Search

A key issue in the analysis of outcome trials is the adjustment for baseline covariates that influence the primary outcome. Imbalance of an important covariate between treatment groups at baseline is of considerable concern if one treatment group is favored over another with respect to the hypothesis testing outcome. With the use of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study database as an example, the influence of baseline proteinuria on the primary composite endpoint, ESRD, and ESRD or death after adjusting for baseline proteinuria as a continuous covariate was examined. Increasing baseline proteinuria was associated with increased risk for renal events, confirming that proteinuria is an important covariate for renal outcomes. When the randomization was stratified according proteinuria <2000 mg/g or >/=2000 mg/g, within the higher proteinuria stratum (>/=2000 mg/g), patients in the losartan group had a higher baseline mean proteinuria value. When the imbalance was adjusted, an increase in the magnitude and the significance of the risk reduction with losartan for each outcome was observed. No apparent interaction between treatment effect and baseline proteinuria was found, and there was no heterogeneity in the treatment response in patients with different baseline proteinuria levels. After proteinuria was adjusted as a continuous variable, greater treatment effects were observed in the RENAAL study. This effect was due solely to the imbalance in baseline proteinuria. Considering the importance of proteinuria as a risk factor, adjustment for baseline proteinuria as a continuous covariate should be prespecified in the design and analysis of clinical trials involving renal outcomes, even when patients are stratified on the basis of level of proteinuria.

Progressive tubule injury and interstitial fibrosis frequently accompany glomerulopathies associated with proteinuria. Clinical experience indicates that higher levels of proteinuria prior to, as well as after initiation of treatment predict more rapid decline in renal function and more pronounced tubulointerstitial injury. It has been proposed that filtration of potentially tubulotoxic plasma proteins is responsible for the observed correlations between proteinuria and progression (i.e., proteinuria is a cause and not only a consequence of progressive renal injury). Numerous attempts have been made to identify the species of putative tubulotoxic proteins in this progressive injury process, but much uncertainty persists. These uncertainties stem from nonphysiologic exposure of apical cell surfaces to proteins in vitro, the extremely high concentrations of various proteins tested in vitro, and the nonuniformity of end points measured. Furthermore, there is often a lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo findings, and a lack of uniformity of results even for seemingly similar in vitro experiments. Less controversy is evident in the potential pathways whereby injured tubules evoke a tubulointerstitial inflammatory and fibrotic response, with many in vivo models serving to incriminate excessive cytokine and chemokine production, infiltration of various inflammatory cells, and the balance between apoptosis and cell proliferation. Despite many years of concerted efforts, we believe it is still unclear whether proteinuria is a cause (and if so, which species of protein), or only a consequence of progressive renal injury. Nevertheless, pending the resolution of these uncertainties by more decisive and unambiguous experimentation, the strongly predictive inverse relationship between level of proteinuria and long-term renal survival currently justifies aggressive antiproteinuric treatment strategies, with a goal of reducing protein excretion rate to the lowest level possible without the induction of symptoms or undue risk.

Background: Proteinuria or albuminuria is an established risk marker for progressive renal function loss. Albuminuria can be effectively lowered with antihypertensive drugs that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). We investigated whether albuminuria could not only serve as a marker of renal disease, but also function as a monitor of the renoprotective efficacy of RAS intervention by the angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist, losartan, in patients with diabetic nephropathy., Methods: The data from the RENAAL (Reduction in End Points in Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study, a double-blind, randomized trial, were used to examine the effects of losartan on the renal outcome [i.e., the primary composite end point of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death] in 1513 type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. We examined the effect of the degree of albuminuria at baseline, initial antiproteinuric response to therapy, and the degree of remaining (residual) albuminuria on renal outcome (either the primary composite end point of RENAAL or ESRD). We also evaluated the contribution to renal protection of the antiproteinuric effect of losartan independently of changes in blood pressure., Results: Baseline albuminuria is almost linearly related to renal outcome, and is the strongest predictor among all measured well-known baseline risk parameters. After adjusting for baseline risk markers of age, gender, race, weight, smoking, sitting diastolic blood pressure, sitting systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, serum creatinine, albuminuria, hemoglobin, and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) patients with high baseline albuminuria (> or =3.0 g/g creatinine) showed a 5.2-fold (95% CI 4.3-6.3) increased risk for reaching a renal end point, and a 8.1-fold (95% CI 6.1-10.8) increased risk for progressing to ESRD, compared to the low albuminuria group (<1.5 g/g). The changes in albuminuria in the first 6 months of therapy are roughly linearly related to the degree of long-term renal protection: every 50% reduction in albuminuria in the first 6 months was associated with a reduction in risk of 36% for renal end point and 45% for ESRD during later follow-up. Albuminuria at month 6, designated residual albuminuria, showed a linear relationship with renal outcome, almost identical to the relationship between baseline albuminuria and renal risk. Losartan reduced albuminuria by 28% (95% CI -25% to -36%), while placebo increased albuminuria by 4% (95% CI +8% to -1%) in the first 6 months of therapy. The specific (beyond blood pressure lowering) renoprotective effect of the Ang II antagonist, losartan, in this study is for the major part explained by its antialbuminuric effect (approximately 100% for the renal end point, and 50% for ESRD end point)., Conclusion: Albuminuria is the predominant renal risk marker in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy on conventional treatment; the higher the albuminuria, the greater the renal risk. Reduction in albuminuria is associated with a proportional effect on renal protection, the greater the reduction the greater the renal protection. The residual albuminuria on therapy (month 6) is as strong a marker of renal outcome as is baseline albuminuria. The antiproteinuric effect of losartan explains a major component of its specific renoprotective effect. In conclusion, albuminuria should be considered a risk marker for progressive loss of renal function in type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, as well as a target for therapy. Reduction of residual albuminuria to the lowest achievable level should be viewed as a goal for future renoprotective treatments.

Background: To test the hypothesis that nephron mass is an independent determinant of arterial pressure, the effects of augmenting renal mass by isograft transplantation were studied in the model of secondary hypertension., Methods: The effects of isograft transplantation or sham operation on blood pressure, proteinuria, remnant kidney mass, glomerular filtration rate and glomerulosclerosis were assessed in 5/6 nephrectomized (5/6 NPX) rats., Results: Systolic blood pressure was lowered on average by approximately 35 mmHg and glomerular hyperfiltration was attenuated in the remnant kidneys of transplant recipients. Markedly lower urinary protein excretion rates and glomerulosclerosis scores in the remnant kidney accompanied these supplemental transplants to values roughly one-third of those from sham-operated rats., Conclusions: The data show that reduced renal mass per se is the major factor in the development and maintenance of arterial hypertension and glomerular injury in 5/6 NPX rats and these changes can be reversed by supplementing renal mass. The data provide strong support for the notion that renal mass is a significant, independent determinant of arterial pressure.

Background: Diabetic nephropathy has become the single most important cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Strategies to slow the rate of loss of renal function in these patients have been developed. We examined the risk factors that predict loss of kidney function (doubling of serum creatinine) or ESRD (dialysis or transplantation) in patients with type 2 diabetes in whom blood pressure was controlled., Methods: We evaluated risk factors for doubling of serum creatinine or the development of ESRD in the Reduction of End Points in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, which included 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy., Results: Univariate analyses demonstrated a group of 23 risk factors that significantly predicted doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD. From these univariate analyses, a multivariate model was developed that demonstrated four independent risk factors: proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, and hemoglobin level. Proteinuria was the strongest and most consistent risk factor. The multivariate risk model was derived from only the placebo group and was similar to that derived for the total population, suggesting that the risk predictors for progression of kidney disease were independent of therapy., Conclusion: After control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy, proteinuria, degree of renal failure, serum albumin, and hemoglobin level are independent risk factors that predict renal outcomes. The level of proteinuria proved to be the most important risk for progressive kidney injury in these diabetic patients.

Type 2 diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most industrialized countries in Europe. The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) Study evaluated the renal protective effects of losartan versus placebo on a background of non-ACE-I/non-AIIA conventional antihypertensive therapy in 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Losartan reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or death by 16% (P=0.022) and reduced the risk of progression to ESRD, defined as the initiation of dialysis or transplantation, by 29% (P=0.002). We set out to estimate the potential effect of losartan on the burden and costs associated with ESRD over 3.5 years in the European Union (EU). The risk reduction in new cases of ESRD was calculated by combining type 2 diabetes population estimates for the EU with the percent absolute risk reduction of ESRD in patients treated with losartan as observed in RENAAL. The number of days each patient experienced ESRD was defined as the length of time from onset of ESRD until the minimum of death or 3.5 years. ESRD-free person-years avoided with losartan treatment were calculated by combining the population estimate with the ESRD days avoided divided by number of days in a year. ESRD costs from Germany were used to approximate the potential cost savings from reduced time with ESRD and fewer ESRD cases on a EU wide basis. There are approximately 700,000 diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with proteinuria (urine albumin/creatinine >or=300 mg/g) in the EU. The addition of losartan to the treatment regimen of these patients is expected to lead to a reduction of 44,100 cases of ESRD, 64,400 fewer person-years with ESRD, and reduce ESRD-related costs by euro 2.6 billion over 3.5 years based on RENAAL data. Treatment with losartan not only reduced the incidence of ESRD, but also can result in substantial cost savings in the European Union.

Background: Recently, the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study demonstrated the benefit of losartan in reducing renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuria. Additional questions concerning the reduction of proteinuria and its relationship to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as well as cardio-renal outcomes and the safety and tolerability of losartan remain to be addressed., Methods: Three analyses were performed: (a) the impact of losartan on the relationship between the reduction of proteinuria and ESRD; (b) a time-to-event analysis of the cardio-renal composite endpoint of ESRD, myocardial infarction, stroke or all-cause death; and (c) additional analyses of adverse events, particularly in patients with serum creatinine >or=2.0 mg/dL., Results: After adjusting the values for proteinuria over the entire study, the reduction of proteinuria accounted for approximately half of the treatment effect of losartan on the risk reduction for ESRD. In addition, losartan was associated with a 21% risk reduction for the composite cardio-renal outcome (P=0.003). The addition of losartan to a conventional antihypertensive regimen did not increase the overall incidence of adverse events, regardless of severity of renal impairment., Conclusions: Losartan significantly reduced the risk of cardiorenal outcomes and was well tolerated by patients, including those with serum creatinine levels >or=2.0 g/dL. In addition, although this study shows that the reduction of proteinuria does not completely explain the impact of intervention on outcomes such as ESRD, reduction of proteinuria must remain an important consideration when treating patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. However, the reduction of outcomes such as ESRD should remain the goal of therapy when evaluating renal protection in this patient population.

Presents a case of a woman with acute renal failure. Case history of the patient; Understanding of the mechanisms of progressive nephron loss; Evaluation of amenorrhea.

The RENAAL Study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the renal protective effects of losartan in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. The study has enrolled 1513 patients and is expected to continue for 3.5 years after the last patient has been entered. Eligible patients must have a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio of at least 300 mg/g and serum creatinine between 1.3 to 3.0 mg/dL. Eligible hypertensive or normotensive patients are randomised to receive either losartan or placebo, in addition to their existing antihypertensive therapy. Medications that block angiotensin production or action, are excluded. The primary endpoint is a composite of the time to first event of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death; secondary endpoints include cardiovascular events, progression of renal disease, and changes in proteinuria; tertiary endpoints include quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation, and amputations. Patients include Caucasians (48.6%), Blacks (15.2%), Asians (16.7%), and Hispanics (18.2%). Baseline urinary albumin:creatinine ratio and serum creatinine levels average 1867 mg/g and 1.9 mg/dL, respectively. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures are 153 and 82 mmHg, respectively. RENAAL will document whether blockade of the AII receptor with losartan produces clinical benefits in patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: From ACEI to angiotensin II antagonists. In landmark clinical trials, pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) attenuated the decline in renal function associated with chronic renal disease (CRD). Hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) attest to its central role in the pathogenesis of CRD. Angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists (AT1 RA) differ from ACEI in their effects on the RAS and on bradykinin metabolism. Elevations in bradykinin levels associated with ACEI and stimulation of angiotensin subtype 2 receptors resulting from AT1 RA may produce therapeutic effects unique to each class of drug. Nevertheless, in animal models of CRD, ACEI and AT1 RA exert equivalent renoprotection, implying that their renoprotective effects result primarily from inhibition of Ang II-mediated stimulation of angiotensin subtype 1 receptors. Clinical data comparing ACEI and AT1 RA therapy in renal disease are limited to short-term studies, which indicate that AT1 RAs have equivalent effects to ACEI on the major determinants of CRD progression, namely blood pressure and proteinuria. AT1 RAs were well tolerated, with side-effect profiles similar to placebo. Taken together, available evidence suggests that AT1 RAs will share the renoprotective properties of ACEI in human CRD. Nevertheless, the results of long-term clinical trials are required before AT1 RA can be recommended as an alternative to ACEI in renoprotective therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Progressive loss of kidney function complicates Fabry disease, an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder that arises from deficiency of α-galactosidase activity. Heterozygous females with Fabry disease can be as severely affected as hemizygous males, who have the classic form of the disease. Enzyme-replacement therapy with recombinant human α-galactosidase clears the glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide from kidney cells, and can stabilize renal function in adults with mild to moderate Fabry nephropathy. However, adults with more advanced nephropathy and overt proteinuria do not respond as well. For these patients, antiproteinuric therapy given in conjunction with enzyme-replacement therapy might prevent further decline in kidney function. In this Review, we propose guidelines and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Fabry nephropathy in adults, based on published data and on the consensus of opinion of participants in the 7th International Fabry Nephropathy Roundtable in 2007. These organ-specific guidelines could be easier to implement than general guidelines, provided they are used in the context of an overall multisystem care approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renin-angiotensin blockade lowers MCP-1 expression in diabetic rats. Background. Glomerular macrophage accumulation in diabetes implicates monocyte recruitment mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. To test the hypothesis that overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a monocyte chemoattractant, is attenuated by renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition, we assessed expression of genes regulating monocyte transmigration in the glomeruli of diabetic rats. Methods. Competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to semiquantitate mRNA expression in glomeruli harvested by sieving at serial intervals after the induction of diabetes by streptozotocin in Munich-Wistar rats. Although subject to limitations, competitive RT-PCR provides an objective measure suited to the minute quantities of RNA extractable from glomerular isolates. Results. Time-dependent elevation of MCP-1 expression was dramatically suppressed by treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan, and was closely associated with effects on proteinuria and glomerular macrophage number. By contrast, no sustained suppression of the cell adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule-1 or vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 or the classic MCP-1 stimulators tumor necrosis factor-α or interleukin-1β followed RAS inhibition, and suppression of transforming growth factor-β1 expression was transient. Conclusion. These data suggest that glomerular macrophage recruitment in experimental diabetes is largely determined by angiotensin-stimulated MCP-1 expression. We conclude that the RAS is an important regulator of local MCP-1 expression, either directly or through glomerular hemodynamic effects, and that our data strongly implicate macrophage recruitment and activation in the pathogenesis of early diabetic glomerular injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses end stage renal disease risk in patients with type two diabetes and nephropathy, treatment of diabetic nephropathy and assessment of renal function. Topics discussed include varoius therapies used for the treatment of renal disease, proteinuria and regulation of blood hemoglobin.