Search

ObjectivePedophilia is a disorder of public concern because of its association with child sexual offense and recidivism. Previous neuroimaging studies identified inconsistent brain abnormalities underlying pedophilic behavior both in idiopathic and acquired (i.e., emerging following brain damage) pedophilia. This study sought to explore the neural underpinnings of pedophilic behavior and to determine the extent to which brain alterations may be related to distinct psychopathological features in pedophilia.MethodsA coordinate based meta-analysis on previously published papers reporting whole brain analysis and a lesion network analysis using brain lesions as seeds in a resting state connectivity analysis were run to investigate the presence of consistent neural basis of idiopathic and acquired pedophilic behavior, respectively. The behavioral profiling approach was applied to link identified regions with corresponding psychological processes.ResultsWhile no consistent neuroanatomical alterations have been identified in idiopathic pedophilia, the current results support that all the lesions causing acquired pedophilia localized to a shared resting state network including posterior midlines structures, right inferior temporal gyrus and bilateral orbitofrontal cortex. These regions are associated with action inhibition and social cognition, abilities that are consistently described as severely impaired in acquired pedophiles.ConclusionsThis study suggests that idiopathic and acquired pedophilia may be two distinct disorders, in line with their distinctive clinical features, including age of onset, reversibility and modus operandi. Understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of pedophilic behavior may contribute to a more comprehensive characterization of these individuals on a clinical ground and to develop more efficient therapeutic rehabilitation strategies.

New psychopharmacological treatments are needed for affective and nonaffective psychoses, especially for the associated negative and cognitive symptoms. Earlier developments mostly failed, probably partly because of limitations in behavioral models used for validation. Now, deeper understanding of the genetics underlying disease pathogenesis and progress in genetic engineering will generate many rodent models with increased construct validity. To improve these models' translational value, we need complementary data from nonhuman primates. We also have to improve and streamline behavioral test systems to cope with increased demand. Here, we propose a comprehensive neurocognitive test battery that should overcome the disadvantages of single tests and yield cognitive/behavioral profiles for modeling subsets of patient symptoms. Further, we delineate a concept for classifying disease-relevant cognitive endophenotypes to balance between face and construct validity and clinical diagnostics. In summary, this review discusses new concepts and the limitations and future potential of translational research on cognition in psychiatry. .Se requiere de nuevos tratamientos psicofarmacológicos para las psicosis afectivas y no afectivas, especialmente para los síntomas negativos y cognitivos asociados. La mayoría de los desarrollos anteriores fallaron; en parte debido, probablemente, a las limitaciones en los modelos conductuales empleados para la validación. Ahora, una comprensión más profunda de la genética subyacente a la patogénesis de la enfermedad y el progreso en la ingeniería genética generará muchos modelos de roedores con una mayor validez de constructo. Para mejorar el valor de estos modelos translacionales se requiere de datos complementarios de primates no humanos. También hay que mejorar y racionalizar los sistemas de pruebas conductuales para hacer frente a una mayor demanda. En este artículo se propone una batería completa de pruebas neurocognitivas que debería superar las desventajas de las pruebas individuales y generar perfiles cognitivo-conductuales para modelar subconjuntos de síntomas del paciente. Además, se plantea un concepto para clasificar los endofenotipos cognitivos relevantes para la enfermedad a fin de equilibrar la validez aparente y de constructo con el diagnóstico clínico. En resumen, esta revisión analiza nuevos conceptos, y las limitaciones y el potencial futuro de la investigación translacional sobre la cognición en psiquiatría.De nouveaux traitements psychopharmacologiques sont nécessaires pour les psychoses dysthymiques ou non, surtout pour les symptômes associés négatifs et cognitifs. Par le passé, la plupart des développements ont échoué, probablement en partie en raison des limites des modèles comportementaux utilisés pour la validation. Aujourd’hui, une meilleure compréhension de la génétique de la pathogenèse de la maladie et les progrès du génie génétique vont produire de nombreux modèles de rongeurs mieux construits. Des données supplémentaires issues de primates non humains sont nécessaires pour améliorer la valeur traductive de ces modèles. Afin de satisfaire une demande croissante, nous devons aussi améliorer et rationaliser les systèmes de tests comportementaux. Nous proposons ici une batterie complète de tests neurocognitifs susceptible de palier les inconvénients des tests isolés et de fournir des profils cognitifs/comportementaux pour des sous-groupes de modélisation des symptômes des patients. En outre, nous définissons un concept pour classer les endophénotypes cognitifs pertinents pour la maladie afin de trouver un équilibre entre une validité de façade et de construit et les diagnostics cliniques. En résumé, cet article analyse de nouveaux concepts ainsi que les limites et les futures possibilités de la recherche translationnelle sur la cognition en psychiatrie.

Diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in humans is based on comparing individuals to the normal population. However, many animal models analyze averaged group effects, thus compromising their translational power. This discrepancy is particularly relevant in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where only a minority develop the disorder following a traumatic experience. In our PTSD rat model, we utilize a novel behavioral profiling approach that allows the classification of affected and unaffected individuals in a trauma-exposed population. Rats were exposed to underwater trauma (UWT) and four weeks later their individual performances in the open field and elevated plus maze were compared to those of the control group, allowing the identification of affected and resilient UWT-exposed rats. Behavioral profiling revealed that only a subset of the UWT-exposed rats developed long-lasting behavioral symptoms. The proportion of affected rats was further enhanced by pre-exposure to juvenile stress, a well-described risk factor of PTSD. For a biochemical proof of concept we analyzed the expression levels of the GABAA receptor subunits α1 and α2 in the ventral, dorsal hippocampus and basolateral amygdala. Increased expression, mainly of α1, was observed in ventral but not dorsal hippocampus of exposed animals, which would traditionally be interpreted as being associated with the exposure-resultant psychopathology. However, behavioral profiling revealed that this increased expression was confined to exposed-unaffected individuals, suggesting a resilience-associated expression regulation. The results provide evidence for the importance of employing behavioral profiling in animal models of PTSD, in order to better understand the neural basis of stress vulnerability and resilience.

Modeling depression in animals is based on the observation of behaviors interpreted as analogue to human symptoms. Typical tests used in experimental depression research are designed to evoke an either-or outcome. It is known that explorative and coping strategies are relevant for depression, however these aspects are generally not considered in animal behavioral testing. Here we investigate the Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL), a rat model of depression, compared to the Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat in three independent tests where the animals are allowed to express a more extensive behavioral repertoire. The multivariate concentric square field T (MCSF) and the novel cage tests evoke exploratory behaviors in a novel environment and the home cage change test evokes social behaviors in the re-establishment of a social hierarchy. In the MCSF test, FSL rats exhibited less exploratory drive and more risk-assessment behavior compared to SD rats. When re-exposed to the arena, FSL, but not SD rats, increased their exploratory behavior compared to the first trial and displayed risk-assessment behavior to the same extent as SD rats. Thus, the behavior of FSL rats was more similar to that of SDs when the rats were familiar with the arena. In the novel cage test FSL rats exhibited a reactive coping style, consistent with the reduced exploration observed in the MCSF. Reactive coping is associated with less aggressive behavior. Accordingly, FSL rats displayed less aggressive behavior in the home cage change test. Taken together, our data show that FSL rats express altered explorative behavior and reactive coping style. Reduced interest is a core symptom of depression, and individuals with a reactive coping style are more vulnerable to the disease. Our results support the use of FSL rats as an animal model of depression and increase our understanding of the FSL rat beyond the behavioral dimensions targeted by the traditional depression-related tests.