Search

Background: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis., Objective: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines., Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts., Results: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination., Limitations: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking., Conclusion: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Chat, Dr Ellebrecht, Ms. Kingston, and Dr Cordoro have no conflicts of interest to declare. Dr Bell is an employee of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Author Gondo is an employee of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Desai has served as a research investigator, consultant, speaker, and/or advisor for AbbVie, Galderma, Foundation for Research & Education of Dermatology, Almirall, Dermavant, Ferndale Laboratories, Inc, Incyte Corporation, Gore Range Capital, AOBiome, LLC, Bristol Myers Squibb, Verrica Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Scientis, EPI Health, Avita, Pfizer, Lilly, LEO, Incyte Corporation, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Beiersdorf, Inc, and Johnson and Johnson; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation and Women's Derm Society; and is a stockholder for Gore Range Capital. Dr Duffin has been a consultant, advisor, or served as an investigator for AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, CorEvitas/Corrona, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologica, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sienna, Stiefel, and UCB. Dr Feldman has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alovtech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Samsung, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen Inc, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, SunPharma, Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Valeant, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Advance Medical, Suncare Research, Informa, UpToDate and the National Psoriasis Foundation; is the founder and majority owner of www.DrScore.com; is a founder and part owner of Causa Research; and has stock in Sensal Health. Dr Garg is an advisor for AbbVie, Aclaris Therapeutics, Anaptys Bio, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, InflaRx, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viela Biosciences; receives honoraria; and receives research grants from AbbVie, UCB and National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Gelfand served as a consultant for Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celldex (DSMB), FIDE (which is sponsored by multiple pharmaceutical companies) GSK, Happify, Lilly (DMC), Leo, Janssen Biologics, Neumentum, Novartis Corp, Pfizer, UCB (DSMB), Neuroderm (DSMB), Regeneron, Trevi, and Mindera Dx., receiving honoraria; receives research grants (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer Inc; and received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly pharmaceutical sponsors. Dr Gelfand is a co-patent holder of resiquimod for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Dr Gelfand is a Deputy Editor for the Journal of Investigative Dermatology receiving honoraria from the Society for Investigative Dermatology, is Chief Medical Editor for Healio Psoriatic Disease (receiving honoraria) and is a member of the Board of Directors for the International Psoriasis Council, receiving no honoraria. Dr Gladman has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lily, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lily, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Green is a research investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, BMS, Dermavant, Lilly, MC2, SunPharma, and UCB. Dr Gudjonsson has served as an advisor for Novartis, Janssen, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received research support from Almirall, Eli Lilly, Prometheus, BMS, and Janssen. Dr Han has served as a research investigator, consultant, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Dermavant, Janssen, Lilly, UCB, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Ortho Dermatologics, Bond Avillion, Pellepharm, MC2, Athenex, Celgene, Sun Pharma, and Pfizer. Dr Hawkes is an advisor and/or consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, LearnSkin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation; and has stock ownership/equity of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Kircik is a research investigator, speaker, advisor, and/or consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Biogen-Idec, BMS, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Inc, Cellceutix, Cipher, Combinatrix, Connetics Corporation, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc, Dr Reddy's Lab, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Idera, Leo, Maruho, Merck, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Novartis AG, Promius, PharmaDerm, Pfizer, Serono, Stiefel Laboratories, Inc, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl, and XenoPort. Dr Koo is a speaker and/or advisor for AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, LEO, Sun Pharma, Janssen, and Epi Pharm. Dr Langley has been an investigator, served on the scientific advisory board, and/or has provided a lecture for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Leo, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai; receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc; and is a consultant for Aditum Bio, Almirall, AltruBio Inc, AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Arrive Technologies, Avotres Therapeutics, BiomX, Brickell Biotech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corevitas, Dermavant Sciences, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Evelo Biosciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitatation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Helsinn Therapeutics, Hexima Ltd., LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Pfizer, Seanergy, and Verrica. Dr Lewitt has received speaking and/or consulting support from AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Ortho Dermatologics, UCB, Galderma, Pfizer; received honoraria; and served as an advisor for AbbVie, Janssen, and Dermavant. Dr Liao has received research/grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Trex Bio, Pfizer, and Regeneron. Dr Martin has served as an advisor for Bristol Meyers Squibb, DUSA/SUN, AbbVie, Ortho/Bausch Health, Galderma, Pfizer, LEO, Janssen, Horizon, UCB, Trevi, Almirall, Dermavent, Incyte, and Lilly; has served as a consultant for Bristol Meyers Squibb, DUSA/SUN, AbbVie, Ortho/Bausch Health, Galderma, Pfizer, LEO, UCB, Trevi, Almirall, Lilly, Arcutis, and Dermavant; and has received speaking support from UCB, Almirall, LEO, Incyte, Dermavant, and Bristol Meyers Squibb. Dr Orbai is a consultant and/or advisor for Janssen, Novartis, and UCB; and receives research support from AbbVie, Amgen, and Celgene. Dr Reddy has served as a consultant for Novartis, AbbVie, Janssen, and UCB; and has received grant support from Pfizer. Ms Richardson has served as an advisor for and received honoraria from Boehringer Engelheim and Lilly. Dr Ritchlin is a consultant and/or speaker for Novartis, Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, and Pfizer. Dr Schwartzman has received speaking support from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, and UCB; served as a consultant for Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, UCB, Stelexis, Jubilant, and Teijin; is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation; and served as an advisor for Myriad. Dr Siegel has served as an advisor, speaker, and/or consultant for Abbvie, UCB, Lilly, Horizon, and BMS. Dr Van Voorhees has served as a research investigator and/or scientific advisor for Lilly, AbbVie, UCB, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Merck. Dr Wallace serves as an investigator for Pfizer and Target RWE. Dr Weinberg is a research investigator, consultant, and/or speaker for Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, AbbVie, Sun, Janssen, and BMS. Dr Winthrop is a consultant for Pfizer, AbbVie, Union Chimique Belge (UCB), Eli Lilly & Company, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Roche, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Regeneron, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; and receives research funding from BMS and Pfizer. Dr Yamauchi serves as a research investigator, consultant, and speaker for Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator, scientific advisor, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, Leo, UCB, Janssen, Lilly, Mindera, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Methotrexate (MTX) is a readily accessible drug, first used in 1948 and employed for a wide variety of indications since then. However, despite widespread off-label use, FDA labeling does not include approved indications for the use of MTX for many inflammatory skin diseases in pediatric patients, including morphea, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata, among others. Without published treatment guidelines, some clinicians may be hesitant to use MTX off-label, or uncomfortable prescribing MTX in this population. To address this unmet need, an expert consensus committee was convened to develop evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for use of MTX to treat pediatric inflammatory skin disease. Clinicians with experience and expertise in clinical research, drug development, and treating inflammatory skin disease in pediatric patients with MTX were recruited. Five committees were created based on major topic areas: (1) indications and contraindications, (2) dosing, (3) interactions with immunizations and medications, (4) adverse effects (potential for and management of), and (5) monitoring needs. Pertinent questions were generated and addressed by the relevant committee. The entire group participated in a modified Delphi process to establish agreement on recommendations for each question. The committee developed 46 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations, each with >70% agreement among members, across all five topics. These are presented in tables and text, along with a discussion of supporting literature, and level of evidence. These evidence- and consensus-based recommendations will support safe and effective use of MTX for the underserved population of pediatric patients who may benefit from this valuable, time-honored medication., (© 2023 The Authors. Pediatric Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Importance: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruption is well recognized in adults, but few reports document this paradoxical effect in children., Objective: To characterize the clinical features and the clinical time course of TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruptions in children., Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter retrospective case series of children younger than 18 years seen between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, who developed a new-onset psoriasiform eruption while taking a TNF inhibitor for a nondermatologic disorder. Participating sites were members of the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance. Data were entered into a Research Electronic Data Capture database at the Mayo Clinic (ie, the coordinating center)., Results: Psoriasiform eruptions were identified in 103 TNF inhibitor-treated patients (median age, 13.8 years [IQR, 11.7-16.4 years]; 52 female patients [50%]; 57 White patients [55%]), with 67 patients (65%) treated with infliximab, 35 (34%) with adalimumab, and 1 (1%) with certolizumab pegol. Most patients had no personal history (101 [98%]) or family history of psoriasis (60 patients [58%]). Inflammatory bowel disease was the most common indication for treatment with TNF inhibitor (94 patients [91%]). The primary extracutaneous disease was under control in 95 patients (92%) who developed the eruption. Most patients (n = 85 [83%]) developed psoriasiform eruptions at multiple anatomic sites, with scalp involvement being most common (65 patients [63%]). Skin disease developed at a median of 14.5 months (IQR, 9-24 months) after TNF inhibitor initiation. To treat the psoriasiform eruption, topical steroidal and nonsteroidal medication was prescribed for all patients. Systemic therapy was added for 30 patients (29%): methotrexate for 24 patients (23%), oral corticosteroids for 8 patients (8%), and azathioprine for 1 patient (1%). For 26 patients (25%), suboptimal effectiveness with topical medications alone prompted discontinuation of the initial TNF inhibitor and a change to a second-line TNF inhibitor with cutaneous improvement in 23 patients (88%) by a median of 3 months (IQR, 2-4 months). Eight patients (31%) who started a second-line TNF inhibitor developed a subsequent TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruption at a median of 6 months (IQR, 4-8 months). Persistent skin disease in 18 patients (17%) prompted discontinuation of all TNF inhibitors; 11 patients changed to a non-TNF inhibitor systemic therapy, and 7 discontinued all systemic therapy., Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, paradoxical TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasiform eruptions were seen in children treated with TNF inhibitors for any indication, and there appears to be a class effect among the varying TNF inhibitors. The majority of these children were able to continue TNF inhibitor therapy with adequate skin-directed and other adjuvant therapies.

Deciding when to start and selecting a specific systemic treatment for pediatric psoriasis patients can be a complex process involving many factors. Considerations include type of psoriasis, severity, potential genetic etiologies, comorbidities, triggering events and characteristics unique to each patient. The constellation of clinical features and drug related factors may prompt selection of a specific agent. Systemic treatments may be considered on the basis of those that are "tried and true" (acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine, phototherapy) and "new and novel" (the biologic agents). Conventional systemic agents have decades of use to support their safety and efficacy and may be used in very flexible ways with titration of dose when maintenance is achieved or when flares occur. Targeted biologic therapies have overall reassuring safety profiles, can be very efficacious, and require little to no lab monitoring as compared to conventional systemics. However, they can be cost prohibitive and most are administered via injection. Here, we provide data and principles guiding the approach to therapy of moderate to severe psoriasis in children and use case examples to highlight several different clinical scenarios., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no disclosures, conflicts of interest, or funding sources to declare., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the United States population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with topical agents and with alternative medicine will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of dermatologists in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as risks that may be associated. This guideline will also address the severity assessment methods of psoriasis in adults., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

While the association between psoriasis and various comorbidities is well documented in adults, questions remain as to whether the same relationships exist in the pediatric population. However, psoriasis develops in childhood or adolescence in approximately 40% of patients, suggesting that the risk of comorbidities may also begin early in life. This presents an opportunity for prevention, early detection and intervention for children who may suffer from, or be at risk of, comorbidities. The pediatric psoriasis Comorbidity Screening Initiative, a multidisciplinary panel, devised and published consensus-based screening recommendations for pediatric psoriasis patients in 2017. As these guidelines closely align with the routine age-related screening recommendations for healthy children set forth by the American Academy of Pediatrics, in the absence of signs and symptoms of comorbidities prompting additional evaluation, dermatologists should partner with patients' primary care physicians to ensure up-to-date, routine, and age-based screening., Competing Interests: All of the authors have no conflicts to declare for this work.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 2% of the world's population. In this guideline, we focus the discussion on systemic, nonbiologic medications for the treatment of this disease. We provide detailed discussion of efficacy and safety for the most commonly used medications, including methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin, and provide recommendations to assist prescribers in initiating and managing patients on these treatments. Additionally, we discuss newer therapies, including tofacitinib and apremilast, and briefly touch on a number of other medications, including fumaric acid esters (used outside the United States) and therapies that are no longer widely used for the treatment of psoriasis (ie, hydroxyurea, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, thioguanine, and tacrolimus)., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Few studies have compared the use of methotrexate and biologics, the most commonly used systemic medications for treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in children., Objective: To assess the real-world, 6-month reduction in psoriasis severity and long-term drug survival (rate and duration of adherence to a specific drug) of methotrexate vs biologics in plaque psoriasis in children., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective medical records review was conducted at 20 European and North American centers. Treatment response was based on site-reported Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and/or Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores at baseline and within the first 6 months of treatment. Participants included all 234 consecutively seen children with moderate to severe psoriasis who received at least 3 months of methotrexate or biologics from December 1, 1990, to September 16, 2014, with sufficient data for analysis. Data analysis was performed from December 14, 2015, to September 1, 2016., Main Outcomes and Measures: PASI, with a range from 0 to 72 (highest score indicating severe psoriasis), and/or PGA, with a scale of 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (very severe)., Results: Of 234 pediatric patients (103 boys [44.0%]; 131 girls [56.0%]) treated with methotrexate and/or biologics, 163 patients (69.7%) exclusively received methotrexate, 47 patients (20.1%) exclusively received biologics, and 24 children (10.2%) received methotrexate and biologics sequentially. Of the latter cohort, 23 children were treated initially with methotrexate. Mean (SD) age at initiation was 11.6 (3.7) years for methotrexate and 13.3 (2.9) years for biologics (73.2% for etanercept) (P = .002). Among patients evaluated by a scoring method at 6-month follow-up, 75% or greater improvement in PASI (PASI75) was achieved in 12 of 30 patients (40.0%) receiving methotrexate and 20 of 28 patients (71.4%) receiving biologics, and PGA was clear/almost clear (PGA 0/1) in 41 of 115 patients (35.6%) receiving methotrexate and 18 of 37 patients (48.6%) receiving biologics. Achieving PASI75 and/or PGA 0/1 between baseline and 6 months was more likely with biologics than methotrexate (PASI75: odds ratio [OR], 4.56; 95% CI, 2.02-10.27; P < .001; and PGA 0/1: OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.98-4.00; P = .06). Decreased mean PASI and PGA scores were associated with biologics more than with methotrexate (PASI effect, -3.13; 95% CI, -4.33 to -1.94; P < .001; and PGA effect, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0.06; P = .02). After 1, 3, and 5 years of use, overall drug survival rates for methotrexate were 77.5%, 50.3%, and 35.9%, and for biologics, the rates were 83.4%, 64.3%, and 57.1%, respectively. Biologics were associated with a better confounder-corrected drug survival than methotrexate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21-4.10; P = .01). Discontinuation owing to lack of response was comparable (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.80-3.36; P = .18)., Conclusions and Relevance: Methotrexate and biologics appear to be associated with improvement in pediatric psoriasis, although biologics seem to be associated with greater reduction in psoriasis severity scores and higher drug survival rates than methotrexate in the real-world setting. Additional studies directly comparing these medications should be performed for confirmation.

Psoriasis is a chronic, multisystem, inflammatory disease that affects approximately 1% of children, with onset most common during adolescence. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and provides evidence-based recommendations. Attention will be given to pediatric patients with psoriasis, recognizing the unique physiology, pharmacokinetics, and patient-parent-provider interactions of patients younger than 18 years old. The topics reviewed here mirror those discussed in the adult guideline sections, excluding those topics that are irrelevant to, or lack sufficient information for, pediatric patients., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 3.2% of the world's population. In this section of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we will focus the discussion on ultraviolet (UV) light-based therapies, which include narrowband and broadband UVB, UVA in conjunction with photosensitizing agents, targeted UVB treatments such as with an excimer laser, and several other modalities and variations of these core phototherapies, including newer applications of pulsed dye lasers, intense pulse light, and light-emitting electrodes. We will provide an in-depth, evidence-based discussion of efficacy and safety for each treatment modality and provide recommendations and guidance for the use of these therapies alone or in conjunction with other topical and/or systemic psoriasis treatments., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of the dermatologist in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as associated risks., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations on the basis of available evidence., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease and has significant associated morbidity and effect on quality of life. It is important to determine whether dietary interventions help reduce disease severity in patients with psoriatic diseases., Objective: To make evidence-based dietary recommendations for adults with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation., Evidence Review: We used literature from prior systematic reviews as well as additional primary literature from the MEDLINE database from January 1, 2014, to August 31, 2017, that evaluated the impact of diet on psoriasis. We included observational and interventional studies of patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for interventional studies. We made evidence-based dietary recommendations, which were voted on by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board., Findings: We identified 55 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review. These studies represent 77 557 unique participants of which 4534 have psoriasis. Based on the literature, we strongly recommend dietary weight reduction with a hypocaloric diet in overweight and obese patients with psoriasis. We weakly recommend a gluten-free diet only in patients who test positive for serologic markers of gluten sensitivity. Based on low-quality data, select foods, nutrients, and dietary patterns may affect psoriasis. For patients with psoriatic arthritis, we weakly recommend vitamin D supplementation and dietary weight reduction with a hypocaloric diet in overweight and obese patients. Dietary interventions should always be used in conjunction with standard medical therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis., Conclusions and Relevance: Adults with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis can supplement their standard medical therapies with dietary interventions to reduce disease severity. These dietary recommendations from the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board will help guide clinicians regarding the utility of dietary interventions in adults with psoriatic diseases.

Skin of colored patients with psoriasis are more likely to remain undiagnosed and experience a greater impact on quality of life than their white counterparts. A better understanding of the ethno-racial differences in the presentation of psoriasis can help address these disparities. To compare the prevalence of psoriatic subtypes (plaque, guttate, pustular, erythrodermic, palmoplantar, and inverse) and lesion locations in Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino patients, we analyzed cross-sectional, patient-reported, physician-reviewed survey data from 882 adult and 16 pediatric psoriasis patients seen at the University of California, San Francisco Department of Dermatology between 2006 and 2016. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the prevalence of psoriasis subtypes and lesional distributions amongst the ethno-racial groups. Asians and Hispanics/Latinos had higher odds of having pustular psoriasis compared to Caucasians (OR=4.36 [95%CI: 1.24-17.62], P=0.026; and OR=5.94 [95%CI: 1.03-31.03], P=0.036, respectively). Asians also had a higher frequency of erythrodermic psoriasis (OR=5.56 [95%CI: 1.41-27.17], P=0.018), but a lower frequency of inverse psoriasis compared to Caucasians (OR=0.26 [95%CI: 0.06-0.80], P=0.036). These differences may relate to genetic or environmental factors or access to care. Clinician awareness of ethno-racial differences in psoriasis subtype and lesion location can facilitate earlier diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

Background/objectives: Childhood-onset psoriasis is a common skin disorder that has recently received increasing attention, particularly because of its significant medical, social, financial, and psychological burdens and its associated comorbidities. With limited data available and lack of standardized management guidelines for pediatric psoriasis, an expert panel desired to provide an updated critical overview and practical guidance for management of the affected population., Methods: A panel of pediatric dermatologists with extensive experience in pediatric psoriasis defined and prioritized a core set of topics, performed an English-language literature review, prepared critical evaluations and presentations of topic areas, and carried out a consensus meeting and follow-up consensus manuscript., Results: The summation of evolving perspectives in pediatric psoriasis includes epidemiology and natural history of the disease, precipitating factors and comorbidities, quality of life and burden of disease, clinical features and disease presentation, differential diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment, including topical, photo, and systemic therapies., Conclusion: Pediatric psoriasis is an important immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease with potential for significant impact on affected individuals and their caregivers. Current state-of-the-art care is based primarily on experience and expert consensus, but pediatric data are accumulating and therapeutic options are rapidly evolving., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Evidence from adult psoriasis studies implicates an imbalance between regulatory and effector T cells, particularly T H -17-producing T cells, in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Little is known about the immunopathology of psoriasis in children., Objective: We sought to functionally characterize the inflammatory cell profiles of psoriatic plaques from pediatric patients and compare them with healthy, age-matched controls and adult psoriasis patients., Methods: Skin samples from pediatric psoriasis patients and healthy controls were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry to determine the dominant immune cell subsets present and cytokines produced., Results: Lesional tissue from pediatric psoriasis patients had significantly increased interleukin (IL) 22 derived from CD4 + and CD8 + cells compared with the tissues from healthy pediatric controls and adult psoriasis patients. Tissue from pediatric psoriasis patients had significantly less elevation of IL-17 derived from CD4 + and CD8 + cells compared with the tissue from adult psoriasis patients. In contrast with the lesions from adult patients, lesional skin in pediatric patients with psoriasis did not have increases in regulatory T cells., Limitations: This is a pilot study, thus the sample size is small., Conclusion: Significant differences in IL-17 and IL-22 expression were observed in the pediatric psoriasis patients compared with pediatric healthy controls and adult psoriasis patients. IL-22 might be relevant in the pathogenesis of pediatric psoriasis and represents a potential treatment target unique to pediatric psoriasis., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Psoriasis is a complex inflammatory skin condition associated with serious medical comorbidities in adults, including obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, psoriatic arthritis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life. Because psoriasis begins in childhood in almost one-third of patients, early identification of risk may be critical to minimizing effects on future health., Objective: To develop the first set of guidelines for comorbidity screening for patients with pediatric psoriasis based on current evidence., Evidence Review: A literature review was performed using PubMed from January 1999 through December 2015. Limiting the search to human studies published in English and removing reviews and editorials produced 153 relevant manuscripts. An expert panel in psoriasis, pediatric dermatology, pediatric rheumatology, pediatric gastroenterology, pediatric endocrinology, and adult and pediatric cardiology used the patient-centered Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) method to evaluate and grade the quality of evidence., Findings: Because of the limited number of pediatric studies published on these topics, the strength of the panel's recommendations is classified as SORT level C expert consensus recommendations. The majority of recommendations coincide with those endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics for the general pediatric patient but with added attention to signs and symptoms of arthritis, depression, and anxiety. The panel also identified key areas for further investigation., Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with pediatric psoriasis should receive routine screening and identification of risk factors for associated comorbidities. These guidelines are relevant for all health care providers caring for patients with pediatric psoriasis, including primary care clinicians, dermatologists, and pediatric specialists. Because these are the first pediatric guidelines, re-review and refinement will be necessary as studies further detail, and possibly stratify, risk in affected children.

We present two cases of Netherton syndrome mimicking pustular psoriasis and discuss potential pathomechanisms of clinical and histologic similarities between Netherton syndrome and pustular psoriasis and implications for management., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Lentigo formation has been described in adults after the resolution of psoriatic plaques treated with various standard psoriasis treatments. We describe three cases of lentigines developing in areas of resolving psoriatic plaques: two in patients treated with etanercept and one before starting etanercept. A possible pathomechanism is proposed., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The clinical features of pediatric psoriasis warrant further attention. A national study was conducted to determine the prevalence of scalp and nail involvement and a history of guttate psoriasis at onset according to age, sex, and disease severity. One hundred eighty-one children ages 5 to 17 years with plaque psoriasis were enrolled in a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Subjects and guardians were asked about a history of scalp and nail involvement and whether the initial presentation was guttate. Peak psoriasis severity was assessed and defined historically as mild psoriasis (MP) or severe psoriasis (SP) according to the Physician's Global Assessment and body surface area measures. One hundred forty-three (79.0%) subjects reported a history of scalp involvement, and 71 (39.2%) described a history of nail involvement. Boys were less likely than girls to report a history of scalp involvement (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19-0.84) but more likely to have had nail involvement (OR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.62-5.60). Scalp and nail involvement was not related to psoriasis severity. In contrast, subjects with SP (35.9%) more often reported a history of guttate lesions than did those with MP (21.8%) (p = .02). Antecedent streptococcal infection was more common in children with guttate than those with plaque psoriasis at onset (p = .02) but did not correlate with severity. Sex-related differences in scalp and nail involvement suggest koebnerization. Preceding streptococcal infection predicts guttate morphology but not severity, and initial guttate morphology is associated with eventual greater severity of disease. More aggressive monitoring and management should be considered for guttate psoriasis, given its later association with more severe disease., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Severe psoriasis is uncommon in children, but when it occurs, can be physically, emotionally and socially disabling. Systemic treatments such as phototherapy, acitretin, methotrexate and cyclosporine have been used to manage severe pediatric psoriasis for decades. Newer biologic agents have demonstrated their effectiveness in adult psoriasis and are accumulating promising data in children. This article discusses the use of these treatments including their indications, efficacy, adverse effects, and monitoring requirements. The aim is to provide practical, clinically relevant information regarding the use of these medications alone and in various combinations based on available evidence and cumulative experience., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the relationship of excess and central adiposity with pediatric psoriasis severity., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, cross-sectional study of 409 psoriatic children. Psoriasis was classified as mild (worst Physician's Global Assessment score ≤3 with body surface area ≤10%) or severe (worst Physician's Global Assessment score ≥3 with body surface area >10%). Children were enrolled from 9 countries between June 19, 2009, and December 2, 2011., Main Outcome Measures: Excess adiposity (body mass index percentile) and central adiposity (waist circumference percentile and waist to height ratio)., Results: Excess adiposity (body mass index ≥85th percentile) occurred in 37.9% of psoriatic children (n=155) vs 20.5% of controls (n=42) but did not differ significantly by severity. The odds ratio (95% CI) of obesity (body mass index ≥95th percentile) overall in psoriatic children vs controls was 4.29 (1.96-9.39) and was higher with severe (4.92; 2.20-10.99) than with mild (3.60; 1.56-8.30) psoriasis, particularly in the United States (7.60; 2.47-23.34, and 4.72; 1.43-15.56, respectively). Waist circumference above the 90th percentile occurred in 9.3% of the control (n=19), 14.0% of the mild psoriasis (n=27), and 21.2% of the of severe psoriasis (n=43) participants internationally; this incidence was highest in the United States (12.0% [n=13], 20.8% [16], and 31.1% [32], respectively). Waist to height ratio was significantly higher in psoriatic (0.48) vs control (0.46) children but was unaffected by psoriasis severity. Children with severe psoriasis at its worst, but mild at enrollment, showed no significant difference in excess or central adiposity from children whose psoriasis remained severe., Conclusions: Globally, children with psoriasis have excess adiposity and increased central adiposity regardless of psoriasis severity. The increased metabolic risks associated with excess and central adiposity warrant early monitoring and lifestyle modification., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00879944

Objective: To characterize patterns of childhood psoriasis health care delivery from 1979-2007., Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional investigation using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data., Setting: US ambulatory physician offices from 1979 through 2007., Patients: Children with psoriasis ages 0 (birth) to 18 years., Main Outcome Measures: Demographics, physician specialty, and medications prescribed., Results: There were an estimated 3.8 million visits for psoriasis over the study interval with a median of 123,420 visits per year. Dermatologists saw 63% of patients, pediatricians saw 17%, and internists, 14%. The numbers of visits were equal between sexes but ranged by age group: patients ages 13 to 18 years accounted for 47% of visits, those ages 8 to 12 years for 35%, and those ages 0 to 7 for 18%. Ninety-three percent of patients were white. Topical corticosteroids were the most commonly prescribed medications. Children 0 to 9 years old received equally potent corticosteroids as children 10 to 18 years old. Among all patients, the most prescribed medication was topical betamethasone; among those ages 0 to 9 years, tacrolimus; and among those ages 10 to 18 years, betamethasone. By physician specialty, the most prescribed medications were high-potency steroids for dermatologists and internists, and topical tacrolimus for pediatricians. Topical calcineurin inhibitors were not among the top 20 most prescribed medications by dermatologists, and systemic antipsoriatic agents were not among the top 20 most prescribed medications in any age group., Conclusions: Over the 28-year interval, outpatient visits for pediatric psoriasis were attended primarily by white children older than 8 years in equal number by sex. Dermatologists and pediatricians saw the majority, and treatment approach differed by physician specialty and patient age. Treatment guidelines for childhood psoriasis may help reduce treatment variability.

The development of new treatments for psoriasis provides dermatologists novel ways to help control the disease but raises questions about what laboratory screening tests are required. As of yet, no consensus or guidelines exist for dermatologists to follow and there may be misconceptions about the relative need for screening and monitoring tests in patients treated with biologic agents. Current practice ranges from no testing to blanket screening panels. The purposes of this review are to (1) systematically review the literature on the use of screening and monitoring tests when initiating and continuing biologic treatments (adalimumab, alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab) for moderate to severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis; and (2) suggest practical guidelines for dermatologists on which to base such testing. We searched the Cochrane Collaborative Database (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Cochrane Reviews] and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [Clinical Trials]) and the MEDLINE database using medical subject headings as search terms when available or key words when appropriate. We compiled published data on risk and risk assessment related to systemic psoriasis treatments, used expert opinion where appropriate when published clinical data were not adequately informative, and assigned evidence grades for various screening tests based on standard methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Finally, we developed a table of evidence grades for tests used to monitor different systemic medications. There is not strong evidence to recommend most screening tests for monitoring biological treatments. Neither is there strong evidence not to do such testing. Ultimately, from a practical standpoint, it is incumbent on the clinician to consider each patient independently and determine what screening tests are most appropriate for each individual patient.

Treating children with psoriasis represents one of the most rewarding yet constantly challenging endeavors in dermatology. These patients require time, energy, enthusiasm, empathy, and current, comprehensive knowledge of the unique clinical presentations in children and available therapies, including clinical action spectrum, mechanism of action, potential toxicity, and monitoring. Longitudinal trials examining the epidemiology and natural history of psoriasis, as well as the safety and efficacy of current and emerging treatments, are desperately needed in the pediatric population. Partner with the patient, family, and other multidisciplinary providers to form an educational and therapeutic alliance. Early in the course of disease, schedule frequent visits for reinforcement of the therapeutic plan, education, clinical and treatment monitoring, and support. As the disease and the patient's physical, psychosocial and emotional level of functioning evolve, so too will the requirement for follow-up and monitoring. Patient advocacy and education groups, such as the National Psoriasis Foundation (www.psoriasis.org; 800-723-9166) are excellent resources and can serve as an extension of your comprehensive care.

Telemedicine emerged as an alternative care delivery system used to offer effective long-term management to patients with chronic, inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic disease. Teledermatology can provide reliable clinical information through thorough history-taking and virtual evaluations that include patient-provided images and disease activity assessment tools that may help accurately diagnose and manage patients with psoriasis. The integration of validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis and effective teledermatology practices may improve access to specialists, thus avoiding preventable delays in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Although the provision of telehealthcare should not completely replace high quality, in-person dermatologic or rheumatologic visits, the convenience and collaborative nature of teledermatology may lead to expanded access and expedited care in the appropriate setting, whether it be in a virtual or in-person visit.

BackgroundHeterozygous mutations in caspase recruitment domain family member 14 gene (CARD14) have been shown to be associated with psoriasis and familial pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP). Many subjects with CARD14 mutations display features of both disorders, which can result in diagnostic uncertainty. In addition, these eruptions are often recalcitrant to conventional psoriasis therapies such as methotrexate, oral retinoids, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.ObjectiveWe sought to describe the clinical characteristics, family history, and response to therapy in subjects with papulosquamous eruptions due to mutations in CARD14.MethodsSubjects were referred for genetic testing as part of a registry of subjects with inherited disorders of keratinization. DNA was isolated from blood or saliva, and multiplex targeted sequencing or whole exome sequencing was performed. Clinical histories of subjects with CARD14 mutations were reviewed.ResultsWe identified 15 kindreds with CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruption (CAPE). Characteristic features of CAPE include early age of onset; prominent involvement of the cheeks, chin, and ears; family history of psoriasis or PRP; minimal response to conventional topical and systemic psoriasis therapies; and improvement with ustekinumab.LimitationsRelatively small sample size.ConclusionsMany subjects with CARD14 mutations display characteristics of both psoriasis and PRP. We propose the term CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruption to describe this spectrum of disease. Subjects with clinical features suggestive of CAPE should undergo CARD14 sequencing and may benefit from treatment with ustekinumab.