity of care and discharge outcome.One hundred 42 patients completed the assessments. Forty-eight percent of patients had spent at least 1 day in a homeless setting in the previous 12 months. Twenty-two percent of patients had long-term (between 2 and 12 months) and six percent chronic (more than 12 months) homelessness. The duration of previous homelessness was significantly inversely correlated with the length of engagement with the service, continuity of psychiatric care at discharge or likelihood of transfer to primary care. Previous interstate mobility was significantly associated with discontinuity of care at discharge.A history of homelessness is common in patients with psychosis using inner urban mental health services and is associated with poorer engagement with psychiatric services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]