Search

Many stresses induce the accumulation of unfolded and misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, a phenomenon known as ER stress. In response to ER stress, cells initiate a protective response, known as unfolded protein response (UPR), to maintain cellular homeostasis. The UPR sensor, inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), catalyzes the cytoplasmic splicing of bZIP transcription factor-encoding mRNAs to activate the UPR signaling pathway. Recently, we reported that pretreatment of Arabidopsis thaliana plants with tunicamycin, an ER stress inducer, increased their susceptibility to bacterial pathogens; on the other hand, IRE1 deficient mutants were susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Psm) and failed to induce salicylic acid (SA)-mediated systemic acquired resistance. However, the functional relationship of IRE1 with the pathogen and TM treatment remains unknown. In the present study, we showed that bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) induced IRE1 expression; however, PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) response such as callose deposition, PR1 protein accumulation, or Pst DC3000 hrcC growth was not altered in ire1 mutants. We observed that IRE1 enhanced plant immunity against the bacterial pathogen P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) under ER stress. Moreover, TM-pretreated ire1 mutants were more susceptible to the avirulent strain Pst DC3000 (AvrRpt2) and showed greater cell death than wild-type plants during effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Additionally, Pst DC3000 (AvrRpt2)-mediated RIN4 degradation was reduced in ire1 mutants under TM-induced ER stress. Collectively, our results reveal that IRE1 plays a pivotal role in the immune signaling pathway to activate plant immunity against virulent and avirulent bacterial strains under ER stress.

Hexokinase1 (HXK1) is an Arabidopsis glucose sensor that has a variety of roles during plant growth and devlopment, including during germination, flowering, and senescence. HXK1 also acts as a positive regulator of plant immune responses. Previous research suggested that HXK1 might influence plant immune responses via responses to glucose. Plant immune responses are governed by two main pathways: PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). PTI involves the recognition of Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) and leads to increased callose formation and accumulation of pathogenesis response (PR) proteins. ETI acts in response to effectors secreted by Gram-negative bacteria. During ETI, the membrane-localized protein RPM1-interacting protein 4 (RIN4) becomes phosphorylated in reponse to interactions with effectors and mediates the downstream response. In this study, the effects of glucose on plant immune responses against infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and other P. syringae strains were investigated in the presence and absence of HXK1. Infiltration of leaves with glucose prior to infection led to decreases in bacterial populations and reductions in disease symptoms in wild-type Arabidopsis plants, indicating that glucose plays a role in plant immunity. Both PTI and ETI responses were affected. However, these effects were not observed in a hxk1 mutant, indicating that the effects of glucose on plant immune responses were mediated by HXK1-related pathways.

Plant pathogens deploy an array of virulence factors to suppress host defense and promote pathogenicity. Numerous strains of Pseudomonas syringae produce the phytotoxin coronatine (COR). A major aspect of COR function is its ability to mimic a bioactive jasmonic acid (JA) conjugate and thus target the JA-receptor COR-insensitive 1 (COI1). Biological activities of COR include stimulation of JA-signaling and consequent suppression of SA-dependent defense through antagonistic crosstalk, antagonism of stomatal closure to allow bacterial entry into the interior of plant leaves, contribution to chlorotic symptoms in infected plants, and suppression of plant cell wall defense through perturbation of secondary metabolism. Here, we review the virulence function of COR, including updates on these established activities as well as more recent findings revealing COI1-independent activity of COR and shedding light on cooperative or redundant defense suppression between COR and type III effector proteins.

Bacterial AvrE-family Type-III effector proteins (T3Es) contribute significantly to the virulence of plant-pathogenic species of Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Ralstonia, Erwinia, Dickeya and Pectobacterium, with hosts ranging from monocots to dicots. However, the mode of action of AvrE-family T3Es remains enigmatic, due in large part to their toxicity when expressed in plant or yeast cells. To search for targets of WtsE, an AvrE-family T3E from the maize pathogen Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii, we employed a yeast-two-hybrid screen with non-lethal fragments of WtsE and a synthetic genetic array with full-length WtsE. Together these screens indicate that WtsE targets maize protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) heterotrimeric enzyme complexes via direct interaction with B’ regulatory subunits. AvrE1, another AvrE-family T3E from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (Pto DC3000), associates with specific PP2A B’ subunit proteins from its susceptible host Arabidopsis that are homologous to the maize B’ subunits shown to interact with WtsE. Additionally, AvrE1 was observed to associate with the WtsE-interacting maize proteins, indicating that PP2A B’ subunits are likely conserved targets of AvrE-family T3Es. Notably, the ability of AvrE1 to promote bacterial growth and/or suppress callose deposition was compromised in Arabidopsis plants with mutations of PP2A genes. Also, chemical inhibition of PP2A activity blocked the virulence activity of both WtsE and AvrE1 in planta. The function of HopM1, a Pto DC3000 T3E that is functionally redundant to AvrE1, was also impaired in specific PP2A mutant lines, although no direct interaction with B’ subunits was observed. These results indicate that sub-component specific PP2A complexes are targeted by bacterial T3Es, including direct targeting by members of the widely conserved AvrE-family., Author Summary Gram-negative bacterial pathogens employ type-III effector (T3E) proteins to suppress host immunity and promote disease symptoms. AvrE-family T3Es, which are widely distributed among plant-pathogenic bacteria, suppress host defense responses and also contribute to water-soaking, which is perhaps the most common symptom of bacterial diseases and likely results in the release of nutrients from host cells to promote pathogen growth. Despite the central virulence functions of AvrE-family T3Es, their mode of action remains enigmatic largely due to their cell toxicity. We report here that two AvrE-family T3Es, WtsE from the maize pathogen Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii and AvrE1 from the tomato and Arabidopsis pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, each target protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complexes in susceptible hosts via direct interaction/association with specific B’ regulatory subunits. Chemical inhibitors were used to demonstrate that PP2A activity is required for the virulence functions of WtsE and AvrE1. PP2A isoform specificity was also tested using mutants of Arabidopsis. More generally, PP2A subunits regulate, both positively and negatively, rapid pattern-triggered immune responses in Arabidopsis. Thus, bacterial T3Es target sub-component specific PP2A complexes to manipulate host immunity and cause disease symptoms during infection.

The cytokinin response factor 5 (CRF5) belongs to a family of plant-specific APETALA2 (AP2)/ previously identified as a mediator of cytokinin signaling, has been suggested to increase pathogen resistance in this study. Endogenous CRF5 transcripts are expressed in all tissues, including the seedlings, leaf, stem, flower, silique and root, and were found to be induced at 1 h after infection with the bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000). The results of a yeast one-hybrid assay revealed that an acidic region of CRF5, including the C-terminal 28 amino acids, functions as a transcriptional activator. Overexpression of CRF5 in transgenic Arabidopsis increases pathogen resistance and concomitantly activates the expression of a large number of GCC-box pathogenesis-related genes. These results indicate that CRF5 may be involved in disease resistance as a transcription activator, thus providing a mechanistic link between the plant pathogen response and cytokinin signaling.

Plants defend themselves by inducing sophisticated multilevel defense responses against pathogenic attack. The first line of defense against microbial pathogens is the process of nonself-recognition, which mediates the activation of the necessary defense repertoire. The hypersensitive response (HR), a macroscopic collapse of plant leaves in primary infection site, is one of such plant resistance responses. Subsequently, the HR triggers a general resistance mechanism called systemic acquired resistance (SAR), rendering uninfected parts of the plants less sensitive to further pathogenic attacks. Here, we show that SIZ1 mutation-mediated preexisting SAR attenuates HR-associated cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. In siz1 mutant, the amount of PR1 and PR5 stayed high level, and the growth of pathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Pma) strain M6CΔE was reduced. Early callose deposition, spontaneous formation of microscopic cell death, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were also observed in siz1 mutant.

Plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize potential pathogens expressing corresponding avirulence (Avr) proteins through 'gene-for-gene' interactions. RPM1 is an Arabidopsis R-protein that triggers a robust defense response upon recognizing the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpm1. Avr-proteins of phytopathogenic bacteria include type III effector proteins that are often capable of enhancing virulence when not recognized by an R-protein. In rpm1 plants, AvrRpm1 suppresses basal defenses induced by microbe-associated molecular patterns. Here, we show that expression of AvrRpm1 in rpm1 plants induced PR-1, a classical defense marker, and symptoms including chlorosis and necrosis. PR-1 expression and symptoms were reduced in plants with mutations in defense signaling genes (pad4, sid2, npr1, rar1, and ndr1) and were strongly reduced in rpm1 rps2 plants, indicating that AvrRpm1 elicits defense signaling through the Arabidopsis R-protein, RPS2. Bacteria expressing AvrRpm1 grew more on rpm1 rps2 than on rpm1 plants. Thus, independent of its classical 'gene-for-gene' activation of RPM1, AvrRpm1 also induces functionally relevant defenses that are dependent on RPS2. Finally, AvrRpm1 suppressed host defenses and promoted the growth of type III secretion mutant bacteria equally well in rps2 and RPS2 plants, indicating that virulence activity of over-expressed AvrRpm1 predominates over defenses induced by weak activation of RPS2.

Arabidopsis is a non-host for Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola NPS3121 (Pph), a bacterial pathogen of bean. Pph does not induce a hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis. Here we show that Arabidopsis instead resists Pph with multi-layered basal defense. Our approach was: (i) to identify defense readouts induced by Pph; (ii) to determine whether mutations in known Arabidopsis defense genes disrupt Pph-induced defense signaling; (iii) to determine whether heterologous type III effectors from pathogens of Arabidopsis suppress Pph-induced defense signaling, and (iv) to ascertain how basal defenses contribute to resistance against Pph by individually or multiply disrupting defense signaling pathways with mutations and heterologous type III effectors. We demonstrate that Pph elicits a minimum of three basal defense-signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. These pathways have unique readouts, including PR-1 protein accumulation and morphologically distinct types of callose deposition. Further, they require distinct defense genes, including PMR4, RAR1, SID2, NPR1, and PAD4. Finally, they are suppressed differentially by heterologous type III effectors, including AvrRpm1 and HopM1. Pph growth is enhanced only when multiple defense pathways are disrupted. For example, mutation of NPR1 or SID2 combined with the action of AvrRpm1 and HopM1 renders Arabidopsis highly susceptible to Pph. Thus, non-host resistance of Arabidopsis to Pph is based on multiple, individually effective layers of basal defense.

A selected strain of rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas putida strain LSW17S (LSW17S), protects tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Seokwang) from bacterial speck by biotrophic Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (DC3000) and bacterial wilt by necrotrophic Ralstonia solanacearum KACC 10703 (Rs10703). To investigate defense mechanisms induced by LSW17S in tomato plants, transcription patterns of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and H(2)O(2) production were analyzed in plants treated with LSW17S and subsequent pathogen inoculation. LSW17S alone did not induce transcriptions of employed PR genes in leaves and roots. DC3000 challenge following LSW17S triggered rapid transcriptions of PR genes and H(2)O(2) production in leaves and roots. Catalase infiltration with DC3000 attenuated defense-related responses and resistance against DC3000 infection. Despite depriving H(2)O(2) production and PR1b transcription by the same treatment, resistance against Rs10703 infection was not deterred significantly. H(2)O(2) is indispensable for defense signaling and/or mechanisms primed by LSW17S and inhibition of bacterial speck, however, it is not involved in resistance against bacterial wilt.

Plants are continually exposed to a variety of potentially pathogenic microbes, and the interactions between plants and pathogenic invaders determine the outcome, disease or disease resistance. To defend themselves, plants have developed a sophisticated immune system. Unlike animals, however, they do not have specialized immune cells and, thus all plant cells appear to have the innate ability to recognize pathogens and turn on an appropriate defense response. Using genetic, genomic and biochemical methods, tremendous advances have been made in understanding how plants recognize pathogens and mount effective defenses. The primary immune response is induced by microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). MAMP receptors recognize the presence of probable pathogens and evoke defense. In the co-evolution of plant-microbe interactions, pathogens gained the ability to make and deliver effector proteins to suppress MAMP-induced defense responses. In response to effector proteins, plants acquired R-proteins to directly or indirectly monitor the presence of effector proteins and activate an effective defense response. In this review we will describe and discuss the plant immune responses induced by two types of elicitors, PAMPs and effector proteins.

Plants are resistant to most potentially pathogenic microbes. Frequently, resistance results from defenses activated upon recognition of "non-self." Invasion of a variety of pathogens, including Gram-negative bacteria, into plants is betrayed by the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Plants challenged by a non-pathogenic bacterial strain or a purified PAMP often form cell wall modifications called papillae. These cell wall thickenings, which can be observed in the electron microscope, can more easily be visualized by staining for the component molecule callose and using fluorescent microscopy. We describe a method to measure callose following infiltration of leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana, a model organism for basic and applied research on plant biology, with pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato or a purified bacterial PAMP. We also detail a method to measure the growth of bacteria infiltrated into leaves of Arabidopsis. These methods can be used to understand the interactions between pathogen and host plant.

Plants are resistant to most potentially pathogenic microbes. Frequently, resistance results from defenses activated upon recognition of "non-self." Invasion of a variety of pathogens, including Gram-negative bacteria, into plants is betrayed by the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Plants challenged by a non-pathogenic bacterial strain or a purified PAMP often form cell wall modifications called papillae. These cell wall thickenings, which can be observed in the electron microscope, can more easily be visualized by staining for the component molecule callose and using fluorescent microscopy. We describe a method to measure callose following infiltration of leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana, a model organism for basic and applied research on plant biology, with pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato or a purified bacterial PAMP. We also detail a method to measure the growth of bacteria infiltrated into leaves of Arabidopsis. These methods can be used to understand the interactions between pathogen and host plant.

Arabidopsis is a non-host for Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola NPS3121 (Pph), a bacterial pathogen of bean. Pph does not induce a hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis. Here we show that Arabidopsis instead resists Pph with multi-layered basal defense. Our approach was: (i) to identify defense readouts induced by Pph; (ii) to determine whether mutations in known Arabidopsis defense genes disrupt Pph-induced defense signaling; (iii) to determine whether heterologous type III effectors from pathogens of Arabidopsis suppress Pph-induced defense signaling, and (iv) to ascertain how basal defenses contribute to resistance against Pph by individually or multiply disrupting defense signaling pathways with mutations and heterologous type III effectors. We demonstrate that Pph elicits a minimum of three basal defense-signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. These pathways have unique readouts, including PR-1 protein accumulation and morphologically distinct types of callose deposition. Further, they require distinct defense genes, including PMR4, RAR1, SID2, NPR1, and PAD4. Finally, they are suppressed differentially by heterologous type III effectors, including AvrRpm1 and HopM1. Pph growth is enhanced only when multiple defense pathways are disrupted. For example, mutation of NPR1 or SID2 combined with the action of AvrRpm1 and HopM1 renders Arabidopsis highly susceptible to Pph. Thus, non-host resistance of Arabidopsis to Pph is based on multiple, individually effective layers of basal defense.

SummaryPlant cells have two defense systems that detect bacterial pathogens. One is a basal defense system that recognizes complex pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). A second system uses disease-resistance (R) proteins to recognize type lll effector proteins that are delivered into the plant cell by the pathogen’s type III secretion system. Here we show that these two pathways are linked. We find that two Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors, AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1, inhibit PAMP-induced signaling and thus compromise the host's basal defense system. RIN4 is an Arabidopsis protein targeted by AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1 for degradation and phosphorylation, respectively. We find that RIN4 is itself a regulator of PAMP signaling. The R proteins, RPS2 and RPM1, sense type III effector-induced perturbations of RIN4. Thus, R proteins guard the plant against type III effectors that inhibit PAMP signaling and provide a mechanistic link between the two plant defense systems.