Search

Importance: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with unmet needs for tailored treatment and therapy de-escalation strategies., Objective: To evaluate early intervention with and prolonging the dosing interval for guselkumab, a p19 subunit-targeted interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GUIDE clinical trial is an ongoing phase 3b, randomized, double-blinded trial conducted across 80 centers in Germany and France comprising 3 parts evaluating the impact of early disease intervention, prolonged dosing interval, and maintenance of response following treatment withdrawal among adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In study part 2, reported herein, first and last patient visits were September 2019 and March 2022, respectively., Interventions: In GUIDE part 1 (week [W]0-W28), patients received guselkumab, 100 mg, at W0, W4, W12, and W20. Those achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 0 at both W20 and W28 were termed super responders (SRes). In part 2 (W28-W68), SRes were randomized to guselkumab, 100 mg, every 8 weeks or every 16 weeks; non-SRes continued open-label guselkumab every 8 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (with a 10% margin) of guselkumab every 16 weeks vs every 8 weeks dosing among SRes for maintenance of disease control (PASI <3 at W68). Biomarker substudies assessed immunologic effects in skin and blood., Results: Overall, 822 patients received guselkumab in part 2 (297 [36.1%] SRes [every 8 weeks/every 16 weeks; n = 148/n = 149] and 525 [63.9%] non-SRes). Among SRes, mean (SD) age was 39.4 (14.1) years, 95 (32.0%) were female, and 202 (68.0%) were male. The primary end point of noninferiority for guselkumab every 16 weeks vs every 8 weeks in SRes was met (P = .001), with 91.9% (137/149; 90% CI, 87.3%-95.3%) of SRes receiving every 16 weeks and 92.6% (137/148; 90% CI, 88.0%-95.8%) of SRes receiving dosing every 8 weeks having PASI lower than 3 at W68. Clinical effects corresponded with immunologic changes; skin CD8-positive tissue-resident memory T (TRM)-cell count decreased quickly from baseline, remaining low in both dosing groups. Similarly, serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and β defensin (BD)-2 levels decreased significantly from baseline, remaining low in both dosing groups to W68. Guselkumab was well-tolerated; no new safety signals were identified., Conclusions and Relevance: Psoriasis treatment guidelines lack or provide inconsistent advice on patient stratification and treatment de-escalation. We present the first randomized trial providing evidence that, in patients with early complete skin clearance at 2 consecutive visits (W20 and W28), extending the guselkumab dosing interval may control disease activity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03818035.

Autoinflammation is a sterile inflammatory process resulting from increased neutrophil infiltration and overexpression of IL-1 cytokines. The factors that trigger these events are, however, poorly understood. By investigating pustular forms of psoriasis, we show that human neutrophils constitutively express IL-26 and abundantly release it from granular stores upon activation. In pustular psoriasis, neutrophil-derived IL-26 drives the pathogenic autoinflammation process by inducing the expression of IL-1 cytokines and chemokines that further recruit neutrophils. This occurs via activation of IL-26R in keratinocytes and via the formation of complexes between IL-26 and microbiota DNA, which trigger TLR9 activation of neutrophils. Thus our findings identify neutrophils as an important source of IL-26 and point to IL-26 as the key link between neutrophils and a self-sustaining autoinflammation loop in pustular psoriasis., (© 2024 Baldo et al.)

Background: In the phase III POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials, deucravacitinib, an oral selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, was well tolerated and efficacious over 1 year in patients with psoriasis., Objective: To evaluate deucravacitinib safety and efficacy over 2 years in patients participating in the phase III trials., Methods: In the POETYK long-term extension (LTE), an ongoing phase IIIb open-label trial, adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who completed PSO-1 or PSO-2 receive deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameter abnormalities. Efficacy endpoints, including ≥ 75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear), were evaluated in patients originally randomized to deucravacitinib, patients who crossed over from placebo at week 16 and patients who achieved PASI 75 at week 24 (peak efficacy)., Results: At data cutoff (1 October 2021), 1519 patients had received at least one dose of deucravacitinib; 79.0% and 39.9% had ≥ 52 weeks and ≥ 104 weeks of total deucravacitinib exposure, respectively. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years were similar at 1 year and 2 years for any AEs (229.2 vs. 154.4, respectively), serious AEs (5.7 vs. 6.1), discontinuations (4.4 vs. 2.8), deaths (0.2 vs. 0.4), serious infections (1.7 vs. 2.6), herpes zoster (0.9 vs. 0.8), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.3 vs. 0.4), venous thromboembolic events (0.2 vs. 0.1) and malignancies (1.0 vs. 0.9). EAIRs for COVID-19 infections were higher at 2 years than at 1 year (5.1 vs. 0.5) owing to the peak of the global COVID-19 pandemic occurring during the LTE. No clinically meaningful changes from baseline or trends were observed over 2 years in haematological, chemistry or lipid parameters. Clinical responses were maintained in patients who received continuous deu-cravacitinib treatment from baseline [PASI 75: week 52, 72.4%; week 112, 79.7%; sPGA 0/1: week 52, 57.9%; week 112, 61.1% (as observed)]. Responses at week 52 were also maintained in placebo crossovers and in week-24 PASI-75 responders., Conclusions: Deucravacitinib maintained efficacy and demonstrated consistent safety with no new safety signals observed through 2 years., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest M.L. has received research funds on behalf of Mount Sinai from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Inozyme, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, and UCB, Inc., and is a consultant for Almirall, AltruBio Inc., AnaptysBio, Apogee, Arcutis, Inc., AstraZeneca, Atomwise, Avotres Therapeutics, Brickell Biotech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle Biosciences, Celltrion, CorEvitas, Dermavant Sciences, EPI, Evommune, Inc., Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Galderma, Genentech, Incyte, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, Seanergy, Strata, Takeda, Trevi, and Verrica. R.B.W. has received research grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, DICE Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB and Union Therapeutics. H.S. has been a clinical investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Sun Pharma. S.I. has received grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Sun Pharma, Taiho Yakuhin, Tanabe Mitsubishi and Torii Yakuhin, and has received personal fees from Amgen (Celgene), Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB. C.P. has received grants from and served as a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB. J.C.S. has served on an advisory board and served as a consultant for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi Genzyme, and Trevi; has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme; and has been an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Galderma, Incyte, InfraRX, Janssen-Cilag, Manlo Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Trevi, and UCB. L.S. has served as a consultant, paid investigator, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Anacor, Ascend, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Blaze Bioscience, Boehringer Ingelheim, Botanix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Hexima, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mayne Pharma, MedImmune, Merck, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Phosphagenics, Photon MD, Regeneron, Roche, Samumed, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma ANZ, Trius, UCB and Zai Lab. T.P. has served on an advisory board for and received consulting fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and UCB. E.V., A.N., R.M.K. and S.B. are employees of and shareholders in Bristol Myers Squibb. A.B. is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb through functional service provider Cytel. D.T. has received research support from and has been a principal investigator (clinical trials) for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi and UCB; has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Galapagos, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; has been a lecturer for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Leo Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Posay, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi, Target-Solution and UCB; and has served on a scientific advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Morphosis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. A.B. has served as a speaker (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi; served as a scientific adviser (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Abcentra, Aclaris, Affibody, Aligos, Almirall, Alumis, Amgen, Anaptysbio, Apogee, Arcutis, Arena, Aslan, Athenex, Bluefin Biomedicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, CTI BioPharma, Dermavant, EcoR1, Eli Lilly and Company, Escient, Evelo, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, HighlightII Pharma, Incyte, InnoventBio, Janssen, Landos, LEO, Lipidio, Merck, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Nektar, Novartis, Overtone Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rani, Rapt, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Spherix Global Insights, Sun Pharma, Takeda, TLL Pharmaceutical, TrialSpark, UCB Pharma, Union, Ventyx, Vibliome and Xencor; and has acted as a clinical study investigator (institution has received clinical study funds) for AbbVie, Acelyrin, Allakos, Almirall, Alumis, Amgen, Arcutis, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Concert, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Evelo, Evommune, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma and Ventyx., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Little is known about phototype and the response to systemic treatment in psoriasis., Objectives: To assess the characteristics of psoriasis, the therapeutic choice and its efficacy according to phototype., Methods: We included patients from the PsoBioTeq cohort initiating a first biologic. Patients were classified according to their phototype. The evaluation included disease characteristics, choice of the initial biologic and therapeutic response at 12 months based on 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1., Results: Of the 1400 patients included, 423 (30.2%), 904 (64.6%) and 73 (5.2%) were in the phototype I-II, III-IV and V-VI groups, respectively. The V-VI group had a higher initial DLQI, and more frequently initiated ustekinumab. Patients in the V-VI group maintained the initial biologic prescribed as did the other phototype groups, even though the proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 and DLQI 0/1 at 12 months was lower in this group than the other groups., Conclusions: Patient phototype seems associated with quality of life and choice of the initial biologic in psoriasis. The phototype V-VI group less frequently switched treatments than did the other groups when the response was not efficient., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest F.T. is Head of the Clinical Research Unit at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital and the Centre de Pharmacoepidemiologie (Cephepi) (Pharmacoepidemiology Centre) of the Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (Paris Hospitals); she has received research funding, grants and fees for consultancy activities from a large number of pharmaceutical companies that have contributed to employee salaries (but no personal remuneration for F.T.). M.V. has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Arrow, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, medac, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. M.B.-B. offers a consultancy service and is an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. N.B. has been an investigator for Novartis and Pfizer; she is a consultant for Janssen and has received speaker remuneration from Janssen. P.J. is a consultant for GSK, Lilly, Principia Biopharma, Roche and Sanofi Aventis. D.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Lilly, medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. E.M. is a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer; she has also been an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer; and has received speaker remuneration from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. C.P. has been an investigator and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer. M.-A.R. is a consultant for AbbVie, BMS, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre. H.B. has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Baxalta, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals and UCB; he has also received grant funding from Pfizer. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The journey of patients with skin diseases through healthcare has been scarcely investigated., Objective: To analyse the journey of people with skin diseases in the different healthcare environment in Europe., Methods: This multinational, cross-sectional, European study was conducted on a representative sample of the adult general population of 27 European countries. The prevalence of the most frequent skin diseases was determined. Information was collected on the patient journey from the first medical consultation to the diagnosis, and the reasons for not consulting a healthcare professional., Results: On a total of 44,689 individuals, 30.3% reported to have consulted a dermatologist during the previous 2 years. Participants consulted mainly for mole control or skin cancer screening (22.3%), followed by chronic skin diseases (16.2%). The diagnoses of acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and rosacea were made most frequently by a dermatologist, while fungal skin infections were diagnosed more often by a general practitioner (GP), and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) by other specialists. The diagnosis was not always definitive at the first consultation, in particular for STD. The percentage of people who did not consult a healthcare professional for their skin disease was particularly high for acne (36.4%), alopecia (44.7%) and fungal infection (30.0%). Moreover, 17.7% of respondents with psoriasis did not consult. A high percentage of participants with alopecia thought that the disease was not worrying, while patients with psoriasis often answered that they were able to manage the disease since they had already consulted a doctor. Many patients with acne (41.1%) and fungal infection (48.2%) thought that they were able to handle the disease by themselves., Conclusion: The analysis of the self-reported medical journey of patients with common skin diseases may allow to understand the unmet needs of patients, thus improving outcomes and reducing expenses., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Several large studies on the burden of skin diseases have been performed in patients recruited in hospitals or clinical centres, thus missing people with skin diseases who do not undergo a clinical consultation., Objectives: To evaluate the burden of the most common dermatological diseases in adult patients across Europe, in terms of quality of life, work life, and stigmatization., Methods: Population-based survey on a representative sample of the European general population aged 18 years or older. Participants who declared to have had one or more skin problem or disease during the previous 12 months completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire, and answered questions regarding the impact of their skin disease on daily and work life, anxiety/depression, and stigmatization., Results: The study population included 19,915 individuals, 44.7% of whom were men. Quality of life was particularly impaired in people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and sexually transmitted diseases. About a half of participants with acne, alopecia, or chronic urticaria, and about 40% of those with atopic dermatitis (AD), skin cancers, or psoriasis reported a modest to extremely large effect of the disease on their quality of life. Overall, 88.1% of participants considered their skin disease as embarrassing in personal life and 83% in work life. About half of the respondents reported sleeping difficulty, feeling tired, and impact of the disease on taking care of themselves. Concerning stigmatization, 14.5% felt to have been rejected by others because of the skin disease, and 19.2% to have been looked at with disgust. Anxiety and depression were frequently reported by patients with all the diseases., Conclusions: Skin diseases may heavily affect patients' daily and work life, and cause feelings of stigmatization. An early intervention is needed to avoid consequences on the patients' life course., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that inhibits interleukin-17A/F. Bimekizumab is more efficacious than secukinumab over 1 year in the treatment of psoriasis., Objective: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of bimekizumab through 2 years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: The BE RADIANT phase 3b randomized controlled trial consisted of a 48-week double-blinded period, where patients received bimekizumab (320 mg every 4 or 8 weeks) or secukinumab (300 mg weekly to Week 4, then every 4 weeks), and an open-label extension (OLE). From Week 48, all patients received bimekizumab in the OLE., Results: At Week 48, more patients achieved complete skin clearance (PASI 100; modified non-responder imputation) with bimekizumab than secukinumab (74.8% vs 52.8%). PASI 100 responses were maintained to Week 96 in continuous bimekizumab patients (70.8%); patients who switched from secukinumab to bimekizumab had increased rates at Week 96 (76.6%). The most common adverse events were: nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and urinary tract infection. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of bimekizumab., Limitations: Limited racial diversity; overlap with the COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusions: High PASI 100 responses achieved with bimekizumab over 48 weeks were sustained through Week 96; secukinumab patients who switched to bimekizumab achieved similar responses by Week 96., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Strober is a consultant (honoraria) for AbbVie, Alumis, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, EPI Health, Evelo Biosciences, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, LEO Pharma Maruho, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera Health, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Union Therapeutics, Ventyxbio, vTv Therapeutics; has stock options from Connect Biopharma and Mindera Health; is a speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme; is a scientific codirector (consulting fee) for CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry; is an investigator for AbbVie, Cara, CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry, Dermavant, Dermira, and Novartis; and serves as editor-in-chief (honorarium) of Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Dr Paul receives consulting fees and/or grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Aslan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, and UCB Pharma. Dr Blauvelt has served as a speaker (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Arcutis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma; served as a scientific adviser (received honoraria) for AbbVie, Abcentra, Affibody, Aligos, Almirall, Alumis, Amgen, Anaptysbio, Arcutis, Arena, Aslan, Athenex, Bluefin Biomedicine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant, EcoR1, Eli Lilly, Escient, Evelo, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, HighlightII Pharma, Incyte, InnoventBio, Janssen, Landos, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Spherix Global Insights, Sun Pharma, TLL Pharmaceutical, TrialSpark, UCB Pharma, Vibliome, and Xencor; and has served as a clinical study investigator (institution has received clinical study funds) for AbbVie, Acelyrin, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Concert, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Evelo, Evommune, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma. Dr Thaçi receives honoraria for participation on advisory boards; as a speaker and for consultancy from AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Morphosis, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB Pharma; and has research grants received from LEO Pharma and Novartis. Dr Puig received consultancy/speaker’s honoraria from and/or participated in trials sponsored by AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Baxalta, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gebro, Janssen, JS BIOCAD, LEO Pharma, Merck-Serono, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Samsung-Bioepis, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB Pharma. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai; receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, LLC, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB Pharma; and is a consultant for Aditum Bio, Almirall, AltruBio Inc, AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Aristea Therapeutics, Arrive Technologies, Avotres Therapeutics, BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corrona, Dermavant, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Evelo Biosciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Helsinn Therapeutics, Hexima Ltd, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Pfizer, Seanergy, and Verrica. Ms White, Ms Vanvoorden, and Ms Deherder are employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. Dr Gomez is a former employee and shareholder of UCB Pharma. Dr Eyerich is a speaker and/or advisor for AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi and UCB Pharma., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

What Is This Summary About?: This is a summary of a paper published in a medical journal that describes the results of a study called POETYK PSO-2, which investigated a new treatment for plaque psoriasis. Plaque psoriasis appears on the body as dry, discolored, patches of skin that can be flaky and covered in scales. This can make the skin itch, crack or bleed and make it difficult for people with psoriasis to perform basic everyday tasks. Treatments are available, but some do not always reduce symptoms or may need to be injected or taken multiple times a day, which can be difficult to do, or can have undesirable side effects. Researchers are looking for new treatments for psoriasis., What Happened in the Study?: Deucravacitinib is a once-daily pill taken by mouth (orally) that was studied as a treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in two large studies conducted globally, PSO-1 and PSO-2. POETYK PSO-2 was a Phase 3 research study, which is a study that tests a treatment in a large group of participants, that looked at how well deucravacitinib worked in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to a placebo (an inactive pill that has no effect) and an approved psoriasis treatment called apremilast, which is a pill taken twice a day. These medications were tested in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, which is psoriasis involving 10% or more of their body (equal to 10 or more handprints). The aims of the POETYK PSO-2 study were to find out if treatment with deucravacitinib could improve psoriasis for the participants in the study and to see if there were any side effects. Side effects are events that happened during treatment that may or may not be caused by that treatment. The study also wanted to find out what would happen after stopping treatment with deucravacitinib in participants who had shown major improvements in their psoriasis., What Do the Results of the Poetyk Pso-2 Study Show?: After 4 months of treatment, more participants taking deucravacitinib had significantly greater improvements in psoriasis than those taking placebo or apremilast. The study also showed that participants continued to see these improvements after taking deucravacitinib for up to 1 year. Some participants maintained the improvements in their psoriasis with deucravacitinib after stopping treatment and switching to a placebo. Side effects for participants taking deucravacitinib were generally mild and occurred in similar numbers to those in participants taking placebo. The most common side effects in participants taking deucravacitinib were inflammation of the nose and throat (a common cold) which occurred at a similar rate in participants who took placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03611751 (POETYK PSO-2 study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Background: Given the chronic nature of psoriasis and the loss of response that can be observed with therapies over time, it is important to understand the long-term efficacy of new treatments., Objectives: To evaluate maintenance of Week 16 responses with bimekizumab (BKZ) treatment through Year 3, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: Data were pooled from BKZ-treated patients in the 52-week (BE VIVID) and 56-week (BE READY and BE SURE) phase III studies, and their ongoing open-label extension (OLE), BE BRIGHT. Efficacy outcomes are reported through 3 years of BKZ treatment in patients with an efficacy response at Week 16. Missing data were imputed primarily using modified nonresponder imputation (mNRI), with nonresponder imputation and observed case data also reported., Results: A total of 989 patients were randomized to BKZ at baseline in BE VIVID, BE READY and BE SURE. At Week 16, 693 patients achieved ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90), 503 achieved 100% reduction from baseline in PASI (PASI 100), 694 achieved absolute PASI ≤ 2 and 597 achieved body surface area (BSA) ≤ 1%, and continued into the OLE. Of these, 93.0% maintained PASI 90, 80.8% maintained PASI 100, 94.0% maintained PASI ≤ 2 and 90.3% maintained BSA ≤ 1% responses through to 3 years of BKZ treatment (mNRI). Among Week 16 PASI 90 responders, 96.8% and 72.5% also achieved Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 and PASI 100 at Week 16, respectively, and 92.2% and 73.4% achieved these responses at Year 3 (mNRI). Among Week 16 PASI 100 responders, 76.3% also achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 at Week 16, and DLQI 0/1 response increased with continuous BKZ treatment to 89.0% at Year 3 (mNRI)., Conclusions: High levels of clinical response were maintained through to 3 years of BKZ treatment in the vast majority of Week 16 responders. Long-term treatment with BKZ was efficacious, with important benefits for health-related quality of life, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest B.S.: Consultant (honoraria) from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, EPI Health, Evelo Biosciences, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera Health, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Union Therapeutics, Ventyxbio and vTv Therapeutics; Stock options in Connect Biopharma and Mindera Health; Speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Regeneron and Sanofi; Scientific Co-Director (consulting fee) from CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry; Investigator for AbbVie, Cara Therapeutics, CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry, Dermavant, Dermira and Novartis; Editor-in-Chief (honorarium) of Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Y.T.: Honoraria and/or grants from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sun Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Torii Pharmaceutical and UCB Pharma. U.M.: Served as advisor and/or clinical study investigator for, and/or received honoraria and/or grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Aristea, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Foamix, Formycon, Forward Pharma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medac, Novartis, Phi-Stone, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. M.L.: Employee of Mount Sinai and receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, LLC, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron and UCB Pharma; Consultant for Aditum Bio, Almirall, AltruBio, AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Aristea, Arrive Technologies, Avotres Therapeutics, BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), Dermavant, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Evelo Biosciences, Evommune, Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Helsinn Therapeutics, Hexima, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera Health, Pfizer, Seanergy and Verrica. P.F.: Grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Sun Pharma; Investigator for AbbVie, Akaal, Amgen, Arcutis, Argenx, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Botanix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celtaxsys, CSL, Cutanea, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Genentech, Geneseq, GenesisCare, GSK, Hexima, Janssen, Kymab, LEO Pharma, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Reistone, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Teva, UCB Pharma and Valeant; served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mayne Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma and Valeant; served as a consultant for Aslan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GenesisCare, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mayne Pharma, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma and Wintermute; received travel grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sun Pharma and Sanofi; served as a speaker for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma and Valeant. R.G.L.: Principal Investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; served on scientific advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; provided lectures for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer. R.B.W.: Consulting fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Astellas, Avillion, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB Pharma; research grants to his institution from AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis and UCB Pharma; honoraria from Astellas, DiCE, GSK and Union. M.W., V.V., B. Szilagyi.: Employees and shareholders of UCB Pharma. V.C.: Employee of UCB Pharma. C.P.: Consulting fees and/or grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen Cilag, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and UCB Pharma., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

What is this summary about? This summary presents findings from recent research involving people with psoriasis, based on an article originally published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology . Psoriasis is a condition that primarily affects the skin. However, it can also influence people's mental health, social activities, work, and relationships too. Current assessment tools used by doctors and nurses do not cover the complete experience of people with psoriasis, which often include other medical conditions and can leave these individuals feeling that treatment has not been successful. Researchers conducted a study in which people with psoriasis, doctors, and nurses were asked in virtual meetings and via questionnaires what freedom from disease in psoriasis means to them. What were the results? In addition to skin symptoms, the areas of mental health, well-being, treatment, and relationships with healthcare teams were found to be important aspects to be addressed. What do the results of the study mean? Focusing on all five aspects of freedom from disease will help people with psoriasis manage their psoriasis with confidence.

Background: In the long-term extension study of the ERASURE and FIXTURE trials, the efficacy of secukinumab (a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody) was demonstrated to have been maintained through to year 3 of treatment in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab through to year 5 of treatment in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: Responders with ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) from two core trials - ERASURE and FIXTURE - were randomized 2 : 1 at year 1 (end of core trials) to either the same dose (300 or 150 mg, continuous treatment) or placebo (treatment withdrawal) every 4 weeks, until year 3 or relapse (> 50% reduction in maximal PASI from core study baseline). Partial responders (achieving PASI 50 but not PASI 75) at year 1 continued at the same dose as in the core trials. At year 3, all patients received open-label secukinumab treatment, with those on secukinumab 300 mg continuing on their dose, while those on secukinumab 150 mg or placebo received secukinumab 150 or 300 mg based on the physician's discretion. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT01544595., Results: Most patients randomized to placebo at year 1 relapsed, but the response was rapidly recaptured upon reinitiation of treatment. PASI responses were sustained with secukinumab through to year 5. The PASI responses for the 300 mg responders + partial responders group at year 1 (PASI 75/90/100: 86.8%/72.8%/45.9%) trended downwards until year 3 (PASI 75/90/100: 82.3%/58.4%/32.7%) and then remained stable through year 4 (PASI 75/90/100: 83.3%/60.1%/32.2%) until year 5 (PASI 75/90/100: 81.1%/62.8%/35.1%). Dermatology Life Quality Index showed sustained benefit up to year 5. Absolute PASI responses were maintained throughout the study. The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections and infestations, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). The overall exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR; with 95% confidence interval) for all AEs was 139.9 (130.3-149.9). EAIRs for Crohn's disease and neutropenia were 0.1 (0.0-0.3) and 0.5 (0.3-0.8), respectively., Conclusions: The 4-year extension of two pivotal phase III trials demonstrated that secukinumab treatment was effective through to year 5 and improved quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The most common AEs were infections and infestations, nasopharyngitis, and URTIs. The safety profile was consistent with that in the secukinumab phase II/III clinical development programme., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: R.G.L. has served and received compensation in the form of grants and/or honoraria as principal investigator for, is on the scientific advisory board of, or has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. H.S. is a clinical investigator for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Lilly, Amgen and Merck; and is a consultant and member of the speakers’ bureau for Novartis, Janssen and Lilly. I.D.-C. has received compensation as a speaker, consultant and investigator for Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen. K.R. has served as an advisor and/or paid speaker for and/or has participated in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Affibody, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma and Xenoport. B.S. has consulted for Novartis and several other pharmaceutical companies; he has served on an advisory board for Novartis and several other pharmaceutical companies. R.B.W. has received research grants from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB and Xenoport. He is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinician Scientist award. He is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health. C. Paul has been an investigator and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer. J.C.S. has served on an advisory board for LEO Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Trevi and Viofor; has been a speaker for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and Sunfarm; and has served as an investigator for AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Galderma, Helm, Incyte, InflaRx, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Trevi and UCB. T.-F.T. has served as an investigator and/or speaker and/or advisor for AbbVie, Allergan, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis and Tanabe. I.H., R.Y., P.C. and C. Papavassilis are employees of Novartis., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: M.B.-B. is a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis, Medac and UCB. N.B. is a consultant for Novartis, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer and AbbVie. P.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly and Novartis. D.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Lilly, Pfizer, MEDAC, Novartis and UCB. E.M. is a consultant for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Celgene, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag and Novartis. C.P. is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boerhinger, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and UCB. M.-A.R. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer and Medac. H.B. is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biocad, Boerhinger, Celgene, Dermavant, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharmaceuticals and UCB. H.A. is a consultant for AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Almirall, Leo and Lilly.

Background: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, inhibits cytokine signaling in psoriasis pathogenesis., Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate deucravacitinib superiority versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis based on ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline at week 16., Methods: POETYK psoriasis second trial (NCT03611751), a 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 trial, randomized patients 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 511), placebo (n = 255), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 254)., Results: At week 16, significantly more deucravacitinib-treated patients versus placebo and apremilast patients achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (53.0% vs 9.4% and 39.8%; P < .0001 vs placebo; P = .0004 vs apremilast) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (49.5% vs 8.6% and 33.9%; P < .0001 for both). Efficacy was maintained until week 52 with continuous deucravacitinib. The most frequent adverse event with deucravacitinib was nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were infrequent. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in laboratory parameters., Limitations: The study duration was 1 year., Conclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority versus placebo and apremilast and was well tolerated in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Strober has served as a consultant (honoraria) for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Equillium, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Maruho, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, UCB, Ventyxbio, and vTv Therapeutics; has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Sanofi Genzyme; has served as a coscientific director (consulting fee) for CorEvitas' (Corrona) Psoriasis Registry; and has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Cara, CorEvitas' (Corrona) Psoriasis Registry, Dermavant, Dermira, and Novartis. Dr Thaçi has received grant/research support from and served on a scientific advisory board and a speakers bureau for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Galderma, Janssen-Cilag, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi, Target-Solution, and UCB. Dr Sofen has served as a clinical investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, and Sun Pharma. Dr Kircik has received research grants from AbbVie, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cellceutix, Centocor, Combinatrix, Connetics, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharma, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Idera, Johnson & Johnson, Leo Pharma, Maruho, Merck, Medicis, Novartis AG, Pfizer, PharmaDerm, Promius, Stiefel, Sun Pharma, UCB, Valeant, and XenoPort; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cipher, Connetics, Dermavant, Dermira, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis AG, PharmaDerm, Promius, Serono (Merck Serono International SA), Stiefel, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, and Valeant. Dr Gordon has received grant support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB, and has received consulting fees from Amgen, Almirall, Dermira, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, and Sun Pharma. Dr Foley has received grant support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Argenx, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Botanix, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celtaxsys, CSL, Cutanea, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Evelo, Galderma, Genentech, Geneseq, GlaxoSmithKline, Hexima, Janssen, Kymab, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Reistone, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Teva, UCB, and Valeant; has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Aslan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Mayne Pharma, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB, and Valeant; has served as a consultant for Aslan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GenesisCare, Hexima, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Mayne Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB; has received travel grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; and has served as a speaker for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and Valeant. Dr Rich has received research grants as a principal investigator on pharmaceutical trials from AbbVie, Arcutis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Dr Paul has received grants from and has been a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB. Dr Bagel has received research funds payable to the Psoriasis Treatment Center of New Jersey from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas' (Corrona) Psoriasis Registry, Dermavant, Dermira/UCB, Eli Lilly, Glenmark, Janssen Biotech, Kadmon, Leo Pharma, Lycera, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Taro, and Valeant; has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biotech, Novartis, Sun Pharma, and Valeant; and has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biotech, and Novartis. Dr Colston, Dr Sekaran, Ms Linaberry, and Dr Banerjee are employees of and shareholders in Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Throup and Dr Kundu were employees of and shareholders in Bristol Myers Squibb at the time of study conduct. Dr Papp has served on a speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Valeant; has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Akros, Allergan, Amgen, Anacor, Arcutis, AstraZeneca, Baxalta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Coherus, Dermira, Dow Pharma, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, MedImmune, Meiji Seika Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant; has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, Arcutis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CanFite, Celgene, Coherus, Dermira, Dow Pharma, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mitsubishi Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant; and has served as scientific officer or on a steering committee/advisory board for AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, Anacor, Astellas, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dow Pharma, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, and Valeant., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical trials study treatment outcomes under stringent conditions, capturing incompletely the heterogeneity of patient populations and treatment complexities encountered in real-world practice., Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Methods: The Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year observational cohort study in adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. Primary study endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and/or static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 at Week 12 (W12) in the anti-IL-17A cohort (ixekizumab [IXE], secukinumab) vs. all other approved biologics. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients who achieve PASI 75/90/100, absolute PASI scores ≤5, ≤2 and ≤1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0/1 at W12 between the two cohorts and among the individual biologics. Comparative effectiveness analyses were conducted using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA), a novel causal inference machine learning approach. Missing data for binary outcomes were imputed as non-response., Results: Patient profiles in the anti-IL-17A cohort and other biologics cohort were similar, with more frequent comorbid psoriatic arthritis and less frequent exposure to conventional treatments in the patients receiving anti-IL-17A biologics. At W12, 71.4% of patients who received an anti-IL-17A biologic achieved PASI 90 and/or sPGA 0/1 compared to 58.6% of patients who received other biologics (odds ratios [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [1.6, 2.4]). Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes., Conclusions: These results reflect the high efficacy and early onset of skin clearance of IL-17A inhibitors observed in randomized clinical trials and confirm the effectiveness of anti-IL-17A biologics in the real-world setting., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Paediatric psoriasis has been associated with school absenteeism, limitation of physical activities, psychiatric disorders and, in the longer term, with sexual dysfunction and addictions. This raises the hypothesis that childhood onset psoriasis may affect patients' educational development, and further social and professional outcomes. This study evaluated the relationship between childhood onset psoriasis and patients' educational and socioeconomic characteristics, and the development of addictions in adulthood. This cross-sectional ancillary study captured patients' characteristics at baseline in the French PSOBIOTEQ registry. Data in adulthood included: educational (baccalaureate) and socioeconomic (working activity) groups, smoking status (self-reporting of being a current smoker vs past smoker or non-smoker), alcohol consumption (defined as at least 1 glass of alcoholic beverage per day), and living conditions (alone/family/social institutions; child at home). A total of 1,960 patients were included, of whom 26.2% had childhood onset psoriasis. In multivariate analyses, childhood onset psoriasis was associated with smoker status (p = 0.02). No association was observed with educational level, working activity, living conditions, or alcohol consumption. This study provides reassuring data overall with regard to the impact of childhood onset psoriasis on major social outcomes. Evidence for some association with addictive behaviours paves the way for larger prospective studies assessing in depth the social and educational impact of this disease.

Purpose: Guselkumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor, effectively treats moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Materials and Methods: ECLIPSE, was a Phase 3, multicenter, 56-week, double-blinded, active-comparator study of guselkumab vs. secukinumab (IL-17A inhibitor) in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients were treated with guselkumab 100 mg ( n  = 534) or secukinumab 300 mg ( n  = 514) through week 44. Efficacy (at least a 90% and 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI 90 and PASI 100], Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1, and IGA 0) was analyzed across subpopulations defined by baseline: age (<45, 45 to <65, and ≥65 years old), body weight, body mass index (BMI), psoriasis disease severity (body surface area, disease duration, PASI, and IGA), psoriasis by body regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities), and prior psoriasis medication history at week 48., Results: Overall, 1048 patients were randomized. At week 48, numerically greater proportions of patients achieved PASI 90, PASI 100, IGA 0/1, and IGA 0 with guselkumab vs. secukinumab regardless of baseline age, body weight, BMI, disease severity, body region, and prior medication. The largest differences were in patients ≥65 years old and patients weighing >100 kg., Conclusions: Guselkumab treatment provided greater efficacy vs. secukinumab at week 48 in most subpopulations of patients with psoriasis.

Background: Type-17 inflammation characterizes psoriasis, a chronic skin disease. Because several inflammatory cytokines contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis, inhibiting the simultaneous production of these cytokines in T H 17 cells may be beneficial in psoriasis. We found that Ca v 1.4, encoded by CACNA1F, was the only Ca v 1 calcium channel expressed in T H 17 cells., Objective: We sought to investigate the role of Ca v 1.4 expression in early T H 17-activation events and effector functions, as well as its association with T H 17 signature genes in lesional psoriatic (LP) skins., Methods: Transcriptional gene signatures associated with CACNA1F expression were examined in LP skins by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. Ca v 1 inhibitor and/or shRNA lentivectors were used to assess the contribution of Ca v 1.4 in T H 17 activation and effector functions in a 3-dimensional skin reconstruction model., Results: CACNA1F expression correlated with inflammatory cytokine expression that characterizes LP skins and was preferentially associated with RORC expression in CD4 + and CD4 - cells from LP biopsies. Nicardipine, a Ca v 1 channel antagonist, markedly reduced inflammatory cytokine production by T H 17 cells from blood or LP skin. This was associated with decreased TCR-induced early calcium events at cell membrane and proximal signaling events. The knockdown of Ca v 1.4 in T H 17 cells impaired cytokine production. Finally, Ca v 1 inhibition reduced the expression of the keratinocyte genes characteristic of T H 17-mediated psoriasis inflammation in human skin equivalents., Conclusions: Ca v 1.4 channels promote T H 17-cell functions both at the periphery and in inflammatory psoriatic skin., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Brodalumab is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Here, we assess the safety profile of brodalumab using pooled safety data from 5 phase II/III trials of brodalumab 140 mg or 210 mg. In total, 4,464 patients received brodalumab, representing 8,891.6 patient-years of exposure. During the placebo-controlled 12-week induction period, rates of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years were 10.8 and 9.6 (brodalumab 140 mg and 210 mg, respectively) vs 4.3 and 6.5 (ustekinumab and placebo, respectively); infections were the most frequent serious adverse event. Rates of serious adverse events during the comparator-controlled 52-week period were 14.4, 10.2 and 8.3 per 100 patient-years for brodalumab 210 mg, brodalumab 140 mg, and ustekinumab, respectively. Brodalumab was not associated with increased risks of malignancy, major adverse cardiac events, suicidal ideation and behaviour, or fatal events. Overall, brodalumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in short- and long-term treatment.

In clinical practice, interruption of treatment may not result in immediate cessation of disease control, and some patients even experience sustained treatment response following treatment interruption. This post hoc analysis of UNCOVER-1 and -2 Phase 3 clinical trials characterized the time to loss of treatment response in patients with psoriasis who responded to ixekizumab through a 12-week treatment period, and who were then re-randomized to placebo for the following 48 weeks. For those with static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA]0/1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]90 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI90 was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.7-16.4). For those with PASI100 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI100 was 12.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 9.0-13.0). A small subset of patients maintained high levels of disease control through Week 60. This study adds to the growing body of evidence on sustained treatment response following treatment interruption.

Drug survival reflects treatment effectiveness and safety in real life. There is limited data on the variation of drug survival with the availability of systemic treatments with additional biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). The aim of this study was to determine whether the increasing number of available systemic treatments for psoriasis affects drug survival over time. Patients were selected from the PsoBioTeq cohort, a French prospective observational cohort enrolling patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. All patients initiating a first bDMARD or sDMARD were included. The primary outcome was comparison of drug survival over time. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio model was computed. A total of 1,866 patients were included; 739 females (39%), median age 47 years. In the multivariate Cox model, no association was found between the calendar year of initiation and drug survival (hazard ratio) overlapping from 0.80 (0.42-1.52) to 1.17 (0.64-2.17), p = 0.633). In conclusion, drug survival in psoriasis is not affected by the year of initiation.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that has a profound effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient education programmes may help patients to gain life-long control over their chronic disease., Objective: This multicentre randomised controlled study evaluated whether a standardised multidisciplinary education programme was beneficial to psoriasis patients., Methods: Adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned (1:1) to an intervention group to receive an educational programme or to a control group to receive usual care. Randomization was stratified by previous treatment history. The primary outcome was HRQoL, assessed by scoring the Skindex-29 domains emotion, symptom, and functioning. Psoriasis severity was assessed using the psoriasis area severity index (PASI). Levels of perceived stress, patient knowledge about psoriasis, and patient satisfaction were also assessed. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months., Results: A total 142 patients formed the intention-to-treat population: 70 in the control group and 72 in the intervention group. Skindex component scores and the PASI were significantly lower at 3, 6, and 12 months as compared to baseline in both groups, but no significant differences were found between the groups. Knowledge about psoriasis improved significantly during follow-up amongst patients from the intervention group compared to controls (68% of correct answers vs. 56%; p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction with psoriasis management and treatment was also better in the intervention group., Conclusions: The standardised education programme did not improve HRQoL and disease severity in psoriasis, but led to a significant improvement in patient knowledge about the disease and increased patient satisfaction., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To report the efficacy and safety of the approved ixekizumab (IXE) dose over 5 years from UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177)., Methods: Patients (N = 1346) were randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly, or IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks after an initial dose of IXE 160 mg, respectively. At week 12, patients entered the long-term extension period with dosing of IXE every 4 weeks and could escalate to every 2 weeks after week 60. Efficacy was reported for the IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks group of the intent-to-treat population. Safety was reported for patients who received at least 1 dose of IXE every 2 or every 4 weeks., Results: Using modified nonresponder imputation, 78.8%/67.1%/46.2% of patients receiving the approved dose of IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks (n = 385) achieved ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, respectively, at week 264; static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and 0 responses were 69.2% and 45.3%, respectively. Infections were the most observed treatment-emergent adverse event (72.7% of patients)., Limitations: Lack of comparison treatment group after week 12., Conclusion: IXE demonstrates sustained efficacy and consistent safety through 264 weeks in patients using the approved dose., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Blauvelt has served as a scientific advisor and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Aclaris, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, Forte, Galderma, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma and as a paid speaker for AbbVie. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai; receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Clinuvel, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Kadmon Corp, LLC, Leo Pharmaceuticals, MedImmune, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, Sciderm, UCB, and Vida; and is a consultant for Allergan, Almirall, Arcutis, Inc, Avotres Therapeutics, BirchBioMed Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corrona, Dermavant Sciences, Evelo, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Inozyme Pharma, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Menlo, Mitsubishi, Neuroderm, Pfizer, Promius/Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Theravance, and Verrica. Dr Mabuchi has served as a paid speaker for Eli Lilly, Maruho, Kyowa Kirin, Celgene, and Janssen and has received research funds from Kyowa Kirin, Torii, Maruho, Taiho, and Leo Pharma. Author Leung is an employee of Syneos Health, on behalf of Eli Lilly. Dr Garrelts, Author Crane, Drs ElMaraghy and Patel, Author Ridenour, and Drs See and Gallo are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and own stock. Dr Paul is a consultant and investigator for Amgen, AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermira, Janssen-Cilag, Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB Pharma., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits both interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with secukinumab, which selectively inhibits interleukin-17A alone, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been extensively examined., Methods: In this phase 3b trial, we randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive bimekizumab subcutaneously at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks or secukinumab subcutaneously at a dose of 300 mg weekly to week 4, followed by every 4 weeks to week 48. At week 16, patients receiving bimekizumab underwent rerandomization, in a 1:2 ratio, to receive maintenance dosing every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks to week 48. The primary end point was 100% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 16. The primary analysis was first tested for the noninferiority of bimekizumab to secukinumab at a margin of -10 percentage points and then tested for superiority., Results: A total of 1005 patients were screened and 743 were enrolled; 373 patients were assigned to receive bimekizumab and 370 to receive secukinumab. At week 16, a total of 230 patients (61.7%) in the bimekizumab group and 181 (48.9%) in the secukinumab group had a 100% reduction from baseline in the PASI score (PASI 100) (adjusted risk difference, 12.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8 to 19.6); bimekizumab was shown to be noninferior and superior to secukinumab (P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). At week 48, a total of 250 patients (67.0%) treated with bimekizumab had a PASI 100 response, as compared with 171 patients (46.2%) treated with secukinumab (adjusted risk difference, 20.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.1 to 27.7; P<0.001). At the week 4 time point, 265 patients (71.0%) in the bimekizumab group had 75% or greater reduction from baseline in the PASI score, as compared with 175 patients (47.3%) in the secukinumab group (adjusted risk difference, 23.7; 95% CI, 17.0 to 30.4; P<0.001). Oral candidiasis occurred more often with bimekizumab (72 patients, 19.3%) than with secukinumab (11 patients, 3.0%)., Conclusions: In patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, treatment with bimekizumab resulted in greater skin clearance than treatment with secukinumab over 16 and 48 weeks but was associated with oral candidiasis (predominantly mild or moderate as recorded by the investigator). Longer and larger trials are required to determine the comparative effect and risks of interleukin-17 inhibitors in psoriasis. (Funded by UCB Pharma; BE RADIANT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03536884.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of psoriasis., Objective: In this study, we examined whether body mass index (BMI) is taken into account when choosing first-line biologic therapy for psoriasis., Methods: In this cohort study, we compared obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients for the first-line biologic therapy prescribed, its survival, reasons for discontinuation, therapy optimization, co-prescription of methotrexate and factors associated with long drug survival., Results: A total of 931 patients were included: 594 (64%) were male, median age was 46 years (interquartile range 36-56). The most-prescribed biologic agents as first-line treatment were adalimumab (ADA; 42.7%), ustekinumab (UST; 29.9%) and etanercept (ETA; 22.9%); only frequency of infliximab (IFX) prescription differed between groups. Drug survival was significantly shorter for obese than non-obese patients (p < 2.10-4) and was worse for obese than non-obese patients for UST (p = 0.009) and ETA (p = 0.02), with no difference for ADA (p = 0.11). The main reason for discontinuation was primary inefficacy (62%), which was more frequent in obese than non-obese patients. The cumulative incidence of optimization did not significantly differ between the groups, except for ADA (SHR 1.91, 95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, risk of discontinuation was associated with only ETA as first-line biologic therapy (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19)., Conclusion: This study highlighted the lack of difference in prescription of first-line biologic treatment, except for IFX, between obese and non-obese patients presenting moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Drug survival in obese patients is shorter, mainly because of inefficacy, than in non-obese patients. This highlights the need for targeted pharmacological studies in obese individuals to find optimal administration schemes., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: To assess improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Methods: Adults with plaque psoriasis were enrolled in phase III, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, or UNCOVER-3). All 3 protocols included a 12-week, placebo-controlled induction period; UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 also had an active-control group (50 mg etanercept) during induction. After induction, patients in UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 entered a 48-week withdrawal (maintenance) period (Weeks 12-60), during which Week-12 sPGA (0,1) responders were rerandomized to receive placebo, or 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 12 weeks. As a secondary objective, HRQoL was measured by the generic Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and Weeks 12 and 60. Changes in mean SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) and domain scores and proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal important differences in SF-36 scores were compared between groups., Results: At Week 12, ixekizumab-treated patients (both dose groups in UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3) reported statistically significantly greater improvements in mean SF-36 PCS and MCS and all 8 SF-36 domain scores versus placebo. Further, more ixekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients reported at least minimal treatment responses in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores and domain scores. Overall improvements in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were maintained through Week 60., Conclusions: Ixekizumab-treated patients reported statistically significant improvements in HRQoL at 12 weeks that persisted through 1 year.

Background: Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide, and is a disease that can be ameliorated by anti-cytokine treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of risankizumab with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: IMMvent was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled trial completed at 66 clinics in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 using interactive response technology to receive 150 mg risankizumab subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 or 80 mg adalimumab subcutaneously at randomisation, then 40 mg at weeks 1, 3, 5, and every other week thereafter during a 16-week double-blind treatment period (part A). For weeks 16-44 (part B), adalimumab intermediate responders were re-randomised 1:1 to continue 40 mg adalimumab or switch to 150 mg risankizumab. In part A, participants and investigators were masked to study treatment. Randomisation was stratified by weight and previous tumour necrosis factor inhibitor exposure. Co-primary endpoints in part A were a 90% improvement from baseline (PASI 90) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16, and for part B was PASI 90 at week 44 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02694523., Findings: Between March 31, 2016, and Aug 24, 2017, 605 patients were randomly assigned to receive either risankizumab (n=301, 50%) or adalimumab (n=304, 50%). 294 (98%) of patients in the risankizumab group and 291 (96%) in the adalimumab group completed part A, and 51 (96%) of 53 patients re-randomised to risankizumab and 51 (91%) of 56 patients re-randomised to continue adalimumab completed part B. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved in 218 (72%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 144 (47%) of 304 patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 24·9% [95% CI 17·5-32·4]; p<0·0001), and sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were achieved in 252 (84%) patients given risankizumab and 252 (60%) patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 23·3% [16·6-30·1]; p<0·0001). In part B, among adalimumab intermediate responders, PASI 90 was achieved by 35 (66%) of 53 patients switched to risankizumab and 12 (21%) of 56 patients continuing adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 45·0% [28·9-61·1]; p<0·0001) at week 44. Adverse events were reported in 168 (56%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 179 (57%) of 304 patients given adalimumab in part A, and among adalimumab intermediate responders, adverse events were reported in 40 (75%) of 53 patients who switched to risankizumab and 37 (66%) of 56 patients who continued adalimumab in part B., Interpretation: Risankizumab showed significantly greater efficacy than adalimumab in providing skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. No additional safety concerns were identified for patients who switched from adalimumab to risankizumab. Treatment with risankizumab provides flexibility in the long-term treatment of psoriasis., Funding: AbbVie and Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. Patient education may be one option to improve adherence and coping. The aim of this systematic review is to identify studies evaluating educational interventions for psoriasis patients. The review was conducted following the methods recommended by Cochrane. We searched seven databases, one trial register and three grey literature repositories. Data screening and extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0, ROBINS-I, and NIH tools were used. Additionally, the APEASE criteria were applied. We evaluated 16 studies. Two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluated patient-practitioner or patient-nurse one-to-one interventions, one RCT assessed a web-based intervention and three RCTs reported group interventions taking place frequently; one RCT reported one-off group sessions. The remaining RCT compared the healthcare professionals involved. The risk of bias rating ranged from "some concerns" to "high". Three RCTs found an effect. We included four controlled clinical trials (CCTs), one of which had an effect. One of the four before-and-after-studies warrants further investigation. Despite similarities in delivery mode across the interventions, patients who were eligible and settings in which interventions were delivered differed. Interventions that included an individual (one-to-one) session appeared to be successful. Two interventions seem suitable for adaptation using APEASE: the topical treatment program and motivational interviewing after climate therapy., (© 2019 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To evaluate short- and long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients according to psoriasis severity., Materials and Methods: Data were integrated from clinical trials (UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3). Patients received placebo, 80-mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W), every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W), or 50 mg etanercept (ETN) biweekly for 12 weeks, then open-label IXEQ4W (UNCOVER-3). Psoriasis severity was categorized by baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI <20 and ≥20). Efficacy was evaluated by percentage reaching PASI 75, 90, 100, and absolute PASI ≤5, ≤2, and ≤1., Results: Significantly more patients with PASI ≥20 (vs. PASI <20) were male and had higher body weight. After 12 weeks, both severity groups had significantly more IXEQ2W- than ETN-treated patients reach PASI 75, 90, 100, and absolute PASI ≤5, ≤2, ≤1. Fewer PASI ≥20 vs. PASI <20 patients across treatments reached PASI ≤5, ≤2, and ≤1 at week 12. Efficacy was maintained during 156 weeks of ixekizumab treatment with no differences between groups. The IXEQ2W safety profile was similar between groups except for injection-site reactions (significantly higher in PASI <20)., Conclusions: Ixekizumab demonstrated a high level of efficacy and had a consistent safety profile in patients with different baseline psoriasis severity levels.

Compounded topical preparations (CTP) were used to treat psoriasis until the last century and have disappeared from guidelines. The present authors report two severe psoriasis patients who were treated with CTP. A man had psoriasis with a PASI of 23 and a body surface area (BSA) of 43%. He had been using daily for several weeks a CTP including minoxidil, clobetasol propionate and hydroxyprogesterone formulated in an alcohol based vehicle. A woman suffered from psoriasis with an annular inflammatory pattern and a central healing. The PASI was 20 and the BSA was 30%. She had been using a CTP daily for 4 months including resorcinol, salicylic acid, 0.05% tretinoin cream, bethamethasone dipropionate cream. Until the 1970s, the dermatological textbooks recommended to treat severe psoriasis with CTP. Nowadays, CTP are considered outdated because of the large therapeutic armamentarium. The stability and benefit risks of the CTP used here were not documented. The use of CTP in psoriasis should be regulated and must be evidence based. Strict protocol and stability evaluation for preparations must be confirmed prior to compounding., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Biologics targeting interleukin 17A (IL-17A) allow for rapid clearance of psoriatic plaques, with a clinically favorable safety profile., Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab, an IL-17A antagonist, with the safety and efficacy of the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab through 52 weeks of treatment in the head-to-head trial IXORA-S., Methods: Patients were randomized to ixekizumab (n = 136) or ustekinumab (n = 166) and dosed per the approved labels. After 1 year, efficacy was assessed via improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (with PASI 90 indicating a 90% or greater improvement from baseline PASI score) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) response of either 0 or 0 or 1, with dropouts counted as nonresponders. Safety analyses included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs)., Results: At week 52, significantly more ixekizumab-treated patients (P < .01) reported PASI 90 (104 [76.5%]), an sPGA response of 0 (72 [52.9%]), or an sPGA response of 0 or 1 (110 [82.1%]) responses than did ustekinumab-treated patients (PASI 90, 98 [59.0%]; sPGA response of 0, 60 [36.1%]; and sPGA response of 0 or 1, 108 [65.1%]). Treatment-emergent AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuation rates were not different between the treatment groups. Injection site reactions occurred more frequently in the ixekizumab-treated group (ixekizumab, 22 [16.3%]; ustekinumab, 2 [1.2%]) (P < .001)., Limitations: This study was not designed to compare safety end points related to rare events., Conclusions: Compared with ustekinumab, ixekizumab showed superior efficacy and comparable safety outcomes through 52 weeks of treatment., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Phase 2 psoriasis studies with the Fc-free, PEGylated, anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic certolizumab pegol demonstrated meaningful clinical activity., Objective: Assess safety and efficacy of certolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis., Methods: Patients were randomized 3:3:1:3 to certolizumab 400 mg, certolizumab 200 mg, or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks. Certolizumab-treated patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 16 from baseline PASI were rerandomized to certolizumab or placebo for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was responder rate (≥75% reduction in PASI from baseline PASI) versus placebo (primary analysis) and etanercept (secondary analysis) at week 12; secondary endpoints included responder rates on various measures versus placebo at weeks 12, 16, and 48. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events., Results: All endpoints were significantly greater for certolizumab versus placebo with the greatest response seen with 400 mg. Certolizumab 400 mg was superior to and 200 mg was noninferior to etanercept. Adverse events were consistent with the anti-tumor necrosis factor class of drugs., Limitations: Etanercept was administered by unblinded study staff or self-administered, but efficacy assessments were performed by a blinded assessor., Conclusion: Both certolizumab regimens improved psoriasis symptoms, with a greater response seen with the higher dose. No new safety signals were observed., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to compare the infectious risk between a group of psoriasis patients treated by biological drugs (BD) and a group treated by traditional systemic treatments (TST). We built a retrospective observational cohort study from the French health insurance database in the Midi-Pyrénées area (2.9 million inhabitants, southwest of France) using data from 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2013. We compared the infectious risk between 'exposed' patients treated with BD (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or ustekinumab) and 'unexposed' patients treated by TST (phototherapy, acitretin, methotrexate, or cyclosporine). We realized a survival analysis on the first infectious event, defined as an anti-infective drug delivery or a hospital diagnosis of infection. We selected 101 'exposed' and 788 'unexposed' patients. In our multivariate Cox model, 'exposure' did not seem to decrease the time frame of the first infectious event compared with 'nonexposure' (HR = 0.94, P = 0.62). Among all treatment, the safest seemed to be ustekinumab while the least safe was etanercept. We found factors statistically associated with the risk of infection: gender (female vs. male), economic deprivation, chronic hepatitis B or C, history of cancer, at least one infectious event, and the number of different drugs during the 6-month period before the study. We did not find any difference of infective risk between the BD and the TST. This result enhances the recent PSONET registries conclusions., (© 2018 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures provide patient-centred evaluations of response to treatment. In the 12-week, Phase III PSO-ABLE study, fixed-combination calcipotriol 50 μg/g as hydrate (Cal) plus betamethasone 0.5 mg/g as dipropionate (BD) aerosol foam was significantly more effective for the treatment of psoriasis than Cal/BD gel., Objective: To compare HRQoL in mild-severe psoriasis vulgaris patients (involving 2-30% body surface area) over 12 weeks of treatment with Cal/BD foam or gel., Methods: HRQoL was assessed using: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EuroQoL-5D-5L-PSO (EQ-5D), and Psoriasis QoL (PQoL-12) questionnaires (baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12); DLQI score of 0/1 (range: 0-30) and weighted EQ-5D utility index score of 1 (range: 0-1) indicates there is no impact on a patient's QoL and perfect health, respectively. Itch, itch-related sleep loss, and work impairment were also assessed., Results: In total, 463 patients were randomized to the study (Cal/BD foam, n = 185; Cal/BD gel, n = 188; foam vehicle, n = 47; gel vehicle, n = 43). Significantly more Cal/BD foam patients achieved DLQI scores of 0/1 at Weeks 4 (45.7% vs 32.4%; p = 0.013) and 12 (60.5% vs 44.1%; p = 0.003) than Cal/BD gel patients. Cal/BD foam significantly improved EQ-5D utility index (0.09 vs 0.03; p<0.001) and PQoL-12 scores (-2.23 vs -2.07; p = 0.029) from baseline to Week 4 versus Cal/BD gel. Itch, itch-related sleep loss, and work impairment improved more with Cal/BD foam than gel., Conclusion: Cal/BD foam demonstrated greater HRQoL improvement in patients with psoriasis than Cal/BD gel over 12 weeks of treatment.

Background: Fixed-combination calcipotriol 50 μg/g plus betamethasone 0.5 mg/g (Cal/BD) aerosol foam is a new topical treatment for psoriasis. Although moderate-to-severe psoriasis is typically treated with systemic/biologic therapies, a topical treatment that is efficacious in these patients may be a significant cost-saving alternative to systemic therapy., Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the response to Cal/BD foam and gel in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis enrolled in the phase III, 12-week PSO-ABLE study., Methods: Patients eligible for this analysis had moderate-to-severe psoriasis, defined by the 'Rule of Tens': body surface area ≥10% or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) [excluding head; modified PASI (mPASI)] >10 or Dermatology Life-Quality Index >10. Endpoints included: proportion of patients achieving mPASI75 or mPASI90; change in body surface area; proportion of patients clear/almost clear with a ≥2 grade improvement (i.e., treatment success); change in Dermatology Life-Quality Index., Results: Seventy-seven Cal/BD foam patients and 82 gel patients had moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A greater proportion achieved mPASI75 and mPASI90 with Cal/BD foam than gel at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (57.1 vs. 35.4%; p = 0.006 and 15.6 vs. 12.2% at week 12, respectively); overall reduction in mPASI from baseline to week 12 was 64% with the foam vs. 51% with the gel. Overall reduction in body surface area at week 12 was 50% with the foam and 39% with the gel. Treatment success rates were higher with the Cal/BD foam than the gel at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 (p = 0.0089), and 12, and a greater proportion of foam patients achieved a Dermatology Life-Quality Index score of 0/1 at weeks 4 (p = 0.004), 8, and 12 (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Cal/BD foam can be considered as a treatment option in some patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who are potential candidates for systemic therapy. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02132936.

Background: Safety of biologics is important when treating patients with psoriasis., Objective: We sought to determine the safety of ixekizumab in psoriasis., Methods: Integrated safety data are presented from a 12-week induction period, a 12- to 60-week maintenance period, and from all ixekizumab-treated patients from 7 clinical trials. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years are reported., Results: Overall, 4209 patients received ixekizumab (total exposure: 6480 patient-years). During the induction period, the IRs of patients experiencing 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) were 251 and 236 among ixekizumab- and etanercept-treated patients, respectively, and for serious AEs was 8.3 in both groups. During maintenance, for ixekizumab, the IRs of treatment-emergent AEs and serious AEs were 100.4 and 7.8, respectively. Among all ixekizumab-treated patients from 7 trials, the IR of Candida infections was 2.5. The IRs of treatment-emergent AEs of special interest (including serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events) were comparable for ixekizumab and etanercept during the induction period., Limitations: Additional long-term data are required., Conclusion: Ixekizumab had an acceptable safety profile with no unexpected safety findings during ixekizumab maintenance in psoriasis., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder with a significant negative impact on quality of life. Most patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis manage their disease with topical therapies; the most commonly used formulations contain corticosteroids and/or vitamin D3 analogues. However, adherence to topical treatment remains a significant issue as the daily treatment regimen can be cumbersome and time consuming and many patients do not obtain complete/almost complete clearance. Areas covered: Published pre-clinical and clinical data evaluating calcipotriol 50 µg/g (Cal) and betamethasone 0.5 mg/g as dipropionate (BD) aerosol foam in patients with psoriasis. Expert opinion: Cal/BD aerosol foam, a once-daily, alcohol-free, paraffin-based vehicle with emollient properties, was developed to increase the therapeutic options available to patients. Cal/BD aerosol foam is rapidly effective for treating psoriasis and the greater efficacy compared with the ointment and gel formulations is consistent and clinically relevant. This enhanced efficacy is due to improved skin penetration of the active ingredients following the formation of a stable supersaturated solution on the skin. Studies have shown increasing patient satisfaction with Cal/BD aerosol foam. It is hoped that this optimized formulation of Cal/BD will improve adherence and help to address the unmet medical needs of patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis.

Background: New psoriasis therapies have increased the ability to achieve skin clearance. However, insufficient evidence exists on the impact of total skin clearance from the patient perspective., Objective: We sought to determine if complete skin clearance is clinically meaningful compared with treatment responses without clearance., Methods: Pooled data from 3 phase-III trials were used to compare results for patients with complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 0) with patients without complete skin clearance (PASI 75 to <100 or static Physician Global Assessment score 1) based on Psoriasis Symptom Inventory and Dermatology Life Quality Index., Results: Percentages of patients with Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 were 45% for those achieving PASI 100 and 8% for PASI 75 to <100 (P < .001). Respective percentages with Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0/1 were 80% and 55% (P < .001). PASI 100 resulted in incremental improvement over PASI 90 to <100 (incremental differences of 28% for Psoriasis Symptom Inventory score 0 and 18% for Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0). Similar results were observed for static Physician Global Assessment scores 0 versus 1., Conclusions: Complete skin clearance represents a clinically meaningful end point and outcome for patients, reflected in experiences of no psoriasis symptoms and no impairment on health-related quality of life., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, poor adherence to medication is associated with increased healthcare costs, decreased patient satisfaction, reduced quality of life and unfavorable treatment outcomes., Objective: To determine the impact of different interventions on medication adherence in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders., Design: Systematic review., Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library., Study Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Included studies were clinical trials and observational studies in adult outpatients treated for psoriasis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis or multiple sclerosis., Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Intervention approaches were classified into four categories: educational, behavioral, cognitive behavioral, and multicomponent interventions. The risk of bias/study limitations of each study was assessed using the GRADE system., Results: Fifteen studies (14 clinical trials and one observational study) met eligibility criteria and enrolled a total of 1958 patients. Forty percent of the studies (6/15) was conducted in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, half (7/15) in rheumatoid arthritis patients, one in psoriasis patients and one in multiple sclerosis patients. Seven out of 15 interventions were classified as multicomponent, four as educational, two as behavioral and two as cognitive behavioral. Nine studies, of which five were multicomponent interventions, had no serious limitations according to GRADE criteria. Nine out of 15 interventions showed an improvement of adherence: three multicomponent interventions in inflammatory bowel disease; one intervention of each category in rheumatoid arthritis; one multicomponent in psoriasis and one multicomponent in multiple sclerosis., Conclusion: The assessment of interventions designed for increasing medication adherence in IMID is rare in the literature and their methodological quality may be improved in upcoming studies. Nonetheless, multicomponent interventions showed the strongest evidence for promoting adherence in patients with IMID.

Background: Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis., Methods: In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients >100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physician's global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100)., Results: At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P<0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P<0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P<0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab., Conclusions: Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).

Background: Ixekizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody against the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 17A. We report two studies of ixekizumab compared with placebo or etanercept to assess the safety and efficacy of specifically targeting interleukin 17A in patients with widespread moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Methods: In two prospective, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 studies (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3), eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis at least 6 months before baseline (randomisation), 10% or greater body-surface area involvement at both screening and baseline visits, at least a moderate clinical severity as measured by a static physician global assessment (sPGA) score of 3 or more, and a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score of 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) by computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous placebo, etanercept (50 mg twice weekly), or one injection of 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks after a 160 mg starting dose. Blinding was maintained with a double-dummy design. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were proportions of patients achieving sPGA score 0 or 1 and 75% or greater improvement in PASI at week 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01597245 and NCT01646177., Findings: Between May 30, 2012, and Dec 30, 2013, 1224 patients in UNCOVER-2 were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous placebo (n=168), etanercept (n=358), or ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=351) or every 4 weeks (n=347); between Aug 11, 2012, and Feb 27, 2014, 1346 patients in UNCOVER-3 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=193), etanercept (n=382), ixekizumab every 2 weeks (n=385), or ixekizumab every 4 weeks (n=386). At week 12, both primary endpoints were met in both studies. For UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 respectively, in the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, PASI 75 was achieved by 315 (response rate 89·7%; [effect size 87·4% (97·5% CI 82·9-91·8) vs placebo; 48·1% (41·2-55·0) vs etanercept]) and 336 (87·3%; [80·0% (74·4-85·7) vs placebo; 33·9% (27·0-40·7) vs etanercept]) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group, by 269 (77·5%; [75·1% (69·5-80·8) vs placebo; 35·9% (28·2-43·6) vs etanercept]) and 325 (84·2%; [76·9% (71·0-82·8) vs placebo; 30·8% (23·7-37·9) vs etanercept]) patients; in the placebo group, by four (2·4%) and 14 (7·3%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 149 (41·6%) and 204 (53·4%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In the ixekizumab every 2 weeks group, sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 292 (response rate 83·2%; [effect size 80·8% (97·5% CI 75·6-86·0) vs placebo; 47·2% (39·9-54·4) vs etanercept]) and 310 (80·5%; [73·8% (67·7-79·9) vs placebo; 38·9% (31·7-46·1) vs etanercept]) patients; in the ixekizumab every 4 weeks group by 253 (72·9%; [70·5% (64·6-76·5) vs placebo; 36·9% (29·1-44·7) vs etanercept]) and 291 (75·4%; [68·7% (62·3-75·0) vs placebo; 33·8% (26·3-41·3) vs etanercept]) patients; in the placebo group by four (2·4%) and 13 (6·7%) patients; and in the etanercept group by 129 (36·0%) and 159 (41·6%) patients (all p<0·0001 vs placebo or etanercept). In combined studies, serious adverse events were reported in 14 (1·9%) of 734 patients given ixekizumab every 2 weeks, 14 (1·9%) of 729 given ixekizumab every 4 weeks, seven (1·9%) of 360 given placebo, and 14 (1·9%) of 739 given etanercept; no deaths were noted., Interpretation: Both ixekizumab dose regimens had greater efficacy than placebo and etanercept over 12 weeks in two independent studies. These studies show that selectively neutralising interleukin 17A with a high affinity antibody potentially gives patients with psoriasis a new and effective biological therapy option., Funding: Eli Lilly and Co., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Skin psoriasis precedes the onset of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 84% of patients with psoriasis. Dermatologists have an important role to screen psoriasis patients for PsA. The efficiency of PsA screening remains unknown., Objective: We sought to determine the point prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis using a systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis., Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase database searches yielded 394 studies for review. No study aimed to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis. We assumed that the prevalence of newly diagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis at the time they seek medical care could be a sound estimate of this value. Seven epidemiological studies and 5 studies on PsA screening questionnaires allowed us to clearly identify patients with newly diagnosed PsA and were selected for review., Results: The prevalence of undiagnosed PsA was 15.5% when all studies were considered and 10.1% when only epidemiological studies were considered., Limitations: Data were obtained from studies not designed to address the question at hand. Heterogeneity was high (I(2) = 96.86%), and therefore a random effects model was used., Conclusion: The high prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis adds to the recommendation that dermatologists need to screen all patients with psoriasis for PsA., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Data that can identify the patients who will not respond to anti-TNF agents are sparse. Therefore, the authors wished to describe specific clinical factors that could be associated with a non-response to any available TNF blockers in patients with psoriasis., Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed through the mailing of a questionnaire to five departments of Dermatology. Only psoriasis patients who were not responsive to all available anti-TNF agents (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab), whatever the chronology of their use, were included., Results: Twenty-two patients were included. Forty patients (64%) did not work at the time of the study and 12 (55%) qualified for Social Security Disability Allowance. Forty patients (64%) were considered as "overweight". Fifty-nine percent of patients were smokers. Antinuclear antibodies were positive in 9 out of 16 patients tested (56%) at the time of non-response. Ustekinumab, which was further introduced in 19 patients, led to PASI 75 in all (94%) but one patient., Conclusion: The data identified different clinical factors associated with a non-response to any available TNF blockers. Furthermore, non-responder patients were highly responsive to ustekinumab suggesting that in few psoriasis patients, TNF blockade is not the best target and other TNF-independent signaling pathway should be considered.

Background: Adalimumab is a fully human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody with demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Objective: This study examined the effect of PsA on adalimumab treatment response in patients from the Phase IIIb BELIEVE trial (NCT00574249, ClinicalTrials.gov registry), and response of other markers of disease burden to adalimumab treatment., Methods: In this post hoc analysis, patients with or without a history of PsA and with moderate to severe psoriasis were randomized to adalimumab plus adjunctive topical therapy (calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate) or monotherapy (adalimumab plus matching topical vehicle)., Results: Regardless of baseline PsA, improvement at Week 16 was seen in PASI 75, pruritus, PSSI, and DLQI (all patients), and mean NAPSI scores. Patients with PsA had HAQ improvement at Week 16, and compared to patients without PsA, had higher VAS pain scores. This analysis represents the first publication of the influence of PsA and PsA plus body weight on patient response to adalimumab, and response of scalp psoriasis, nail psoriasis, and patient-reported outcomes to adalimumab. The incidence of AEs was similar among all patients (62%), those with PsA (65%) and without PsA (60%). The most common AEs were infections (27%); 4.2% of all patients reported serious AEs., Conclusion: Adalimumab treatment resulted in comprehensive, clinically relevant improvements from baseline PsA status, in skin, nails, quality of life, pain and pruritus. Despite having more severely affected disease and quality of life, patients with PsA did not respond to adalimumab significantly differently from patients without PsA.

Background: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases like psoriasis are at increased risk of infection. Specific recommendations are available regarding vaccinations however the vaccination coverage in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases has received limited attention and studies are not available in patients with psoriasis., Objectives: To assess the coverage of 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccination and to identify factors associated with vaccination among patients with psoriasis., Methods: Patients member of the French psoriasis patients association were sent a self administrated anonymous questionnaire. It consisted in socio-demographic data, history of psoriasis, seasonal and vaccination status. Factors associated with vaccination for A/H1N1 influenza were identified and adjusted odds ratios (ORa) and prevalence ratios (PRa) were estimated with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using logistic regression models., Results: 1308 psoriasis patients with a mean age of 58.2 years completed the study between September and December 2010. A total of 240 (19%) patients received the 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccine. 25 out of 75 patients treated with biologics (33%) received the vaccine. Previous influenza seasonal (ORa (PRa)=10.2 (6.6) [6.1 (4.1)-16.9 (10.7)]), pneumococcal (ORa (PRa)=2.0 (1.6) [1.2 (1.1)-3.3 (2.3)]) and hepatitis B (ORa (PRa)=2.2 (1.7) [1.4 (1.1)-3.5 (2.5)]) vaccinations were independently associated with being vaccinated for influenza A(H1N1)., Conclusion: This is the largest study conducted to assess the coverage of 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccine among patients with psoriasis, a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease. This vaccination coverage is more than twice the one in the French general population, but still remained low for patients receiving immunosuppressants. The limited impact of specific recommendations, free vaccines and the massive national campaign warrant alternative strategies in case of future pandemics., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a standardized tool designed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a large cohort of French patients with psoriasis, the QualiPso Questionnaire. A draft questionnaire was developed based on a literature review, followed by one-to-one interviews of 50 patients with psoriasis conducted by trained psychologists. The interview transcripts were analysed, after which 56 items were retained and validated in a cohort of 569 patients. Four QualiPso subscales were derived from factor analysis. The first factor encompasses disturbances of social life, a key factor in HRQoL among psoriasis patients (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: α=0.948). The second factor assesses the impact of psoriasis on mental health (α=0.932). The third factor reflects concerns related to treatment outcomes (α=0.873), and the fourth factor is related to skin symptoms (α=0.772). The subscales are related but distinct, accounting for 60% of the common variance. In conclusion, the QualiPso questionnaire provides a reliable and valid measure of a patient's psychosocial well-being in relation to psoriasis. It also measures the impact of concerns related to treatment outcomes and skin symptoms, which have not been addressed previously by HRQoL research on psoriasis.