Search

Objective: This article presents a comparison of the changes of Posttraumatic Growth (PTG) in breast cancer and melanoma patients over a 2-year follow-up period and investigates the associations between coping strategies, anxiety, depression, emotional functioning, and PTG over time. Method: Seventy-eight early stage melanoma patients from Nantes University Hospital and 215 breast cancer patients from Nantes Cancerology Institute completed self-administered questionnaires collecting sociodemographic and medical information and assessing health-related quality of life, coping strategies, anxiety and depression within 1 month of diagnosis and 6, 12, and 24 months after the diagnosis. PTG was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months postdiagnosis. Results: We found that PTG increased over time for both cancers, but that breast cancer and melanoma patients did not experience the same magnitude of changes in PTG depending on time and on depression. While we did not find any relationship between anxiety, emotional functioning, negative coping and PTG; positive and emotional coping were positively associated with PTG changes for both cancers. Substance use was negatively related to PTG at 2 years postdiagnosis for melanoma and breast cancer. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that PTG increases over time for both cancers. In addition, it provides relevant information about the coping strategies that are associated with the experience of positive changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Satisfaction is known to be correlated with the quality of care; it indicates the adequacy of the caregivers' responses in meeting the needs and expectations of patients. The FAMCARE-Patient questionnaire has been used to quantify satisfaction level in outpatients with advanced-stage cancers.Objectives: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the FAMCARE-Patient questionnaire for French patients and to evaluate the psychometric properties of this version.Methods: The original questionnaire was translated into French and adapted to French cultural context by an expert committee. The French FAMCARE-Patient Version 16 (FFP-16) was then pilot tested among 51 patients. Subsequently, psychometric properties were evaluated in a cross-sectional study by administrating the new tool to 176 adult outpatients with advanced-stage cancer who underwent oncological care at our university hospital.Results: We performed a confirmatory factor analysis and assessed the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. The one-factor structure was confirmed, and it had an acceptable fit with a comparative fit index and root mean square error of approximation of 0.93 and 0.07, respectively. Internal reliability was high as shown by Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.95). Reproducibility was very good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.91). The FFP-16 score was independent of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the overall Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale distress scores. It was significantly but weakly correlated with anxiety, well-being, and overall quality of life (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.18, -0.20, and 0.30, respectively; P < 0.05).Conclusion: We found the FFP-16 questionnaire to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of satisfaction in French outpatients with advanced-stage cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]