1. What do eye movements tell us about the visual perception of individuals with congenital prosopagnosia?
- Author
-
Andrea Albonico, Roberta Daini, Manuela Malaspina, Carlo Toneatto, Malaspina, M, Albonico, A, Toneatto, C, and Daini, R
- Subjects
Scan pattern ,Adult ,Male ,Eye movement ,Visual perception ,Eye Movements ,genetic structures ,Population ,M-PSI/02 - PSICOBIOLOGIA E PSICOLOGIA FISIOLOGICA ,Facial recognition system ,050105 experimental psychology ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Face recognition ,education ,education.field_of_study ,Social perception ,05 social sciences ,Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition ,Congenital prosopagnosia ,Object recognition ,Gaze ,Prosopagnosia ,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology ,Pattern Recognition, Visual ,Social Perception ,Female ,M-PSI/01 - PSICOLOGIA GENERALE ,Psychology ,Facial Recognition ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Objective The lack of inversion effect for face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia (CP) is consistent with the hypothesis of a failure in holistic processing. However, although CPs' abnormal gaze behavior for upright faces has already been demonstrated, neither their scanning strategy for inverted faces, nor the possibility that their abnormal gaze behavior with upright faces is because of reasons other than the holistic deficit have been investigated yet. Method We recorded the eye movements of a congenital prosopagnosic and a control group during the encoding of unknown faces, objects, and flowers. Two types of stimuli (faces and objects) were presented upright and inverted. Results CPs explored upright and inverted faces in the same way (i.e., similar number of fixations of the same duration and similarly distributed), whereas controls increased the number of fixations and their duration during the presentation of inverted faces. By contrast, the 2 groups showed a similar inversion effect during the encoding of objects. Finally, CPs showed anomalous exploration of within-class objects (i.e., flowers) and impairment in subordinate-level object discrimination. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that: (a) CPs use the same part-based strategy in encoding both upright and inverted faces, suggesting a possible interpretation of the lack of inversion effect in this population; (b) CPs' lack of inversion effect is face-specific and does not affect objects; (c) however, CPs' deficit seems not to be limited to faces, and to extend to individual-item recognition within a class. (PsycINFO Database Record
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF