STRESS CAN HAVE A SIGNIFICANT, LONG-LASTING NEGATIVE IMPACT ON HEALTH INCLUDING CHANGES IN BEHAVIOR AND SLEEP. HOWEVER, STRESSORS are often encountered without producing permanent or pathological changes. The difference between successful and unsuccessful coping with stress may involve the resilience of the organism1 as well as characteristics of the stressor. Stressor controllability, along with intensity and predictability, have been found to be important factors in the effects of stress.2 For example, lack of stressor controllability has been suggested to be a factor in the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).3,4 Conditioned fear training is conducted with a fear-inducing stressor (usually inescapable shock, [IS])5,6 presented in an experimental paradigm in which the animal receiving training has no control over the stressor. Through association to IS, initially neutral environmental cues and contexts acquire the capacity to elicit behavioral and physiological responses indicative of fear and anxiety, including behavioral freezing,7–9 autonomic responses,10–12 and fear-potentiated startle.5,6 Disturbances in sleep often follow a stressful or traumatic event,13 and we and others have demonstrated that IS and IS-associated fearful cues and contexts produce similar alterations in sleep, including a prominent reduction in rapid eye movement sleep (REM).14,15 By comparison, training with avoidable, signaled shock (a controllable stressor) in a shuttlebox is followed by significant increases in REM,15–18 even though the same stressor (footshock) is initially experienced before the avoidance response is acquired. The results of these studies have typically been focused on demonstrating a correlation between REM and acquisition of the avoidance response.15–18 It is possible to train animals with escapable shock (ES) as a controllable stressor using a shuttlebox paradigm. In this paradigm, the stressor is always experienced but can be terminated by the animal's action. The effects of ES and IS have not been directly compared with respect to post-stress alterations in sleep. Therefore, in this study, we used a yoked design to examine the effects of ES and IS training and of contextual reminders of ES and IS on sleep in BALB/cJ mice, a “behaviorally reactive” strain that shows greater post-stress reductions in REM and alterations in sleep in response to IS compared to C57BL/6J mice.19–21 We also compared mice in the ES and IS conditions for potential differences in gross motor activity and we examined freezing, a common behavioral index of fear,7,22,23 during exposure to the fearful context. Examining freezing enabled us to compare immediate emotional reactivity across conditions and to determine the relationship of initial emotionality to subsequent changes in arousal and sleep.