Search

Background: Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving targets is known to be impacted by interplay effects between the scanning beam and organ motion. While respiratory motion in the thoracic region is the major cause for organ motion, interplay effects depend on the delivery characteristics of proton accelerators., Purpose: To evaluate the impact of different types of PBS proton accelerators and spot sizes on interplay effects, mitigations, and plan quality for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Twenty NSCLC patients treated with photon SBRT were selected to represent varying tumor volumes and respiratory motion amplitudes (median: 0.6 cm with abdominal compression) for this retrospective study. For each patient, plans were created using: (1) cyclotron-generated proton beams (CPB) with spot sizes of σ = 2.7-7.0 mm; (2) linear accelerator proton beams (LPB) (σ = 2.9-5.5 mm); and (3) linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) (σ = 0.9-3.9 mm). The energy switching time is one second for CPB, and 0.005 s for LPMB and LPB. Plans were robustly optimized on the gross tumor volume (GTV) using each individual phase of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans. Initially, single-field optimization (SFO) plans were evaluated; if the plan quality did not meet the dosimetric requirement, multi-field optimization (MFO) was used. MFO plans were created for all patients for comparisons. For each patient, all plans were normalized to have the same dose received by 99% of the GTV. Interplay effects were evaluated by computing the dose on 10 breathing phases, based on the spot distribution. Volumetric repainting (VR) was performed 2-6 times for each plan. We compared volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V 100%RX ) of the GTV, and normal lung V 20Gy ., Results: Twelve of 20 plans can be optimized sufficiently with SFO. SFO plans were less sensitive to the interplay effect compared to MFO plans in terms of target coverage for both LPB and LPMB. The following comparisons showed results utilizing the MFO technique. In the interplay evaluation without repainting, the mean V 100%RX of the GTV were 99.42 ± 0.6%, 97.52 ± 3.9%, and 94.49 ± 7.3% for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans, respectively. Following VR (2 × for CPB; 3 × for LPB; 5 × for LPMB), V 100%RX of the GTV were improved (on average) by 0.13%, 1.84%, and 4.63%, respectively, achieving the acceptance criteria of V 100%RX  > 95%. Because of fast energy switch in linear accelerator proton machines, the delivery time for VR plans was the lowest for LPB plans, while delivery time for LPMB was on average 1 min longer than CPB plans. The advantage of small spot machines was better sparing in normal lung V 20Gy , even when VR was applied., Conclusion: In the absence of repainting, proton machines with large spot sizes generated more robust plans against interplay effects. The number of VR increased with decreasing spot sizes to achieve the acceptance criteria. VR improved the plan robustness against interplay effects for modalities with small spot sizes and fast energy changes, preserving the low dose sparing aspect of the LPMB, even when motion is included., (© 2024 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: Proton pencil beam energy spectrum is an essential parameter for calculations of dose and linear energy transfer. We extract the energy spectrum from measured integral depth dose (IDD)., Methods: A measured IDD (measIDD) in water is decomposed into many IDDs of mono-energetic pencil beams (monoIDDs) in water. A simultaneous iterative technique is used to do the decomposition that extracts the energy spectrum of protons from the measIDD. The monoIDDs are generated by our analytic random walk model-based proton dose calculation algorithm. The linear independence of the monoIDDs is considered and high spatial resolution monoIDDs are used to improve their linear independence. To validate the extraction, first we use synthesized IDDs (synIDD) with Gaussian energy spectrum and compare the extracted energy spectrum with the Gaussian; second, for the energy spectrum extracted from measIDDs, the accuracy of the extraction is validated by comparing the calculated IDD from the energy spectrum with the measIDD. The measIDDs are derived from commissioning of a cyclotron proton pencil beam system with a Bragg peak ionization chamber. The nominal energy of the pencil beams is from 70 to 245 MeV. The monoIDDs are generated for energies from 0.05 to 275 MeV in steps of 0.05 MeV with a spatial resolution of 1 mm., Results: The difference of the extracted and original Gaussian energy spectrum peaked at 75 and 80 MeV was <1%. As the energy decreased, the difference increased but was reduced by using 0.1-mm monoIDDs. The difference was not sensitive to the energy interval of monoIDDs when the interval increased from 0.05 to 1 MeV. For the energy spectrum extraction from measIDDs, there was a main peak near the nominal energy but the spectrum was not in Gaussian distribution. In three example cases (70, 160, and 245 MeV), the relative differences of the measIDDs and calculated IDDs were within 3.4%, 2.9%, and 4.7% of the Bragg peak value, respectively. Fitting the spectrum by Gaussian distribution, we had σ = 0.87, 1.51, and 0.86 MeV, respectively, for these three examples, and the relative differences of the resultant calculated IDDs from the measIDDs were within 4.7%, 7.4%, and 4.5%, respectively., Conclusions: Our algorithm accurately extracted the energy spectrum from the synIDDs and measIDDs. High-resolution monoIDDs are necessary to extract low-energy spectrum. Energy spectrum extraction from measIDD reveals important information for beam modeling., (© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Proton therapy is an expanding radiotherapy modality in the United States and worldwide. With the number of proton therapy centers treating patients increasing, so does the need for consistent, high-quality clinical commissioning practices. Clinical commissioning encompasses the entire proton therapy system's multiple components, including the treatment delivery system, the patient positioning system, and the image-guided radiotherapy components. Also included in the commissioning process are the x-ray computed tomography scanner calibration for proton stopping power, the radiotherapy treatment planning system, and corresponding portions of the treatment management system. This commissioning report focuses exclusively on intensity-modulated scanning systems, presenting details of how to perform the commissioning of the proton therapy and ancillary systems, including the required proton beam measurements, treatment planning system dose modeling, and the equipment needed., (© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: The goal was to develop and test a large diameter parallel plate ionization chamber capable of intercepting at least 98% of the proton beamlets tested with the system., Methods: A commercial synchrotron proton therapy system was used for the study (Hitachi, Ltd, Hitachi City, Japan; Model: Probeat-V). The energies investigated were in the range of 100 to 192 MeV. Three beam spot options available from the system were used. A PTW Bragg peak IC of diameter 84 mm (BP84) (Model PTW34070) was employed for comparison in a scanning water phantom. A prototype of 150 mm diameter was produced (PTW, Freiburg, Germany; model: T34089) and used for the testing. Monte Carlo calculations were also performed with FLUKA to guide the BP150 design and for comparison to the radiological measurements. For comparison, a 40 cm diameter ideal virtual detector was included in the Monte Carlo model., Results: The measured proton range R90 agrees between the BP84 and BP150 ionization chambers within +0.06/-0.27 mm across the energies 100-192 MeV, which is less than the daily experimental setup uncertainty of 0.4 mm. The differences in the absolute integral depth dose curves (IDDs) between the BP84 and BP150 ranged from 0.3% to 1.0% for the spot sizes and beam energies tested. As predicted by the Monte Carlo modeling, the greatest differences were found in the plateau region of the IDDs. Also, the IDDs measured with the BP150 were very similar to those of the ideal 40 cm diameter detector Monte Carlo simulations., Conclusions: We conclude that the BP150 offers a small, but a useful reduction in uncertainty from the nuclear halo effect for the system under test., (© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose:  Task Group (TG) 224 was established by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Science Council under the Radiation Therapy Committee and Work Group on Particle Beams. The group was charged with developing comprehensive quality assurance (QA) guidelines and recommendations for the three commonly employed proton therapy techniques for beam delivery: scattering, uniform scanning, and pencil beam scanning. This report supplements established QA guidelines for therapy machine performance for other widely used modalities, such as photons and electrons (TG 142, TG 40, TG 24, TG 22, TG 179, and Medical Physics Practice Guideline 2a) and shares their aims of ensuring the safe, accurate, and consistent delivery of radiation therapy dose distributions to patients., Methods:  To provide a basis from which machine-specific QA procedures can be developed, the report first describes the different delivery techniques and highlights the salient components of the related machine hardware. Depending on the particular machine hardware, certain procedures may be more or less important, and each institution should investigate its own situation., Results:  In lieu of such investigations, this report identifies common beam parameters that are typically checked, along with the typical frequencies of those checks (daily, weekly, monthly, or annually). The rationale for choosing these checks and their frequencies is briefly described. Short descriptions of suggested tools and procedures for completing some of the periodic QA checks are also presented., Conclusion:  Recommended tolerance limits for each of the recommended QA checks are tabulated, and are based on the literature and on consensus data from the clinical proton experience of the task group members. We hope that this and other reports will serve as a reference for clinical physicists wishing either to establish a proton therapy QA program or to evaluate an existing one., (© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: Proton dose coverage is sensitive to proton beam range. The current practice of CT number-based registration for patient positioning focuses on matching the target and is not sufficient for proton therapy because the proton range depends on the medium traversed by the beam. Patient body deformations and anatomical changes result in range deviation in the target. We propose proton range-based registration to minimize the range deviation., Methods: The range was calculated from cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT) of the patient on couch, and the range deviation was the difference of the calculated range from that on the initial (day 1) CBCT. In the investigated prostate cases in which the main cause of range deviation was the rotation of femur bones, and in the investigated abdomen cases in which the main cause of range deviation was body growth and anatomic change, our range-based registration was used to obtain the optimal beam angle by minimizing the range deviation. The new angle was limited to be ±5° from that planned to prevent potentially increased dose to the organs at risk. To demonstrate the benefit of range-based registration, we investigated the range at the voxels on the surface of the target volume. The calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was investigated by using solid water phantoms with different thicknesses. Range-based registration using both CBCTs and CTs was performed in cases of two patients with pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma and one patient with upper abdominal tumor. The range was represented by the water-equivalent thickness to shorten the computation for online application purposes., Results: In the phantom study, the calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was within 2 mm for a 1-cm thickness change (the mean range deviation was 0.8 mm). In the CT study of the prostate cases, the range deviation (mean ± root-mean-square deviation) on the contour in each slice was efficiently reduced from 3.6 ± 2.8 mm to 2.1 ± 1.4 mm, with most slices being within 3 mm; in the CT study of the abdomen cases, the range deviation of the whole set was reduced from 4.4 ± 1.9 mm to 3.5 ± 2.1 mm. Both the mean and root-mean-square deviation of the range deviation on each treatment day were decreased. The dose coverage on the target was improved and the dose on the OARs was only slightly changed., Conclusion: Range-based registration can efficiently mitigate range deviation due to patient positioning and anatomical changes. It can shorten patient positioning time and reduce the patient's dose from CBCT., (© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose of Review: Newer methods and advances in radiation therapy promise to reduce the risk of complications in children who require irradiation. They have secured the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of a variety of pediatric central nervous system and solid tumors and for young patients enrolled on clinical trials., Recent Findings: Proton therapy is the latest advancement in radiation therapy. Its availability is increasing as new centers are built throughout the United States. Pediatric specialists should understand that proton therapy is in its pioneering stage of development and that advantages have not been quantitatively demonstrated. Proton therapy clearly reduces collateral radiation dose to normal tissue when compared with photon (X-ray)-based methods of irradiation and has the potential to selectively and safely escalate dose to high-risk tumors; however, research results are lacking in both of these areas, leading to some confusion among pediatric specialists with regard to indications and the need to refer patients for this limited resource and expensive form of radiation therapy., Summary: This review highlights a number of issues surrounding proton therapy in children and supports the use of proton therapy in clinical trials.

Large area, shallow fields are well suited to proton therapy. However, due to beam production limitations, such volumes typically require multiple matched fields. This is problematic due to the relatively narrow beam penumbra at shallow depths compared to electron and photon beams. Therefore, highly accurate dose planning and delivery is required. As the dose delivery includes shifting the patient for matched fields, accuracy at the 1-2 millimeter level in patient positioning is also required. This study investigates the dosimetric accuracy of such proton field matching by an innovative robotic patient positioner system (RPPS). The dosimetric comparisons were made between treatment planning system calculations, radiographic film and ionization chamber measurements. The results indicated good agreement amongst the methods and suggest that proton field matching by a RPPS is accurate and efficient.

Calculations of dose per monitor unit (D/MU) are required in addition to measurements to increase patient safety in the clinical practice of proton radiotherapy. As in conventional photon and electron therapy, the D/MU depends on several factors. This study focused on obtaining range and modulation dependence factors used in D/MU calculations for the double scattered proton beam line at the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute. Three dependencies on range and one dependency on modulation were found. A carefully selected set of measurements was performed to discern these individual dependencies. Dependencies on range were due to: (1) the stopping power of the protons passing through the monitor chamber; (2) the reduction of proton fluence due to nuclear interactions within the patient; and (3) the variation of proton fluence passing through the monitor chamber due to different source-to-axis distances (SADs) for different beam ranges. Different SADs are produced by reconfigurations of beamline elements to provide different field sizes and ranges. The SAD effect on the D/MU varies smoothly as the beam range is varied, except at the beam range for which the first scatterers are exchanged and relocated to accommodate low and high beam ranges. A geometry factor was devised to model the SAD variation effect on the D/MU. The measured D/MU variation as a function of range can be predicted within 1% using the three modeled dependencies on range. Investigation of modulated beams showed that an analytical formula can predict the D/MU dependency as a function of modulation to within 1.5%. Special attention must be applied when measuring the D/MU dependence on modulation to avoid interplay between range and SAD effects.

Compensator-based proton therapy of lung cancer using an un-gated treatment while allowing the patient to breathe freely requires a compensator design that ensures tumor coverage throughout respiration. Our investigation had two purposes: one is to investigate the dosimetric impact when a composite compensator correction is applied, or is not, and the other one is to evaluate the significance of using different respiratory phases as the reference computed tomography (CT) for treatment planning dose calculations. A 4D-CT-based phantom study and a real patient treatment planning study were performed. A 3D MIP dataset generated over all phases of the acquired 4D-CT scans was adopted to design the field-specific composite aperture and compensator. In the phantom study, the MIP-based compensator design plan named plan D was compared to the other three plans, in which average intensity projection (AIP) images in conjunction with the composite target volume contour copied from the MIP images were used. Relative electron densities within the target envelope were assigned either to original values from the AIP image dataset (plan A) or to predetermined values, 0.8 (plan B) and 0.9 (plan C). In the patient study, the dosimetric impact of a compensator design based on the MIP images (plan ITV(MIP)) was compared to designs based on end-of-inhale (EOI) (plan ITV(EOI)) and middle-of-exhale (MOE) CT images (plan ITV(MOE)). The dose distributions were recalculated for each phase. Throughout the ten phases, it shows that D(GTV)(min) changed slightly from 86% to 89% (SD = 0.9%) of prescribed dose (PD) in the MIP plan, while varying greatly from 10% to 79% (SD = 26.7%) in plan A, 17% to 73% (SD = 22.5%) in plan B and 53% to 73% (SD = 6.8%) in plan C. The same trend was observed for D(GTV)(mean) and V95 with less amplitude. In the MIP-based plan ITV(MIP), D(GTV)(mean) was almost identically equal to 95% in each phase (SD = 0.5%). The patient study verified that the MIP approach increased the minimum value of D99 of the clinical target volume (CTV) by 58.8% compared to plan ITV(EOI) and 12.9% compared to plan ITV(MOE). Minimum values of D99 were 37.60%, 83.50% and 96.40% for plan ITV(EOI), plan ITV(MOE) and plan ITV(MIP), respectively. Standard deviations of D99 were significantly decreased (SD = 0.5%) in the MIP plan as compared to plan ITV(EOI) (SD = 18.9%) or plan ITV(MOE) (SD = 4.0%). These studies demonstrate that the use of MIP images to design the patient-specific composite compensators provide superior and consistent tumor coverage throughout the entire respiratory cycle whilst maintaining a low average normal lung dose. The additional benefit of the MIP-based design approach is that the dose calculation can be implemented on any single phase as long as it uses the aperture and compensator optimized from the MIP images. This also reduces the requirement for contouring on all breathing phases down to just one.

A study of neutron production from a novel active scanning proton beam delivery system at the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute (MPRI) has been performed. The neutron dose equivalent was determined using a neutron rem (roentgen equivalent in man) detector which has an upper energy limit of 10 MeV. Measurement were taken at 0, 45, and 90 degrees from the proton beam central axis and for various proton beam energies (127-208 MeV) and scanned field sizes (25-144 cm2). The maximum neutron dose observed was 0.43 mSv / (proton treatment Gy) at 90 degrees from the beam axis for a beam energy of 208.4 MeV and a scanned field size of 144 cm2. It is still possible to further mitigate this secondary neutron dose during treatment by optimizing parameters within the treatment nozzle and using shielding.

PurposeHere, we report the feasibility and long-term efficacy of a granulomatous slack skin disease (GSSD) treatment with combined high-energy photon and proton beams.Patient and methodsA GSSD patient with abdominal disease volume 25×15×2–4 cm deep was recommended for treatment at this institution. In addition to photons and electrons, high-energy protons delivered with advanced planning techniques and patient positioning were used. The patient was irradiated to a total dose of 40 Gy by using 20 Gy matched photon and electrons followed by 20 Gy equivalent protons delivered by using innovative range compensation and patient positioning.ResultsThe test patient tolerated the treatment well and is now a 10-year survivor of the disease.ConclusionsTreatment of GSSD with protons is feasible. The range and narrow penumbra properties of the proton beam provided an ideal capability to match fields accurately to cover large volumes while also sparing underlying normal tissues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In proton therapy delivered with range modulated beams, the energy spectrum of protons entering the delivery nozzle can affect the dose uniformity within the target region and the dose gradient around its periphery. For a cyclotron with a fixed extraction energy, a rangeshifter is used to change the energy but this produces increasing energy spreads for decreasing energies. This study investigated the magnitude of the effects of different energy spreads on dose uniformity and distal edge dose gradient and determined the limits for controlling the incident spectrum. A multilayer Faraday cup (MLFC) was calibrated against depth dose curves measured in water for nonmodulated beams with various incident spectra. Depth dose curves were measured in a water phantom and in a multilayer ionization chamber detector for modulated beams using different incident energy spreads. Some nozzle entrance energy spectra can produce unacceptable dose nonuniformities of up to ±21% over the modulated region. For modulated beams and small beam ranges, the width of the distal penumbra can vary by a factor of 2.5. When the energy spread was controlled within the defined limits, the dose nonuniformity was less than ±3%. To facilitate understanding of the results, the data were compared to the measured and Monte Carlo calculated data from a variable extraction energy synchrotron which has a narrow spectrum for all energies. Dose uniformity is only maintained within prescription limits when the energy spread is controlled. At low energies, a large spread can be beneficial for extending the energy range at which a single range modulator device can be used. An MLFC can be used as part of a feedback to provide specified energy spreads for different energies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]