Search

Creativity is an essential cognitive ability linked to all areas of our everyday functioning. Thus, finding a way to enhance it is of broad interest. A large number of anecdotal reports suggest that the consumption of psychedelic drugs can enhance creative thinking; however, scientific evidence is lacking. Following a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, we demonstrated that psilocybin (0.17 mg/kg) induced a time- and construct-related differentiation of effects on creative thinking. Acutely, psilocybin increased ratings of (spontaneous) creative insights, while decreasing (deliberate) task-based creativity. Seven days after psilocybin, number of novel ideas increased. Furthermore, we utilized an ultrahigh field multimodal brain imaging approach, and found that acute and persisting effects were predicted by within- and between-network connectivity of the default mode network. Findings add some support to historical claims that psychedelics can influence aspects of the creative process, potentially indicating them as a tool to investigate creativity and subsequent underlying neural mechanisms. Trial NL6007; psilocybin as a tool for enhanced cognitive flexibility; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6007.

Background: In the last decade, the psychoactive substance delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in cannabis products has risen considerably, which has been associated with increased anxiety [1]. The non-psychoactive cannabis compound cannabidiol (CBD) is suggested to counteract THC-induced anxiety to some extent [2,3], however, these effects are mild [3]. Trait anxiety has been suggested to moderate cannabis-induced anxiety [4]. The present study aimed to examine whether the CBD effects on THC-induced anxiety can be explained by baseline state anxiety levels and/or trait anxiety levels in healthy volunteers. Methods: A placebo-controlled, randomized within-subjects study including 26 healthy recreational cannabis users was set up to test the effects of vaporized cannabis containing THC (11% THC

Background 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is characterized by a microdeletion on the long arm of chromosome 22. The clinical phenotype of this syndrome is highly variable but symptoms include cognitive impairment, heart malformations, auto-immune problems and a high risk of developing a psychotic disorder. One of the genes located in the deleted region is PRODH which encodes proline dehydrogenase (PRODH). This enzyme is involved in converting proline to glutamate (GLU). GLU is involved in the pathophysiology of psychosis, particularly in cognitive symptoms (Lewis and Moghaddam 2006). Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is involved in cognition and psychosis as well (Vinkers et al. 2010). With this study we aimed to investigate GLUergic and GABAergic reactivity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and striatum in medication-free patients with 22q11DS with no psychiatric history and healthy controls (HC). Methods This was a randomized double-blind placebo controlled cross-over study. Groups were matched for age and gender. 12 patients with 22q11DS (mean age 35 years) and 20 HCs (mean age 31 years) were enrolled in the study. GABA and GLU, levels in the ACC and striatum were obtained twice with 7Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS, STEAM): once after placebo and once after oral administration of 50 mg. riluzole (agent with anti-glutamate and pro-GABA action). Striatal and ACC GLU/GABA ratios were computed as well as GLUergic and GABAergic reactivity (placebo minus riluzole). In addition, within the 22q11DS group, the relationship between cognitive functions (memory and attention) measured with the CANTAB and GABA, GLU, GLU/GABA ratio, GABAergic reactivity and GLUergic in the ACC and striatum were examined. Results Analyses of Covariance (ANCOVA) showed no baseline group differences in glutamate and GABA levels and GLU/GABA ratios (corrected for fraction of cerebral spinal fluid, CSF) in both brain regions. A repeated measures ANCOVA showed a trend level significant increase in striatal GABA concentrations after (p= 0.065). Riluzole had no significant effect on GLU (p= 0.303) and GLU/GABA ratios (p= 0.150) in the striatum. No medication X group interaction effects were found. Riluzole had no significant effect on GABA (p= 0.101), GLU (p= 0.847) and GLU/GABA ratio (p= 0.108) in the ACC. No group main effects and no medication X group interactions effects were found. However, a significant negative correlation was found between verbal memory (r= -0.650, p= 0.030) and ACC GLU levels, as well as GLUergic reactivity (r= -0.733, p= 0.010). Moreover, in the 22q11DS group, a significant negative correlation was found between attention (target sequence detection) and ACC GLU levels (r= -0.704, p= 0.016) as well as GLU/GABA ratio (r= -0.602, p= 0.050). Furthermore, sustained attention was positively associated with ACC GABA levels (r= 0.700, p= 0.024) and negatively associated with GLU/GABA ratio r= -0.639, p= 0.047) in these patients. Finally, a positive correlation was found between visual memory and striatal GLU levels (r= 0.616, p= 0.043). Discussion The present study did not demonstrate differences in ACC and striatal GLU and GABA levels, nor in GLUergig or GABAergic reactivity in response to riluzole between 22q11DS patients and controls. However, these results suggest a role for GLU and GABA in cognition in the 22q11DS group. Therefore, influencing these neurotransmitter systems might enhance cognitive functioning in these patients. More studies are required to replicate these findings.

A range of studies has indicated that users of 3.4-Methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ‘Ecstasy’) display cognitive deficits, particularly memory impairment, as compared to non-drug using controls. Yet it is difficult to determine whether these deficits are caused by MDMA or some other confounding factor, such as polydrug use. The present study was designed to establish the direct relation between MDMA and memory impairment under placebo-controlled conditions. Eighteen recreational MDMA users participated in a double blind, placebo controlled, 3-way crossover design. They were treated with placebo, MDMA 75mg and methylphenidate 20mg. Memory tests were conducted between 1.5-2h (intoxication phase) and between 25.5-26h (withdrawal phase) post dosing. Results showed that a single dose of MDMA caused impairment of immediate and delayed recall on a verbal learning task during the intoxication phase. However, there was no residual memory impairment during the withdrawal phase. Subjects reported more fatigue and less vigour, but no symptoms of depression during the withdrawal phase of MDMA treatment. Methylphenidate did not affect memory or mood at any time of testing. A single dose of MDMA produces transient memory impairment.