Search

Your search keyword '"Morris, Wendy"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Morris, Wendy" Topic psychology
6 results on '"Morris, Wendy"'

1. Investigating variation in replicability: A 'Many Labs' Replication Project

Author

Klein, Richard, Ratliff, Kate, Nosek, Brian, Vianello, Michelangelo, Pilati, Ronaldo, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Devos, Thierry, Galliani, Elisa, Brandt, Mark, van 't Veer, Anna, Levitan, Carmel, Kurtz, Jaime, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Ehrlinger, Joyce, Bernstein, Michael, Morris, Wendy, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Wichman, Aaron, Rutchick, Abraham, Kappes, Heather, Brumbaugh, Claudia, Nelson, Anthony, Eisner, Matthew, Smith, Robert, Woodzicka, Julie, Bocian, Konrad, Frankowska, Natalia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Skorinko, Jeanine, Storbeck, Justin, Thompson, Donna, Packard, Grant, van Swol, Lyn, Nier, Jason, Cheong, Winnee, Davis, William, Mallett, Robyn, Huntsinger, Jeffrey, Bahník, Štěpán, Vranka, Marek, Hasselman, Fred, IJzerman, Hans, and Krueger, Lacy

Subjects
replication, psychology
Abstract

We will attempt to replicate 12 effects in a single experimental package across numerous labs. Variations between lab conditions and sample characteristics will be analyzed to investigate how these factors might influence replication success.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting

Author

Salomon , Erika, Smith-Castro , Vanessa, Chang , Jen-Ho, Collisson , Brian, Malingumu , Winfrida, Karick , Haruna, Cambier , Fanny, Eller , Anja, Coleman , Jennifer, Kovacs , Carrie, Williams , Lisa, Pinter , Brad, Vranka , Marek, Packard , Grant, Zelenski , John, Sundfelt , Oskar, Hall , Michael, Thomae , Manuela, Schmidt , Kathleen, Haigh , Matthew, Finck , Carolyn, Galliani , Elisa, Steiner , Troy, Bernstein , Michael, Ebersole , Charles, Tybur , Joshua, Dunham , Yarrow, Stouten , Jeroen, Coen , Sharon, Smith , Michael, Gnambs , Timo, Hicks , Joshua, Giessner , Steffen, Osowiecka , Malgorzata, Devos , Thierry, Mallett , Robyn, English , Alexander, Nelson , Anthony, Cheong , Winnee, Petrovic , Boban, Ujhelyi , Adrienn, Gonzalez , Roberto, Berkics , Mihaly, Graham , Jesse, Nichols , Austin, Dozo , Nerisa, Tang , Andrew, Szumowska , Ewa, Skorinko , Jeanine, Rosa , Anna, Haines , Elizabeth, Myachykov , Andriy, Carmichael , Cheryl, Maitner , Angela, Vega , Diego, Van Der Hulst , Marije, Oikawa , Masanori, Ghoshal , Tanuka, Frankowska , Natalia, Saavedra , Patricio, Keller , Victor, Torres-Fernández , David, Huntsinger , Jeffrey, Sirlopu , David, ODonnell , Susan, Bialobrzeska , Olga, Levitan , Carmel, Berry , Daniel, Spachtholz , Philipp, Curran , Paul, Traczyk , Jakub, Kurapov , German, Kurtz , Jaime, Lakens , Daniel, Sacco , Airi, Corker , Katherine, Durrheim , Kevin, Chandler , Jesse, Cai , Huajian, Jimenez-Leal , William, Easterbrook , Matthew, Maassen , Esther, Saeri , Alexander, Brandt , Mark, Cantarero , Katarzyna, Hai , Kakul, Heffernan , Marie, Kende , Anna, Doğulu , Canay, Karabati , Serdar, Freyre , Miguel-Ángel, Voermans, Ingrid, Huynh , Ho, Busching , Robert, Nosek , Brian, Woodzicka , Julie, John , Melissa-Sue, Orosz , Gabor, Coen, Sharon, Van T Veer , Anna, Joy-Gaba , Jennifer, Dukes , Kristin, Marotta , Satia, Welch , Cheryl, Tear , Morgan, Lazarevic , Ljiljana, Kamiloglu , Roza, Van Assen , Marcel, Međedović , Janko, Podesta , Lysandra, Pollmann , Monique, Schönbrodt , Felix, Theriault , Jordan, De Bruijn , Maaike, Sekerdej , Maciek, Ms Ms, Alexandra, Pr. Pr., Nicolas, Grahe , Jon, Neto , Felix, Conway , Morgan, Klein , Richard, Mcintyre , Jason, Murphy , Sean, Adams Jr., Reginald, Kappes , Heather, Cushman , Fiery, Street , Chris, Wichman , Aaron, Lewis Jr., Neil, Babalola , Mayowa, Alper , Sinan, Hasselman , Fred, Aveyard , Mark, Saavedra, Patricio, Babalola, Mayowa, Torres-Fernández, David, Vianello , Michelangelo, Adams , Byron, Barlow , Fiona, Axt , Jordan, Bahník , Štěpán, Young , Liane, Sowden, Walter, Knezevic , Goran, Verschoor , Mark, Tanzer , Norbert, Edlund , John, De Vries, Marieke, Vaughn , Leigh, Morris , Wendy, Lins , Samuel, Rutchick , Abraham, Krueger , Lacy, Ijzerman , Hans, Green , Eva, Davis , William, Inbar , Yoel, Sobkow , Agata, Cicero , David, Bocian , Konrad, Houdek , Petr, Chatard , Armand, Gomez , Angel, Innes-Ker , Åse, Dalgar , Ilker, Echeverría , Alejandro, Milfont , Taciano, Cemalcilar , Zeynep, Wronska , Marta, Gill , Tripat, Verniers , Catherine, Pilati , Ronaldo, Friedman , Mike, Grahek , Ivan, Chen , Eva, Neijenhuijs , Koen, Pérez , Rolando, Kappes , Andreas, and Coen, S

Subjects
manylabs, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, replication, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Quantitative Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods, psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology, WEIRD, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology
Abstract

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance to examine variation in effect magnitudes across sample and setting. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples and 15,305 total participants from 36 countries and territories. Using conventional statistical significance (p < .05), fifteen (54%) of the replications provided evidence in the same direction and statistically significant as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), fourteen (50%) provide such evidence reflecting the extremely high powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications had effect sizes larger than the original finding and 21 (75%) had effect sizes smaller than the original finding. The median comparable Cohen’s d effect sizes for original findings was 0.60 and for replications was 0.15. Sixteen replications (57%) had small effect sizes (< .20) and 9 (32%) were in the opposite direction from the original finding. Across settings, 11 (39%) showed significant heterogeneity using the Q statistic and most of those were among the findings eliciting the largest overall effect sizes; only one effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity. Only one effect showed a Tau > 0.20 indicating moderate heterogeneity. Nine others had a Tau near or slightly above 0.10 indicating slight heterogeneity. In moderation tests, very little heterogeneity was attributable to task order, administration in lab versus online, and exploratory WEIRD versus less WEIRD culture comparisons. Cumulatively, variability in observed effect sizes was more attributable to the effect being studied than the sample or setting in which it was studied.\ud \ud Data, materials and code available at: https://osf.io/8cd4r/

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting

Author

Klein, Richard, Vianello, Michelangelo, Hasselman, Fred, Adams, Byron, Adams, Reginald, Alper, Sinan, Vega, Diego, Aveyard, Mark, Axt, Jordan, Babalola, Mayowa, Bahník, Štěpán, Barlow, Fiona, Berkics, Mihaly, Bernstein, Michael, Berry, Daniel, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Bocian, Konrad, Brandt, Mark, Busching, Robert, Cai, Huajian, Cantarero, Katarzyna, Carmichael, Cheryl, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Chang, Jen-Ho, Chatard, Armand, CHEN, Eva, Cheong, Winnee, Cicero, David, Coen, Sharon, Coleman, Jennifer, Collisson, Brian, Conway, Morgan, Corker, Katherine, Curran, Paul, Cushman, Fiery, Dalgar, Ilker, Davis, William, de Bruijn, Maaike, de Vries, Marieke, Devos, Thierry, Doğulu, Canay, Dozo, Nerisa, Dukes, Kristin, Dunham, Yarrow, Durrheim, Kevin, Easterbrook, Matthew, Ebersole, Charles, Edlund, John, English, Alexander, Eller, Anja, Finck, Carolyn, Freyre, Miguel-Ángel, Frankowska, Natalia, Friedman, Mike, Galliani, Elisa, Ghoshal, Tanuka, Giessner, Steffen, Gill, Tripat, Gnambs, Timo, Gonzalez, Roberto, Govia, Ishtar, Grahe, Jon, Grahek, Ivan, Green, Eva, Hai, Kakul, Haigh, Matthew, Haines, Elizabeth, Hall, Michael, Heffernan, Marie, Hicks, Joshua, Houdek, Petr, Huntsinger, Jeffrey, Huynh, Ho, IJzerman, Hans, Inbar, Yoel, Innes-Ker, Åse, Gomez, Angel, John, Melissa-Sue, Jimenez-Leal, William, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Kamiloglu, Roza, Kappes, Andreas, Kappes, Heather, Karabati, Serdar, Karick, Haruna, Keller, Victor, Kende, Anna, Kervyn, Nicolas, Knezevic, Goran, Krueger, Lacy, Kurapov, German, Kurtz, Jaime, Lakens, Daniel, Lazarevic, Ljiljana, Levitan, Carmel, Lewis, Neil, Lins, Samuel, Maassen, Esther, Maitner, Angela, Malingumu, Winfrida, Mallett, Robyn, Marotta, Satia, McIntyre, Jason, Međedović, Janko, Milfont, Taciano, Morris, Wendy, Myachykov, Andriy, Murphy, Sean, Nelson, Anthony, Neto, Felix, Nichols, Austin, O'Donnell, Susan, Oikawa, Masanori, Orosz, Gabor, Packard, Grant, Pérez, Rolando, Petrovic, Boban, Pilati, Ronaldo, Pinter, Brad, Pollmann, Monique, Dalla Rosa, Anna, Ruggs, Enrica, Rutchick, Abraham, Sacco, Airi, Saeri, Alexander, Salomon, Erika, Schmidt, Kathleen, Schönbrodt, Felix, Sekerdej, Maciek, Sirlopu, David, Skorinko, Jeanine, Smith, Michael, Smith-Castro, Vanessa, Sobkow, Agata, Sowden, Walter, Steiner, Troy, Stouten, Jeroen, Street, Chris, Sundfelt, Oskar, Tang, Andrew, Tear, Morgan, Theriault, Jordan, Thomae, Manuela, Torres-Fernández, David, Traczyk, Jakub, Tybur, Joshua, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van Assen, Marcel, van 't Veer, Anna, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Vázquez, Alexandra, Verniers, Catherine, Verschoor, Mark, Vranka, Marek, Welch, Cheryl, Wichman, Aaron, Williams, Lisa, Woodzicka, Julie, Wronska, Marta, Young, Liane, Zelenski, John, and Nosek, Brian

Subjects
replication, psychology
Abstract

In Many Labs 2, we will employ an expanded version of the Many Labs paradigm to investigate a substantial number of new effects and further examine the findings from Many Labs 1.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Investigating variation in replicability: A 'Many Labs' replication project

Author

Klein, Richard, Ratliff, Kate, Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald, Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael, Bocian, Konrad, Brandt, Mark, Brooks, Beach, Brumbaugh, Claudia, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Cheong, Winnee, Davis, William, Devos, Thierry, Eisner, Matthew, Frankowska, Natalia, Furrow, David, Galliani, Elisa, Hasselman, Fred, Hicks, Joshua, Hovermale, James, Hunt, S., Huntsinger, Jeffrey, IJzerman, Hans, John, Melissa-Sue, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Kappes, Heather, Krueger, Lacy, Kurtz, Jaime, Levitan, Carmel, Mallett, Robyn, Morris, Wendy, Nelson, Anthony, Nier, Jason, Packard, Grant, Pilati, Ronaldo, Rutchick, Abraham, Schmidt, Kathleen, Skorinko, Jeanine, Smith, Robert, Steiner, Troy, Storbeck, Justin, van Swol, Lyn, Thompson, Donna, van 't Veer, Anna, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Vranka, Marek, Wichman, Aaron, Woodzicka, Julie, Nosek, Brian, and Department of Social Psychology

Subjects
replication, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, corelabdat, Learning and Plasticity, Sample (statistics), Replicate, psychology, Conservatism, reproductability, manylabs, Variation (linguistics), cross-cultural, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Replication (statistics), Generalizability theory, variation, Psychology, Priming (psychology), Social psychology, generalizability, General Psychology, Prejudice (legal term)
Abstract

Contains fulltext : 131506.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect. 11 p.

Published
2014

5. She’s single, so what? How are singles perceived compared with people who are married?

Author

Hertel, Janine, Schütz, Astrid, DePaulo, Bella M., Morris, Wendy L., and Stucke, Tanja S.

Subjects
lcsh:HQ1-2044, lcsh:The family. Marriage. Woman, Psychology, social perception, romantic relationships, single people, Humanities, soziale Wahrnehmung, Partnerschaft, Singles
Abstract

Over the past few decades, relationship patterns have become more diverse. Besides classical marriage we find cohabitation, romantic partners living apart, and same-sex couples. Furthermore, single people have become an important and intensely discussed segment of society. Due to the increasing plurality of living arrangements, one might assume that stereotypes about singles have changed over the years. Our study shows that married people are generally still seen more positively than singles. Singles were seen as more lonely, less warm and caring than married people. However, some positive features are ascribed to singles, too. Importantly, characteristics of the perceiver moderate his or her perceptions. Some groups rated single people as more sophisticated and sociable than married people. Zusammenfassung In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten haben sich klassische Beziehungsmuster geändert. Neben der traditionellen Ehe finden sich heute nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften, Paare, die getrennte Haushalte führen (LATs) und gleichgeschlechtliche Paare. Daneben wurden Singles zu einer viel diskutierten Gruppe. In Anbetracht der Vielzahl an Lebensformen könnte man annehmen, dass negativ geprägte Stereotype gegenüber Singles zurückgegangen sind. Unsere Studie zeigt allerdings, dass noch immer verheiratete Personen positiver beurteilt werden als Singles. Beispielsweise werden Singles als einsamer, weniger einfühlsam und weniger fürsorglich eingeschätzt. Es zeigt sich aber auch eine tendenzielle Aufweichung des negativen Stereotyps: (jungen) Singles werden einige positive Eigenschaften zugeschrieben. Hierbei moderieren Merkmale der bewertenden Person die Einschätzung. Vor allem jüngere Frauen und ältere Singles haben ein relativ positives Bild von Singles und beurteilen sie im Vergleich zu verheirateten Personen als geselliger und weltgewandter., Journal of Family Research, Vol 19 No 2 (2007): Forschungsbeiträge aus den Disziplinen

Published
2007

6. Stereotyping and Nonconformity:The Effects of Punk Music on Social Behavior.

Author

PAULL, EMILY J. and MORRIS, WENDY L.

Subjects
*PUNK rock music, *CONFORMITY, *STEREOTYPES, *INTERPERSONAL relations, *FEMALES, *SOCIAL pressure, *PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that nonconformist behavior can be primed via visual activation of nonconformist stereotypes. The present experiments were conducted to determine if nonconformity can be primed via aural activation of the punk stereotype. In Study 1, 46 male and 104 female students from McDaniel College were primed with punk, popular, or no music and exposed to social pressure. Not only did participants exposed to punk music fail to exhibit nonconformity, they conformed more than participants who heard popular music and almost as much as those without a prime. As Study 2 determined that members of the population in question did associate the stereotype of nonconformity with punk music, possible alternative explanations and areas for further research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2008
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results