1. Serial Reaction Time Task Performance in Older Adults with Neuropsychologically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Author
-
Rachel L. Alvarado, Amod Jog, David H. Salat, Yue Hong, and Douglas N. Greve
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Serial reaction time ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Audiology ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Serial Learning ,Article ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Explicit memory ,Reaction Time ,Humans ,Learning ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,Longitudinal Studies ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,General Neuroscience ,Neuropsychology ,Cognition ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Implicit learning ,Random forest ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,030104 developmental biology ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,Sequence learning ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Psychology ,Motor learning ,human activities ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Psychomotor Performance - Abstract
Background Studies have found that individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) exhibit a range of deficits outside the realm of primary explicit memory, yet the role of response speed and implicit learning in older adults with MCI have not been established. Objective The current study aims to explore and document response speed and implicit learning in older adults with neuropsychologically defined MCI using a simple serial reaction (SRT) task. In addition, the study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel utilization of the simple cognitive task using machine learning procedures as a proof of concept. Method Participants were 22 cognitively healthy older adults and 20 older adults with MCI confirmed through comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Two-sample t-test, multivariate regression, and mixed-effect models were used to investigate group difference in response speed and implicit learning on the SRT task. We also explored the potential utility of SRT feature analysis through random forest classification. Results With demographic variables controlled, the MCI group showed overall slower reaction time and higher error rate compared to the cognitively healthy volunteers. Both groups showed significant simple motor learning and implicit learning. The learning patterns were not statistically different between the two groups. Random forest classification achieved overall accuracy of 80.9%. Conclusions Individuals with MCI demonstrated slower reaction time and higher error rate compared to cognitively healthy volunteers but demonstrated largely preserved motor learning and implicit sequence learning. Preliminary results from random forest classification using features from SRT performance supported further research in this area.
- Published
- 2020