Search

Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by eosinophil inflammation restricted to the esophagus and the resulting symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Critical to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is a trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy to exclude alternative causes of esophageal eosinophilia such as proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. While consensus guidelines recommend a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis, little is known about its implementation in clinical practice. The primary aim of this study is to assess the frequency of proton pump inhibitor trial prior to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in community practice. The secondary aim is to assess the frequency of other treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis, including topical steroids and/or dietary therapy, in patients who did not undergo a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis or who had an alternative diagnosis to eosinophilic esophagitis upon completed workup. We conducted a single-center, case series of patients referred to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for eosinophilic esophagitis management between 2010 and 2015. This case series consisted of 125 patients who were referred from community practitioners with a presumptive diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Upon review, 90 out of 125 (72%) patients had not had a proton pump inhibitor trial or esophageal pH testing prior to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis being made. Of these patients, 77.8% (70/90) had already received either topical steroid or dietary therapy for presumed eosinophilic esophagitis. Of the 125 patients initially diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis, 32 (25.6%) were found to have an alternative diagnosis, and 79.2% of this subset of patients (25/32) had previously received topical steroid or dietary therapy. This study demonstrates that a substantial number of patients with presumed eosinophilic esophagitis have not had a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis in community practice. This led to the misclassification of patients and potentially to the use of less optimal medical therapies in a substantial number of these patients.

Proton pump inhibitors are highly effective acid suppressants with decades of use highlighting positive outcomes in millions of patients worldwide, and they offer minimal risk of adverse events. PPIs are considered overutilised when prescribed without an appropriate indication, when patients are left on them 'indefinitely' without appropriate indications and when they are continued after being utilised for most cases of hospital SUP. While several adverse outcomes have been linked to PPI therapy, most data are from retrospective observational studies that may be subject to confounding and bias., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Dexlansoprazole MR is a dual delayed release formulation of dexlansoprazole, an enantiomer of lansoprazole., Aim: To assess safety of dexlansoprazole MR in phase 3 clinical trials., Methods: Data from 4270 patients receiving dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg (n = 455), 60 mg (n = 2311) or 90 mg (n = 1864); lansoprazole 30 mg (n = 1363); or placebo (n = 896) in six randomized controlled trials and a 12-month safety study were pooled. Safety was assessed via adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory results and gastric biopsies. Adverse events were summarized per 100 patient-months of exposure to account for imbalances in study drug exposure., Results: The number of patients with > or =1 treatment-emergent adverse event per 100 patient-months was higher in placebo (24.49) and lansoprazole (21.06) groups than in any dexlansoprazole MR (15.64-18.75) group. Fewer patients receiving dexlansoprazole MR discontinued therapy because of an adverse event (P < or = 0.05 vs. placebo). Seven patients died of events considered unrelated to study drug. Mean serum gastrin rose in all groups except placebo; increases were not dose-related. No clinically concerning trends were seen in gastric biopsy results. Endocrine cell hyperplasia, dysplasia and neoplasia were not observed., Conclusion: Dexlansoprazole MR 30-90 mg has a safety profile comparable to that of lansoprazole.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide the most effective pharmacotherapy for treating acid-related disorders. However, PPIs do not completely control acid over 24 h with once-daily dosing., Aims: To discuss limitations inherent in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of conventional PPI formulations, which provide a single drug release. Also, to consider approaches to extending the duration of acid suppression focusing on dexlansoprazole MR, a PPI with a novel Dual Delayed Release (DDR) formulation., Method: We reviewed the available literature regarding marketed and investigational PPIs., Results: Non-standard dosing of currently marketed PPIs has produced incremental advances in acid control. Multiple approaches are being evaluated to enhance acid suppression with PPIs. Dexlansoprazole MR is a DDR formulation of dexlansoprazole, an enantiomer of lansoprazole, with two distinct drug release periods to prolong the plasma dexlansoprazole concentration-time profile and extend duration of acid suppression. Clinical studies show that dexlansoprazole MR produces a dual-peak PK profile that maintains therapeutic plasma drug concentrations longer than lansoprazole, with a single-peak PK profile, and increases the percentage of time that intragastric pH >4., Conclusions: Novel drug delivery platforms, including the dexlansoprazole MR DDR formulation, may improve acid suppression and offer benefits over conventional single release PPI formulations.

Background: Dexlansoprazole MR heals all grades of erosive oesophagitis (EO)., Aim: To assess efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR in maintaining healed EO and heartburn relief., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, 445 patients with healed EO received dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg or 60 mg or placebo once daily for 6 months. This trial assessed maintenance of endoscopic healing (primary endpoint) and continued symptom relief based on daily diaries (secondary endpoints)., Results: Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg and 60 mg were superior to placebo for maintaining healed EO (P < 0.0025; Hochberg's). By life-table analysis, maintenance rates were 75%, 83% and 27% for dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, 60 mg and placebo respectively. Crude maintenance rates were 66% for both dexlansoprazole MR doses and 14% for placebo. Dexlansoprazole MR controlled heartburn (medians of 91-96% for 24-h heartburn-free days, 96-99% for heartburn-free nights). The only more common adverse event occurring at a significantly higher rate in dexlansoprazole MR groups than placebo when analysed per patient-months of exposure was upper respiratory tract infection., Conclusions: Dexlansoprazole MR effectively maintained EO healing and symptom relief; most patients were heartburn-free for >90% of days. Both doses were well tolerated.

Background: Intravenous esomeprazole may be beneficial for patients who cannot take oral medications., Aim: To compare intravenous esomeprazole with oral esomeprazole for effects on maximal acid output during pentagastrin stimulation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms., Methods: In four separate open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies, adult patients were administered esomeprazole 20 or 40 mg once daily either orally or intravenously (by 15-min infusion or 3-min injection) for 10 days and switched to the other formulation with no washout period. Basal acid output and maximal acid output were measured on days 11, 13 and 21., Results: In the four studies (total of 183 patients), least-squares mean maximal acid output ranged from 3.0 to 4.1 mmol/h after intravenous esomeprazole 40 or 20 mg and from 2.2 to 3.3 mmol/h after oral esomeprazole 20 or 40 mg. Differences between formulations were small and not statistically significant but did not meet the prospectively defined criterion for non-inferiority of the intravenous formulation. Median basal acid output values ranged from 0.04 to 0.27 mmol/h after intravenous administration and from 0.05 to 0.25 mmol/h after oral esomeprazole., Conclusions: Intravenous esomeprazole is an acceptable alternative to the oral formulation for treatment of up to 10 days of duration.

Proton pump inhibitors are the most effective agents for suppressing gastric acidity and are the preferred therapy for many acid-related conditions. While proton pump inhibitors have been accessible in intravenous formulations in several European countries, they have been available only as oral drugs in the United States. In the near future, the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole is likely to become available in an intravenous formulation for American patients. Potential uses for intravenous proton pump inhibitors include treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and peptic ulcers complicated by bleeding or gastric outlet obstruction, as well as prevention of stress ulcers and acid-induced lung injury. These intravenous proton pump inhibitors are also likely to be beneficial to patients undergoing long-term maintenance with oral proton pump inhibitors who cannot take oral therapy for a period of time. Intravenous pantoprazole is especially distinguished in its lack of clinically relevant drug interactions, and it requires no dosage adjustment for patients with renal insufficiency or with mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction. Both omeprazole and pantoprazole are well tolerated in both oral and intravenous forms. Although further studies are needed to define their roles clearly, the availability of intravenous formulations of proton pump inhibitors will certainly assist with the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders., (Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is highly effective. However, in some patients, especially those with nonerosive reflux disease or atypical GERD symptoms, acid-suppressive therapy with PPIs is not as successful. Alginates are medications that work through an alternative mechanism by displacing the postprandial gastric acid pocket. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefit of alginate-containing compounds in the treatment of patients with symptoms of GERD. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched through October 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing alginate-containing compounds to placebo, antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), or PPIs for the treatment of GERD symptoms. Additional studies were identified through a bibliography review. Non-English studies and those with pediatric patients were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models to calculate odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the I² statistic. Analyses were stratified by type of comparator. The search strategy yielded 665 studies and 15 (2.3%) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were included in the meta-analysis (N = 2095 subjects). Alginate-based therapies increased the odds of resolution of GERD symptoms when compared to placebo or antacids (OR: 4.42; 95% CI 2.45-7.97) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity between studies (I² = 71%, P = .001). Compared to PPIs or H2RAs, alginates appear less effective but the pooled estimate was not statistically significant (OR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.27-1.22). Alginates are more effective than placebo or antacids for treating GERD symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies suggest that older adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are more likely to develop complications, including erosive esophagitis, but it is unclear whether erosive esophagitis is more difficult to treat in older patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if adults ≥ 65 years with erosive esophagitis are more difficult to treat than younger adults. The study was a post hoc analysis of two double-blind, randomized, multicenter trials of patients with erosive esophagitis. Patients received pantoprazole 40 mg once daily, nizatidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo. Patients were evaluated for endoscopic healing at 4 and 8 weeks. Patients recorded typical reflux symptoms using a daily diary to note presence or absence of symptoms. Results showed that 44, 13 and 11 patients ≥ 65 years and 210, 69, and 71 patients < 65 received pantoprazole 40 mg daily, nizatidine 150 mg twice daily, or placebo, respectively. Eighty-six percent (86%[76%, 97% CI]) of older and 83% (78%, 88% CI) of younger pantoprazole-treated patients were healed at 8 weeks; 46% (19%, 73% CI) and 35% (24%, 46% CI) of nizatidine-treated and 27% (1%, 54% CI) and 34% (23%, 45% CI) of placebo-treated were healed at 8 weeks. Median time to persistent absence of GERD-related symptoms was similar for older and younger patients treated with pantoprazole. We conclude that older patients with erosive esophagitis do not appear to have more difficult-to-treat disease. Erosive esophagitis is effectively healed and GERD symptoms are controlled in older patients using pantoprazole 40 mg daily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of the 14C-urea breath test (UBT) performed 2 wk after the completion of therapy for Helicobacter pylori using a 4 to 6 wk study as the gold standard. METHODS: Patients with active Helicobacter pylori infection at four medical centers received proton pump inhibitor-based triple or quadruple therapy for 10-14 days. Patients underwent the 14C-UBT 2 and 4 -6 wk after the completion of therapy. A positive test was defined as 14CO2 excretion of >200 dpm, a negative test as <50 dpm, and an equivocal test as >50 but <200 dpm. Performance characteristics of the 2-wk UBT were calculated using the 4 to 6-wk result as a gold standard. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled and 82 patients (mean ± SD age, 62 ± 15 yr; 15 women) completed the protocol. Four patients had equivocal UBT results and were excluded from the analysis. Of the 78 patients, 68 (87%) had a negative 4 to 6-wk UBT. The 2-week UBT yielded a sensitivity of 90% (95% confidence interval 72-100%), specificity of 99% (97-100%), and accuracy of 97% (93-100%). In patients with a persistently positive UBT, 14CO2 excretion at 2 wk was significantly lower than at 4-6 wk after therapy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: A UBT performed 2 wk after therapy yielded results comparable to 4 to 6 wk testing. Further studies to evaluate the optimal time of confirmatory testing in the age of more effective proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the implication of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on the increase risk of hip fracture. Long term use of PPIs about more than a year is linked with an increased risk of hip fracture among adults who are over 50 years old. Risk is higher among persons who took higher doses of PPIs and increased with duration of use. PPI therapy is linked with a significant increased risk of hip fracture about an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.44 with a 95 percent confidence interval rate. Prolonged exposure to PPI therapy resulted to calcium malabsorption which eventually caused a higher risk of bone fractures.